Curiosity in engineering roles is the intrinsic desire to explore, understand, and solve problems through questioning, experimentation, and continuous learning. It's a fundamental trait that drives engineers to dig beneath surface-level understanding, challenge assumptions, and pursue knowledge beyond immediate requirements.

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, curious engineers are invaluable assets to organizations. They're naturally inclined to stay current with emerging technologies, question established practices, and discover innovative solutions. When evaluating engineering candidates, assessing curiosity helps identify those who will contribute not just technical skills, but also the intellectual drive that fuels innovation and growth.

Curious engineers demonstrate several distinct behaviors: they ask thoughtful questions that probe beyond the obvious, they eagerly explore unfamiliar technologies or approaches, they pursue knowledge and skills beyond job requirements, and they show genuine enthusiasm when discussing technical challenges. They're often the ones who discover elegant solutions to complex problems because they're willing to investigate thoroughly rather than applying quick fixes.

To effectively evaluate curiosity during interviews, focus on eliciting specific examples from candidates' past experiences. Listen for details about how they've pursued knowledge independently, tackled difficult problems, or explored new technologies. The best indicators come from their actions rather than their claims, so use follow-up questions to dig deeper into their specific behaviors and thought processes. As you'll see in the interview questions below, assessing curiosity requires going beyond surface-level responses to understand the candidate's authentic drive for learning and exploration.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you encountered a technical concept or system you didn't understand, and how you went about learning it.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical concept or system they needed to learn
• Their motivation for learning it (requirement vs. personal interest)
• The approach they took to gain understanding
• Resources they utilized (documentation, courses, mentors, experimentation)
• Challenges they faced during the learning process
• How they applied what they learned
• How this experience affected their approach to learning new things

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you choose that particular approach to learning rather than alternatives?
• How did you verify that you truly understood the concept?
• What would you do differently if you had to learn that same concept again?
• How has this experience influenced the way you approach unfamiliar technologies now?

Describe a project where you went beyond the original requirements to deliver a better solution. What motivated you to do the extra work?

Areas to Cover:

• The original scope and requirements of the project
• What specifically they did beyond requirements
• Their motivations for exceeding expectations
• How they identified the opportunity for improvement
• The research or learning they undertook to enable the enhancement
• The impact of their additional contribution
• How the team or stakeholders responded to their initiative

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance the extra exploration with meeting deadlines?
• What specific insights led you to identify this opportunity for improvement?
• Were there any risks involved in going beyond the requirements? How did you manage them?
• What did you learn from this experience that you've applied to other projects?

Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a standard approach or established practice in your field. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific practice or approach they questioned
• Why they found it problematic or suboptimal
• The research they did to validate their concerns
• How they communicated their perspective to others
• The alternative approach they proposed or implemented
• How they balanced respect for established practices with innovation
• The outcome of challenging the standard approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially triggered your skepticism about the standard approach?
• How did you research alternatives? What sources did you consult?
• How did you present your alternative ideas to the team or stakeholders?
• How did this experience shape your approach to evaluating established practices now?

Share an example of a technical problem you faced where the obvious solution didn't work. How did you approach finding an alternative?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the technical problem they encountered
• Why the obvious or initial solution was inadequate
• Their process for identifying and evaluating alternatives
• Resources they consulted or people they collaborated with
• How they tested different approaches
• What they learned through the process
• The ultimate resolution and its effectiveness

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you realize you needed a different approach?
• How did you decide which alternative solutions to explore first?
• What was the most surprising thing you learned while solving this problem?
• How has this experience influenced your problem-solving approach on subsequent projects?

Describe a time when you taught yourself a new technical skill that wasn't required for your job. What motivated you, and how did you go about learning it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific skill they chose to learn
• Their motivation for pursuing this skill independently
• The learning approach and resources they utilized
• How they practiced or applied the new skill
• Challenges they encountered in the self-learning process
• How they measured their progress or proficiency
• Whether and how they've applied this skill professionally

Follow-Up Questions:

• Why did you choose this particular skill to develop rather than others?
• How did you stay motivated throughout the learning process?
• How did you find time to pursue this learning alongside your regular responsibilities?
• Have you continued to develop this skill? Why or why not?

