Integrity in DevOps engineering is the consistent adherence to ethical principles and professional standards while managing infrastructure, deployment processes, and system reliability. It encompasses honesty in reporting issues, accountability for mistakes, transparency in communication, and maintaining security protocols even when under pressure.

In the DevOps world, integrity is not just a personal virtue but a technical necessity. DevOps engineers have privileged access to production systems, sensitive data, and critical infrastructure. Their decisions directly impact business continuity, security posture, and compliance requirements. A DevOps engineer with high integrity will maintain honest communication about system limitations, acknowledge mistakes quickly, represent risks accurately to stakeholders, and prioritize security even when facing delivery pressure.

Evaluating integrity in DevOps candidates requires looking beyond technical skills to understand how they handle challenging situations. The best DevOps engineers maintain consistent ethical standards when dealing with incidents, balancing competing priorities, or addressing technical debt. They prioritize transparent documentation, follow established security protocols, and take accountability for both successes and failures. When interviewing candidates, focus on past behaviors rather than hypothetical scenarios, as previous actions are better predictors of future performance.

To effectively assess integrity in your DevOps candidates, use behavioral questions that explore specific past experiences, then follow up with probing questions to understand their decision-making process, values, and principles. Listen for candidates who demonstrate honesty about technical limitations, accountability for mistakes, and commitment to ethical practices in their work.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you discovered a mistake you made in a production environment. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and potential impact of the mistake
• Initial reaction and immediate actions taken
• How transparently they communicated about the error
• Who they informed and how quickly
• Steps taken to resolve the issue
• Preventive measures implemented afterward
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your thought process when deciding how to communicate about the mistake?
• Were there any temptations to minimize or hide aspects of the issue?
• How did others respond to your approach?
• How has this experience influenced your work since then?

Describe a situation where you were asked to take a shortcut that would have compromised system security or reliability. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the requested shortcut
• Pressures or incentives to comply with the request
• How they evaluated the risks involved
• Their communication with stakeholders
• The ultimate decision and its rationale
• How they navigated potential conflicts
• The outcome of the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific security or reliability concerns did this shortcut raise?
• How did you communicate your position to the person making the request?
• What alternatives did you propose, if any?
• How did this experience influence your approach to similar situations later?

Share an example of when you had to deliver bad news about a project delay, system limitation, or technical issue to stakeholders. How did you approach this?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the bad news
• Their preparation before communicating
• How transparent they were about the issues
• The communication method they chose
• How they managed expectations
• The stakeholders' reactions
• Steps taken to address concerns

Follow-Up Questions:

• What considerations factored into how and when you delivered this news?
• Were you tempted to downplay any aspects of the situation?
• How did you balance transparency with not causing unnecessary alarm?
• What feedback did you receive about your communication approach?

Tell me about a time when you observed someone on your team not following proper security protocols or best practices. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific protocol or practice being violated
• The potential risks involved
• Initial approach to the situation
• Communication with the team member
• Whether they escalated the issue
• Actions taken to resolve the situation
• Measures to prevent similar issues

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors did you consider when deciding how to address this situation?
• How did you balance addressing the issue with maintaining a positive relationship?
• What would you have done differently if the person had been more senior than you?
• Did this experience lead to any changes in team practices or policies?

Describe a situation where you had access to sensitive information or systems that you could have used for personal benefit. How did you handle this access?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the sensitive information/systems
• Safeguards they put in place
• Their approach to handling privileged access
• Any policies or guidelines they followed
• Their personal boundaries around system access
• How they ensured accountability

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles guide your approach to handling privileged access?
• Have you ever been tempted to use access in ways that might be questionable?
• How do you ensure others on your team maintain proper boundaries?
• What systems or processes have you implemented to maintain accountability?

Share an example of when you had to make a difficult decision between meeting a deadline and ensuring proper testing or security measures. How did you approach this decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation and competing priorities
• Their decision-making process
• How they communicated with stakeholders
• The final decision and its rationale
• How they mitigated potential risks
• The outcome and consequences
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors weighed most heavily in your decision?
• How did you communicate the tradeoffs to stakeholders?
• Looking back, would you make the same decision again?
• How do you typically balance speed and quality/security in your work?

Tell me about a time when documentation was incomplete or misleading, and you had to decide whether to improve it or move forward with your task. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific documentation issues
• Impact on their work and others
• Their decision-making process
• Actions taken to address the documentation
• Communication with team members
• The outcome of their approach
• Any process improvements implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors influenced your decision to address or not address the documentation?
• How did you prioritize documentation work against other responsibilities?
• How did team members respond to your approach?
• How has this experience shaped your documentation practices?

Describe a situation where you discovered a potential security vulnerability or compliance issue in your infrastructure. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• Nature of the vulnerability or compliance issue
• Initial assessment of risk and impact
• Their communication about the discovery
• Steps taken to validate the issue
• Actions taken to address the vulnerability
• Documentation and reporting processes followed
• Preventive measures implemented afterward

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prioritize addressing this issue against other work?
• What factors did you consider when deciding who to inform?
• Were there any pressures to minimize or delay addressing the issue?
• How did this experience impact your approach to security going forward?

