In the world of software development, technical skills are crucial, but humility often emerges as a differentiating trait that enables exceptional performance and team cohesion. Humility in software developers reflects a balanced self-awareness that acknowledges both strengths and limitations without ego or defensiveness, creating space for continuous learning and improvement.

Humility manifests in multiple ways within a software development environment. It appears when developers readily admit knowledge gaps, seek input from peers, acknowledge mistakes transparently, share credit for successes, and approach new technologies or methodologies with openness. This trait is particularly valuable in collaborative environments where complex problems require diverse perspectives and collective intelligence.

For hiring managers and technical leaders, evaluating humility during the interview process provides insight into how candidates might handle feedback, contribute to team dynamics, and navigate the inevitable challenges of software development. Engineers with genuine humility tend to learn faster, collaborate more effectively, and ultimately deliver better results by leveraging the collective wisdom of their teams.

When evaluating candidates, focus on listening for specific examples that demonstrate a balance between confidence in their abilities and awareness of their limitations. The most revealing responses often come from follow-up questions that explore how candidates have handled situations requiring them to acknowledge mistakes, learn from others, or reconsider their approaches. Remember that structured behavioral interviews provide the most reliable insights when combined with thoughtful evaluation of past behaviors.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you realized your initial approach to a coding problem was incorrect or inefficient, and how you handled that realization.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific nature of the problem and initial approach
• How and when they realized their approach wasn't optimal
• Their emotional and practical response to this realization
• How they communicated this to teammates or stakeholders
• What alternative approach they ultimately took
• What they learned from this experience
• How this experience influenced their approach to future problems

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you feel when you realized your approach wasn't working?
• How did you communicate this realization to others involved in the project?
• What specific steps did you take to correct course?
• How did this experience change your approach to similar challenges in the future?

Describe a situation where you received critical feedback on your code or technical work. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific feedback received and from whom
• Their initial reaction to the criticism
• How they processed the feedback (internally and externally)
• Actions taken in response to the feedback
• Impact of the feedback on their work and approach
• Lessons learned from the experience
• How they've applied those lessons since

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when you received this feedback?
• What specific changes did you make based on the feedback?
• How has this experience affected how you give feedback to others?
• Can you share an example of a time when you actively sought feedback rather than waiting for it?

Tell me about a time when a junior team member or someone with less experience than you pointed out a flaw in your work or suggested a better approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the situation and nature of the suggestion
• How they received the input from someone with less experience
• Their response to the suggestion (emotionally and practically)
• How they acknowledged the contribution
• The outcome of implementing (or not implementing) the suggestion
• How this experience affected their view of team dynamics
• What they learned about valuing diverse perspectives

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when this person pointed out the issue?
• How did you acknowledge their contribution to the team?
• How has this experience changed your approach to mentoring or working with less experienced developers?
• What did this teach you about the value of diverse perspectives on a team?

Describe a significant technical mistake or bug you introduced into production code. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the mistake and its impact
• How the issue was discovered
• Their immediate response and actions taken
• How they communicated about the error to the team and stakeholders
• Steps taken to fix the issue
• Preventative measures implemented afterward
• Personal and professional growth from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate about this mistake to your team and leadership?
• What specific steps did you take to ensure a similar issue wouldn't happen again?
• How did this experience affect your confidence or approach to future work?
• What would you do differently if you could go back to that situation?

Tell me about a project where you had to work with a technology or programming language you weren't familiar with. How did you approach the learning curve?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technology and project context
• Their initial comfort level and knowledge gaps
• Resources they sought out to learn (people, documentation, courses)
• How they balanced learning with delivery requirements
• Challenges faced during the learning process
• How they leveraged team knowledge
• The outcome of their efforts to learn and apply new skills

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most challenging aspect of working with unfamiliar technology?
• Who did you turn to for help, and how did you approach those conversations?
• How did you balance being honest about your knowledge gaps while maintaining confidence in your ability to learn?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to learning new technologies since then?

