Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Healthcare Diagnostic Specialists

The integration of artificial intelligence into healthcare diagnostics and treatment represents one of the most promising frontiers in modern medicine. Organizations seeking to implement AI solutions in clinical settings need specialists who possess a unique blend of technical expertise, healthcare domain knowledge, and ethical awareness. These professionals must not only understand complex machine learning algorithms but also grasp the nuances of medical data, clinical workflows, and patient care implications.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field. While a resume might showcase impressive credentials in AI or healthcare separately, it rarely demonstrates how effectively a candidate can bridge these domains. Technical questions alone cannot predict how well someone will handle the real-world challenges of implementing AI systems that physicians and patients will rely upon for critical healthcare decisions.

Work samples and role-playing exercises provide a window into how candidates approach actual scenarios they'll encounter on the job. They reveal problem-solving methodologies, communication skills with non-technical stakeholders, awareness of regulatory considerations, and ability to balance technical innovation with patient safety. These practical demonstrations help hiring managers distinguish between candidates who merely understand AI concepts theoretically and those who can successfully apply them in healthcare settings.

The following four exercises are designed to evaluate candidates for AI healthcare diagnostic and treatment roles across multiple dimensions. They assess technical implementation skills, project planning capabilities, ethical awareness, and cross-functional collaboration abilities. By incorporating these work samples into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into which candidates possess the comprehensive skill set required to successfully develop and deploy AI solutions that enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness while maintaining the highest standards of patient care.

Activity #1: Diagnostic Algorithm Evaluation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to critically assess AI diagnostic algorithms and identify potential issues that could impact clinical outcomes. Healthcare AI specialists must be able to evaluate model performance beyond standard metrics, considering clinical relevance, potential biases, and edge cases that could lead to misdiagnosis. This skill is fundamental for ensuring AI systems enhance rather than compromise patient care.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a dataset and documentation for a fictional AI algorithm designed to detect a specific medical condition (e.g., diabetic retinopathy from retinal images or pneumonia from chest X-rays).
• Include performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC), training methodology, and sample outputs with both correct and incorrect predictions.
• Prepare a simplified version of the algorithm's architecture and feature importance data.
• Ensure the algorithm has intentional flaws such as dataset bias, overfitting on certain patterns, or poor performance on specific demographic groups.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided algorithm documentation and performance data.
• Identify potential issues, limitations, or biases in the algorithm that could impact its clinical utility.
• Propose specific improvements to address the identified issues.
• Prepare a brief (5-minute) presentation explaining your findings and recommendations.
• Consider both technical aspects (model architecture, feature selection) and clinical implications (false positive/negative consequences, integration with clinical workflow).

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., thorough analysis of demographic bias) and one area for improvement (e.g., consideration of implementation challenges).
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes revising their top recommendation based on the feedback.
• Evaluate how receptive they are to feedback and their ability to quickly incorporate new perspectives.

Activity #2: Healthcare AI Project Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to plan a complex AI implementation project in a healthcare setting. Success in healthcare AI requires not just technical expertise but strategic planning that accounts for clinical workflows, regulatory requirements, and change management. This activity reveals how candidates approach the multifaceted challenges of bringing AI from concept to clinical deployment.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario brief for implementing a new AI system in a healthcare setting (e.g., an AI-powered triage system for the emergency department or a treatment recommendation engine for oncology).
• Include key stakeholders (physicians, nurses, IT, administration), current workflow challenges, available data sources, and organizational constraints.
• Provide relevant regulatory considerations (HIPAA, FDA approval requirements) and timeline expectations.
• Allow candidates to request additional information during the exercise.
• Allocate 60-75 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a comprehensive project plan for implementing the described AI system.
• Include key phases, milestones, resource requirements, and risk mitigation strategies.
• Address data requirements, model development approach, validation methodology, and clinical integration strategy.
• Create a stakeholder engagement plan detailing how you would involve clinicians throughout the development process.
• Outline your approach to regulatory compliance and clinical validation.
• Prepare a 10-minute presentation of your project plan.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength (e.g., thorough consideration of clinical validation) and one area for improvement (e.g., more detailed approach to change management).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising the stakeholder engagement portion of their plan based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate clinical perspectives and adapt their technical approach to healthcare realities.

Activity #3: Medical Data Privacy and Ethics Role Play

This role play evaluates a candidate's understanding of healthcare data privacy regulations and ethical considerations in AI development. Healthcare AI specialists must navigate complex ethical terrain while advocating for responsible innovation. This exercise reveals how candidates balance technical possibilities with ethical imperatives and regulatory compliance.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where the candidate must explain a proposed AI diagnostic system to a hospital ethics committee concerned about patient privacy and algorithmic transparency.
• Create a brief for the candidate describing the AI system (e.g., a deep learning model to predict hospital readmissions using electronic health record data).
• Assign team members to play roles of committee members with specific concerns: a privacy officer worried about HIPAA compliance, a physician concerned about "black box" algorithms, a patient advocate questioning consent, and an administrator concerned about liability.
• Prepare specific challenging questions for each role.
• Allocate 30 minutes for the role play.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI system brief and prepare to address ethical and privacy concerns.
• During the role play, explain the system's functionality, data usage, and safeguards in non-technical terms.
• Address specific concerns raised by committee members regarding privacy, transparency, bias, and patient consent.
• Propose specific measures to ensure ethical implementation and ongoing monitoring.
• Demonstrate understanding of relevant regulations (HIPAA, GDPR if applicable) and ethical frameworks for AI in healthcare.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength (e.g., clear explanation of technical concepts to non-technical audience) and one area for improvement (e.g., more specific privacy safeguards).
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes revising their approach to addressing the transparency concern based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to balance technical innovation with ethical considerations and regulatory compliance.

