Drive is a critical trait for engineering success, defined as the intrinsic motivation and determination that propels individuals to take initiative, overcome obstacles, and persistently pursue goals despite challenges. In engineering contexts, drive manifests as the self-motivated energy that enables professionals to tackle complex technical problems, maintain focus through extended debugging sessions, and continually seek improvement in both their skills and solutions.

Assessing drive in engineering candidates is crucial because technical environments often present ambiguous problems requiring persistence and self-direction. Engineers with strong drive don't wait for instructions—they identify issues proactively, take ownership of solutions, and push through frustrating technical challenges that might cause others to give up. This trait becomes increasingly important as engineers advance in their careers, evolving from personal technical persistence to influencing and motivating entire teams toward ambitious goals.

When interviewing engineering candidates, look for evidence of drive across different dimensions: self-motivation (working without external pressure), initiative (starting projects or improvements unprompted), resilience (bouncing back from setbacks), and a pattern of setting and achieving progressively challenging goals. The best candidates will demonstrate these qualities not just in successful outcomes but also in how they've handled failures and learned from them. According to research from Yardstick's interview guides, effective assessment of drive requires asking behavior-based questions and listening for specific examples rather than hypothetical responses or generic statements.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you pursued a technical challenge or project outside your required responsibilities because you saw an opportunity for improvement.

Areas to Cover:

• What specifically motivated them to take on this additional work
• How they identified the opportunity
• The specific actions they took to pursue the improvement
• Any obstacles they encountered and how they overcame them
• The outcome of their initiative
• How they balanced this additional work with their core responsibilities
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specifically motivated you to take on this project when it wasn't required?
• How did you convince others of the value of this initiative?
• What obstacles did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
• How did you measure the success of this improvement?

Describe a situation where you faced significant technical obstacles or setbacks on an engineering project but persisted to completion.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the project and the specific obstacles encountered
• Their emotional and practical response to the setbacks
• The strategies they used to overcome the obstacles
• How they maintained motivation during difficult periods
• Whether and how they sought help or resources
• The ultimate outcome of the project
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you realize this would be more difficult than anticipated?
• What kept you motivated when you hit the most challenging parts?
• How did you adapt your approach when your initial solutions didn't work?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to learn a completely new programming language, framework, or technical skill to accomplish an important engineering goal.

Areas to Cover:

• What prompted the need to learn the new skill
• Their approach to learning (resources, methods, timeline)
• Challenges faced during the learning process
• How they applied the newly acquired knowledge
• The outcome of the project requiring the new skill
• How this experience has influenced their approach to learning

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your learning strategy, and how did you measure your progress?
• What was the most difficult aspect of mastering this new skill?
• How did you balance learning with your other responsibilities?
• How has this experience affected your approach to acquiring new technical skills?

Describe a situation where you had to advocate persistently for a technical solution or approach that you believed in, despite initial resistance from others.

Areas to Cover:

• The technical solution they proposed and why they believed in it
• The nature of the resistance they faced
• Their approach to advocating for their solution
• How they responded to feedback and criticism
• The strategies they used to build support
• The ultimate outcome of their advocacy
• What they learned about influence and persistence

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you so confident in your solution despite the pushback?
• How did you address the specific concerns raised by others?
• At what point would you have been willing to abandon your approach?
• How did this experience change how you advocate for ideas now?

Tell me about a long-term engineering goal or project you set for yourself and how you stayed motivated to achieve it.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the goal and why it was important to them
• How they broke down the goal into manageable steps
• Challenges they faced during the process
• Strategies they used to maintain motivation over time
• How they tracked progress and adjusted their approach
• The outcome of their efforts
• What they learned about their own motivations and work style

Follow-Up Questions:

• What inspired you to pursue this particular goal?
• How did you maintain focus during periods when progress was slow?
• Were there times you considered giving up? What kept you going?
• How did you celebrate milestones along the way?