Tell me about a time when you discovered a bug or issue that wasn't obvious or easy to find. What led you to discover it?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the system or project where they found the issue
• Initial symptoms or indicators that something was wrong
• Their investigation process and thinking
• Tools or techniques they used to diagnose the problem
• How they verified the root cause
• The solution they implemented
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you pursue this particular issue when it wasn't immediately obvious?
• What hypotheses did you form during your investigation, and how did you test them?
• Were there any assumptions you had to challenge to find the root cause?
• How did this experience change how you approach debugging or troubleshooting now?

Describe a situation where you had to understand a complex codebase or system that was new to you. How did you approach making sense of it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and complexity of the codebase or system
• Their strategy for building understanding
• Tools or techniques they used to aid comprehension
• How they prioritized what to learn first
• Challenges they faced in the process
• How they validated their understanding
• The time it took to achieve sufficient understanding

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most effective technique you used to understand the system?
• How did you identify the most important components to focus on first?
• What surprised you most once you understood how the system worked?
• How would you approach a similar situation differently in the future?

Tell me about a time when you contributed to an open-source project or community. What motivated you to get involved, and what did you contribute?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific project or community they contributed to
• Their motivation for participating
• The nature of their contribution (code, documentation, support, etc.)
• How they identified what to contribute
• The process of making their contribution
• Feedback or response from the community
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you select this particular project to contribute to?
• What challenges did you face when making your contribution?
• How did you navigate the project's standards and contribution guidelines?
• Has this experience influenced your approach to your own work or projects? How?

Share an example of when you explored a technology or tool that wasn't commonly used in your organization. What prompted you to look into it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technology or tool they explored
• What sparked their interest in this particular technology
• How they researched and evaluated it
• Any proof of concept or testing they conducted
• How they assessed its potential value for their organization
• Whether and how they advocated for its adoption
• The outcome of their exploration

Follow-Up Questions:

• What potential benefits did you see in this technology that others might have missed?
• How did you balance exploration of this new technology with your regular responsibilities?
• How did you validate that this technology would be valuable in your specific context?
• How did you share your findings with others in your organization?

Describe a time when you were fascinated by an engineering or technical concept and dove deep into understanding it. What drew you to that particular topic?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific concept or topic that fascinated them
• What initially sparked their interest
• How they pursued deeper understanding
• Resources they used for learning
• How deeply they explored the topic
• Whether and how they applied their knowledge
• How this learning experience compared to others

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was it about this particular concept that captivated your interest?
• At what point did you consider yourself knowledgeable about the topic?
• Did your understanding of this concept change your perspective on other areas of technology?
• How do you decide which interests to pursue deeply versus which to explore more casually?

Tell me about a situation where you had limited documentation or resources to solve a problem. How did you approach finding a solution?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the problem
• Why documentation or resources were limited
• Initial steps they took to gather information
• Creative approaches they used to understand the problem
• How they developed and tested potential solutions
• Resources they eventually discovered or created
• The outcome and any knowledge sharing that followed

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your first reaction when you realized documentation was limited?
• How did you validate your understanding of the problem without complete information?
• What alternatives did you consider when traditional resources weren't available?
• How did this experience influence how you document your own work?

Share an example of when you identified a potential improvement in a system or process before others noticed it. What made you notice this opportunity?

Areas to Cover:

• The system or process they identified for improvement
• What specifically triggered their observation
• How they investigated to confirm their suspicion
• The improvement they proposed or implemented
• How they presented their findings to others
• Resistance or challenges they faced (if any)
• The ultimate impact of their improvement

Follow-Up Questions:

• What aspects of the system made you question its efficiency or effectiveness?
• How did you validate that your observation represented a genuine opportunity?
• How did you prioritize this improvement among other potential enhancements?
• What did you learn about identifying improvement opportunities from this experience?

