Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring AI Business Analysts

In today's data-driven business landscape, the ability to interpret AI model outputs and translate them into actionable business decisions has become a critical skill. AI Business Analysts serve as the vital bridge between technical data science teams and business stakeholders, ensuring that complex AI insights drive meaningful business outcomes. Finding candidates who can effectively navigate both the technical and business aspects of this role presents a unique hiring challenge.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true ability to interpret AI outputs in real-world scenarios. While candidates may articulate theoretical knowledge well, their practical skills in analyzing model results, identifying limitations, and communicating insights to non-technical stakeholders remain untested. This gap between interview performance and on-the-job effectiveness can lead to costly hiring mistakes.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually approach AI interpretation tasks. By observing candidates work through realistic scenarios, hiring managers can assess not only technical competence but also critical thinking, business acumen, and communication skills. These exercises reveal how candidates balance technical rigor with business practicality—a fundamental requirement for success in this role.

The following four work sample activities are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities to interpret AI model outputs, communicate findings effectively, plan implementation strategies, and troubleshoot model limitations. Each exercise simulates real challenges faced by AI Business Analysts, providing a comprehensive assessment of candidates' readiness for the role.

Activity #1: Interpreting Customer Churn Model Results

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze AI model outputs and extract meaningful business insights. Customer churn prediction is a common application of machine learning in business, making this a relevant scenario for assessing how candidates bridge technical understanding with business impact. The exercise tests their ability to identify key drivers of customer behavior and translate statistical findings into actionable recommendations.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a mock dataset and model output showing the results of a customer churn prediction model, including feature importance scores, model accuracy metrics, and sample predictions.
• Include some non-intuitive findings that require deeper analysis (e.g., a counterintuitive feature that strongly predicts churn).
• Provide business context about the company, its customer base, and current retention strategies.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to analyze the data and prepare their findings.
• Have a business stakeholder role and a data scientist role played by team members for the presentation portion.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided customer churn model outputs and supporting data.
• Identify the key factors driving customer churn according to the model.
• Prepare a 10-minute presentation explaining:
• What the model reveals about customer churn patterns
• Which customer segments are at highest risk
• 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations to reduce churn
• Any limitations or caveats about the model's findings
• Be prepared to answer questions from both business and technical perspectives.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one aspect the candidate explained particularly well and one area where their analysis or communication could be improved.
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise one of their recommendations based on the feedback.
• Observe how they incorporate the feedback and whether they can adapt their thinking on the spot.

Activity #2: Translating AI Insights for Executive Decision-Making

This exercise assesses the candidate's ability to communicate complex AI concepts and findings to non-technical stakeholders. The skill of translating technical information into business language is crucial for ensuring AI insights actually influence decision-making. This activity reveals how candidates prioritize information, handle technical questions, and maintain accuracy while simplifying complex concepts.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a mock scenario involving a complex AI model (e.g., a pricing optimization algorithm or market segmentation model).
• Prepare technical documentation including model architecture, performance metrics, and key findings.
• Designate team members to play the roles of executives with varying levels of technical understanding.
• Prepare challenging questions that executives might ask, including some that question the model's validity.
• Allow candidates 30 minutes to prepare and 15 minutes for the presentation and Q&A.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the technical documentation about the AI model and its findings.
• Prepare a brief executive summary (5-7 slides or equivalent) that:
• Explains what business question the model addresses
• Summarizes key insights in non-technical language
• Outlines recommended actions based on the findings
• Acknowledges limitations without undermining confidence in the results
• Present your summary to the "executive team" and field their questions.
• Focus on business impact rather than technical details, but be prepared to address technical questions if asked.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the clarity of the candidate's explanation and their ability to maintain technical accuracy while simplifying concepts.
• Identify one aspect of their communication that could be improved (e.g., too technical, oversimplified, or missed key business implications).
• Ask the candidate to re-explain one particular finding based on this feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to adjust their communication style while maintaining the integrity of the information.