Describe an engineering project or situation where you failed initially but persisted and eventually succeeded.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the initial failure
• Their emotional and practical response to the failure
• The specific actions they took to regroup and try again
• What they learned from the failure and how they applied those lessons
• How they maintained belief in their ability to succeed
• The factors that contributed to their eventual success
• How this experience has shaped their approach to failure

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your immediate reaction when you realized you had failed?
• What specific insights from the failure proved most valuable?
• How did you approach the situation differently the second time?
• How has this experience affected how you deal with setbacks now?

Tell me about a time when you identified and solved a technical problem before it was apparent to others on your team.

Areas to Cover:

• How they identified the potential problem
• What prompted them to investigate further
• The process they used to analyze and understand the issue
• The actions they took to address the problem proactively
• How they communicated the issue and solution to others
• The outcome of their proactive problem-solving
• Any recognition or feedback they received

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initial signs indicated to you that there might be a problem?
• What tools or methods did you use to diagnose the issue?
• How did you prioritize addressing this issue among your other responsibilities?
• How did the team respond to your proactive solution?

Describe a situation where you had to work with limited resources or under significant constraints but still delivered a high-quality engineering solution.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the constraints or resource limitations
• Their initial reaction to these limitations
• The strategies they developed to work within the constraints
• Any creative approaches or workarounds they implemented
• How they maintained quality despite the limitations
• The outcome of their efforts
• Lessons learned about working effectively with constraints

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when you realized the constraints you'd be working with?
• What creative approaches did you develop to overcome the limitations?
• How did you ensure quality wasn't compromised despite the constraints?
• What would you do differently if faced with similar constraints in the future?

Tell me about a time when you took the initiative to improve an inefficient process or piece of code without being asked to do so.

Areas to Cover:

• How they identified the inefficiency
• What motivated them to address it without being asked
• The approach they took to analyze and improve the process/code
• Any resistance or challenges they encountered
• How they measured the success of their improvement
• The impact of their initiative on the team or organization
• Feedback they received from others

Follow-Up Questions:

• What metrics or indicators helped you identify this as an area needing improvement?
• How did you balance this initiative with your regular responsibilities?
• Did you encounter any resistance when implementing your improvements?
• What was the measurable impact of your initiative?

Describe a time when you had to push yourself beyond your comfort zone to accomplish an important engineering objective.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the engineering objective
• What aspects pushed them beyond their comfort zone
• Their emotional response to being outside their comfort zone
• Strategies they used to adapt and perform effectively
• Support or resources they sought out
• The outcome of their efforts
• How this experience changed their perspective or approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What aspects of this situation were most uncomfortable for you?
• What strategies did you use to manage any anxiety or uncertainty?
• What did you learn about yourself through this experience?
• How has this experience affected your willingness to take on challenging situations?

Tell me about a time when you remained determined to solve a particularly difficult technical problem that others might have given up on.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the technical problem and why it was particularly challenging
• Why they chose to persist when others might have abandoned it
• The approach they took to break down the problem
• Strategies they used when they hit roadblocks
• Resources or help they sought out
• The ultimate resolution (or current status) of the problem
• What they learned about problem-solving and persistence

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you realize this was an unusually difficult problem?
• What kept you motivated when progress was slow or non-existent?
• How did you change your approach when initial attempts failed?
• What would you tell someone else facing a similar seemingly unsolvable problem?

Describe a situation where you had to motivate or energize a team of engineers when morale was low or the project faced significant challenges.

Areas to Cover:

• The context that led to low morale or significant challenges
• How they recognized the need for motivation
• Specific actions they took to energize the team
• How they personally modeled drive and resilience
• The response from team members
• The outcome for the project and team dynamics
• What they learned about motivating others through challenges

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you first recognize that team morale was suffering?
• What specific approaches did you take to reinvigorate the team?
• How did you adapt your approach for different team members?
• How did this experience change your approach to team leadership?

