Accessibility Awareness is the conscious understanding and application of inclusive design principles to ensure products, services, and environments can be effectively used by people of all abilities. In the workplace, it manifests as an ongoing commitment to identifying and removing barriers that might prevent equal access and participation for individuals with disabilities.

What makes Accessibility Awareness essential in today's workplace extends beyond compliance with regulations like the ADA or WCAG guidelines. It reflects an organization's commitment to inclusivity and recognizes the business value of designing for all users. Professionals with strong Accessibility Awareness consider diverse perspectives, anticipate potential barriers, and proactively work to create inclusive solutions. This competency encompasses several dimensions: knowledge of accessibility standards, empathy for different user experiences, technical understanding of assistive technologies, advocacy skills, and the ability to balance accessibility requirements with other business priorities.

When evaluating candidates for Accessibility Awareness, interviewers should look for evidence of both knowledge and practical application. The best indicators come from specific examples that demonstrate how candidates have identified accessibility issues, implemented solutions, advocated for inclusive practices, and continuously expanded their understanding of accessibility needs. Through behavioral interview questions, you can assess a candidate's approach to accessibility challenges and their commitment to creating inclusive environments.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you advocated for accessibility improvements in a project or workplace.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific accessibility issue or gap the candidate identified
• How they recognized the importance of addressing this issue
• The approach they took to advocate for the change
• Obstacles they faced and how they overcame them
• The outcome of their advocacy efforts
• Impact on users with disabilities
• Lessons learned about effective advocacy

Follow-Up Questions:

• What research or evidence did you use to support your case for accessibility improvements?
• How did you handle any resistance or pushback you encountered?
• How did you measure the success or impact of the accessibility improvements?
• Looking back, is there anything you would do differently in your approach?

Describe a situation where you had to balance accessibility requirements with other project constraints such as timelines or budgets.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific project context and accessibility considerations
• Competing priorities or constraints they faced
• Their decision-making process and criteria
• How they communicated trade-offs to stakeholders
• The compromise or solution they reached
• Long-term impact of decisions made
• How they ensured accessibility wasn't completely sacrificed

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prioritize which accessibility features were non-negotiable versus those that could be implemented later?
• What strategies did you use to make the case for accessibility despite constraints?
• How did you ensure the final solution still met minimum accessibility standards?
• What would you do differently if faced with similar constraints in the future?

Share an example of how you've educated colleagues or stakeholders about the importance of accessibility.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and why education was needed
• The specific knowledge gap they identified
• Their approach to sharing information
• Methods or resources they used
• How they made the information relevant to their audience
• Response from colleagues or stakeholders
• Long-term impact on team awareness and practices

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you tailor your message for different stakeholders?
• What challenges did you face in helping others understand accessibility concepts?
• How did you measure whether your educational efforts were successful?
• What ongoing support did you provide after the initial education?

Tell me about a time when you discovered an accessibility barrier in a product, service, or environment. How did you address it?

Areas to Cover:

• How they identified the accessibility barrier
• Their process for understanding the impact on users
• The specific solution they developed or implemented
• Resources or expertise they leveraged
• Challenges encountered during implementation
• Results of their solution
• Measures taken to prevent similar issues in the future

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you validate that your solution effectively addressed the barrier?
• What considerations went into prioritizing this particular accessibility issue?
• What did you learn about accessibility from this experience?
• How did you incorporate what you learned into future work?

Describe a situation where you had to consider accessibility needs for a specific disability that you weren't previously familiar with.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the specific disability considerations
• How they recognized their knowledge gap
• Research methods and resources they used
• People or experts they consulted
• How they applied what they learned
• Challenges in understanding and implementing appropriate accommodations
• Impact on their broader understanding of accessibility

Follow-Up Questions:

• What surprised you most about what you learned?
• How did this experience change your approach to accessibility?
• What resources did you find most valuable in building your understanding?
• How have you applied this knowledge to other situations since then?

Share an example of how you've incorporated accessibility considerations into the early stages of a project or design process.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific project and their role
• When and how they introduced accessibility considerations
• Methods or tools used to evaluate accessibility early on
• Stakeholders they involved in the process
• How early consideration affected the final outcome
• Challenges in implementing "accessibility by design"
• Benefits realized from this proactive approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific accessibility checks or criteria did you build into the process?
• How did you ensure accessibility remained a priority throughout the project lifecycle?
• What resistance did you encounter to incorporating accessibility early, and how did you address it?
• How did this approach compare to projects where accessibility was considered later?

Tell me about a time when you received feedback that something you created or implemented wasn't accessible. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the accessibility issue identified
• Their initial reaction to the feedback
• Steps taken to understand the problem more deeply
• How they addressed the issue
• Changes made to their process to prevent similar oversights
• What they learned from the experience
• How they followed up with the person who provided feedback

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about receiving this feedback?
• How did this experience change your approach to testing for accessibility?
• What systems or checks did you put in place afterward?
• How did you thank or acknowledge the person who pointed out the issue?

Describe a situation where you had to make a business case for investing in accessibility improvements.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific accessibility improvements needed
• Business context and constraints
• Data and arguments they gathered
• How they framed accessibility in terms of business value
• The presentation or pitch they developed
• Response from decision-makers
• Outcome and implementation details
• Lessons about effective persuasion

Follow-Up Questions:

• What metrics or examples did you find most persuasive in building your case?
• How did you address concerns about ROI or resource allocation?
• What unexpected benefits came from implementing these accessibility improvements?
• How has this experience informed how you advocate for accessibility resources in other contexts?

