Confidence in software engineering roles can be defined as the self-assurance that enables engineers to make decisions, defend technical positions, and take appropriate action even in the face of uncertainty or complexity. It's the balanced conviction in one's abilities that supports effective problem-solving while remaining open to feedback and continuous learning.

For software engineers, confidence is essential in numerous day-to-day activities: proposing technical solutions, participating in code reviews, communicating with stakeholders, navigating ambiguity, and learning new technologies. Unlike arrogance, healthy confidence in engineering is grounded in competence and tempered by humility. It empowers engineers to advocate for their ideas while remaining receptive to alternative perspectives.

When evaluating confidence in software engineering candidates, it's important to distinguish between different aspects: technical confidence in one's skills and knowledge; communication confidence when explaining complex concepts; decision-making confidence when choosing solutions; and learning confidence when approaching unfamiliar technologies. The right balance is crucial—too little confidence can lead to hesitation and missed opportunities, while overconfidence might result in poor listening and flawed decisions.

To effectively assess confidence during interviews, listen for specific examples that demonstrate both appropriate self-assurance and self-awareness. The most revealing responses often include not just successes, but also how candidates have handled uncertainty, adapted to feedback, and grown from challenges. Remember that confidence can manifest differently based on experience level—junior engineers might demonstrate it through eagerness to learn and appropriate question-asking, while senior engineers might show it through comfortable uncertainty and measured technical advocacy.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to defend a technical decision that others initially disagreed with. How did you handle the situation, and what was the outcome?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical decision and its importance
• Who disagreed with the decision and their reasoning
• How the candidate maintained confidence while addressing concerns
• Evidence or reasoning the candidate presented
• Whether the candidate was open to modifying their position
• How resolution was reached
• Impact of the final decision

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you the confidence to stand by your decision despite opposition?
• What steps did you take to understand the perspectives of those who disagreed?
• Was there a point where you reconsidered your position, and if so, what prompted that?
• Looking back, would you approach the situation differently now?

Describe a situation where you had to present a complex technical solution to non-technical stakeholders. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The technical complexity involved and why it needed explanation
• How the candidate prepared for the presentation
• Techniques used to make technical concepts accessible
• How questions or confusion were handled
• Adjustments made during the presentation if needed
• Whether the stakeholders ultimately understood the solution
• Lessons learned about effective communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you gauge the audience's level of understanding during your presentation?
• What was the most challenging question you received, and how did you respond?
• How did you handle moments when you weren't sure about an answer?
• What would you do differently in your next technical presentation to non-technical stakeholders?

Share an experience where you needed to learn a completely new technology or framework under significant time pressure. How did you approach it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technology and why it needed to be learned quickly
• The candidate's initial reaction to the challenge
• Strategy for learning efficiently
• How they handled obstacles in the learning process
• Resources or support they leveraged
• Balance between learning and application
• Outcomes of their efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most challenging aspect of learning this new technology quickly?
• How did you determine when you knew enough to begin implementing?
• What helped you maintain confidence when facing this unfamiliar technology?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to learning new technologies since?

Tell me about a time when you received critical feedback on your code or design. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the feedback and who provided it
• Initial reaction to the criticism
• How the candidate evaluated the validity of the feedback
• Steps taken to address the feedback
• Communication with the person who provided the feedback
• What the candidate learned from the experience
• Changes in approach following this feedback

Follow-Up Questions:

• What about the feedback was most difficult to hear?
• How did you separate your emotional response from your professional response?
• What steps did you take to ensure you understood the feedback correctly?
• How has this experience affected how you give feedback to others?

Describe a situation where you had to make a technical decision with incomplete information. How did you handle the uncertainty?

Areas to Cover:

• The decision context and why information was limited
• How the candidate assessed available information
• Risk evaluation process
• Strategies used to reduce uncertainty
• How the decision was made and communicated
• Contingency plans if developed
• Outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you confidence to make a decision despite the uncertainty?
• How did you communicate the uncertainty to stakeholders or team members?
• What was your plan if your decision turned out to be incorrect?
• How do you balance moving forward with incomplete information versus waiting for more data?

