Circularity Thinking is a cognitive approach that embraces systems-based solutions and closed-loop perspectives where resources, processes, and outcomes form interconnected cycles rather than linear paths. In the workplace, it manifests as the ability to identify opportunities for eliminating waste, optimizing resources, and creating regenerative systems that benefit multiple stakeholders over time.

This competency has become increasingly valuable across industries as organizations seek to improve sustainability, resource efficiency, and long-term viability. Circularity Thinking enables professionals to recognize the hidden connections between seemingly disparate elements and identify innovative solutions that create value while reducing negative impacts. It combines analytical skills with creative problem-solving, systems thinking, and forward-looking perspective.

Whether you're hiring for sustainability roles, operations, product development, or leadership positions, assessing a candidate's capacity for Circularity Thinking can reveal their potential to drive innovation and efficiency. The following behavioral questions will help you evaluate how candidates have demonstrated this competency in past situations, providing insight into how they might apply similar approaches in your organization.

To effectively assess Circularity Thinking, focus on listening for specific examples rather than theoretical knowledge. Ask follow-up questions to understand their thought process, the constraints they navigated, and the outcomes they achieved. Pay attention to whether candidates naturally consider interconnections, long-term impacts, and opportunities for creating regenerative systems rather than merely solving immediate problems. The interview questions below will help you uncover these patterns through carefully structured behavioral inquiries.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified an opportunity to transform a linear process into a circular one in your work or personal projects.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific linear process they identified
• How they recognized the opportunity for circularity
• Their approach to analyzing the current process
• The stakeholders they involved in developing the solution
• The specific changes they implemented
• The outcomes and benefits achieved
• Challenges they encountered and how they addressed them

Follow-Up Questions:

• What prompted you to look at this process differently?
• How did you measure the impact of your circular approach compared to the previous linear one?
• What resistance did you encounter, and how did you overcome it?
• How have you applied similar thinking to other processes since then?

Describe a situation where you had to consider the entire lifecycle of a product or service as part of your decision-making process.

Areas to Cover:

• The product or service in question
• The decision they needed to make
• How they approached lifecycle analysis
• The different stages they considered
• Trade-offs they identified and evaluated
• The ultimate decision they made
• The impact of their decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• What tools or frameworks did you use to analyze the complete lifecycle?
• What surprised you most when considering the full lifecycle?
• How did your lifecycle analysis change your initial assumptions?
• What would you do differently if you were to approach this again?

Tell me about a time when you found a way to create value from what was previously considered waste or a by-product.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific waste or by-product they identified
• How they recognized its potential value
• Their process for developing a solution
• Resources required to implement their idea
• Challenges in implementation
• The outcomes and benefits achieved
• How they measured success

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you first recognize the potential value in what others saw as waste?
• What research did you conduct to validate your approach?
• How did others react to your idea initially?
• What systems or processes did you need to modify to capture this value?

Share an example of when you had to balance short-term efficiency against long-term sustainability in a project or decision.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the project or decision
• The specific trade-off between short-term and long-term considerations
• How they analyzed different options
• The stakeholders involved in the decision
• The ultimate choice they made
• How they justified their decision
• The outcomes that resulted

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or compare the short-term versus long-term impacts?
• What resistance did you face when advocating for the longer-term perspective?
• How did you communicate your reasoning to various stakeholders?
• Looking back, how well did your decision balance these competing priorities?

Describe a time when you collaborated across departments or disciplines to create a more integrated or circular solution.

Areas to Cover:

• The problem or opportunity they were addressing
• The different departments or disciplines involved
• Their approach to fostering collaboration
• Challenges in getting diverse perspectives aligned
• How they integrated different expertise
• The solution they developed together
• The impact of the cross-functional approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific insights came from having diverse perspectives involved?
• How did you handle conflicts or competing priorities between departments?
• What methods did you use to ensure everyone had input into the solution?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach collaboration now?

Tell me about a time when you challenged an established process or system because you saw a more sustainable or circular alternative.

Areas to Cover:

• The established process they challenged
• Why they believed a different approach was needed
• How they developed their alternative solution
• The way they presented their ideas to stakeholders
• Resistance they encountered
• How they influenced others to consider their approach
• The outcome of their challenge

Follow-Up Questions:

• What evidence did you gather to support your alternative approach?
• How did you build support for your ideas?
• What compromises did you make to gain acceptance?
• What would you do differently if you were to approach this situation again?

Describe a situation where you had to consider complex interdependencies or systems effects in your planning or decision-making.

Areas to Cover:

• The decision or planning scenario they faced
• The interdependencies they identified
• How they mapped or analyzed the system
• Tools or methods they used to understand complexity
• How their understanding of the system influenced their approach
• Unexpected consequences they encountered
• What they learned about systems thinking

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the relevant interdependencies in this situation?
• What frameworks or tools did you use to map the system?
• What surprised you most about the systems effects you observed?
• How has this experience changed how you approach complex problems?

Tell me about a time when you had to rethink material or resource use to create a more sustainable solution.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific materials or resources involved
• The initial approach or conventional usage
• How they identified the need for change
• Their process for researching alternatives
• Criteria they used to evaluate options
• The solution they implemented
• The impact of their resource optimization

Follow-Up Questions:

• What inspired you to question the conventional material or resource use?
• What challenges did you face in implementing your alternative approach?
• How did you measure the improvement in sustainability?
• What unexpected benefits or challenges emerged from your solution?

Share an example of when you designed or improved a process to reduce waste or create a closed-loop system.

