Humility in HR roles refers to the ability to maintain an accurate self-perspective, acknowledge limitations, recognize others' contributions, and remain open to learning and feedback—all while effectively performing professional responsibilities. In HR specifically, this trait enables professionals to make fair decisions, build trust across the organization, and model the cultural values that create psychological safety and high performance.

Evaluating humility during interviews requires careful attention, as true humility differs from false modesty or lack of confidence. Genuine humility in HR professionals manifests as an appropriate balance between confidence in their expertise and openness to others' perspectives. This balance is crucial as HR professionals navigate complex interpersonal dynamics, implement sensitive people programs, and serve as cultural ambassadors for their organizations.

To effectively assess humility in HR candidates, interviewers should focus on past behaviors that demonstrate self-awareness, openness to feedback, willingness to admit mistakes, appropriate credit-sharing, and the ability to balance confidence with openness to growth. According to research from the Harvard Business Review, humble HR leaders create stronger team cultures characterized by psychological safety, innovation, and higher employee engagement.

When evaluating candidates for HR roles, listen carefully for specific examples that demonstrate genuine humility rather than rehearsed responses. Probe beyond initial answers with follow-up questions that explore the candidate's thought processes, emotional responses, and lessons learned. Pay attention to how candidates describe team accomplishments, handle questions about failures, and discuss their development areas. The interview questions below will help you uncover authentic demonstrations of humility while distinguishing between false modesty and genuine humility paired with appropriate confidence.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you received feedback that was difficult to hear but ultimately helped you improve in your HR role.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific nature of the feedback received
• Initial reaction to the feedback
• How the candidate processed the feedback
• Actions taken to address the feedback
• How the candidate's perspective changed
• Impact of implementing the feedback
• How this experience influenced their approach to giving feedback to others

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this feedback particularly difficult to receive?
• How did you distinguish between feedback that was valid versus feedback that might not have been accurate?
• How has this experience changed the way you give feedback to others in your HR role?
• What did you learn about yourself through this experience?

Describe a situation where you had to acknowledge a significant mistake or error in judgment in an HR initiative or program you were leading.

Areas to Cover:

• Nature of the mistake and its impact
• How the candidate identified or came to recognize the mistake
• How they communicated about the error to stakeholders
• Actions taken to address or rectify the situation
• What they learned from the experience
• How they applied those lessons to future situations
• Changes made to prevent similar mistakes

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most challenging part of acknowledging this mistake?
• How did others respond to your acknowledgment?
• What specific measures did you put in place to prevent similar mistakes in the future?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to risk and decision-making in HR?

Share an example of a time when someone with less experience or in a more junior position taught you something valuable about HR or people management.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the interaction
• What the candidate learned
• How they demonstrated openness to learning from someone less experienced
• How they acknowledged the other person's contribution
• How they applied the learning
• Impact of this learning on their approach to HR
• How this experience influenced their view on learning from others at all levels

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you acknowledge this person's contribution to your learning?
• What made you receptive to learning from this person despite their more junior position?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to developing more junior team members?
• What does this experience tell you about the value of diverse perspectives in HR?

Tell me about a successful HR initiative or project you led. How did others contribute to its success?

Areas to Cover:

• Brief description of the initiative and its outcomes
• Specific contributions from team members and stakeholders
• How the candidate encouraged and facilitated others' contributions
• How credit was shared for the success
• How the candidate balanced their leadership with team empowerment
• Specific acknowledgments of others' ideas and work
• Lessons learned about collaboration

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure that contributors received appropriate recognition?
• Was there anyone whose contribution might have been overlooked initially? How did you address that?
• How did you balance providing direction with being open to others' ideas?
• If you were to run this initiative again, how would you approach the collaborative aspects differently?

