Interview Guide for

Senior Technical Writer

This comprehensive interview guide is designed to help you evaluate candidates for the Senior Technical Writer position. It provides a structured approach to assessing candidates' skills, experience, and behavioral competencies through various interview stages and a practical work sample.

How to Use This Guide

Familiarize yourself with the entire guide before beginning the interview process.
Use the provided questions and scorecards for each interview stage.
Take detailed notes during interviews to support your evaluations.
Complete the scorecard immediately after each interview while the information is fresh.
Use the debrief meeting to discuss candidates with the hiring team.
Conduct thorough reference checks using the provided questions.

For additional ideas and alternative interview questions, you can refer to our interview questions database.

Remember, this guide is a tool to assist your decision-making process. While it provides structure and consistency, your judgment and the overall fit of the candidate with your team and company culture are crucial factors in the final hiring decision.

By following this guide, you'll be able to conduct a thorough and fair evaluation of each candidate, increasing your chances of identifying the best Senior Technical Writer for your team.

Job Description

[Company] is seeking a skilled Senior Technical Writer to join our dynamic team.

📌 Role Overview

As a Senior Technical Writer at [Company], you'll play a crucial role in creating and maintaining high-quality documentation for our software products. You'll collaborate with engineers, product managers, and other stakeholders to ensure our documentation is clear, comprehensive, and user-friendly.

🎯 Key Responsibilities

Continuously improve product documentation in collaboration with cross-functional teams
Work on strategic initiatives to enhance the overall documentation experience
Peer review other writers' work and provide constructive feedback
Contribute to the improvement of team processes and style guides
Participate in company-wide events and initiatives related to documentation

💼 Qualifications

Required:
Demonstrated experience writing software documentation using a docs-as-code approach
Hands-on experience with Git
Experience working with CI/CD pipelines
Excellent writing and editing skills
Remote work experience
Strong collaboration and communication abilities
Preferred:
Experience with DevOps or DevSecOps concepts
Familiarity with open-source project documentation
Knowledge of technical writing best practices (e.g., DITA, topic-based authoring)

🌟 What We Offer

Competitive salary: [Pay Range]
Remote work environment
Comprehensive benefits package
Professional development opportunities
Collaborative and inclusive company culture

📍 Location

This is a [remote/hybrid/on-site] position based in [Location].

Hiring Process

Our hiring process is designed to be thorough and fair, giving you the opportunity to showcase your skills and learn more about our team. Here's what you can expect:

Screening Interview

A brief phone or video call to discuss your background and interest in the role.

Work Sample: Documentation Review and Improvement

You'll review and improve a sample of technical documentation, demonstrating your skills in action.

Hiring Manager Interview

An in-depth discussion about your relevant work history and performance in previous roles.

Behavioral Competency Interview

We'll explore specific experiences from your past that relate to key competencies for this role.

Executive Interview

A final interview to assess your fit with our company culture and long-term goals.

We aim to make this process as smooth and transparent as possible. Feel free to ask questions at any stage about the role, our team, or the company.

Ideal Candidate Profile (Internal)

🔑 Role Overview

The Senior Technical Writer will be responsible for elevating our documentation quality and processes. They will work closely with engineering and product teams to create user-friendly, accurate, and comprehensive documentation for our software products.

📊 Essential Behavioral Competencies

Attention to Detail: Meticulously reviews and edits content for accuracy and clarity
Collaborative Mindset: Works effectively with diverse teams and stakeholders
Adaptability: Quickly learns new technologies and adjusts to changing priorities
Problem-Solving: Identifies documentation gaps and proposes effective solutions
Initiative: Proactively suggests and implements improvements to documentation processes

🏆 Example Goals for Role

Reduce documentation-related support tickets by 25% within the first six months
Implement a new topic-based documentation structure for 50% of existing content within one year
Achieve a 90% or higher satisfaction rate on documentation quality surveys from internal and external users
Lead the creation of a comprehensive style guide for the technical writing team within three months
Conduct monthly training sessions for engineers on effective documentation practices

👤 Ideal Candidate Profile

3-5 years of experience in technical writing for software products
Strong understanding of software development lifecycles and DevOps practices
Proven ability to simplify complex technical concepts for various audiences
Experience with documentation tools such as MkDocs, Sphinx, or similar
Excellent project management skills and ability to manage multiple priorities
Passionate about creating user-centric documentation
Comfortable working in a fast-paced, remote environment
Demonstrates curiosity and a continuous learning mindset
[Specific industry experience, if relevant]
[Any additional company-specific requirements]

📞 Screening Interview

Directions for the Interviewer

This initial screening is crucial to quickly assess if a candidate should move forward. Focus on work eligibility, cultural fit, key skills, and performance history. Getting details on past performance early is essential. Ask all candidates the same questions to ensure fair comparisons.