Activity #4: Clinical Integration Simulation

This simulation assesses a candidate's ability to collaborate with clinical stakeholders and integrate AI tools into existing healthcare workflows. Successful healthcare AI specialists must bridge the gap between technical capabilities and clinical realities. This exercise reveals how candidates communicate with healthcare professionals and adapt technical solutions to meet clinical needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario involving the integration of an AI diagnostic tool into a clinical workflow (e.g., an AI system for prioritizing radiology images or flagging high-risk lab results).
• Prepare materials including current workflow diagrams, clinician pain points, and technical specifications of the AI system.
• Assign team members to play roles of key stakeholders: a skeptical physician, a tech-enthusiastic nurse, an IT systems administrator, and a quality improvement officer.
• Prepare specific concerns for each stakeholder (e.g., the physician worries about over-reliance on AI, IT is concerned about integration with existing systems).
• Allocate 45 minutes for this simulation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided materials and prepare for a collaborative design session with the stakeholders.
• Facilitate a discussion to understand each stakeholder's needs, concerns, and workflow requirements.
• Sketch a proposed integration approach that addresses clinical, technical, and operational considerations.
• Explain how the AI system would complement rather than replace clinical judgment.
• Develop a plan for measuring success and iteratively improving the system based on clinical feedback.
• Create a simple visual representation of the proposed integration.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strength (e.g., effective stakeholder engagement) and one area for improvement (e.g., more detailed consideration of workflow disruption).
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising their integration approach based on the feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to listen to clinical perspectives, adapt technical solutions to clinical realities, and build consensus among diverse stakeholders.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much healthcare knowledge should we expect from AI specialists applying for these roles?

While deep clinical expertise isn't always necessary, candidates should demonstrate understanding of healthcare workflows, medical data characteristics, and the implications of AI in clinical decision-making. The exercises are designed to evaluate both technical AI skills and healthcare domain awareness. Look for candidates who recognize the unique challenges of healthcare data (variability, missing values, context-dependence) and appreciate the high stakes of medical applications.

Should we customize these exercises for specific healthcare specialties?

Yes, ideally these exercises should be tailored to the specific medical domains your AI systems will address. For example, if hiring for a radiology AI team, the diagnostic algorithm evaluation could focus on imaging data, while a candidate for an oncology-focused role might evaluate a treatment recommendation engine. The core structure remains valuable across specialties, but using relevant examples significantly increases the assessment's effectiveness.

How do we evaluate candidates who have strong AI backgrounds but limited healthcare experience?

Focus on their learning agility, humility about healthcare complexities, and willingness to collaborate with clinical experts. In the exercises, look for candidates who ask insightful questions about clinical context, recognize the limits of their knowledge, and propose thoughtful approaches to gaining necessary domain expertise. Strong candidates without healthcare backgrounds will demonstrate respect for clinical expertise while clearly articulating how their technical skills transfer to healthcare challenges.

What if we don't have team members who can effectively role-play clinical stakeholders?

Consider involving actual clinicians or healthcare administrators in the interview process, even if just for the role-play portions. Alternatively, provide detailed character briefs and specific questions/concerns for team members playing these roles. The key is ensuring the candidate faces realistic healthcare-specific challenges rather than generic technical questions. If clinical participation isn't possible, focus more on the diagnostic algorithm evaluation and project planning exercises.

How should we balance evaluating technical AI expertise versus healthcare domain knowledge?

The ideal balance depends on your team composition and specific needs. If you already have strong clinical expertise on the team, you might weight technical AI skills more heavily. Conversely, if you have AI engineers but need someone to bridge to clinical stakeholders, emphasize the communication and healthcare integration aspects. These exercises are designed to evaluate both dimensions, allowing you to adjust your scoring emphasis based on your specific requirements.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all four exercises can be adapted for remote interviews. For the diagnostic algorithm evaluation and project planning, provide materials in advance and use screen sharing for presentations. Role plays and simulations work well on video conferencing platforms, though you may need to adjust time allocations and provide more structured interaction frameworks. Consider using collaborative online tools (virtual whiteboards, shared documents) to facilitate the clinical integration simulation.

The integration of AI into healthcare diagnostics and treatment requires professionals who can navigate both technical and clinical domains with equal facility. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll identify candidates who not only possess the technical skills to build sophisticated AI systems but also understand the unique challenges and responsibilities of deploying these technologies in healthcare settings. The most successful AI healthcare specialists combine technical excellence with clinical sensitivity, ethical awareness, and collaborative skills—qualities these exercises are specifically designed to reveal.

For more resources to optimize your hiring process for specialized technical roles like AI in healthcare, explore Yardstick's comprehensive suite of tools, including AI-powered job descriptions, customized interview question generators, and complete interview guide creation.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Healthcare Diagnostic roles by signing up for a free Yardstick account here