Tell me about a time when you had to balance multiple engineering priorities and still managed to deliver high-quality work on time.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the competing priorities
• Their process for evaluating and prioritizing the work
• Specific time management or productivity strategies they employed
• How they maintained focus and energy across multiple areas
• Any tradeoffs or compromises they had to make
• The outcome of their efforts
• What they learned about managing multiple priorities effectively

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which tasks or projects needed your attention first?
• What specific techniques did you use to manage your time effectively?
• Were there any tasks you had to delegate or deprioritize? How did you make those decisions?
• What would you do differently if faced with similar competing priorities in the future?

Tell me about a personal technical project you pursued in your spare time. What motivated you, and how did you sustain your momentum?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the personal project
• The specific motivation behind pursuing it
• How they structured their approach to the project
• Challenges they faced and how they overcame them
• How they maintained motivation without external deadlines or oversight
• The current status or outcome of the project
• What they learned about self-motivation and drive

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specifically inspired you to take on this particular project?
• How did you make time for this alongside your other commitments?
• Were there periods when your motivation flagged? How did you reinvigorate yourself?
• What did this project teach you about your own work style and motivation?

Describe a situation where you had to quickly master a new technology or domain to meet an urgent engineering need.

Areas to Cover:

• The context that created the urgent need
• Their approach to rapid learning under pressure
• Resources and methods they used to accelerate learning
• How they balanced learning with application
• Any challenges they faced in the accelerated learning process
• The outcome of their efforts
• What they learned about their ability to adapt quickly

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what was essential to learn versus what could wait?
• What learning approaches proved most effective under the time pressure?
• How did you manage any anxiety or stress about the situation?
• How has this experience affected your approach to learning new technologies?

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between drive and just being hardworking?

Drive goes beyond simply working hard. It includes intrinsic motivation, initiative, resilience, and goal-orientation. While hardworking people may put in long hours, those with drive are self-motivated, proactively identify opportunities, persist through setbacks, and continuously push themselves toward ambitious goals. In engineering contexts, drive manifests as someone who tackles difficult problems enthusiastically rather than just completing assigned tasks.

How can I distinguish between genuine drive and rehearsed interview answers?

Look for detailed, specific examples in candidates' responses rather than vague or generic statements. Use follow-up questions to probe deeper into their experiences, asking about their thought processes, emotional responses, and specific actions. Candidates with genuine drive will be able to provide rich context, describe their internal motivations, and articulate lessons learned. Pay attention to their enthusiasm when discussing challenges and how they frame setbacks—those with authentic drive often view obstacles as interesting puzzles rather than annoyances.

How important is drive compared to technical skills for engineering roles?

According to research aggregated by Yardstick's hiring specialists, while technical skills are obviously important, drive often becomes the differentiating factor between average and exceptional engineers. Technical skills can be taught, but drive is more intrinsic. Engineers with strong drive continuously improve their technical abilities, take on challenging projects, and persist through difficult problems that might defeat others. For junior roles, drive may actually be more predictive of long-term success than current technical proficiency, as it fuels rapid learning and growth.

How do I use these questions for different engineering seniority levels?

For entry-level candidates, focus on questions about personal projects, academic challenges, and learning experiences, allowing them to draw from non-professional contexts. For mid-level engineers, emphasize questions about taking initiative on projects, overcoming technical obstacles, and pursuing self-improvement. For senior candidates and leaders, prioritize questions about motivating teams, advocating for solutions against resistance, and driving large-scale initiatives. Adjust your expectations for the scope and impact of their examples based on their career stage.

Should I be concerned if a candidate talks about failures when answering these questions?

Not at all—in fact, how candidates discuss failure is often more revealing about their drive than how they discuss success. Engineers with genuine drive view failures as learning opportunities and stepping stones toward eventual success. Listen for how they responded to the failure, what they learned, and how they applied those lessons. Be more concerned about candidates who can't provide examples of overcoming setbacks or who blame failures entirely on external factors without taking any personal responsibility.

Interested in a full interview guide with Assessing Drive in Engineering Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.