Directions to Share with Candidate

"I'll be asking you some initial questions about your background and experience to determine fit for our Senior Technical Writer role. Please provide concise but thorough answers. Do you have any questions before we begin?"

Interview Questions

1. Are you legally authorized to work in [country] without sponsorship?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Confirm work eligibility status
Any visa or work permit requirements

Possible Follow-up Questions:

When does your current work authorization expire?
Are there any restrictions on your ability to work?

2. Tell me about your most recent technical writing role and the types of documentation you created.

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Relevance of past experience
Complexity of documentation
Tools and processes used

Possible Follow-up Questions:

What was the most challenging documentation project you worked on?
How did you measure the success of your documentation?
Can you provide an example of how you improved documentation quality?

3. Describe your experience with docs-as-code approaches and working with Git.

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Familiarity with docs-as-code concepts
Practical experience with Git
Understanding of version control

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How do you handle merge conflicts in Git?
What's your preferred Git workflow for documentation projects?
Have you contributed to open-source documentation? If so, describe the project.

4. How do you ensure your documentation is clear and user-friendly for various audiences?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Audience analysis techniques
Writing style adaptability
User feedback incorporation

Possible Follow-up Questions:

Can you give an example of how you've tailored documentation for different user groups?
How do you gather and implement user feedback on documentation?
What tools or techniques do you use to assess documentation clarity?

5. Tell me about your experience working in remote or distributed teams.

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Remote work tools and practices
Communication strategies
Self-motivation and time management

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How do you maintain effective communication in a remote setting?
What challenges have you faced working remotely, and how did you overcome them?
How do you stay motivated and productive when working from home?

6. What interests you most about this Senior Technical Writer role at our company?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Knowledge of company/products
Alignment with role expectations
Career motivations

Possible Follow-up Questions:

What do you know about our products and target market?
How does this role fit into your long-term career goals?
What excites you most about technical writing in our industry?

Interview Scorecard

Work Eligibility

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Not eligible to work without sponsorship
2: Eligible with significant restrictions
3: Eligible with minor restrictions
4: Fully eligible without restrictions

Relevant Technical Writing Experience

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: No relevant technical writing experience
2: Some technical writing experience but in unrelated fields
3: 3-5 years of relevant technical writing experience
4: 5+ years of highly relevant technical writing experience

Docs-as-Code and Git Experience

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: No experience with docs-as-code or Git
2: Basic understanding but limited practical experience
3: Solid experience with docs-as-code and Git
4: Expert-level knowledge and extensive experience

User-Focused Writing Skills

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Limited ability to adapt writing for different audiences
2: Some understanding of user-focused writing
3: Strong skills in creating clear, user-friendly documentation
4: Exceptional ability to tailor content for various audiences

Remote Work Experience

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: No remote work experience
2: Limited remote work experience
3: Significant remote work experience with good practices
4: Extensive remote work experience with demonstrated success

Cultural Fit

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Poor alignment with company values and culture
2: Some misalignment with company values and culture
3: Good alignment with company values and culture
4: Excellent alignment and enthusiasm for company culture

Overall Recommendation

1: Strong No Hire
2: No Hire
3: Hire
4: Strong Hire

💻 Work Sample: Documentation Review and Improvement

Directions for the Interviewer

This work sample assesses the candidate's ability to review, critique, and improve existing documentation. Provide the candidate with a sample of technical documentation (e.g., an API guide or user manual section) that contains some intentional issues. Ask them to review it, identify problems, and suggest improvements.

Best practices:

Give the candidate 30-45 minutes to review and improve the documentation
Provide access to any necessary reference materials or style guides
Ask the candidate to explain their thought process and decisions

Directions to Share with Candidate

"For this exercise, you'll review a sample of technical documentation. Your task is to identify any issues with clarity, structure, or technical accuracy, and propose improvements. You'll have 30 minutes to review and edit the document, followed by a 15-minute discussion of your changes. Please think aloud or make notes as you work to help us understand your thought process."

