Engineering environments often demand more than just technical expertise—they require courage: the ability to take calculated risks, speak up about concerns, challenge assumptions, and persist through uncertainty. Courage in engineering contexts is defined as the willingness to take appropriate risks and advocate for technical excellence despite potential personal or professional consequences. This trait is essential for driving innovation, maintaining quality standards, and ensuring ethical considerations remain at the forefront of technical decision-making.

In today's rapidly evolving technical landscape, courage manifests in different ways across engineering roles. Junior engineers might demonstrate courage by asking clarifying questions or admitting knowledge gaps, while senior engineers may need to challenge established architectures or make high-stakes decisions with incomplete information. From speaking up about potential safety concerns to proposing innovative but untested solutions, courage empowers engineers to prioritize long-term quality over short-term comfort.

When evaluating candidates for engineering positions, it's crucial to look beyond technical proficiency to assess how they've demonstrated courage in previous roles. Behavioral interview questions focused on past situations provide meaningful insights into a candidate's authentic responses to challenges. By encouraging candidates to share specific examples where they've exhibited courage, you can gain valuable perspective on how they might approach similar situations within your organization.

To effectively assess courage during interviews, listen for specific details rather than general statements. Use follow-up questions to explore the reasoning behind candidates' actions, the risks they considered, and the outcomes they achieved. Remember that structured interviews with consistent questions across candidates will provide the most objective assessment of this critical trait for your engineering roles.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a significant flaw or vulnerability in a technical system or design that others had overlooked or weren't addressing.

Areas to Cover:

• How the candidate discovered or recognized the issue
• The potential impact of the flaw if left unaddressed
• How they approached communicating this information to stakeholders
• Any resistance or challenges they faced when raising the concern
• The steps they took to validate their concerns before raising them
• The outcome of the situation and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you confident enough to speak up about this issue?
• How did you prepare to communicate this concern to others?
• What risks did you consider before raising this issue?
• Looking back, would you have approached the situation differently?

Describe a situation where you had to advocate for a technical decision or approach that was unpopular or went against conventional wisdom in your team or organization.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical decision they advocated for
• Their reasoning and the evidence that supported their position
• How they communicated their perspective to stakeholders
• The resistance or pushback they encountered
• How they maintained their position while remaining respectful
• The ultimate outcome of the situation
• How this experience affected their approach to similar situations since

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you the confidence to maintain your position despite the pushback?
• How did you balance being persistent about your idea while remaining open to feedback?
• Were there any relationship dynamics you had to be mindful of in this situation?
• What would you have done if your approach had ultimately been rejected?

Tell me about a time when you took responsibility for a technical failure or mistake that you or your team made.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and scope of the failure or mistake
• Their role in the situation
• How they recognized and acknowledged the issue
• The steps they took to address the immediate problem
• How they communicated about the mistake to stakeholders
• What they learned from the experience
• How they applied those lessons to future work

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most challenging aspect of taking responsibility in this situation?
• How did others respond to your willingness to take ownership?
• What systems or processes did you implement to prevent similar issues in the future?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to risk and failure?

Share an example of when you had to make an important technical decision with incomplete information or under significant time pressure.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• The constraints they were operating under
• Their process for evaluating options with limited information
• How they managed the uncertainty and risk
• The rationale behind their final decision
• The outcome of the decision
• How they handled any consequences

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles guided your decision-making process?
• How did you communicate the uncertainty to stakeholders?
• What contingency plans did you develop?
• How did this experience change your approach to decision-making under pressure?

Describe a situation where you challenged a senior leader or client about a technical direction that you believed was flawed.

Areas to Cover:

• The technical issue at stake and why they believed the direction was problematic
• The power dynamic involved and how they navigated it
• How they prepared for the conversation
• Their approach to communicating their concerns constructively
• The response they received
• The resolution of the situation
• Any relationship impacts and how they managed them

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this situation important enough to speak up despite the potential risks?
• How did you frame your concerns to maximize receptiveness?
• What would you have done if your concerns continued to be dismissed?
• How did this experience shape your approach to similar situations?

Tell me about a time when you proposed or implemented an innovative technical solution that others considered too risky.

Areas to Cover:

• The problem they were trying to solve
• Their innovative approach and why it was considered risky
• How they evaluated and mitigated the potential risks
• Their strategy for gaining buy-in from stakeholders
• The implementation process and challenges
• The ultimate outcome of the solution
• Lessons learned about innovation and risk management

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance innovation with practical constraints?
• What contingency plans did you have in place?
• How did you respond to skepticism from others?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation today?

Share an example of when you had to admit you didn't know something important in a high-stakes engineering context.

Areas to Cover:

• The situation and why admitting knowledge gaps was difficult
• How they approached acknowledging their limitations
• The steps they took to address the knowledge gap
• How others responded to their honesty
• The impact on the project or work
• How they balanced humility with maintaining credibility
• What they learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this situation particularly challenging for admitting uncertainty?
• How did you go about finding the information or expertise you needed?
• How has this experience affected how you handle knowledge gaps now?
• What advice would you give to junior engineers about handling similar situations?

Describe a situation where you identified a significant ethical concern in a technical project or product.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the ethical concern they identified
• How they discovered or recognized the issue
• The potential impacts if the issue remained unaddressed
• Their process for evaluating the ethical dimensions
• How they raised the concern and to whom
• Any resistance they encountered
• The resolution of the situation
• The personal and professional impact of taking this stand

Follow-Up Questions:

• What ethical frameworks or principles guided your thinking?
• How did you balance business objectives with ethical considerations?
• What would you have done if the organization had decided to proceed despite your concerns?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to ethical considerations in your work?

