Dealing with difficult people is an essential workplace competency that involves managing challenging personalities and situations effectively while maintaining professionalism and achieving desired outcomes. In today's collaborative business environment, this skill set has become increasingly valuable across virtually all professional roles and industries.

The ability to navigate difficult interactions successfully encompasses several dimensions, including emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, active listening, assertiveness, and maintaining composure under pressure. Whether handling disagreements with colleagues, managing challenging clients, or addressing difficult behaviors from direct reports, this competency directly impacts workplace harmony, productivity, and ultimately, business results.

When evaluating candidates for this competency, interviewers should focus on specific past behaviors rather than hypothetical scenarios. The most revealing insights come from detailed examples of how candidates have navigated interpersonal challenges, the specific approaches they implemented, and the outcomes they achieved. By using behavioral interview questions with thoughtful follow-ups, you can evaluate a candidate's ability to handle conflict constructively, their self-awareness during tense situations, and their capacity to maintain productive relationships despite difficulties.

A strong candidate will demonstrate adaptability in their approach to different personality types, show resilience in the face of challenging behaviors, and exhibit a learning mindset from their experiences. The best indicators of future success in handling difficult people are concrete examples of past situations where candidates successfully navigated interpersonal challenges while maintaining professional relationships.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to work closely with someone who was particularly difficult to get along with. How did you handle the situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific behaviors that made the person difficult
• The impact these behaviors had on work and team dynamics
• The candidate's approach to managing the relationship
• Any adjustments made over time to improve the relationship
• The outcome of their approach
• Lessons learned that they've applied to other difficult relationships
• How they maintained professionalism throughout the situation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What did you learn about yourself through this interaction?
• How did you adjust your communication style to better work with this person?
• What specific strategies were most effective in improving the relationship?
• How did you manage your own emotions during difficult moments with this person?

Describe a situation where you had to deal with an angry or upset customer/client/stakeholder. What did you do to resolve the situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the person's anger or frustration
• The candidate's initial reaction and emotional control
• De-escalation techniques they employed
• How they identified and addressed the underlying issue
• Steps taken to restore trust and satisfaction
• The final outcome of the situation
• How they followed up afterward

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you remain calm when faced with this person's anger?
• What specific phrases or approaches did you use to de-escalate the situation?
• How did you determine what the person really needed beyond what they were saying?
• What would you do differently if you encountered a similar situation now?

Tell me about a time when you had to deliver difficult feedback or news to someone who you anticipated would react negatively. How did you handle this?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the difficult message
• How they prepared for the conversation
• Their approach to delivering the message
• How they managed the other person's reaction
• Steps taken to maintain the relationship despite the difficult message
• The ultimate outcome of the situation
• Whether they would change their approach in hindsight

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for this difficult conversation?
• What specific language or framing did you use to deliver the message constructively?
• How did you respond when the person reacted negatively?
• What did you learn about delivering difficult messages from this experience?

Describe a time when a colleague or team member consistently failed to meet their commitments or deadlines, affecting your work. How did you address this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific pattern of behavior and its impact
• Initial approaches to addressing the issue
• How the candidate balanced assertiveness with maintaining the relationship
• Escalation steps, if any were needed
• How they continued working effectively despite the challenges
• The resolution of the situation
• Preventative measures they implemented for future collaborations

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you decide to address the issue directly?
• What was your approach to the conversation about missed commitments?
• How did you document or track the agreements going forward?
• What boundaries did you establish to protect your own work?

Tell me about a situation where you faced resistance to your ideas or initiatives from a difficult stakeholder. How did you handle their opposition?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the resistance and the stakeholder's concerns
• How the candidate sought to understand the opposing viewpoint
• Strategies used to influence the stakeholder
• Compromises or adjustments made to address legitimate concerns
• How they maintained a productive relationship despite disagreement
• The ultimate outcome of the situation
• Lessons learned about handling resistance

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you initially react to the resistance?
• What did you do to understand the stakeholder's perspective more deeply?
• What specific influence strategies were most effective with this person?
• How did this experience change your approach to introducing new ideas?