Provide the candidate with:

Sample technical documentation (e.g., API guide section)
Any relevant style guides or reference materials
Access to a computer for editing

Interview Scorecard

Document Analysis

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Fails to identify major issues in the document
2: Identifies some issues but misses key problems
3: Effectively identifies most significant issues
4: Comprehensively analyzes document, finding subtle issues

Improvement Suggestions

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Provides few or unhelpful suggestions
2: Offers basic improvements that partially address issues
3: Proposes effective solutions for most identified problems
4: Suggests innovative, comprehensive improvements

Technical Accuracy

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Introduces technical errors in suggestions
2: Maintains existing technical accuracy without improvement
3: Improves technical accuracy and clarity
4: Significantly enhances technical accuracy and provides valuable insights

User-Centric Approach

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Fails to consider end-user needs
2: Shows some consideration for user experience
3: Consistently applies user-centric improvements
4: Demonstrates exceptional understanding of user needs and applies it throughout

Style Guide Adherence

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Ignores provided style guide
2: Inconsistently applies style guide rules
3: Consistently applies style guide effectively
4: Masterfully applies style guide while suggesting valuable additions

Goal: Reduce documentation-related support tickets by 25% within the first six months

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Implement a new topic-based documentation structure for 50% of existing content within one year

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Achieve a 90% or higher satisfaction rate on documentation quality surveys

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Overall Recommendation

1: Strong No Hire
2: No Hire
3: Hire
4: Strong Hire

👥 Hiring Manager Interview

Directions for the Interviewer

This interview focuses on the candidate's relevant work history and performance. Ask the following questions for each relevant previous role, adapting as needed for time and the number of relevant roles. Ask all questions on the most recent or most relevant role. Probe for specific examples and quantifiable results.

Directions to Share with Candidate

"I'd like to discuss your relevant work experience in more detail. We'll go through each of your previous roles, focusing on your responsibilities, achievements, and lessons learned. Please provide specific examples and metrics where possible."

Interview Questions

1. What were your main responsibilities in this role?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Scope of documentation work
Types of products or technologies documented
Team structure and interactions

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did your responsibilities evolve over time?
What was the most challenging aspect of the role?
How did this role prepare you for your next career step?

2. What were your key performance metrics and how did you perform against them?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Specific documentation targets or goals
Performance relative to peers
Consistency of achievement

Possible Follow-up Questions:

What strategies did you use to consistently meet/exceed your targets?
How did you recover from any periods of underperformance?
What tools or resources were most helpful in tracking and improving your performance?

3. Tell me about your most significant documentation achievement in this role.

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Project scope and complexity
Stakeholders involved
Unique challenges overcome

Possible Follow-up Questions:

What was your specific role in this project?
How did you measure the success of this documentation?
What lessons from this achievement have you applied to subsequent projects?

4. Describe a time when you received critical feedback on your documentation. How did you handle it and what did you learn?

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Ability to accept and act on feedback
Problem-solving approach
Lessons learned and applied

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you incorporate the feedback into your work?
What specific changes did you make to your approach after this experience?
How have you used this experience to mentor or guide others?

Interview Scorecard

Relevant Experience

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Limited relevant technical writing experience
2: Some relevant experience but gaps in key areas
3: Strong relevant experience aligned with role requirements
4: Extensive highly relevant experience exceeding role requirements

Performance History

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Consistently underperformed against targets
2: Occasionally met targets with inconsistent performance
3: Consistently met or exceeded targets
4: Consistently top performer, significantly exceeding targets

Documentation Complexity

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Primarily worked on simple, straightforward documentation
2: Some experience with moderately complex documentation
3: Proven success with complex, technical documentation projects
4: Exceptional track record with highly complex, cutting-edge technical documentation

Learning and Adaptability

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Struggles to adapt or learn from experiences
2: Shows some ability to learn and adapt
3: Demonstrates good self-awareness and applies lessons learned
4: Highly self-aware with clear examples of continuous improvement and adaptation

Goal: Reduce documentation-related support tickets by 25% within the first six months

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Implement a new topic-based documentation structure for 50% of existing content within one year

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Achieve a 90% or higher satisfaction rate on documentation quality surveys

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Overall Recommendation

1: Strong No Hire
2: No Hire
3: Hire
4: Strong Hire

🧠 Behavioral Competency Interview

Directions for the Interviewer

This interview assesses the candidate's behavioral competencies critical for success in the Senior Technical Writer role. Ask all candidates the same questions, probing for specific examples and details about the situation, actions taken, results achieved, and lessons learned. Avoid hypothetical scenarios and focus on past experiences.

Directions to Share with Candidate

"I'll be asking you about specific experiences from your past that relate to key competencies for this role. Please provide detailed examples, including the situation, your actions, the outcomes, and what you learned. Take a moment to think before answering if needed."

