Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Voice of Customer Analysis Skills

Voice of Customer (VoC) analysis has evolved dramatically with the integration of artificial intelligence. Organizations now have unprecedented capabilities to extract meaningful insights from vast amounts of customer feedback across multiple channels. However, finding professionals who can effectively leverage AI for VoC analysis requires careful evaluation beyond traditional interviews and resume reviews.

The intersection of AI expertise and customer experience knowledge is rare, making it crucial to assess candidates through practical work samples. These exercises reveal a candidate's ability to not only implement technical solutions but also translate complex data into actionable business insights. Without proper evaluation, companies risk hiring individuals who understand AI concepts but struggle to apply them meaningfully to customer feedback data.

Effective AI-powered VoC analysis requires a blend of technical proficiency, strategic thinking, and business acumen. The right candidate must demonstrate skills in data processing, natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and insight generation—all while maintaining a customer-centric perspective. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach these multifaceted challenges.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate candidates' capabilities across the AI VoC analysis spectrum. From technical implementation to strategic planning, these activities will help you identify professionals who can truly transform your organization's approach to understanding and acting on customer feedback.

Activity #1: Customer Feedback Classification and Sentiment Analysis

This exercise evaluates a candidate's technical ability to process unstructured customer feedback data using AI techniques. It tests their proficiency with natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and classification algorithms—core technical skills for effective VoC analysis. The activity reveals how candidates approach data preprocessing, model selection, and insight extraction.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a dataset of 100-200 anonymized customer feedback entries from various channels (surveys, reviews, support tickets, social media).
• Include a mix of structured (ratings) and unstructured (text comments) data.
• Specify that the candidate should use Python and relevant libraries (NLTK, spaCy, scikit-learn, or similar tools).
• Allow candidates to use their preferred development environment.
• Allocate 2-3 hours for completion, which can be done as a take-home assignment.
• Provide clear evaluation criteria focusing on both technical implementation and business relevance of insights.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a solution that classifies customer feedback into meaningful categories (e.g., product features, service quality, pricing, usability).
• Implement sentiment analysis to determine customer satisfaction levels across different categories.
• Identify the top 3-5 themes or issues mentioned in the feedback.
• Create visualizations that effectively communicate your findings.
• Prepare a brief explanation of your methodology, including preprocessing steps, algorithms chosen, and any limitations.
• Submit your code (with comments) and a summary of insights (1-2 pages) derived from the analysis.

Feedback Mechanism:

• During the follow-up discussion, provide specific feedback on the technical approach, highlighting one strength (e.g., "Your preprocessing steps effectively handled the varied text formats") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The classification model could be refined to better distinguish between feature requests and bug reports").
• Ask the candidate to explain how they would modify their approach based on the improvement feedback, allowing them to demonstrate adaptability and technical depth.

Activity #2: VoC Analysis System Design

This planning exercise assesses a candidate's ability to design a comprehensive AI-powered VoC analysis system. It evaluates strategic thinking, technical architecture knowledge, and understanding of how VoC insights integrate with business operations. This activity reveals how candidates approach complex system design with multiple stakeholders and technical components.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a fictional company profile with specific business goals, customer segments, and existing feedback channels.
• Provide information about current challenges in analyzing customer feedback (e.g., data silos, manual processing, delayed insights).
• Include constraints such as budget limitations, technical infrastructure, or compliance requirements.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise during an interview, or make it a take-home assignment with a 24-hour turnaround.
• Prepare questions that probe the candidate's reasoning behind design choices.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive AI-powered VoC analysis system that addresses the company's specific needs.
• Create a system architecture diagram showing data flows, processing components, and integration points.
• Specify which AI/ML techniques would be implemented at different stages of the system.
• Outline the key metrics and KPIs the system would track and report.
• Describe how insights would be delivered to different stakeholders (executives, product teams, customer service).
• Include a phased implementation plan with priorities and estimated timelines.
• Prepare to explain your design choices and trade-offs.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one strong aspect of the design (e.g., "Your approach to real-time sentiment monitoring would effectively address the company's need for rapid response") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The design could better address how to handle multi-language feedback").
• Ask the candidate to revise a specific portion of their design based on the improvement feedback, observing how they incorporate new considerations and adapt their thinking.

