Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI Governance Implementation Skills

Implementing effective AI governance policies has become a critical capability for organizations deploying artificial intelligence solutions. As AI systems increasingly impact business operations, customer experiences, and strategic decision-making, the need for robust governance frameworks has never been more important. Organizations must ensure their AI implementations are ethical, transparent, compliant with regulations, and aligned with organizational values.

Evaluating a candidate's ability to implement AI governance policies requires more than just theoretical knowledge assessment. The complexity of AI governance demands practical demonstration of skills across policy development, risk assessment, stakeholder communication, and technical implementation. Traditional interview questions often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in navigating the nuanced challenges of AI governance implementation.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world AI governance scenarios. By observing candidates tackle authentic challenges, hiring managers can assess their problem-solving methodology, communication skills, and ability to balance innovation with responsible AI use. These exercises reveal not just what candidates know about AI governance, but how they apply that knowledge in practice.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate different dimensions of AI governance implementation skills. They range from policy development to risk assessment, stakeholder communication, and incident response. By incorporating these exercises into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and identify those who can effectively guide your organization's responsible AI journey.

Activity #1: AI Governance Framework Development

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to develop a comprehensive AI governance framework tailored to organizational needs. Effective AI governance begins with a well-structured policy framework that addresses key risk areas while enabling innovation. This exercise reveals the candidate's understanding of governance principles, regulatory requirements, and practical implementation considerations.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a brief description of a fictional company planning to implement a customer-facing AI system (e.g., a financial services company implementing an AI-powered loan approval system).
• Include details about the company's industry, size, regulatory environment, and the specific AI application being deployed.
• Allow candidates 45-60 minutes to complete this exercise.
• Provide access to a document template or blank document for creating their framework.
• Consider providing a sample AI governance framework from another domain as reference (not directly applicable to the scenario).

Directions for the Candidate:

• Develop a high-level AI governance framework for the described organization and AI system.
• Your framework should include key governance components such as:
• Governance structure (roles and responsibilities)
• Risk assessment methodology
• Documentation requirements
• Testing and validation procedures
• Monitoring and reporting mechanisms
• Incident response protocols
• Identify the top three regulatory or ethical considerations specific to this AI implementation.
• Outline implementation priorities and a phased approach for deploying this governance framework.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the framework, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., comprehensive risk assessment approach) and one area for improvement (e.g., insufficient attention to explainability requirements).
• Ask the candidate to revise the section needing improvement, allowing 10-15 minutes for this targeted revision.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised framework.

Activity #2: AI Risk Assessment Exercise

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to identify and assess risks in AI systems, a fundamental skill for effective governance implementation. By analyzing how candidates approach risk identification and mitigation planning, you can gauge their technical understanding of AI systems and their practical risk management capabilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed description of an AI system implementation scenario (e.g., a healthcare predictive analytics tool, a hiring algorithm, or a customer service chatbot).
• Include system specifications, data sources, intended use cases, and stakeholder information.
• Provide a risk assessment template with categories such as data privacy, bias/fairness, security, transparency, and regulatory compliance.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare discussion points to probe the candidate's reasoning behind their risk assessments.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI system description provided.
• Using the risk assessment template, identify at least three potential risks in each category (data privacy, bias/fairness, security, transparency, regulatory compliance).
• Rate each identified risk on a scale of 1-5 for both likelihood and impact.
• For the three highest-rated risks (likelihood × impact), develop detailed mitigation strategies.
• Be prepared to explain your reasoning for risk ratings and mitigation approaches.
• Consider both technical and procedural controls in your mitigation strategies.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their risk assessment, highlight one risk area where their analysis was particularly strong.
• Identify one risk area where important considerations were missed or underestimated.
• Ask the candidate to reconsider this area and develop additional mitigation strategies in a 10-minute follow-up exercise.
• Evaluate how the candidate incorporates new perspectives into their revised assessment.

Activity #3: AI Governance Communication Exercise

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to effectively communicate AI governance concepts to different stakeholders. Successful AI governance implementation requires translating complex technical and policy concepts for various audiences, from executive leadership to technical teams and end users.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario involving a new AI governance policy that needs to be communicated to multiple stakeholder groups (e.g., executive leadership, data science team, compliance department, and end users).
• Provide details about the policy (e.g., new requirements for AI model documentation and testing).
• Create profiles of each stakeholder group, including their technical knowledge level, primary concerns, and role in AI governance.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation/discussion.
• Assign 1-2 interviewers to role-play different stakeholders during the presentation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI governance policy and stakeholder profiles provided.
• Develop communication materials tailored to each stakeholder group that explain:
• The policy requirements and their rationale
• How the policy affects each group's work
• Implementation steps and timeline
• Resources available for support
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-7 minutes) for one primary stakeholder group (to be specified by the interviewer).
• Be prepared to answer questions from the perspective of different stakeholders.
• Focus on clarity, appropriate level of detail, and addressing stakeholder-specific concerns.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one communication strength (e.g., effective translation of technical concepts for non-technical audience).
• Identify one area where the communication could be improved (e.g., insufficient addressing of stakeholder concerns).
• Ask the candidate to revise their approach for the identified stakeholder group, allowing 10 minutes for this targeted revision.
• Evaluate how effectively the candidate adapts their communication based on feedback.