Interview Questions

1. Tell me about a time when you had to quickly adapt your documentation approach due to unexpected changes in product features or technology. (Adaptability, Problem-Solving)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Nature of the change and its impact
Process for reassessing the documentation needs
Specific adjustments made to approach
Outcome and lessons learned

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you communicate the changes to stakeholders?
What resources or support did you leverage to adapt quickly?
How has this experience influenced your approach to future documentation projects?

2. Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with a difficult team member or stakeholder to complete a documentation project. How did you handle it? (Collaborative Mindset, Communication Skills)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Nature of the difficulty and its impact on the project
Strategies for improving collaboration
Communication techniques used
Resolution and project outcome

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you identify the root cause of the collaboration issues?
What specific steps did you take to improve the working relationship?
How have you applied lessons from this experience to subsequent team interactions?

3. Give me an example of how you've taken initiative to improve documentation processes or standards in a previous role. (Initiative, Attention to Detail)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Identification of improvement opportunity
Development of solution or new approach
Implementation and change management
Measurable impact on documentation quality or efficiency

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you gain buy-in from leadership and team members?
What challenges did you encounter during implementation and how did you overcome them?
How have you continued to iterate on this improvement over time?

Interview Scorecard

Adaptability

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Struggles to adapt to changing circumstances
2: Can adapt when given clear direction
3: Proactively adjusts approach based on new information
4: Thrives in dynamic environments, driving positive change

Problem-Solving

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Struggles to identify or address documentation challenges
2: Solves straightforward problems with guidance
3: Effectively solves complex documentation issues
4: Innovatively addresses systemic documentation challenges

Collaborative Mindset

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Prefers to work independently, struggles with collaboration
2: Cooperates when required but doesn't seek collaboration
3: Actively collaborates and contributes to team success
4: Excels in collaborative environments, fostering strong partnerships

Communication Skills

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Difficulty expressing ideas clearly or tailoring message
2: Communicates adequately in most situations
3: Articulates ideas clearly and adapts style effectively
4: Exceptional communicator, inspiring and engaging all audiences

Initiative

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Waits for direction, rarely suggests improvements
2: Occasionally suggests ideas when prompted
3: Regularly identifies and acts on improvement opportunities
4: Consistently drives innovation and positive change

Attention to Detail

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Often overlooks important details in documentation
2: Catches most obvious errors but misses subtle issues
3: Consistently produces accurate, high-quality documentation
4: Exhibits exceptional attention to detail, catching and correcting subtle issues

Goal: Reduce documentation-related support tickets by 25% within the first six months

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Implement a new topic-based documentation structure for 50% of existing content within one year

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Achieve a 90% or higher satisfaction rate on documentation quality surveys

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Overall Recommendation

1: Strong No Hire
2: No Hire
3: Hire
4: Strong Hire

👨‍💼 Executive Interview

Directions for the Interviewer

This interview further assesses the candidate's behavioral competencies from a different perspective. Ask all candidates the same questions, probing for specific examples and details about the situation, actions taken, results achieved, and lessons learned. Avoid hypothetical scenarios and focus on past experiences.

Directions to Share with Candidate

Interview Questions

1. Tell me about a time when you had to persuade a skeptical stakeholder to adopt a new documentation approach or tool. How did you approach this challenge? (Influence, Communication Skills)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Initial objections or skepticism
Research and preparation
Tailoring of message and approach
Outcome and follow-up

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you identify the stakeholder's key priorities and concerns?
What evidence or data did you use to support your case?
How has this experience shaped your approach to introducing change in documentation practices?

2. Describe a situation where you had to balance multiple high-priority documentation projects simultaneously. How did you manage your time and priorities? (Organization and Planning, Drive)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Scope and complexity of competing priorities
Strategies for time management and organization
Communication with stakeholders
Results achieved across multiple projects

Possible Follow-up Questions:

What tools or systems do you use to stay organized?
How do you decide when to delegate or seek support?
Can you give an example of a time when you had to make a difficult prioritization decision?

3. Give me an example of how you've contributed to improving your team's documentation processes or standards. What was your approach, and what was the outcome? (Strategic Thinking, Initiative)

Guidance for Interviewer:Areas to Cover:

Identification of improvement opportunity
Development of solution or new approach
Implementation and change management
Measurable impact on team performance

Possible Follow-up Questions:

How did you gain buy-in from leadership and team members?
What challenges did you encounter during implementation and how did you overcome them?
How have you continued to iterate on this improvement over time?