Describe an experience where you had to deal with a person who was aggressive or intimidating in their communication style. How did you manage this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific behaviors that were aggressive or intimidating
• The impact these behaviors had on the candidate and others
• Strategies used to respond effectively without escalating
• Whether and how they addressed the communication style directly
• How they protected their own wellbeing while still engaging productively
• The outcome of their approach
• Techniques they've developed for handling similar personalities

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prevent yourself from responding in kind to their aggression?
• What boundaries did you establish with this person?
• What techniques were most effective in changing the tone of your interactions?
• How did you ensure your own needs and perspectives were still heard?

Tell me about a time when you needed to resolve a conflict between team members who weren't getting along. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the conflict and its impact on the team
• How the candidate assessed the situation before intervening
• The specific conflict resolution process they implemented
• How they ensured both parties felt heard and respected
• The resolution that was reached
• Follow-up measures to ensure the conflict remained resolved
• How team dynamics changed after the resolution

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the signs that told you it was time to intervene in this conflict?
• How did you prepare for the conflict resolution conversation?
• What techniques did you use to keep the discussion productive and focused?
• How did you ensure any agreements made were followed through on?

Describe a situation where you had to work with someone who constantly complained or had a negative attitude. How did you handle working with them?

Areas to Cover:

• The impact of the negativity on the work environment
• Strategies used to maintain their own positive outlook
• How they addressed the negativity directly, if at all
• Techniques for redirecting negative conversations to solutions
• How they protected team morale while working with this person
• The outcome of their approach
• Lasting strategies developed for handling negative people

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prevent the negativity from affecting your own attitude?
• What techniques did you use to redirect negative conversations toward solutions?
• How did you decide when to address the negativity directly versus when to let it go?
• What boundaries did you establish with this person?

Tell me about a time when you had to handle a situation involving someone who refused to take responsibility for their mistakes or shortcomings. How did you approach this?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the situation and the impact of their lack of accountability
• The candidate's initial approach to addressing the issue
• How they framed feedback or concerns to promote accountability
• Their strategies for focusing on solutions rather than blame
• How they documented or tracked issues if necessary
• The resolution of the situation
• What they learned about promoting accountability in difficult personalities

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you frame your feedback to make it more acceptable to someone defensive?
• What strategies did you use to focus the conversation on solutions rather than blame?
• How did you handle your own frustration with their lack of accountability?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation now?

Describe your experience dealing with a person who was resistant to change or new ways of doing things. How did you handle their resistance?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the change and the basis for the person's resistance
• How the candidate sought to understand the underlying concerns
• Strategies used to help the person become more comfortable with change
• How they balanced respecting concerns while still moving forward
• The pace at which they implemented change with this person
• The ultimate outcome and the person's final adaptation (or not)
• Lessons learned about managing change with resistant individuals

Follow-Up Questions:

• What did you discover were the real reasons behind their resistance?
• What specific approaches were most effective in helping them become more comfortable with change?
• How did you determine when to push forward versus when to slow down?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to introducing change?

Tell me about a time when you had to work with someone who took credit for others' work or ideas, including yours. How did you handle this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific pattern of behavior and its impact
• How the candidate verified their perception of the situation
• Their approach to addressing the issue directly, if they did
• Strategies used to ensure proper attribution moving forward
• How they maintained a professional relationship despite the issue
• The resolution or outcome of the situation
• How this experience shaped their approach to recognition and collaboration

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you confirm your perception that credit was being inappropriately taken?
• What approach did you take when discussing this issue with the person?
• What systems or practices did you implement to ensure proper attribution going forward?
• How did you balance addressing the issue while maintaining a working relationship?

Describe a situation where you had to work with someone who consistently dominated conversations or meetings, making it difficult for others to contribute. How did you handle this?

Areas to Cover:

• The impact of the dominating behavior on team dynamics and outcomes
• Strategies used to create space for other voices
• Whether and how they addressed the behavior directly with the person
• Techniques employed during meetings to manage the conversation flow
• How they ensured their own voice was heard despite the dominating presence
• The outcome of their approach
• Lessons learned about facilitating inclusive conversations

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific techniques did you use during meetings to create space for others?
• How did you approach the conversation if you addressed this behavior directly?
• What was the person's response to any feedback or interventions?
• How did meeting dynamics change as a result of your approach?

