Honesty is a fundamental trait that underlies trust and ethical conduct in the workplace. According to the Society for Human Resource Management, honesty can be defined as "the quality of being truthful and straightforward in attitude and speech, free from deceit or fraud." In an interview context, assessing honesty means evaluating a candidate's propensity to communicate truthfully, take accountability for their actions, and maintain ethical standards even when under pressure.
Evaluating honesty during interviews requires understanding its various dimensions – truthfulness in communication, transparency with information, accountability for mistakes, consistency between words and actions, and ethical decision-making. These elements manifest differently across roles and seniority levels. For entry-level positions, honesty might appear in how candidates handle academic integrity or admit mistakes. For leadership roles, it extends to creating transparent cultures, making ethical decisions under pressure, and modeling integrity for teams.
When interviewing candidates, focus on eliciting detailed accounts of past situations where honesty was tested. Listen for specific actions taken, the reasoning behind decisions, and how candidates balanced honesty with other considerations. Remember that behavioral interview questions are significantly more effective than hypothetical scenarios, as they reveal patterns from a candidate's actual history rather than their aspirational self-image. The most revealing insights often come through thoughtful follow-up questions that probe beyond initial responses, uncovering how candidates truly operate when their integrity is challenged.
Interview Questions
Tell me about a time when you had to deliver an uncomfortable truth to a manager, colleague, or client.
Areas to Cover:
- The specific situation and why the truth was uncomfortable
- How the candidate prepared for the conversation
- The approach they took to deliver the message
- How they balanced honesty with tact and respect
- The outcome and any relationship impacts
- What they learned about effective truthful communication
Follow-Up Questions:
- What considerations went into how you framed the message?
- How did you manage your own discomfort during this conversation?
- If you had to have this conversation again, would you approach it differently?
- How did this experience affect your approach to similar situations later?
Describe a situation when you made a significant mistake at work. How did you handle it?
Areas to Cover:
- The nature of the mistake and its potential impact
- How quickly the candidate acknowledged the error
- Whether they took full accountability without excuses
- The actions taken to address or correct the mistake
- How they communicated about the mistake to others
- The lessons learned from the experience
Follow-Up Questions:
- What was your initial reaction when you realized you made this mistake?
- Were you tempted to hide the mistake or minimize its importance? Why or why not?
- How did others respond to your transparency about the error?
- How has this experience influenced your work approach since then?
Share an example of a time when being completely honest might have had negative short-term consequences for you, but you chose honesty anyway.
Areas to Cover:
- The specific situation and the potential negative consequences
- The candidate's decision-making process
- How they communicated the honest information
- The immediate impact of choosing honesty
- The long-term outcomes of the decision
- How they reconcile honesty with professional consequences
Follow-Up Questions:
- What factors did you consider when making your decision?
- Was there a moment of hesitation? What pushed you toward honesty?
- How did this experience reinforce or challenge your values?
- What did you learn about balancing honesty with other professional considerations?
Tell me about a time when you observed unethical behavior in the workplace. What did you do?
Areas to Cover:
- The nature of the unethical behavior observed
- How the candidate assessed the situation
- The actions they took (or didn't take) in response
- Their reasoning process for their chosen course of action
- The outcomes of their decision
- How they felt about their response in retrospect
Follow-Up Questions:
- What factors did you consider when deciding how to respond?
- What potential consequences did you weigh?
- How did you balance loyalty to colleagues with ethical standards?
- Would you handle a similar situation differently now? Why or why not?
Describe a situation where you had to maintain confidentiality while still being honest and transparent.
Areas to Cover:
- The context requiring confidentiality
- The competing pressures for transparency
- How the candidate navigated these competing demands
- Their communication approach and reasoning
- How they determined what information to share versus withhold
- The outcome of their approach
Follow-Up Questions:
- How did you determine where to draw the line between confidentiality and transparency?
- What principles guided your decisions about what to share?
- How did you handle questions you couldn't fully answer?
- What feedback did you receive about your approach?
Share an experience where you had to deliver results that didn't meet expectations. How did you handle that communication?
Areas to Cover:
- The context of the expectations and results
- When and how the candidate recognized the gap
- Their process for preparing the communication
- The level of transparency in their message
- How they balanced honesty with constructive next steps
- The response to their communication
Follow-Up Questions:
- At what point did you decide to communicate about the missed expectations?
- Were you tempted to present the results in a more favorable light? Why or why not?
- How did you prepare for potential negative reactions?
- What would you do differently in similar future situations?
Tell me about a time when following a workplace policy or directive would have required you to be dishonest or misleading. How did you handle it?
Areas to Cover:
- The policy or directive in question
- The ethical conflict it created
- How the candidate assessed the situation
- The actions they took to resolve the conflict
- Their communication with relevant stakeholders
- The outcome and any professional consequences
Follow-Up Questions:
- How did you weigh organizational loyalty against your personal ethics?
- What alternatives did you consider before deciding on your approach?
- How did you communicate your concerns to leadership?
- What was the long-term impact of this situation on your relationship with the organization?
Describe a situation where you had to admit you didn't have the answer or didn't know how to solve a problem.
Areas to Cover:
- The specific situation and expectations
- The candidate's internal process when realizing their knowledge gap
- How they communicated about their limitations
- Actions taken to address the knowledge gap
- The response from others to their honesty
- What they learned about intellectual honesty
Follow-Up Questions:
- What was difficult about admitting you didn't know?