Interview Scorecard

Influence

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Struggles to persuade or influence others
2: Can influence others in straightforward situations
3: Consistently persuades and gains buy-in from stakeholders
4: Masterfully influences at all levels, driving consensus and action

Communication Skills

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Difficulty expressing ideas clearly or tailoring message
2: Communicates adequately in most situations
3: Articulates ideas clearly and adapts style effectively
4: Exceptional communicator, inspiring and engaging all audiences

Organization and Planning

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Often disorganized or reactive in approach
2: Basic organization with some proactive planning
3: Well-organized with effective prioritization and planning
4: Exceptionally organized, optimizing processes for maximum efficiency

Drive

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Lacks self-motivation or sense of urgency
2: Meets basic expectations with some prompting
3: Consistently self-motivated to exceed goals
4: Demonstrates exceptional drive, inspiring others through example

Strategic Thinking

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Focuses primarily on short-term, tactical execution
2: Demonstrates some longer-term planning
3: Develops comprehensive strategies aligned with business goals
4: Creates innovative, forward-thinking approaches to documentation

Initiative

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Waits for direction, rarely suggests improvements
2: Occasionally suggests ideas when prompted
3: Regularly identifies and acts on improvement opportunities
4: Consistently drives innovation and positive change in documentation practices

Goal: Reduce documentation-related support tickets by 25% within the first six months

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Implement a new topic-based documentation structure for 50% of existing content within one year

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Goal: Achieve a 90% or higher satisfaction rate on documentation quality surveys

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Unlikely to Achieve Goal
2: Likely to Partially Achieve Goal
3: Likely to Achieve Goal
4: Likely to Exceed Goal

Overall Recommendation

1: Strong No Hire
2: No Hire
3: Hire
4: Strong Hire

Debrief Meeting

Directions for Conducting the Debrief Meeting

The Debrief Meeting is an open discussion for the hiring team members to share the information learned during the candidate interviews. Use the questions below to guide the discussion.

Start the meeting by reviewing the requirements for the Senior Technical Writer role and the key competencies and goals to succeed.

The meeting leader should strive to create an environment where it is okay to express opinions about the candidate that differ from the consensus or the leadership's opinions.

Scores and interview notes are important data points but should not be the sole factor in making the final decision.

Any hiring team member should feel free to change their recommendation as they learn new information and reflect on what they've learned.

Debrief Meeting Questions

Does anyone have any questions for the other interviewers about the candidate?

Guidance: The meeting facilitator should initially present themselves as neutral and try not to sway the conversation before others have a chance to speak up.

Are there any additional comments about the Candidate?

Guidance: This is an opportunity for all the interviewers to share anything they learned that is important for the other interviewers to know.

Based on the candidate's performance in the work sample, how well do you think they would be able to improve our existing documentation?

Guidance: Discuss the candidate's approach to the documentation review and improvement exercise, focusing on their ability to identify issues and propose effective solutions.

How well do you think the candidate's experience aligns with our documentation needs and goals?

Guidance: Consider the candidate's past projects and achievements in relation to our specific documentation challenges and objectives.

Is there anything further we need to investigate before making a decision?

Guidance: Based on this discussion, you may decide to probe further on certain issues with the candidate or explore specific issues in the reference calls.

Has anyone changed their hire/no-hire recommendation?

Guidance: This is an opportunity for the interviewers to change their recommendation from the new information they learned in this meeting.

If the consensus is no hire, should the candidate be considered for other roles? If so, what roles?

Guidance: Discuss whether engaging with the candidate about a different role would be worthwhile.

What are the next steps?

Guidance: If there is no consensus, follow the process for that situation (e.g., it is the hiring manager's decision). Further investigation may be needed before making the decision. If there is a consensus on hiring, reference checks could be the next step.

Reference Checks

Directions for Conducting Reference Checks

When conducting reference checks, aim to speak with former managers or colleagues who have directly worked with the candidate on relevant projects. Explain the role we're considering the candidate for and ask for honest feedback. Be sure to listen for nuances in tone and hesitations that might indicate areas to probe further.

Reference Check Questions

In what capacity did you work with [Candidate Name], and for how long?

Guidance: This helps establish the context of the relationship and the relevance of the reference's feedback.

Can you describe [Candidate Name]'s role and primary responsibilities when you worked together?

Guidance: Compare this information with what the candidate shared during interviews to verify consistency.