Activity #3: Planning an AI Implementation Project

This exercise evaluates the candidate's ability to plan the implementation of AI insights into business operations. It tests their understanding of change management, cross-functional collaboration, and practical constraints that affect AI adoption. The activity reveals how candidates balance technical ideals with organizational realities and how they approach the human aspects of AI implementation.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where an AI model has produced valuable insights that now need to be implemented into business processes.
• Provide details about the organization's structure, current processes, potential resistance points, and technical infrastructure.
• Include constraints such as limited resources, regulatory considerations, or tight timelines.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to develop their implementation plan.
• Prepare questions about specific implementation challenges that might arise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI model findings and organizational context provided.
• Develop a comprehensive implementation plan that includes:
• Key stakeholders who need to be involved
• Required changes to existing processes or systems
• Timeline with major milestones
• Potential obstacles and mitigation strategies
• Success metrics to evaluate the implementation
• Change management approach to ensure adoption
• Create a one-page executive summary and a more detailed 2-3 page implementation roadmap.
• Be prepared to discuss how you would adjust the plan if certain assumptions change.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the thoroughness of the implementation plan and one specific area that could be strengthened.
• Present the candidate with a new constraint or challenge not previously mentioned (e.g., "The IT department just informed us they can't support this until next quarter").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their implementation approach based on this new information.
• Evaluate their flexibility, problem-solving approach, and ability to adapt while maintaining the core objectives.

Activity #4: Troubleshooting Model Performance Issues

This exercise tests the candidate's ability to identify and address limitations in AI models when they don't perform as expected in real-world conditions. It evaluates critical thinking, diagnostic skills, and the ability to balance technical solutions with business pragmatism. The activity reveals how candidates approach uncertainty and whether they can maintain business continuity while resolving technical issues.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario where an AI model that performed well in development is showing unexpected results in production.
• Provide model documentation, performance metrics from both testing and production environments, and sample data.
• Include subtle issues that might be causing the discrepancy (e.g., data drift, selection bias, or changes in business conditions).
• Allow 60 minutes for the candidate to analyze the situation and develop recommendations.
• Prepare to play the role of both technical team members and concerned business stakeholders.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided information about the model's expected and actual performance.
• Analyze potential causes for the performance discrepancy.
• Develop both immediate actions to address business needs and longer-term solutions to fix the underlying issues.
• Prepare a response plan that includes:
• Diagnosis of the most likely causes of the performance issues
• Immediate steps to mitigate business impact
• Approach for validating your hypothesis about the root cause
• Recommended changes to prevent similar issues in the future
• Communication strategy for affected stakeholders
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning and defend your recommendations to both technical and business audiences.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's diagnostic approach and one aspect of their solution that could be improved.
• Challenge one of their assumptions or recommendations with new information.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to refine their approach based on this feedback.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate new information, adjust their thinking, and maintain a solution-oriented approach under pressure.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise requires 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete, plus time for feedback and discussion. We recommend scheduling no more than two exercises in a single interview day to avoid candidate fatigue. For remote candidates, consider splitting the exercises across multiple days.

Should we use real company data for these exercises?

While using real data creates authenticity, it often raises confidentiality concerns. We recommend creating realistic synthetic data based on your actual business patterns but with anonymized or modified values. This approach maintains relevance while protecting sensitive information.

What if candidates don't have experience with the specific AI models we use?

Focus on evaluating their analytical approach rather than familiarity with specific models. The exercises are designed to test fundamental skills in interpreting and applying AI insights, which transfer across different model types. Provide sufficient context about the model's purpose and basic functioning.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose different solutions than we expected?

Unexpected approaches often provide valuable insights. Evaluate the candidate's reasoning process, whether their solution addresses the core business need, and how well they can explain their approach. Strong candidates should be able to articulate why their solution might be superior to conventional approaches.

Should we share these exercises with candidates in advance?

For Activities #1 and #2, providing the general topic but not the specific data allows candidates to prepare contextually while still testing their analytical abilities in real-time. For Activities #3 and #4, which involve more complex planning, consider providing the scenario 24 hours in advance, but reserve some elements as surprises during the interview.

How do these exercises fit into our broader interview process?

These work samples are most effective when used after initial screening and basic technical assessment. They should complement, not replace, behavioral interviews and culture fit assessments. Consider using one or two of these exercises as the final stage for shortlisted candidates to make your final selection.

Finding the right AI Business Analyst requires evaluating both technical competence and business acumen. These work sample exercises provide a comprehensive assessment of candidates' abilities to interpret AI outputs and translate them into business value. By observing candidates work through realistic scenarios, you'll gain deeper insights into their problem-solving approach, communication skills, and readiness for the role than traditional interviews alone can provide.

For more resources to optimize your hiring process, explore Yardstick's tools for creating AI-powered job descriptions, generating targeted interview questions, and developing comprehensive interview guides.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account at https://yardstick.team/sign-up