Areas to Cover:

• The process they were working with
• The waste or inefficiency they identified
• Their approach to analyzing the current state
• How they designed the improved process
• Implementation challenges they faced
• Metrics they used to measure improvement
• The outcomes they achieved

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the opportunity for waste reduction?
• What stakeholders did you need to involve to make this change successful?
• What systems or technologies were necessary to enable the closed-loop approach?
• What ongoing adjustments have you made to continue improving the process?

Describe a time when you had to help others understand the value of taking a more circular or systems-based approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the audience they needed to influence
• The circular or systems-based concept they were advocating
• Initial resistance or misunderstanding they encountered
• Their approach to communication and education
• How they demonstrated value or built the business case
• The outcome of their influence efforts
• Lessons learned about advocating for circularity

Follow-Up Questions:

• What aspects of circularity did people find most difficult to understand?
• How did you tailor your message for different stakeholders?
• What evidence or examples were most effective in building understanding?
• How has this experience shaped how you communicate complex concepts?

Tell me about a project where you incorporated feedback loops or continuous improvement principles to enhance sustainability.

Areas to Cover:

• The project context and objectives
• How they designed feedback mechanisms
• The data or inputs they collected
• How they analyzed and responded to feedback
• Adjustments they made based on learning
• The impact of the feedback loops on outcomes
• How the approach enhanced sustainability

Follow-Up Questions:

• What prompted you to incorporate feedback loops into this project?
• What were the most valuable sources of feedback?
• How often did you review and respond to the feedback collected?
• What systems or processes did you create to ensure continuous improvement?

Share an experience where you identified second-order or unintended consequences of a decision or process and adjusted your approach accordingly.

Areas to Cover:

• The initial decision or process implementation
• How they discovered the unintended consequences
• Their analysis of the system dynamics at play
• How they responded to these discoveries
• The adjustments they made to their approach
• The outcomes after adjustment
• What they learned about anticipating consequences

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you realize there were unintended consequences?
• How did you investigate the cause-and-effect relationships?
• What stakeholders did you consult when adjusting your approach?
• How has this experience influenced how you evaluate potential impacts of decisions?

Describe a situation where you had to extend your thinking beyond immediate outcomes to consider long-term or broader system impacts.

Areas to Cover:

• The decision or situation they faced
• The immediate considerations at play
• How they expanded their perspective to longer-term impacts
• Methods they used to evaluate future consequences
• How they balanced immediate needs with long-term considerations
• The decision they ultimately made
• The outcomes of taking this broader perspective

Follow-Up Questions:

• What prompted you to think beyond the immediate outcomes?
• How far into the future did you consider potential impacts?
• What frameworks or tools did you use to evaluate long-term effects?
• How did you communicate the importance of this broader perspective to others?

Tell me about a time when you found an innovative way to extend the useful life of a product, material, or system.

Areas to Cover:

• The product, material, or system in question
• The conventional end-of-life scenario
• How they identified the opportunity for extension
• Their innovative approach or solution
• Resources required to implement their idea
• Challenges they faced in implementation
• The impact and benefits of the life extension

Follow-Up Questions:

• What insight led you to see the potential for extended use?
• What research or testing did you conduct to validate your approach?
• How did others respond to your innovative solution?
• What systems or processes needed to change to support this extended life?

Share an example of when you created or contributed to a partnership or collaboration that enabled a more circular approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The circular opportunity they identified
• Why partnership was necessary to achieve it
• How they identified potential partners
• Their approach to establishing the collaboration
• Challenges in aligning different organizations
• The structure or terms of the partnership
• The outcomes and benefits for all parties

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the right partners for this initiative?
• What were the key factors in creating a successful collaboration?
• How did you ensure all partners realized value from the arrangement?
• What would you do differently if establishing a similar partnership in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on behavioral questions for assessing Circularity Thinking rather than knowledge-based questions?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually applied Circularity Thinking in real situations, which is a much stronger predictor of future performance than theoretical knowledge. By exploring past experiences, you can assess not just their understanding of circular concepts but their ability to implement them in practical contexts, navigate challenges, and drive meaningful outcomes.

How many of these questions should I ask in a single interview?

We recommend selecting 3-4 questions that are most relevant to the role, then using follow-up questions to probe deeper into the candidate's responses. Quality of exploration is more important than quantity of questions. This approach allows you to thoroughly understand the candidate's thinking processes and past behaviors while giving them sufficient time to provide detailed responses.

Do these questions work for candidates who haven't worked in sustainability-focused roles?

Yes, these questions are designed to assess Circularity Thinking as a cognitive approach rather than specific sustainability credentials. Candidates from any background can demonstrate systems thinking, resource optimization, and long-term perspective in their previous work. For candidates with limited professional experience, encourage them to draw from academic projects, volunteer work, or personal initiatives.

How can I differentiate between candidates who truly understand circular principles versus those who are just using the right terminology?

Focus on the specificity of their examples and the depth of their reasoning. Candidates with genuine Circularity Thinking will be able to explain the systems they considered, the trade-offs they evaluated, and the specific outcomes they achieved. Use follow-up questions to probe beyond surface-level descriptions and assess whether they naturally consider interconnections and circular opportunities.

How should I adapt these questions for different seniority levels?

For junior roles, focus on more tactical questions about resource use, waste reduction, or participation in circular initiatives. For mid-level roles, emphasize questions about implementing circular processes or influencing others. For senior roles, concentrate on strategic questions about designing systems, leading organizational change, or creating partnerships that enable circularity at scale. Adjust your expectations for the scope and impact of their examples based on their career stage.

Interested in a full interview guide with Circularity Thinking as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.