How would you rate [Candidate Name]'s technical writing skills, particularly in terms of clarity, accuracy, and ability to explain complex concepts?

Guidance: Listen for specific examples that demonstrate the candidate's writing abilities and how they compare to other technical writers.

Can you give an example of a particularly challenging documentation project [Candidate Name] worked on? How did they approach it, and what was the outcome?

Guidance: This question helps assess the candidate's problem-solving skills and ability to handle complex documentation tasks.

How well did [Candidate Name] collaborate with other team members, particularly engineers and product managers?

Guidance: Effective collaboration is crucial for a Senior Technical Writer, so pay attention to specific examples of teamwork and communication skills.

What areas of improvement or development would you suggest for [Candidate Name]?

Guidance: This question can reveal potential weaknesses or growth areas that may not have been apparent during the interviews.

On a scale of 1-10, how likely would you be to hire [Candidate Name] for a Senior Technical Writer role if you had the opportunity? Why?

Guidance: This question provides a quantifiable measure of the reference's overall impression and can lead to valuable insights about the candidate's strengths and weaknesses.

Reference Check Scorecard

Technical Writing Skills

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Below expectations for a senior role
2: Meets some expectations but inconsistent
3: Consistently meets expectations for a senior role
4: Exceeds expectations, recognized as an exceptional writer

Problem-Solving and Handling Complex Projects

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Struggles with complex documentation challenges
2: Can handle routine challenges but needs support on complex issues
3: Effectively solves complex documentation problems
4: Excels at tackling the most challenging documentation projects

Collaboration and Communication

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Often encounters difficulties working with others
2: Collaborates adequately but with some room for improvement
3: Collaborates effectively with various stakeholders
4: Exceptional collaborator, builds strong relationships across teams

Initiative and Continuous Improvement

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Rarely takes initiative or suggests improvements
2: Occasionally suggests improvements when prompted
3: Regularly identifies and implements process improvements
4: Consistently drives innovation in documentation practices

Overall Recommendation from Reference

0: Not Enough Information Gathered to Evaluate
1: Would not recommend hiring (1-3 on scale)
2: Lukewarm recommendation (4-6 on scale)
3: Would recommend hiring (7-8 on scale)
4: Highly enthusiastic recommendation (9-10 on scale)

FAQ

Q: How long should each interview typically take?

The screening interview should take 20-30 minutes. The work sample exercise should be allotted 45-60 minutes. The hiring manager and behavioral competency interviews should each last 45-60 minutes. Allow some buffer time between interviews.

Q: What if a candidate doesn't have experience with all the required technical skills?

Focus on the candidate's ability to learn and adapt. Look for transferable skills and a track record of quickly picking up new technologies. You can use the work sample to assess how they approach unfamiliar tasks.

Q: How should we handle remote interviews?

Ensure you have a reliable video conferencing platform. Test the connection before the interview. For the work sample, use screen sharing or collaborative editing tools. Be prepared with backup communication methods in case of technical issues.

Q: What if we need to customize the interview questions?

Feel free to adapt the questions to better fit your specific needs, but maintain the focus on behavioral competencies and past experiences. You can find alternative questions in our interview questions database.

Q: How do we ensure consistency across different interviewers?

Use this guide as a standard reference for all interviewers. Hold a pre-interview briefing to align on expectations and scoring criteria. Conduct regular calibration sessions to ensure everyone is evaluating candidates similarly.

Q: What should we do if there's disagreement among interviewers about a candidate?

Use the debrief meeting to discuss differing perspectives. Focus on specific examples and scores rather than general impressions. If necessary, conduct additional reference checks or a follow-up interview to address areas of concern.

Q: What if a candidate doesn't have traditional technical writing experience but shows strong potential?

Consider their transferable skills and overall fit with the role's competencies. The work sample can be particularly valuable in assessing their ability to perform the job tasks. You may also consider offering a paid trial project if you're unsure.

Q: How do we balance technical skills assessment with evaluating soft skills?

The interview guide is designed to cover both areas. The work sample and some targeted questions assess technical skills, while behavioral questions evaluate soft skills. Remember that both are crucial for success in this role.

Q: What's the best way to provide feedback to candidates who aren't selected?

Offer constructive, specific feedback based on the interview scorecard. Focus on areas for improvement rather than personal characteristics. Be respectful and thank them for their time and interest.

For more guidance on conducting effective interviews, check out our blog post on how to conduct a job interview.

Was this interview guide helpful? You can build, edit, and use interview guides like this with your hiring team with Yardstick. Sign up for Yardstick and get started for free.