Share a time when you received credit for work that was partially or wholly done by someone else. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation and how credit was misattributed
• Their immediate reaction
• Actions taken to correct the misunderstanding
• How they communicated with relevant parties
• Steps taken to ensure proper attribution
• Impact on team relationships
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles guided your response to this situation?
• Were there any challenges in correcting the misattribution?
• How did others respond to your approach?
• How do you ensure proper credit attribution in your current work?

Tell me about a time when you had to manage credentials, secrets, or sensitive configuration information. How did you ensure these were handled securely?

Areas to Cover:

• Types of credentials or sensitive information involved
• Security practices they implemented
• Tools or systems used for secure storage
• Access control measures
• Approaches to rotation or updates
• Monitoring or auditing implemented
• Compliance with organizational policies

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance security with operational accessibility?
• Have you ever encountered resistance to secure credential management practices?
• How have your approaches to credential management evolved over time?
• What do you consider best practices for secrets management in DevOps?

Describe a situation where you had conflicting information about the right technical approach, and you needed to make a recommendation. How did you handle this?

Areas to Cover:

• The technical decision context
• Sources of conflicting information
• Their process for evaluating options
• How they acknowledged uncertainty
• Their communication with stakeholders
• The ultimate recommendation and its basis
• How they proceeded after the decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate the uncertainty to stakeholders?
• Were you tempted to present one option with more certainty than warranted?
• How did you balance gathering more information with the need to move forward?
• How has this experience influenced how you make technical recommendations?

Share an example of when you had to maintain the confidentiality of information despite pressure or curiosity from others. How did you handle this?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the confidential information
• Sources of pressure to disclose
• Their response to requests for information
• Boundaries they established
• How they communicated these boundaries
• Challenges faced in maintaining confidentiality
• The ultimate outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles guided your approach to maintaining confidentiality?
• How did you respond to direct questions about the confidential information?
• Did this situation create any tensions or conflicts with colleagues?
• How do you balance transparency with necessary confidentiality in your work?

Tell me about a time when a project or deployment didn't go as planned. How did you communicate about the issues?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the project or deployment problems
• Initial assessment and response
• Their communication approach and timing
• Level of detail and transparency provided
• Who they informed and how
• Steps taken to address the issues
• Lessons learned and process improvements

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide what information to share and with whom?
• Were there any temptations to minimize or delay communicating about problems?
• How did stakeholders respond to your communication?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to project communication?

Describe a situation where you witnessed or were asked to participate in behavior that you considered ethically questionable. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the ethically questionable behavior
• Their assessment of the ethical concerns
• Initial response to the situation
• Actions taken to address the issue
• Communication with relevant parties
• The outcome of their approach
• Impact on their professional relationships

Follow-Up Questions:

• What ethical principles guided your response?
• What factors did you consider when deciding how to address the situation?
• Did you face any repercussions for your approach?
• How has this experience shaped your ethical boundaries at work?

Share a time when you had to decide whether to report a colleague's mistake that others might not notice. What did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and potential impact of the mistake
• Their decision-making process
• Their approach to the colleague involved
• Whether and how they reported the issue
• Steps taken to address the mistake
• The outcome and consequences
• Impact on their relationship with the colleague

Follow-Up Questions:

• What factors influenced your decision to report or not report the mistake?
• How did you approach the conversation with your colleague?
• Looking back, would you handle the situation differently?
• How do you balance team loyalty with your professional responsibilities?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on integrity specifically for DevOps engineers?

DevOps engineers typically have privileged access to production environments, sensitive data, and critical infrastructure. Their work directly impacts system security, reliability, and business continuity. An integrity lapse in this role can have severe consequences for the organization, including security breaches, compliance violations, and loss of customer trust.

How can I tell if a candidate is being honest in their responses?

Look for detailed, specific examples rather than vague or generic answers. Candidates with integrity typically acknowledge both successes and failures, explain their decision-making process transparently, and discuss what they learned from challenging situations. Pay attention to consistency across different stories and willingness to admit limitations.

Should I expect candidates to have perfect integrity in all their examples?

No. What's more important is how candidates recognize and learn from situations where they could have demonstrated greater integrity. Listen for self-awareness, accountability for past decisions, and evidence of growth. The most telling responses often involve candidates explaining how they would approach a similar situation differently today.

How many integrity-focused questions should I include in an interview?

For DevOps roles, aim to include 3-4 integrity-focused questions in your interview. This allows you to explore different dimensions of integrity (technical honesty, accountability, security consciousness) while leaving room for questions about technical skills and other competencies. Quality follow-up questions are crucial for getting beyond surface-level answers.

How do I evaluate integrity for candidates with limited professional experience?

For entry-level candidates, frame questions to include non-work examples, such as school projects, volunteer work, or personal coding projects. Focus on basic ethical understanding, honesty about technical limitations, and willingness to acknowledge mistakes. Their approach to learning and accountability often reveals their integrity foundation.

Interested in a full interview guide with Assessing Integrity in DevOps Engineer Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.