- How did you balance honesty about your limitations with maintaining professional credibility?
- What steps did you take after acknowledging the knowledge gap?
- How has this experience affected how you approach similar situations?
Share an example of when you had to give honest feedback that might be difficult for someone to hear.
Areas to Cover:
- The context requiring the feedback
- How the candidate prepared for the conversation
- Their approach to delivering honest yet constructive feedback
- How they balanced honesty with empathy and respect
- The recipient's reaction and the conversation outcome
- Any follow-up actions or relationship impacts
Follow-Up Questions:
- How did you determine the right level of directness for this feedback?
- What specific techniques did you use to make the feedback more receivable?
- How did you ensure your feedback was fact-based rather than subjective?
- What did you learn about giving difficult feedback effectively?
Tell me about a time when you were pressured to withhold information or spin the truth. How did you respond?
Areas to Cover:
- The source and nature of the pressure
- What was at stake in the situation
- How the candidate evaluated their options
- The actions they ultimately took
- Their reasoning process and principles
- The consequences of their decision
Follow-Up Questions:
- What conflicting values were at play in this situation?
- How did you weigh short-term versus long-term consequences?
- Did you seek advice or support from others? Why or why not?
- How did this experience shape your approach to similar pressures?
Describe a situation where you had to navigate a conflict between transparency and other business priorities.
Areas to Cover:
- The specific business context and competing priorities
- How the candidate identified and framed the conflict
- Their decision-making process
- The approach they took to balance priorities
- How they communicated their decisions to stakeholders
- The outcome and lessons learned
Follow-Up Questions:
- What principles guided your thinking in this situation?
- How did you determine where to draw the line on transparency?
- What stakeholders did you consider in your decision-making?
- How did this experience inform your approach to similar situations later?
Share an example of when you challenged information you believed was inaccurate or misleading.
Areas to Cover:
- The context and the misleading information
- How the candidate verified their concerns
- Their approach to raising the issue
- How they balanced assertiveness with respect
- The response to their challenge
- The ultimate resolution and impact
Follow-Up Questions:
- What made you confident enough to challenge the information?
- How did you approach the conversation to maximize receptivity?
- How did you manage any potential for conflict?
- What was the impact on team trust and communication afterward?
Tell me about a time when being honest required courage in a professional setting.
Areas to Cover:
- The specific situation requiring courage
- The potential personal or professional risks
- The candidate's decision-making process
- How they delivered the honest communication
- The immediate and long-term consequences
- What they learned about courageous honesty
Follow-Up Questions:
- What specifically made this situation require courage?
- What helped you find the courage to be honest?
- How did you prepare for potential negative consequences?
- How has this experience influenced your professional values?
Describe a situation where you discovered information that would reflect poorly on you or your team, but needed to be shared.
Areas to Cover:
- The nature of the problematic information
- The potential impact of disclosure versus non-disclosure
- How the candidate decided to proceed
- Their approach to sharing the information
- The reaction from others and consequences
- How they managed the aftermath
Follow-Up Questions:
- At what point did you decide this information needed to be shared?
- What considerations factored into how you presented the information?
- How did you prepare yourself and your team for potential consequences?
- What would you do similarly or differently in the future?
Share an example of when you had to correct misinformation that you had previously provided.
Areas to Cover:
- The initial misinformation and how it occurred
- When and how the candidate realized the error
- Their process for deciding to correct it
- How they approached the correction
- The response from others
- What they learned about maintaining credibility while admitting errors
Follow-Up Questions:
- How quickly did you act once you realized the mistake?
- What concerns did you have about correcting the information?
- How did you balance the correction with maintaining professional credibility?
- What systems or practices did you implement to prevent similar mistakes?
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I tell if a candidate is being truthful when answering honesty questions?
Look for detailed, specific examples rather than vague or generalized responses. Honest candidates typically include nuance in their stories, including challenges or mistakes, rather than presenting overly polished narratives. Pay attention to consistency across different answers and note how they respond to follow-up questions that probe for details they didn't initially share.
Should I explicitly tell candidates I'm assessing their honesty?
It's generally better not to explicitly state you're evaluating honesty, as this may lead to rehearsed responses. Instead, frame questions as exploring their approach to communication, decision-making, and handling challenging situations. The authentic examples they share will naturally reveal their commitment to honesty.
How many honesty-related questions should I include in an interview?
Include 3-4 well-chosen behavioral questions that address different dimensions of honesty (transparency, accountability, ethical decision-making). This provides multiple opportunities to assess the competency without dominating the interview. Remember that other competencies are also important to evaluate.
What if a candidate struggles to provide examples of situations testing their honesty?
This could be a red flag, as most professionals encounter situations requiring ethical decisions. However, first try rephrasing the question or providing an example to clarify what you're looking for. If they still struggle, consider asking about hypothetical scenarios as a fallback, though remember these are less predictive of actual behavior.
How should I balance assessing honesty with other key competencies in limited interview time?
Design questions that can assess multiple competencies simultaneously. For example, a question about handling a mistake can reveal both honesty and problem-solving abilities. Use a structured interview scorecard to ensure you're methodically evaluating all critical competencies across your interview process.
Interested in a full interview guide with Honesty as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.