Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI Compensation Equity Analysis Skills

Compensation equity analysis has evolved significantly with the integration of artificial intelligence. Organizations now leverage AI to identify patterns of inequity, predict compensation trends, and develop more fair and transparent pay structures. However, finding professionals who can effectively combine AI expertise with compensation analysis requires a rigorous evaluation process that goes beyond traditional interviews.

The intersection of AI and compensation equity demands a unique skill set: technical proficiency in machine learning and data analysis, deep understanding of compensation structures, awareness of equity principles, and the ability to translate complex findings into actionable insights. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal whether candidates truly possess these capabilities or merely understand them conceptually.

Work samples and technical evaluations provide a window into how candidates approach real-world compensation equity challenges using AI. They demonstrate not just technical knowledge, but critical thinking, ethical awareness, and communication skills essential for this specialized field. By observing candidates in action, organizations can better assess their ability to design, implement, and explain AI-driven compensation equity solutions.

The following four activities are designed to evaluate candidates' proficiency in applying AI to compensation equity analysis. Each exercise targets different aspects of the skill set, from technical implementation to strategic planning and communication. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and identify those who can truly drive your compensation equity initiatives forward.

Activity #1: Compensation Disparity Detection Using AI

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to apply AI techniques to identify patterns of potential compensation inequity in a dataset. It tests technical skills in data analysis, feature engineering, and model interpretation, as well as understanding of compensation equity principles. Candidates must demonstrate they can not only build effective models but also interpret results in a meaningful way that addresses business and ethical concerns.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare an anonymized dataset containing employee compensation information including salary, bonus, job level, department, performance ratings, tenure, education, and demographic information.
• Ensure the dataset contains some deliberate patterns of inequity (e.g., gender or racial pay gaps within similar roles, experience levels, or performance ratings).
• Provide access to Python or R with relevant libraries (pandas, scikit-learn, etc.) or appropriate AI/ML tools the company uses.
• Allow 2-3 hours for this exercise, which can be conducted remotely or on-site.
• Assign a technical evaluator familiar with both AI and compensation principles to review the work.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided dataset to identify potential patterns of compensation inequity.
• Use appropriate AI/ML techniques to detect statistically significant disparities.
• Create at least one visualization that effectively communicates your findings.
• Prepare a brief report (1-2 pages) that:
• Explains your methodology and why you chose it
• Summarizes key findings regarding potential inequities
• Recommends next steps for further investigation or remediation
• Discusses limitations of your analysis and potential biases in your approach

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's work, provide specific feedback on their technical approach and interpretation of results.
• Highlight one strength in their analysis methodology or communication of findings.
• Suggest one area for improvement, such as consideration of additional variables, alternative statistical approaches, or clearer explanation of a particular finding.
• Ask the candidate to spend 15-20 minutes implementing the suggested improvement and explain how this changes their interpretation or recommendations.

Activity #2: AI Compensation Equity System Design

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to design a comprehensive AI system for ongoing compensation equity monitoring and remediation. It evaluates strategic thinking, technical architecture knowledge, and awareness of ethical considerations in AI-driven compensation systems. The exercise reveals how candidates approach complex, multifaceted problems that require balancing technical capabilities with business needs and ethical principles.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a brief description of your organization's compensation structure, review processes, and current challenges related to equity.
• Include information about available data sources, stakeholders, and any regulatory requirements.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have both technical and HR/compensation leaders participate in the evaluation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a comprehensive AI-driven system for monitoring and addressing compensation equity in the organization.
• Create a one-page system architecture diagram showing data flows, analytical components, and output mechanisms.
• Develop a 2-3 page proposal that includes:
• Key features and capabilities of the system
• Required data inputs and integration points
• AI/ML methodologies to be employed and why
• Governance mechanisms to ensure ethical use
• Implementation phases and timeline
• Success metrics and evaluation approach
• Potential challenges and mitigation strategies

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the comprehensiveness and feasibility of the proposed system.
• Highlight one particularly innovative or thoughtful aspect of their design.
• Suggest one area where the design could be improved, such as addressing a specific ethical concern, data limitation, or implementation challenge.
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes revising their proposal to address this feedback, focusing specifically on how they would modify their approach.