Describe a time when you strongly disagreed with a technical decision made by your team or manager. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific decision and why they disagreed
• How they expressed their disagreement
• Their willingness to understand the opposing viewpoint
• How they balanced advocacy for their position with respect for others
• The resolution of the disagreement
• How they proceeded after the final decision was made
• What they learned from this experience about technical discussions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you express your disagreement while maintaining respect for others?
• What steps did you take to understand the other perspective?
• How did you proceed after the final decision was made, particularly if it wasn't your preferred option?
• What did this experience teach you about handling technical disagreements in a team?

Tell me about a successful project you worked on as part of a team. How did you contribute to the team's success, and how did others contribute?

Areas to Cover:

• The project scope and their specific role
• How they describe their own contributions vs. others'
• Their acknowledgment of team members' contributions
• How credit was shared and attributed
• The dynamics of collaboration during the project
• Challenges overcome through teamwork
• How they balance speaking about personal achievements with team achievements

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most valuable contribution from another team member to this project?
• How did you acknowledge and support the contributions of others during the project?
• Were there moments when you needed to step back and let someone else take the lead?
• How do you balance highlighting your own achievements with giving credit to the team?

Describe a time when you had to admit you didn't know something important related to your work as a developer. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific knowledge gap and its relevance to their role
• The context in which they had to admit not knowing
• How they communicated their knowledge gap
• Steps they took to address the knowledge gap
• How others responded to their admission
• The ultimate resolution and impact
• What they learned about handling knowledge gaps

Follow-Up Questions:

• How comfortable were you admitting this knowledge gap?
• What specific steps did you take to fill in this gap in your knowledge?
• How has this experience affected how you approach similar situations now?
• What advice would you give to a junior developer about handling knowledge gaps?

Tell me about a time when you helped a peer developer who was struggling with a problem. How did you approach helping them?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the problem and their peer's difficulties
• How they identified that help was needed
• Their approach to offering assistance
• How they balanced solving the problem versus teaching
• The collaborative dynamics during the process
• The outcome for both the problem and their peer's development
• What they learned about effective mentoring and support

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance solving the problem for them versus helping them learn?
• What did you learn about your own knowledge or skills through this teaching experience?
• How did this experience affect your approach to helping others on your team?
• Have you ever been in a situation where helping someone made you realize you had something to learn as well?

Describe a situation when you received credit for a success that was actually a team effort. How did you respond?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the success and recognition
• Their initial reaction to receiving disproportionate credit
• How they redirected credit to appropriate team members
• Their comfort level with sharing recognition
• The impact on team dynamics
• How leadership responded to their redirection of credit
• What this situation revealed about their values regarding teamwork

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific actions did you take to ensure proper credit was given to everyone involved?
• How did your team members react to your efforts to share credit?
• Has there been a time when you didn't properly acknowledge others' contributions? What did you learn from that?
• How do you ensure everyone's contributions are recognized in your current projects?

Tell me about a time when you were wrong about a technical approach or solution, and a colleague helped you see a better way.

Areas to Cover:

• The original technical approach and their thinking
• How the colleague provided alternative perspectives
• Their openness to reconsidering their position
• The process of evaluating the alternative approach
• How they acknowledged their colleague's better solution
• The outcome of implementing the better approach
• What they learned about their own problem-solving process

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when your colleague suggested an alternative approach?
• How did you evaluate whether their solution was actually better than yours?
• How did you acknowledge your colleague's contribution?
• How has this experience changed your approach to problem-solving or collaboration?

Describe a time when you had to balance confidence in your technical expertise with humility about what you might not know.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation requiring this balance
• Their assessment of their own expertise versus knowledge gaps
• How they projected appropriate confidence
• How they acknowledged limitations or sought input
• The reaction from others to this balanced approach
• The outcome of the situation
• What they learned about effective technical leadership

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine where the boundaries of your knowledge were in this situation?
• What strategies did you use to project confidence while acknowledging limitations?
• How did others respond to your approach?
• How do you maintain this balance in your current role?