Activity #4: AI Governance Incident Response Simulation

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to respond to AI governance incidents, demonstrating their problem-solving skills under pressure and their understanding of incident management protocols. Effective incident response is crucial for minimizing harm and maintaining trust when AI systems encounter governance issues.

Directions for the Company:

• Develop a detailed scenario describing an AI governance incident (e.g., discovery of bias in an AI system, data privacy breach, or unexpected system behavior affecting customers).
• Include relevant details such as when and how the issue was discovered, potential impact, and available information.
• Prepare a timeline for the simulation with escalating complexity (e.g., new information revealed at specific intervals).
• Assign roles to interviewers (e.g., technical team member, legal counsel, executive leadership).
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this simulation exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• You will be presented with an AI governance incident scenario and asked to lead the response effort.
• Develop an immediate action plan addressing:
• Information gathering and assessment
• Containment measures
• Stakeholder notifications
• Investigation process
• Remediation steps
• Prepare communications for key stakeholders (internal teams, leadership, regulators, affected users).
• Respond to new information as it becomes available during the simulation.
• Document lessons learned and governance improvements to prevent similar incidents.
• Balance transparency with legal/reputational considerations in your response.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the simulation, highlight one aspect of the incident response that was handled particularly well.
• Identify one area where the response could have been more effective.
• Ask the candidate to reconsider this specific aspect of the incident response, allowing 10-15 minutes for this targeted revision.
• Evaluate how the candidate incorporates feedback and adapts their approach based on new perspectives.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these AI governance work samples?

Each exercise is designed to take approximately 60-75 minutes total, including the feedback and revision portions. For a comprehensive assessment, you might conduct 1-2 exercises during an interview day. For senior roles, consider spreading multiple exercises across different interview sessions to evaluate the full range of governance implementation skills.

Should we adapt these exercises for different levels of AI governance roles?

Yes, these exercises should be calibrated to the seniority and specific focus of the role. For junior positions, simplify the scenarios and focus on fundamental governance concepts. For senior roles, increase complexity and emphasize strategic thinking. For specialized roles (e.g., AI ethics officer), emphasize the most relevant exercises.

How can we evaluate candidates who have experience in governance but not specifically in AI?

For candidates with governance experience in adjacent fields (data governance, IT governance, etc.), provide additional context about AI-specific challenges. Focus on transferable skills like risk assessment methodology and stakeholder communication, while acknowledging the learning curve for AI-specific governance concepts.

What if our organization is just beginning to implement AI governance?

These exercises are still valuable for organizations early in their AI governance journey. In fact, they can help identify candidates who can establish foundational governance frameworks. Consider emphasizing the framework development exercise and looking for candidates who demonstrate an ability to build governance capabilities incrementally.

How should we weight technical AI knowledge versus governance expertise?

The balance depends on your organizational needs. For roles focused on policy development and stakeholder management, governance expertise may be more critical. For roles implementing technical controls and monitoring systems, deeper AI technical knowledge becomes more important. These exercises help reveal strengths in both dimensions.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using video conferencing and collaborative document tools. For the communication exercise, ensure candidates can share their screen for presentations. For the incident response simulation, consider using breakout rooms or chat functions to simulate different information channels.

Implementing effective AI governance policies requires a unique combination of technical understanding, policy expertise, communication skills, and practical problem-solving abilities. By incorporating these work samples into your interview process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and identify those best equipped to guide your organization's responsible AI journey.

The landscape of AI governance continues to evolve rapidly with new regulations, standards, and best practices emerging regularly. The most valuable candidates will demonstrate not just current knowledge but an ability to adapt and learn as governance requirements change. These exercises help identify candidates with this crucial adaptability while assessing their fundamental governance implementation skills.

For more resources to enhance your AI hiring process, explore Yardstick's comprehensive tools for creating AI-optimized job descriptions, generating effective interview questions, and developing complete interview guides.

Want to build a complete interview guide for evaluating AI governance implementation skills? Sign up for a free Yardstick account