Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring AI Specialists in Financial Compliance and Fraud Detection

Financial institutions face increasingly sophisticated fraud attempts and complex regulatory requirements. AI specialists who can develop and implement intelligent systems for compliance monitoring and fraud detection are invaluable assets in this environment. These professionals must possess a unique blend of technical AI expertise, domain knowledge in financial services, and an understanding of regulatory frameworks.

Evaluating candidates for these specialized roles requires more than traditional interviews. Work samples that simulate real-world challenges provide deeper insights into a candidate's capabilities, problem-solving approach, and technical proficiency. These exercises reveal how candidates apply their knowledge to practical situations they would encounter on the job.

The most effective AI specialists in this domain can not only build sophisticated models but also communicate complex concepts to non-technical stakeholders, balance detection accuracy with operational efficiency, and ensure solutions meet regulatory requirements. Work samples help identify candidates who demonstrate this multifaceted expertise.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities across key dimensions: technical AI implementation, stakeholder communication, strategic planning, and performance analysis. By observing candidates complete these tasks, hiring managers can make more informed decisions about which individuals will excel in protecting financial institutions from fraud while ensuring regulatory compliance.

Activity #1: Fraud Detection System Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design an AI-based fraud detection system for financial transactions. It tests their understanding of machine learning approaches for anomaly detection, feature engineering for financial data, and how to balance false positives with false negatives in a high-stakes environment. Candidates must demonstrate both technical knowledge and practical implementation considerations.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a written brief describing a financial institution facing specific fraud challenges (e.g., credit card fraud, account takeover, or money laundering patterns).
• Include sample anonymized transaction data (CSV or similar format) with 100-200 records containing fields like transaction amount, timestamp, merchant category, location, and device information.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete the exercise.
• Have a technical team member available to answer clarifying questions about the data or requirements.
• Evaluate the candidate on their approach to feature selection, model choice, explainability considerations, and implementation strategy.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided scenario and transaction data to understand the fraud patterns and challenges.
• Design an AI-based fraud detection system that addresses the specific needs of the financial institution.
• Create a diagram or flowchart showing the system architecture and data flow.
• Specify which machine learning algorithms you would use and why.
• Identify the key features from the transaction data you would use in your model.
• Explain how you would handle the trade-off between false positives and false negatives.
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-7 minutes) explaining your approach.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, the interviewer should provide specific feedback on one aspect the candidate handled well (e.g., "Your feature engineering approach was particularly thoughtful") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how you might incorporate real-time processing requirements").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their approach based on the feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised solution.

Activity #2: Regulatory Compliance Explanation Role Play

This role play assesses the candidate's ability to explain complex AI systems to non-technical stakeholders while addressing regulatory compliance concerns. Financial services AI specialists must regularly communicate with compliance officers, auditors, and executives who need to understand how AI systems meet regulatory requirements without necessarily understanding the technical details.

Directions for the Company:

• Assign an interviewer to play the role of a Chief Compliance Officer who is concerned about the explainability and regulatory compliance of a new AI system.
• Provide the candidate with a one-page description of an AI model used for suspicious activity reporting, including its basic functionality and the regulations it needs to satisfy (e.g., AML requirements, GDPR, or banking regulations).
• Include specific regulatory concerns the "compliance officer" should raise during the conversation.
• Schedule 20-30 minutes for this exercise.
• Evaluate the candidate on clarity of explanation, understanding of regulatory requirements, and ability to translate technical concepts for non-technical audiences.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI system description and relevant regulations.
• Prepare to explain how the AI system works at a high level and how it addresses regulatory requirements.
• During the role play, listen carefully to the compliance officer's concerns and address them specifically.
• Be prepared to explain concepts like model explainability, bias mitigation, and audit trails in non-technical terms.
• Suggest practical solutions to any compliance gaps identified during the conversation.
• Your goal is to build the compliance officer's confidence in the AI system while acknowledging legitimate regulatory concerns.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the role play, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., "You effectively translated complex concepts into accessible language") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider providing more concrete examples of how the system satisfies specific regulatory requirements").
• Ask the candidate to revisit one of the compliance officer's concerns with the improvement feedback in mind.
• Assess how well the candidate adapts their communication approach based on feedback.

Activity #3: AI Compliance Monitoring System Implementation Plan

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to plan the implementation of a complex AI system for compliance monitoring. It tests their project management skills, understanding of the financial services technology ecosystem, and ability to anticipate challenges specific to compliance applications of AI.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a scenario describing a financial institution that needs to implement an AI-based transaction monitoring system to replace legacy rule-based systems.
• Include details about the institution's current technology stack, data sources, and key compliance requirements.
• Specify constraints such as timeline (e.g., 6 months to implementation), budget limitations, and regulatory deadlines.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to develop their implementation plan.
• Evaluate the candidate on their ability to create a comprehensive, realistic plan that addresses technical, operational, and regulatory considerations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and develop a detailed implementation plan for the AI compliance monitoring system.
• Create a project timeline with key milestones and dependencies.
• Identify the cross-functional team members needed and their roles.
• Outline the data integration requirements and potential challenges.
• Address model training, testing, and validation approaches.
• Include a plan for regulatory approval and documentation.
• Develop a risk mitigation strategy for common implementation challenges.
• Prepare a brief presentation of your implementation plan (5-7 minutes).