Tell me about a situation where you changed your mind about a technical decision after discussing it with your team.

Areas to Cover:

• The initial decision and their reasoning
• What perspectives or information changed their thinking
• How open they were to alternative viewpoints
• Their process for reconsidering their position
• How they communicated their change of mind
• The outcome of the revised approach
• What they learned about decision-making and flexibility

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specifically convinced you to change your mind?
• How did you communicate your revised thinking to the team?
• Was it difficult to admit that your initial approach wasn't the best option?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach technical discussions now?

Describe a time when you needed to learn a new skill or technology quickly to contribute to a project. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific skill or technology they needed to learn
• Their starting knowledge level and the gap to be filled
• Resources and support they sought out
• How they balanced learning with productivity
• Challenges they faced during the learning process
• Their comfort level with being a novice temporarily
• The outcome of their learning efforts and contribution to the project

Follow-Up Questions:

• How comfortable were you with being a beginner again?
• What strategies did you use to learn efficiently while still contributing to the project?
• How did you communicate your learning progress to your team?
• What did this experience teach you about your learning style or capacity?

Tell me about a time when you inherited another developer's code that was difficult to understand or poorly documented. How did you approach working with it?

Areas to Cover:

• The state of the code and specific challenges
• Their initial reaction and assessment
• How they approached understanding the existing work
• Whether they sought out the original developer (if possible)
• Their attitude toward the previous developer's work
• The process of improving the code while respecting the original work
• What they learned about code maintenance and documentation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you feel initially about working with this challenging code?
• How did you balance being critical of the code quality with respect for the previous developer?
• What specific steps did you take to improve the situation for future developers?
• How has this experience influenced your own coding and documentation practices?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions about humility particularly important for software developer roles?

Software development is inherently collaborative and iterative. Developers with humility tend to learn more quickly, collaborate more effectively, and contribute to psychologically safe environments where innovation thrives. In technical roles, humility balances expertise with openness to new approaches and technologies, which is essential in our rapidly evolving field. Humble developers also tend to write more maintainable code, document better, and create systems that others can work with effectively.

How can I tell if a candidate is genuinely humble or just saying what they think I want to hear?

Look for specificity and consistency in their answers. Genuinely humble candidates typically provide detailed examples with concrete actions they took, acknowledge both successes and failures, give proper credit to teammates, and show self-awareness about their growth areas. Follow-up questions are crucial—dig deeper into their initial responses to get beyond rehearsed answers. Also, note how they talk about failures; humble candidates take appropriate responsibility rather than blaming circumstances or others.

Should I evaluate humility differently for senior versus junior developers?

Yes, but the core attributes remain similar. For junior developers, look for eagerness to learn, openness to feedback, and acknowledgment of knowledge gaps. For senior developers, humility often manifests as elevating team members, creating psychological safety, mentoring others, and balancing technical leadership with openness to others' ideas. Senior developers should demonstrate humility while still showing appropriate confidence in their expertise and decision-making abilities.

How many of these humility questions should I include in an interview?

Include 2-3 humility-focused questions in a typical interview. This gives you enough data points to evaluate the competency without overwhelming the interview with a single trait. Remember that using fewer questions with high-quality follow-ups provides better insights than rushing through many questions superficially. Combine these with questions about other crucial competencies for a well-rounded assessment.

Can humility be developed, or should I only hire candidates who already demonstrate this trait?

Humility can definitely be developed, though some candidates may have a stronger natural inclination toward it. Look for candidates who show self-awareness and a growth mindset, even if their humility isn't fully mature. In your organization, you can foster humility through modeling the behavior yourself, creating psychologically safe environments where admitting mistakes is normalized, and recognizing and rewarding humble behaviors. That said, candidates who show significant ego, defensiveness, or inability to acknowledge limitations during the interview process may struggle to integrate well with collaborative teams.

Interested in a full interview guide with Humility for Software Developer Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.