Activity #3: Executive Presentation on AI Compensation Findings

This role play evaluates a candidate's ability to communicate complex AI findings to non-technical stakeholders and advocate for data-driven compensation equity initiatives. It tests communication skills, business acumen, and the ability to translate technical concepts into business value. This exercise reveals how effectively candidates can influence decision-makers and drive organizational change based on AI insights.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario brief with AI-generated compensation equity analysis findings that reveal concerning patterns requiring executive attention.
• Include relevant visualizations, key metrics, and background information about the fictional company's compensation philosophy.
• Assign 2-3 interviewers to play the roles of executives (CEO, CHRO, CFO) with different perspectives on compensation equity.
• Provide the candidate with the materials 24 hours in advance.
• Prepare challenging but realistic questions executives might ask about methodology, implications, and recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI analysis findings and prepare a 15-minute executive presentation.
• Your presentation should:
• Summarize the key findings from the AI analysis in non-technical terms
• Explain what patterns the AI has identified and why they matter
• Present recommendations for addressing identified inequities
• Outline the business case for implementing your recommendations
• Address potential concerns about cost, implementation challenges, and legal implications
• Be prepared to answer questions from executives who may have varying levels of technical understanding and different priorities.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation and Q&A, provide feedback on the candidate's communication effectiveness and handling of executive questions.
• Highlight one aspect of the presentation that was particularly compelling or well-explained.
• Suggest one area for improvement, such as better explaining a technical concept, more effectively addressing a specific executive concern, or strengthening the business case.
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes re-presenting a specific portion of their presentation incorporating this feedback.

Activity #4: AI Model Evaluation for Compensation Bias

This technical exercise assesses a candidate's ability to evaluate AI models for potential biases that could perpetuate or amplify compensation inequities. It tests technical knowledge of model evaluation, fairness metrics, and bias mitigation techniques. This activity reveals whether candidates have the specialized skills needed to ensure AI systems promote rather than undermine compensation equity goals.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare documentation for an existing or fictional AI model used for compensation decisions (e.g., performance-based bonus allocation, promotion readiness, or salary increase recommendations).
• Include model specifications, training data description, feature list, and current evaluation metrics.
• Ensure the model has some potential bias issues that a skilled evaluator should identify.
• Provide access to appropriate tools for model evaluation (Python environment, fairness toolkits, etc.).
• Allow 2 hours for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided AI model documentation and evaluate it for potential biases that could impact compensation equity.
• Conduct a thorough analysis that includes:
• Evaluation of training data representativeness and potential historical biases
• Assessment of feature selection and potential proxy variables for protected characteristics
• Analysis of model performance across different demographic groups
• Identification of fairness metrics appropriate for this use case
• Documentation of at least three specific bias concerns with supporting evidence
• Develop a detailed plan for mitigating the identified biases, including:
• Technical approaches (e.g., data preprocessing, algorithm modifications)
• Process changes (e.g., human oversight, approval workflows)
• Monitoring mechanisms to detect bias in production

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the thoroughness of the bias evaluation and the practicality of proposed mitigations.
• Highlight one particularly insightful observation or creative mitigation strategy.
• Suggest one additional bias concern or mitigation approach the candidate may have overlooked.
• Ask the candidate to spend 15 minutes expanding their analysis to address this feedback, explaining how they would incorporate this new consideration into their overall evaluation and mitigation plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical AI knowledge should candidates have for these exercises?

Candidates should have strong working knowledge of machine learning techniques, particularly those applicable to tabular data analysis and bias detection. They should be comfortable with data preprocessing, model building, and evaluation metrics. However, the focus should be on applying these skills to compensation equity rather than cutting-edge AI research.

Should we provide real company compensation data for these exercises?

No, always use anonymized, synthetic data that mimics your actual compensation patterns but doesn't contain real employee information. This protects confidentiality while still creating realistic scenarios. You can introduce artificial patterns of inequity to test candidates' ability to detect them.

How do we evaluate candidates who use different AI approaches than we currently use?

Focus on the soundness of their methodology, clarity of reasoning, and quality of insights rather than specific tools or algorithms. Different approaches may reveal new perspectives. However, candidates should be able to explain why their chosen approach is appropriate for the specific compensation equity challenge.

What if we don't have technical evaluators who understand both AI and compensation equity?

Consider having separate evaluators for technical and domain aspects, then combine their assessments. Alternatively, provide candidates with more structured exercises with clearer evaluation criteria. You might also consider bringing in an external consultant with this specialized expertise for the evaluation process.

How can we make these exercises accessible to candidates with different backgrounds?

Provide clear instructions and necessary background information. Allow candidates to use tools they're comfortable with when possible. Focus evaluation on problem-solving approach and results rather than specific implementation details. Consider offering accommodations for candidates who may need them.

Should we expect perfect solutions to these complex problems?

No, these exercises evaluate approach and reasoning rather than perfect solutions. Look for candidates who demonstrate thoughtful analysis, awareness of limitations, consideration of ethical implications, and ability to communicate clearly about complex topics. The best candidates will acknowledge uncertainties and trade-offs in their approaches.

The intersection of AI and compensation equity analysis represents a powerful opportunity for organizations to address systemic inequities and build more fair, transparent compensation systems. By using these work samples in your hiring process, you'll identify candidates who not only understand the technical aspects of AI but can apply them thoughtfully to the nuanced challenges of compensation equity.

Yardstick helps organizations design comprehensive interview processes that effectively evaluate specialized skills like AI in compensation equity analysis. Our AI-powered tools can help you create custom job descriptions, generate targeted interview questions, and develop complete interview guides that assess both technical proficiency and alignment with your organization's compensation philosophy and equity goals.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Compensation Equity Analysis by signing up for a free Yardstick account