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the implementation plan (e.g., "Your phased approach to model deployment shows good risk management") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider adding more detail about how you would handle data quality issues").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise the specific section of their plan that needs improvement.
• Assess how well the candidate incorporates the feedback and whether they demonstrate flexibility in their approach.

Activity #4: Model Performance Analysis and Optimization

This technical exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze the performance of an existing fraud detection model and recommend improvements. It tests their understanding of model evaluation metrics, their ability to identify performance issues, and their knowledge of optimization techniques specific to financial fraud detection.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with performance data from an existing fraud detection model, including confusion matrices, ROC curves, and precision-recall data.
• Include a dataset of model predictions versus actual outcomes for a sample of transactions.
• Provide context about the current model's architecture and feature set.
• Specify business constraints (e.g., maximum acceptable false positive rate, regulatory requirements for explainability).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to analyze the data and prepare recommendations.
• Evaluate the candidate on their analytical approach, understanding of performance metrics in the context of fraud detection, and the practicality of their recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided model performance data to identify strengths and weaknesses.
• Calculate relevant performance metrics beyond what's provided (e.g., F1 score, cost-weighted metrics).
• Identify patterns in false positives and false negatives that might indicate specific model limitations.
• Recommend at least three specific improvements to the model architecture, feature engineering, or training approach.
• Explain how your recommendations would address the identified performance issues while meeting business constraints.
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-7 minutes) of your analysis and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength of the analysis (e.g., "Your cost-sensitive approach to evaluation shows good business understanding") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how different customer segments might require different optimization approaches").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes developing one additional recommendation that addresses the feedback.
• Assess how well the candidate incorporates the feedback and whether they demonstrate depth of knowledge in their additional recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical AI knowledge should candidates have for these exercises?

Candidates should have strong technical knowledge of machine learning algorithms, particularly those relevant to anomaly detection and classification problems. However, the exercises are designed to evaluate not just technical depth but also the ability to apply that knowledge in a financial services context. Look for candidates who understand the unique challenges of applying AI to compliance and fraud detection, not just those with general AI expertise.

Should we provide real financial data for these exercises?

No, never use real customer data for interview exercises. Instead, create synthetic datasets that mimic the patterns and structures of your actual data without containing sensitive information. These synthetic datasets should include the types of features your models actually use but with generated values. This approach protects privacy while still allowing candidates to demonstrate their skills.

How should we evaluate candidates who propose approaches different from our current methods?

Different approaches should be evaluated on their merit rather than their similarity to your existing systems. The financial services industry is evolving rapidly, and candidates may bring fresh perspectives that could improve your fraud detection capabilities. Evaluate whether their approach is well-reasoned, addresses the specific challenges presented, and demonstrates an understanding of the regulatory environment, even if it differs from your current methodology.

What if candidates don't have specific experience with financial regulations?

While domain knowledge is valuable, strong candidates can often transfer their skills from other regulated industries or quickly learn the specific requirements of financial services. Focus on evaluating their ability to incorporate regulatory considerations into their technical solutions and their awareness of the importance of compliance, even if they don't cite specific regulations. Consider providing a brief overview of key regulations relevant to your organization as part of the exercise materials.

How can we ensure these exercises don't take too much of the candidate's time?

These exercises are designed to be completed within reasonable timeframes during an interview process. If you're concerned about time constraints, consider sending the scenario information ahead of time while keeping the specific questions or data for the in-person interview. Alternatively, you could select just two of the four exercises that best align with your specific needs rather than conducting all four.

Should we adapt these exercises for different seniority levels?

Yes, these exercises should be calibrated to the seniority of the role. For junior positions, focus more on technical implementation and less on strategic planning. For senior roles, emphasize system design, stakeholder communication, and implementation planning. You can adjust the complexity of the scenarios and the depth of analysis expected based on the level of the position.

The financial services industry faces unique challenges in implementing AI for compliance and fraud detection. By using these targeted work samples, you can identify candidates who not only possess technical AI skills but also understand the regulatory landscape and operational realities of financial institutions. The right hire will help your organization leverage AI to enhance compliance efforts, reduce fraud losses, and improve operational efficiency while navigating complex regulatory requirements.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for AI specialists in financial compliance and fraud detection? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!