Tell me about a time when you continued to pursue a technical solution or project despite facing significant setbacks or failures along the way.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the project and its importance
• The specific setbacks or failures encountered
• Their emotional and practical response to these challenges
• How they assessed whether to continue or pivot
• The strategies they used to overcome obstacles
• How they maintained motivation and momentum
• The ultimate outcome and key takeaways

Follow-Up Questions:

• What kept you motivated despite the setbacks?
• How did you distinguish between persistence and stubbornness?
• How did you manage stakeholder expectations during this difficult period?
• What did this experience teach you about resilience in technical work?

Share an example of when you had to push back on scope or timeline expectations to maintain technical quality or team well-being.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the project and the original expectations
• Why they felt the expectations were unrealistic or problematic
• How they evaluated the tradeoffs involved
• Their approach to communicating concerns to stakeholders
• Data or evidence they used to support their position
• The negotiation process and outcome
• The impact on the project, product quality, and team

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for potentially difficult conversations?
• What alternative solutions did you propose?
• How did you balance business needs with technical quality considerations?
• What would you do differently in a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you experimented with a new technology or approach that was outside your comfort zone.

Areas to Cover:

• What motivated them to explore this new territory
• The challenges and uncertainties they faced
• How they navigated the learning process
• Any setbacks encountered and how they overcame them
• Support or resources they sought out
• The outcome of the experiment
• How this experience affected their approach to learning and risk-taking

Follow-Up Questions:

• What strategies did you use to learn quickly in this unfamiliar area?
• How did you manage the risk of failure while experimenting?
• How did you determine when to persist versus when to pivot?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to professional growth?

Describe a situation where you had to defend a team member's work or idea when others were criticizing it.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the situation and the criticism being raised
• Why they felt compelled to defend their colleague
• How they evaluated the merits of both the criticism and the original work
• Their approach to the conversation
• How they balanced team loyalty with objective assessment
• The outcome of the situation
• The impact on team dynamics and relationships

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure your defense was seen as objective rather than just loyalty?
• What risks did you consider before speaking up?
• How did your colleague respond to your support?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a technical decision that required balancing conflicting priorities or requirements.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific decision and why it involved conflicting priorities
• The key stakeholders and their different interests
• How they gathered information about the various priorities
• Their process for evaluating tradeoffs
• How they communicated their thinking to stakeholders
• The ultimate decision and its rationale
• The outcomes and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What principles or frameworks did you use to evaluate the tradeoffs?
• How did you ensure all perspectives were adequately considered?
• How did you communicate your decision, especially to those whose priorities weren't prioritized?
• What would you do differently if faced with similar conflicts today?

Share an example of when you raised concerns about technical debt or maintenance issues when others wanted to focus solely on new features.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical debt issues they identified
• The context and business pressures toward new features
• How they quantified or explained the impact of the technical debt
• Their strategy for advocating for maintenance work
• The stakeholders involved and their perspectives
• The resolution or compromise reached
• The long-term impact of their advocacy

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you make the invisible costs of technical debt visible to stakeholders?
• What metrics or evidence did you use to support your position?
• How did you propose balancing new development with necessary maintenance?
• What have you learned about effectively advocating for technical quality?

Describe a situation where you had to make a significant engineering decision that had business or user experience tradeoffs.

Areas to Cover:

• The decision and its context
• The technical options they were considering
• The business or user experience implications
• How they evaluated different perspectives
• The process for gathering input from relevant stakeholders
• Their ultimate decision and rationale
• The outcome and what they learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you incorporate non-technical perspectives into your decision-making?
• What frameworks or principles guided your evaluation of tradeoffs?
• How did you communicate your decision to non-technical stakeholders?
• What would you do differently if making a similar decision today?

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you differentiate between healthy courage and recklessness in engineering candidates?

In engineering contexts, healthy courage involves calculated risk-taking backed by research and consideration of consequences, while recklessness lacks this thoughtful evaluation. Listen for how candidates weigh tradeoffs, consider contingency plans, and validate their ideas before taking action. Courageous engineers can articulate their decision-making process and demonstrate learning from both successes and failures.

Should I evaluate courage differently for junior versus senior engineering candidates?

Yes, absolutely. Junior engineers might demonstrate courage through asking challenging questions, admitting knowledge gaps, or taking on difficult learning opportunities. Senior engineers should show examples of making consequential decisions, challenging organizational direction when necessary, or taking ownership of significant technical strategies. Adjust your expectations based on the scope of responsibility appropriate for each career stage.

How can I ensure my evaluation of courage isn't biased toward more extroverted candidates?

Focus on outcomes and actions rather than communication style. Courage manifests differently across personality types—some engineers demonstrate courage through thoughtful written documentation of concerns, others through persistent one-on-one conversations, and some in group settings. Allow candidates to describe their approach in their own terms, and probe for the thinking process behind their actions rather than evaluating the boldness of their delivery.

How many courage-focused questions should I include in an engineering interview?

For most engineering roles, include 2-3 courage-focused questions within your broader interview plan. Courage is an important trait but should be balanced with technical competence, problem-solving ability, and collaboration skills. If courage is particularly critical for a role (e.g., a senior engineer who will need to drive significant technical changes), you might include more questions in this area.

What red flags should I watch for when assessing courage in engineering candidates?

Watch for candidates who confuse courage with combativeness, describe situations where they persisted without learning or adapting, or show disregard for legitimate concerns from others. Also be cautious of candidates who only demonstrate courage in low-stakes situations or who can't provide specific examples of taking meaningful professional risks. True courage in engineering involves thoughtful risk-taking and standing up for what's right while maintaining respect for others.

Interested in a full interview guide with Assessing Courage in Engineering Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.