Describe a situation where your initial approach or idea related to an HR challenge wasn't working, and you needed to be open to a different approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The initial approach and why it was chosen
• Signs or indicators that the approach wasn't working
• How the candidate recognized the need for change
• The process of identifying an alternative approach
• How the candidate demonstrated openness to changing course
• The outcome of implementing the new approach
• Learning gained from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the early signs that your approach wasn't working, and how did you respond to them?
• What was the most difficult part about changing your approach?
• How did you communicate the change in approach to stakeholders?
• How has this experience influenced your planning for future HR initiatives?

Tell me about a time when you had to balance confidence in your HR expertise with humility and openness to others' perspectives.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the situation
• Competing considerations that required both confidence and humility
• How the candidate demonstrated appropriate confidence
• How they remained open to other perspectives
• The process of finding the right balance
• The outcome of the situation
• Lessons learned about balancing confidence and humility

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine when to stand firm on your expertise versus when to incorporate others' views?
• What signals or feedback helped you know if you were striking the right balance?
• How did this balance of confidence and humility impact the outcome?
• How has your approach to balancing confidence and humility evolved throughout your career?

Share an example of when you advocated for an HR initiative or policy but had to accept a different decision from leadership. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The initiative or policy the candidate advocated for
• Their rationale and the competing perspective
• How they presented their case
• Their reaction when their recommendation wasn't accepted
• How they adapted to and supported the alternative decision
• Their communication with their team about the decision
• What they learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about accepting and implementing the alternative decision?
• How did you ensure your disappointment didn't affect your implementation of the chosen approach?
• What did you learn about organizational decision-making from this experience?
• How did this experience influence how you approach advocacy in your HR role now?

Describe a situation where you recognized a gap in your HR knowledge or expertise and took steps to address it.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific knowledge gap identified
• How the candidate became aware of this gap
• Their comfort level with acknowledging the gap to others
• Steps taken to address the knowledge gap
• Resources or people leveraged for learning
• Impact of addressing this knowledge gap
• Ongoing approach to professional development

Follow-Up Questions:

• How comfortable were you acknowledging this gap to colleagues or leaders?
• What was most challenging about addressing this knowledge gap?
• How did filling this gap impact your effectiveness in your role?
• How do you proactively identify potential knowledge gaps now?

Tell me about a time when you needed to defer to someone else's expertise on an HR matter despite being in a position of authority.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation and the expertise needed
• How the candidate recognized the need to defer
• How they balanced their authority with appropriate deference
• The approach to incorporating the other person's expertise
• How credit and recognition were handled
• The outcome of the situation
• Impact on the relationship with the team member

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate your deference to this person's expertise to other stakeholders?
• How did deferring to their expertise impact your credibility as a leader?
• What did you learn from this person's expertise that you've applied since?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to team building and recognizing different types of expertise?

Share an example of a time when you had to admit you didn't have all the answers in an HR situation and needed to seek help.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the situation
• The point at which the candidate recognized they needed help
• Their approach to acknowledging their limitations
• How they identified appropriate sources of help
• The process of seeking and incorporating assistance
• The outcome of the situation
• How this experience shaped their view on vulnerability in leadership

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made it difficult to admit you didn't have all the answers?
• How did others respond when you acknowledged you needed help?
• What did you learn about yourself through this experience?
• How has this experience influenced how you respond when team members admit they need help?

Describe a situation where you received credit for a successful HR initiative or project but felt others deserved more recognition for their contributions.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the initiative or project
• The specific contributions of others that deserved recognition
• Why the credit initially came primarily to the candidate
• Actions taken to redirect or share credit appropriately
• Reactions from those involved
• Long-term impact on team dynamics
• Lessons learned about recognition and credit-sharing

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific steps did you take to ensure others received appropriate recognition?
• How did redirecting credit affect your relationships with team members?
• What systems or practices have you put in place to ensure fair credit distribution in the future?
• How has this experience shaped your leadership philosophy?