Tell me about a time when you had to learn about a new accessibility standard, technology, or best practice and apply it to your work.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific standard or technology they needed to learn
• Their motivation or the context requiring this learning
• Resources and methods used to build knowledge
• Challenges in understanding or implementing new concepts
• How they applied what they learned
• Impact on project outcomes
• How they shared their new knowledge with others

Follow-Up Questions:

• What strategies did you use to quickly get up to speed on this new information?
• What aspects were most difficult to understand or implement?
• How did you validate that you were correctly applying the new standard or technology?
• How has this knowledge continued to benefit your work?

Share an example of how you've tested or evaluated the accessibility of a product, service, or environment.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context and what was being evaluated
• Testing methodology and tools they used
• Whether they involved users with disabilities
• Key findings from the evaluation
• How they documented and communicated results
• Recommendations they made based on findings
• Implementation of improvements
• Lessons learned about effective accessibility testing

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which aspects to test and which testing methods to use?
• What surprised you most during the testing process?
• How did you prioritize the issues you discovered?
• If you had limited resources, how would you modify your testing approach?

Describe a time when you had to retrofit accessibility features into an existing product or system that wasn't originally designed with accessibility in mind.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific product or system and its accessibility gaps
• Constraints and challenges of working with existing architecture
• Their approach to assessment and planning
• Prioritization of improvements
• Technical or design solutions implemented
• Stakeholder management during the process
• Results achieved and limitations
• Lessons for future projects

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the biggest technical or organizational challenges you faced?
• How did you prioritize which accessibility issues to address first?
• What compromises did you have to make due to the existing architecture?
• How did this experience inform how you approach new projects from an accessibility standpoint?

Tell me about a time when you identified an opportunity to go beyond minimum accessibility requirements to create a more inclusive experience.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and specific opportunity they identified
• Their inspiration or motivation for exceeding requirements
• Additional features or considerations they implemented
• Resources or support needed
• Response from users with disabilities
• Business or organizational impact
• How they measured success
• Lessons about meaningful inclusion versus compliance

Follow-Up Questions:

• What inspired you to go beyond the minimum requirements?
• How did you justify the additional resources or effort required?
• What unexpected benefits came from this enhanced approach?
• How has this experience shaped your perspective on accessibility standards?

Share an example of how you've collaborated with people with disabilities to improve accessibility.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the collaboration
• How the partnership was established
• Specific insights gained from people with disabilities
• Changes made based on their input
• Challenges in the collaborative process
• Impact on the final product or service
• How this collaboration affected their understanding of accessibility
• Ongoing relationships developed

Follow-Up Questions:

• What surprised you most about what you learned from this collaboration?
• How did you ensure participants felt their contributions were valued and respected?
• What methods did you use to incorporate diverse perspectives?
• How has this experience changed how you approach accessibility in your work?

Describe a situation where you needed to ensure digital content was accessible to people with various disabilities.

Areas to Cover:

• The type of content and intended audience
• Specific accessibility considerations for different disabilities
• Standards or guidelines they followed
• Tools or techniques used to create accessible content
• Challenges encountered in the process
• Testing methods used to verify accessibility
• User feedback received
• Lessons about creating universally accessible content

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance creative or design goals with accessibility requirements?
• What was most challenging about making this content accessible?
• Which tools or resources did you find most helpful?
• How did you ensure content remained accessible when updated?

Tell me about a time when you had to quickly address an accessibility issue that was affecting users.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the accessibility issue and its impact
• How it was discovered or reported
• Their initial response and prioritization
• Steps taken to implement a solution
• Resources or support they mobilized
• Communication with affected users
• Long-term fixes implemented
• Preventative measures established

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance the need for a quick solution with ensuring quality?
• What communication strategies did you use to keep stakeholders informed?
• How did you follow up with the users who were experiencing the issue?
• What systems did you put in place to catch similar issues earlier in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical scenarios when assessing accessibility awareness?

Behavioral questions reveal a candidate's actual experience with accessibility challenges rather than their theoretical knowledge. Past behavior is the best predictor of future performance. When candidates describe real situations, you get insight into their practical knowledge, problem-solving approach, and commitment to accessibility—not just what they think the "right answer" is. Their stories also reveal whether they've truly engaged with accessibility or are simply familiar with the concepts.

How can I tell if a candidate has genuine passion for accessibility versus just checking compliance boxes?

Look for indicators in their responses that go beyond minimum requirements. Candidates with genuine passion will talk about the people impacted by their work, share stories of advocacy even when it wasn't their primary responsibility, discuss continuous learning about accessibility, and frame accessibility as an opportunity rather than an obligation. They'll also tend to discuss accessibility in human terms rather than just technical specifications.

What's the best way to use follow-up questions effectively during accessibility awareness interviews?

Start with broad behavioral questions, then use follow-ups to probe specific aspects of their experience. If a candidate gives a vague answer, ask for specific examples. If they focus only on technical implementation, ask about user impact. If they describe a success, ask about challenges faced. Good follow-ups might include: "How did you measure success?", "What would you do differently now?", or "How did this change your approach going forward?" These questions reveal depth of experience and reflective thinking.

How do I assess accessibility awareness in candidates for non-technical roles?

For non-technical roles, focus questions on awareness, advocacy, and process integration rather than technical implementation. Ask about how they've considered diverse user needs in their work, times they've collaborated with technical teams on accessibility, how they've incorporated accessibility checkpoints into workflows, or how they've advocated for accessible practices. The principles of inclusion and empathy for users with disabilities are relevant across all roles, even when technical knowledge varies.

How many accessibility-focused questions should I include in an interview?

If accessibility is a core competency for the role, include 3-4 behavioral questions focused on different aspects of accessibility awareness (implementation, advocacy, problem-solving, continuous learning). This provides enough data points for evaluation without dominating the interview. For roles where accessibility is important but not central, 1-2 well-chosen questions with thorough follow-up can provide sufficient insight while balancing other competency assessments.

Interested in a full interview guide with Accessibility Awareness as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.