Activity #3: AI-Generated Insight Interpretation and Recommendation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to interpret AI-generated VoC insights and translate them into actionable business recommendations. It tests critical thinking, business acumen, and communication skills—essential for ensuring that AI analysis leads to meaningful organizational action. The activity reveals how candidates bridge the gap between technical findings and business strategy.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a mock AI analysis report containing customer feedback insights for a specific product or service.
• Include visualizations such as sentiment trends, topic clusters, customer journey pain points, and competitive benchmarks.
• Provide context about the business goals, market position, and current initiatives.
• Schedule 30 minutes for preparation and 20 minutes for presentation and discussion.
• Involve stakeholders from relevant departments (product, marketing, customer experience) in the evaluation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI-generated VoC analysis report and identify the most significant insights.
• Prioritize findings based on business impact, customer importance, and feasibility.
• Develop 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on the insights.
• For each recommendation, explain:
• The specific insight(s) supporting it
• Expected business impact
• Implementation considerations
• How success would be measured
• Prepare a concise presentation (10-15 minutes) for business stakeholders.
• Be ready to answer questions about your reasoning and defend your recommendations.
• Be ready to answer questions about your reasoning and defend your recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, highlight one strength in the candidate's approach (e.g., "Your prioritization framework effectively balanced customer impact with implementation feasibility") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The recommendations could be more specific about implementation steps").
• Ask the candidate to refine one of their recommendations based on the feedback, observing how they incorporate greater specificity or address stakeholder concerns.

Activity #4: VoC Analysis Process Optimization

This problem-solving exercise assesses a candidate's ability to identify inefficiencies in an existing VoC analysis process and implement AI-driven improvements. It tests practical problem-solving, process optimization skills, and technical creativity—crucial for evolving VoC capabilities. The activity reveals how candidates approach enhancement of established systems rather than building from scratch.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a case study describing a fictional company's current VoC analysis process, including:
• Data collection methods and channels
• Current analysis approaches (manual and automated)
• Reporting cadence and formats
• Key challenges and limitations
• Include metrics showing issues like processing delays, missed insights, or low stakeholder adoption.
• Provide sample outputs from the current process.
• Allow 2-3 hours for completion as a take-home assignment, or 60 minutes during an onsite interview.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focused on practical improvements and implementation feasibility.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the current VoC process to identify key bottlenecks, gaps, and improvement opportunities.
• Develop a proposal for integrating or enhancing AI capabilities to address the identified issues.
• Specify which AI techniques or tools would be implemented and how they would improve the process.
• Create a before/after comparison showing expected improvements in efficiency, accuracy, or insight quality.
• Outline an implementation approach that minimizes disruption to ongoing operations.
• Include considerations for change management and stakeholder adoption.
• Prepare a brief presentation or document (2-3 pages) outlining your recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback highlighting one strength of the optimization plan (e.g., "Your approach to automating theme detection would significantly reduce analysis time") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The proposal could better address how to maintain human oversight of AI-generated insights").
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach to address the improvement feedback, observing how they balance automation with appropriate human involvement or other considerations.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical AI knowledge should candidates demonstrate in these exercises?

Candidates should show practical understanding of AI techniques relevant to VoC analysis, such as natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and classification algorithms. However, the focus should be on appropriate application rather than theoretical depth. Look for candidates who can explain their technical choices in business terms and understand the limitations of different approaches.

Should we provide real customer data for these exercises?

No, always use anonymized or synthetic data that resembles your actual customer feedback but contains no personally identifiable information or sensitive content. This protects customer privacy while still allowing candidates to demonstrate their skills in a realistic context.

How do we evaluate candidates who use different AI tools or approaches than we currently use?

Focus on the effectiveness of their solution rather than specific tools. A candidate using different technologies may bring valuable new perspectives. Evaluate their reasoning for tool selection, the quality of their implementation, and their ability to explain trade-offs between different approaches.

What if a candidate has limited experience with our specific industry?

Domain knowledge is valuable but can be acquired. Prioritize candidates who demonstrate strong analytical thinking, ask insightful questions about the business context, and show they can quickly understand customer needs and pain points. Consider providing additional industry context for exercises if candidates come from different backgrounds.

How should we balance evaluating technical skills versus business acumen?

The most effective VoC analysts bridge technical and business worlds. Design your evaluation to weight both aspects according to your specific needs. For more technical roles, emphasize Activities #1 and #4. For more strategic positions, place greater emphasis on Activities #2 and #3. Ideally, candidates should demonstrate competence in both areas.

Can these exercises be adapted for remote hiring processes?

Yes, all these activities can be conducted remotely. Technical exercises can be completed as take-home assignments with code submitted via GitHub or similar platforms. Design and presentation exercises can be conducted via video conferencing with screen sharing. Consider extending time allowances slightly for remote sessions to account for potential technical issues.

AI-powered Voice of Customer analysis represents a significant competitive advantage for organizations that implement it effectively. By using these work sample exercises, you can identify candidates who not only understand AI technologies but can apply them to extract meaningful customer insights that drive business value. The right hire will transform how your organization listens to, understands, and acts upon customer feedback.

For more resources to optimize your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Voice of Customer Analysis skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account