Tell me about your experience dealing with someone who consistently missed deadlines or delivered poor-quality work that impacted your projects. How did you address this?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific pattern and its impact on work outcomes
• Initial steps taken to understand the root causes
• How they provided feedback about the performance issues
• Strategies implemented to improve accountability and quality
• How they managed dependencies and protected project outcomes
• The resolution of the situation
• Preventative approaches developed for future collaborations

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the root causes of the performance issues?
• What specific feedback did you provide and how did you deliver it?
• What systems or checkpoints did you implement to improve accountability?
• How did you protect your own work and deadlines while this was occurring?

Describe a time when you had to negotiate with someone who was particularly difficult or unreasonable in their demands. How did you handle the negotiation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the negotiation and why the person was difficult
• How the candidate prepared for the negotiation
• Their approach to understanding the other party's true needs and interests
• Techniques used to find common ground despite difficult behavior
• How they maintained composure during challenging moments
• The outcome of the negotiation
• Lessons learned about negotiating with difficult personalities

Follow-Up Questions:

• What research or preparation did you do before the negotiation?
• How did you identify the other party's underlying interests beyond their stated positions?
• What specific techniques helped you maintain a productive dialogue?
• What would you do differently in a similar negotiation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to manage a stakeholder who had unrealistic expectations about what could be delivered or accomplished. How did you handle this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the unrealistic expectations
• How the candidate assessed what was actually feasible
• Their approach to resetting expectations constructively
• Data or evidence used to support their position
• How they negotiated a more realistic path forward
• The outcome of the situation
• How they set up future engagements to avoid similar issues

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine that the expectations were truly unrealistic?
• What specific approach did you take to reset expectations constructively?
• How did you respond to any pushback or disappointment?
• What preventative measures have you put in place to avoid similar situations?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why should I use behavioral questions rather than hypothetical scenarios when assessing how candidates deal with difficult people?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually handled challenging situations in the past, which is a much more reliable predictor of future behavior than hypothetical scenarios. When candidates describe real experiences, they provide concrete evidence of their skills, decision-making processes, and emotional intelligence in action. Hypothetical questions often elicit idealized answers that may not reflect how a person truly behaves under pressure.

How many questions about dealing with difficult people should I include in an interview?

Rather than asking many questions superficially, it's better to select 2-3 well-crafted questions and explore them deeply with follow-ups. This approach allows you to understand the candidate's thought process, assess multiple dimensions of their competency, and get beyond rehearsed answers. The quality and depth of exploration matter more than the quantity of questions.

What should I look for in a candidate's answers to these questions?

Look for specific examples with details about actions taken, not generalities. Strong candidates will demonstrate self-awareness about their emotional responses, show they can understand perspectives different from their own, explain clear strategies they used to address the situation, and reflect on what they learned. Red flags include blaming others without self-reflection, showing a pattern of avoiding difficult conversations, or displaying an inability to adapt their approach to different personality types.

How can I adapt these questions for different experience levels?

For entry-level candidates, focus on personal conflicts, academic team situations, or customer service examples. For mid-level roles, look for examples involving cross-functional collaboration and independently resolving issues without escalation. For senior roles, probe for strategic approaches to systemic people problems, creating team cultures that minimize destructive conflict, and successfully influencing difficult stakeholders with significant organizational impact.

How can I tell if a candidate is being authentic in their responses versus just telling me what they think I want to hear?

Authentic responses include specific details about situations, emotions experienced, challenges faced, and lessons learned—not just positive outcomes. Use follow-up questions to probe deeper into their examples: "What was going through your mind at that moment?" or "How did you feel when they responded that way?" Look for reflections on mistakes or things they'd do differently, which indicates honesty and growth mindset rather than presenting a perfect image.

Interested in a full interview guide with Dealing with Difficult People as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.