Tell me about a complex technical problem you solved that required you to learn something completely new. How did you approach the learning process?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the complex problem
• The specific knowledge or skill gap they identified
• Their strategy for acquiring the necessary knowledge
• Resources they utilized for learning
• How they applied their new knowledge to the problem
• Challenges they faced during the learning process
• The outcome of their efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what specific knowledge you needed to acquire?
• How did you evaluate the credibility of different learning resources?
• How did you know when you had learned enough to tackle the problem?
• How has this experience affected your approach to learning new technical skills?

Describe a time when you leveraged your curiosity to turn a potential failure into a success. What specifically did you do?

Areas to Cover:

• The situation that was trending toward failure
• Warning signs or indicators they noticed
• How they investigated the root causes
• The approach they took to understand the full problem
• Their process for developing alternative solutions
• How they implemented their solution
• The ultimate outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially made you suspect there might be a problem?
• How did you maintain optimism and curiosity when facing potential failure?
• What questions were most critical in helping you understand the true nature of the problem?
• How has this experience shaped how you approach challenging situations now?

Share an example of when you explored the "why" behind a technical requirement or specification rather than simply implementing it as given. What prompted you to do this?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific requirement or specification they questioned
• Why they felt compelled to understand the reasoning behind it
• How they went about investigating the purpose
• The conversations or research they conducted
• What they discovered through their exploration
• How this affected their implementation approach
• The ultimate impact on the project or product

Follow-Up Questions:

• What about this particular requirement made you want to understand its purpose?
• How did stakeholders respond to your questions about the requirement?
• Did your understanding of the "why" change your approach to implementation? How?
• How do you decide when to question requirements versus when to implement them as given?

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I tell the difference between genuine curiosity and well-rehearsed answers?

Look for specificity and enthusiasm in the candidate's responses. Genuinely curious engineers will provide detailed examples with technical depth, explain their thought processes naturally, and often show visible excitement when discussing discoveries or learning experiences. Ask unexpected follow-up questions to see how they respond—truly curious candidates can elaborate beyond prepared answers and will acknowledge knowledge gaps honestly.

Should I prioritize curiosity over technical expertise when hiring engineers?

Both are important, but their relative priority depends on the role. For junior positions or roles requiring adaptability to changing technologies, strong curiosity may outweigh some technical gaps, as these candidates will likely learn quickly. For senior roles requiring immediate specialized expertise, technical skills may be more critical. However, hiring for traits like curiosity often leads to better long-term outcomes as technologies evolve.

How does curiosity manifest differently in junior versus senior engineering candidates?

Junior candidates typically demonstrate curiosity through personal projects, self-study efforts, and thoughtful questions about technologies. Their examples may come from academic or early professional experiences. Senior candidates should show deeper, more strategic curiosity—like challenging established practices, exploring innovative architectural approaches, or investigating emerging technologies with business impact. They should also demonstrate how they foster curiosity in their teams.

Can too much curiosity be a negative trait in engineering candidates?

Yes, when curiosity isn't balanced with pragmatism and delivery focus. Watch for candidates who get so caught up in exploring interesting problems that they lose sight of deadlines or business objectives. Effective engineers channel their curiosity toward valuable outcomes rather than pursuing interesting tangents indefinitely. The best candidates can articulate how they balance exploration with practical constraints.

How can I structure my interview process to consistently evaluate curiosity across all candidates?

Use a standardized set of behavioral questions focusing on different dimensions of curiosity (learning approaches, problem-solving, exploration of new technologies). Create a scorecard with specific criteria related to curiosity (depth of investigation, self-directed learning, questioning assumptions). Ensure all interviewers understand how to evaluate curiosity consistently and compare notes before making final assessments to reduce individual biases.

Interested in a full interview guide with Assessing Curiosity in Engineering Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.