Share an experience where you were the least knowledgeable person on the team about a particular technology or domain. How did you contribute effectively despite this knowledge gap?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the knowledge gap
• Initial feelings about the situation
• Strategies for adding value despite limited domain knowledge
• How the candidate leveraged their other strengths
• Steps taken to increase relevant knowledge
• Collaboration approach with more knowledgeable team members
• Impact of their contributions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you maintain confidence in your ability to contribute despite the knowledge gap?
• What unique perspective were you able to bring because you weren't entrenched in established thinking?
• How did you determine which aspects of the domain you needed to learn first?
• How has this experience shaped how you approach new domains or technologies?

Tell me about a time when a project or feature you were responsible for failed or had significant issues. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the project and what went wrong
• The candidate's role and responsibilities
• How they initially responded to the failure
• Steps taken to address the problems
• Communication with team members and stakeholders
• Whether and how they took ownership
• What was learned and how they applied these lessons

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did this experience affect your confidence in the short term?
• What helped you regain or maintain your confidence after this setback?
• How did you balance taking responsibility with not being overly self-critical?
• How has this experience changed how you approach similar projects now?

Describe a situation where you had to speak up about a process or technical approach that you believed needed improvement, even though it was established practice.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific process or approach and its limitations
• Why the candidate felt compelled to speak up
• How they prepared their case for change
• The approach taken to suggest improvements
• Reactions from team members or leadership
• Challenges faced in driving the change
• Outcome and impact of the intervention

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you the confidence to challenge an established practice?
• How did you ensure your suggestion would be received constructively?
• How did you respond if there was resistance to your proposed changes?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Share an experience where you had to take on a leadership role in a technical project when you hadn't been officially designated as the leader.

Areas to Cover:

• The project context and why leadership was needed
• How the candidate recognized the leadership gap
• Steps taken to assume leadership tactfully
• How they gained buy-in from team members
• Challenges faced during the transition
• Their leadership approach and effectiveness
• Outcomes of the project and feedback received

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you decide to step into a leadership role?
• How did you balance asserting leadership while respecting team dynamics?
• What was the most challenging aspect of taking on this unofficial leadership role?
• How did this experience affect your confidence in your leadership abilities?

Tell me about a time when you had to admit you were wrong about a technical approach or solution. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The technical context and initial position
• What led to realizing the error
• How quickly they recognized and admitted the mistake
• The way they communicated the admission to others
• Steps taken to correct the approach
• Impact on team dynamics and project
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most difficult part about admitting you were wrong?
• How did this experience affect your confidence in subsequent technical discussions?
• What helped you maintain professional composure while changing your position?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach technical disagreements now?

Describe a situation where you had to learn from a more junior team member. How did you approach this learning opportunity?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific knowledge or skill the junior person possessed
• Initial reaction to the situation
• How the candidate approached the learning opportunity
• Dynamic between the candidate and the junior team member
• Challenges to ego or established perspectives
• What was learned beyond the technical knowledge
• Impact on future interactions and team dynamics

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure your position didn't inhibit the learning experience?
• What surprised you most about learning from a more junior colleague?
• How did this experience affect your perception of expertise and hierarchy?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach knowledge sharing on your team?

Share an experience where you had to give a presentation or demo that didn't go as planned due to technical issues or tough questions. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the presentation and its importance
• What went wrong during the presentation
• Initial reaction to the problems
• How the candidate maintained composure
• Steps taken to address the issues in real-time
• Recovery strategy and communication approach
• Outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What helped you maintain your confidence when things started going wrong?
• How did you prioritize which problems to address and which to defer?
• What preparation could have helped prevent or better handle the situation?
• How has this experience affected how you prepare for presentations now?