Tell me about a particularly challenging piece of feedback you've received about your leadership or communications style in an HR role. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific feedback received
• Initial reaction and emotions
• The process of reflecting on the feedback
• Actions taken to address the feedback
• How the candidate measured improvement
• The impact of changes made
• Ongoing development in this area

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this feedback particularly challenging to receive?
• How did you determine which aspects of the feedback to act on?
• What support or resources did you seek to help you implement changes?
• How do you now solicit feedback about your leadership or communication style?

Share a situation where you realized an HR policy or practice you had previously championed was not as effective as you initially thought.

Areas to Cover:

• The policy or practice initially championed
• Original rationale for supporting it
• Evidence or experiences that changed the candidate's perspective
• Process of acknowledging the need for change
• How they communicated this shift to others
• Actions taken to implement improvements
• Lessons learned about evolving perspectives

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about acknowledging the need for change?
• How did you balance admitting the previous approach wasn't optimal with maintaining credibility?
• How did stakeholders react to your change in position?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to evaluating and implementing HR policies?

Describe a time when you needed to set aside your ego to resolve a conflict or challenge in your HR role.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the conflict or challenge
• The ego-driven response that might have been natural
• How the candidate recognized the need to set ego aside
• Specific actions taken that demonstrated humility
• The resolution process
• Outcome of the situation
• Personal growth from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What internal signals helped you recognize when your ego was becoming an obstacle?
• What strategies did you use to set your ego aside in this situation?
• How did this approach affect the outcome compared to what might have happened otherwise?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach similar situations now?

Tell me about a time when you had strong convictions about an HR approach but remained open to being wrong.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific HR approach and the candidate's convictions
• Basis for these strong convictions
• How they balanced confidence with openness
• Signals or feedback that prompted reconsideration
• The process of evaluating alternative perspectives
• The ultimate decision or outcome
• Lessons learned about balancing conviction with openness

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate both your convictions and your openness to other perspectives?
• What helped you remain genuinely open despite having strong initial beliefs?
• How did you evaluate competing perspectives or evidence?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to decision-making in HR?

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I distinguish between genuine humility and false modesty in HR candidates?

Genuine humility is characterized by a balanced self-view rather than self-deprecation. Look for candidates who confidently acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses, speak candidly about mistakes while highlighting lessons learned, and naturally share credit for successes while taking responsibility for failures. False modesty often involves fishing for compliments, deflecting all credit (even when appropriate to accept some), or making self-deprecating comments while clearly expecting contradiction.

Why is humility particularly important for HR professionals?

HR professionals serve as cultural ambassadors and often handle sensitive issues requiring fairness and balance. Humble HR professionals can better build trust with employees at all levels, make impartial decisions, admit when policies need improvement, and model the behaviors that create psychological safety. Additionally, HR often requires influencing without authority, which is more effective when approached with appropriate humility rather than ego.

Can someone be both humble and confident in an HR role?

Absolutely. In fact, the most effective demonstration of humility in professional settings balances appropriate confidence with openness to others' ideas and recognition of one's limitations. Strong HR candidates should display confidence in their expertise and judgment while remaining open to feedback, willing to learn from others regardless of position, and able to acknowledge when they don't have all the answers.

How many of these humility-focused questions should I include in an interview?

Include 3-4 of these questions within a broader competency-based interview. These questions work best when combined with other competency areas relevant to the specific HR role, such as business acumen, HR expertise, communication skills, and strategic thinking. Evaluating humility alongside other competencies provides a more complete picture of the candidate.

What are red flags that might indicate a lack of humility in an HR candidate?

Watch for candidates who consistently use "I" instead of "we" when describing team accomplishments, blame external factors for all failures while taking credit for all successes, struggle to identify development areas when asked, dismiss feedback as invalid without reflection, or speak condescendingly about previous colleagues or leaders. Also note candidates who can't provide specific examples of learning from others or changing their approach based on new information.

Interested in a full interview guide with Evaluating Humility in HR Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.