Tell me about a time when you had to make an important technical decision quickly. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• Time constraints and why quick action was needed
• Process for gathering and evaluating information
• How risks were assessed in the limited timeframe
• Confidence level in the decision and how it was communicated
• Follow-up actions after the decision
• Results and retrospective assessment

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you confidence in your decision despite the time pressure?
• How did you ensure you weren't overlooking critical factors?
• What would you have done differently with more time?
• How do you balance thoughtfulness with decisiveness in time-sensitive situations?

Describe a situation where you had to work on a high-visibility project where your performance would be closely scrutinized. How did you handle the pressure?

Areas to Cover:

• The project context and why it had high visibility
• Initial reaction to the pressure and scrutiny
• Strategies for managing stress and maintaining focus
• How performance expectations were clarified
• Communication approach with stakeholders
• Quality assurance methods employed
• Outcome and personal growth from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific techniques did you use to manage any anxiety about the high stakes?
• How did you respond when receiving critical feedback during the project?
• What helped you maintain confidence in your abilities despite the pressure?
• How has this experience changed how you approach high-visibility work?

Share an experience where you identified a significant technical problem that others had missed. How did you bring attention to it and ensure it was addressed?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the problem and how it was discovered
• Why others might have missed it
• Initial steps to validate the issue
• Strategy for communicating the problem
• How the candidate built support for addressing it
• Challenges faced in convincing others
• Resolution approach and outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What gave you the confidence that this was a real issue worth addressing?
• How did you frame the problem to avoid appearing critical of those who missed it?
• How did you respond if others were initially skeptical of your concerns?
• What would you do differently if identifying a similar overlooked issue in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I tell the difference between healthy confidence and overconfidence in software engineering candidates?

Healthy confidence in software engineers is typically characterized by balanced self-assessment, willingness to admit knowledge gaps, and openness to feedback while still being able to defend positions with sound reasoning. Overconfident candidates often dismiss alternative viewpoints quickly, struggle to acknowledge mistakes, and may speak in absolutes without nuance. Look for candidates who can articulate both their strengths and areas for growth, who cite evidence for their positions, and who demonstrate learning from past mistakes.

Should I expect the same level of confidence from junior engineers as I would from senior engineers?

No, confidence typically manifests differently across experience levels. Junior engineers with healthy confidence often show eagerness to learn, ask thoughtful questions, and take appropriate risks while recognizing their limitations. Senior engineers typically demonstrate confidence through comfort with uncertainty, balanced technical advocacy, and willing vulnerability when facing knowledge gaps. Tailor your expectations accordingly, focusing more on learning confidence for junior roles and balanced confidence with humility for senior roles.

How important is confidence compared to technical skills when hiring software engineers?

Both are important but serve different purposes. Strong technical skills form the foundation of an engineer's ability to deliver quality work, but confidence enables them to fully apply those skills, advocate for best practices, and contribute to team discussions. A technically brilliant engineer who lacks the confidence to speak up or defend their ideas may not reach their full potential, while an overly confident engineer with mediocre skills might lead teams down problematic paths. The ideal candidate possesses both strong technical abilities and appropriate confidence.

How can we accurately assess confidence in remote or virtual interviews?

In remote interviews, pay special attention to communication patterns that indicate confidence: clarity of expression, appropriate pausing to think before answering difficult questions, comfort with saying "I don't know" when appropriate, and ability to articulate reasoning behind technical decisions. Use collaborative coding exercises or system design discussions to observe how candidates respond to feedback in real-time. Video interviews also provide visual cues about comfort level when discussing challenging situations, though these should be interpreted cautiously across different cultural backgrounds.

If a candidate seems too quiet or reserved during the interview, does that automatically indicate a lack of confidence?

Not necessarily. Some highly capable engineers may be introverted, culturally reserved, or simply nervous during interviews. Rather than focusing solely on outward presentation, listen carefully to the content of their responses. A quieter candidate who provides thoughtful, detailed examples of navigating complex situations, standing behind their decisions, and effectively collaborating with others may be demonstrating significant confidence in their own way. Consider providing a few minutes of warm-up questions and creating a supportive interview environment to help reserved candidates show their true capabilities.

Interested in a full interview guide with Confidence for Software Engineer Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.