Effective communication is essential in today's workplace, but influential communication goes beyond simply conveying information—it drives action, builds relationships, and shapes outcomes. Influential communication involves the ability to adapt messaging for different audiences, persuade effectively, listen actively, and convey ideas with clarity and impact. According to communication experts at the Harvard Business Review, influential communicators combine strategic messaging with authentic delivery to achieve specific outcomes while building trust and credibility with their audience.

In today's collaborative and often remote work environments, the ability to communicate influentially can be the difference between a good employee and an exceptional one. This competency manifests in various ways: presenting compelling arguments in meetings, crafting persuasive written proposals, navigating difficult conversations with stakeholders, building consensus among diverse team members, and communicating complex ideas in accessible ways. The most effective influential communicators demonstrate audience awareness, emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, and adaptability in their approach.

When interviewing candidates for positions requiring strong influential communication skills, focus on exploring specific past behaviors rather than hypothetical situations. The most revealing insights often come from detailed follow-up questions about the context, strategies, and outcomes of previous communication challenges candidates have faced. Behavioral interview questions, when properly structured, can help you identify candidates who not only communicate clearly but do so with purpose and impact.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to convince a skeptical audience to support an idea or initiative you believed in.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific context and what made the audience skeptical
• How the candidate assessed the audience's concerns or reservations
• The approach and strategies used to influence the audience
• Specific messaging techniques or framing used
• How the candidate handled objections or resistance
• The ultimate outcome and any lessons learned
• How this experience informed future communication approaches

Follow-Up Questions:

• What research did you do to understand your audience's perspective before communicating with them?
• How did you adapt your message based on what you knew about their concerns?
• What signals told you that your approach was or wasn't working, and how did you adjust?
• If you were to approach a similar situation today, what would you do differently?

Describe a situation where you had to communicate a complex or technical concept to someone without your background or expertise.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the complex information and why it needed to be communicated
• How the candidate assessed the audience's existing knowledge
• Specific techniques used to simplify without oversimplifying
• Any analogies, visuals, or examples leveraged
• How the candidate checked for understanding
• The ultimate outcome of the communication
• Lessons learned about making complex information accessible

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about translating this complex information?
• How did you determine whether your communication was successful?
• What feedback did you receive, and how did you incorporate it?
• What techniques have you found most effective when communicating complex information to non-experts?

Share an example of how you adapted your communication style or approach to effectively reach a different audience than you typically work with.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the different audience involved
• How the candidate recognized the need for adaptation
• Specific changes made to communication style, content, or delivery
• Research or preparation done to understand the audience
• Challenges encountered in the adaptation process
• The outcome and effectiveness of the adapted approach
• Insights gained about communication flexibility

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you research or learn about this audience's preferences or needs?
• What aspects of your usual communication style did you find most important to change?
• How did you know your adapted approach was working or not working?
• What did this experience teach you about your communication strengths and limitations?

Tell me about a time when you had to deliver a difficult or unpopular message to colleagues, team members, or stakeholders.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the difficult message and why it needed to be communicated
• How the candidate prepared for the conversation
• The approach chosen and why
• Techniques used to maintain relationships while delivering difficult news
• How the candidate handled emotional responses
• The short and long-term outcomes of the communication
• What the candidate would do similarly or differently in the future

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for potential reactions to your message?
• What was most challenging about delivering this particular message?
• How did you balance honesty with sensitivity?
• What follow-up was necessary after delivering the message, and how did you handle it?

Describe a situation where your initial communication approach wasn't effective, and you had to change your strategy to achieve your objective.

Areas to Cover:

• The initial communication objective and approach
• Signs that indicated the approach wasn't working
• The analysis of why the first attempt failed
• How the candidate reformulated their approach
• Specific changes made to content, timing, medium, or style
• The outcome after the adjusted approach
• Lessons learned about communication flexibility and effectiveness

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the earliest signs that your initial approach wasn't working?
• How did you decide which aspects of your communication needed to change?
• How did you manage any frustration you might have felt when your first approach didn't succeed?
• What did this experience teach you about your communication blind spots?

Give me an example of a time when you used data or evidence to make a persuasive case for a decision or direction.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and objective of the communication
• How the candidate selected and prepared the relevant data
• The way the data was presented and contextualized
• How technical information was translated into meaningful insights
• Any resistance encountered and how it was addressed
• The ultimate outcome and impact of the data-supported communication
• Lessons about effectively using data in communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which data points would be most persuasive for this audience?
• What techniques did you use to make the data meaningful and not just informational?
• Were there any surprising reactions to the data you presented, and how did you handle them?
• How do you balance data-driven arguments with other persuasive elements like storytelling or emotional appeals?

Tell me about a time when you successfully built consensus among people with competing priorities or different viewpoints.

Areas to Cover:

• The situation and the nature of the differing priorities
• The stakeholders involved and their perspectives
• How the candidate facilitated dialogue between parties
• Techniques used to find common ground
• How the candidate managed potential conflicts
• The resolution achieved and how it accommodated different needs
• Insights gained about consensus-building communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure all perspectives were genuinely heard and considered?
• What was the most challenging moment in the consensus-building process, and how did you handle it?
• What techniques did you use to help people see beyond their immediate positions to underlying interests?
• How did you maintain momentum toward resolution when the process became difficult?

Share an experience where you had to communicate a vision or strategy in a way that inspired others to take action.

Areas to Cover:

• The vision or strategy being communicated
• The audience and their initial level of engagement
• How the candidate crafted their message for maximum impact
• Techniques used to create inspiration rather than just understanding
• How the message connected to the audience's values or interests
• The resulting actions taken by the audience
• Lessons about inspirational communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you connect your vision to things your audience already cared about?
• What elements of your communication do you think were most effective in inspiring action?
• How did you sustain momentum after the initial communication?
• What feedback did you receive about your communication of this vision?

Describe a situation where you had to use your communication skills to defuse tension or resolve a conflict.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the conflict or tension
• The stakeholders involved and their emotional states
• The candidate's approach to opening dialogue
• Active listening techniques employed
• How the candidate managed emotions (both others' and their own)
• The resolution process and outcome
• Insights about effective communication during tense situations

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals told you this situation needed intervention?
• How did you create a safe space for open communication?
• What techniques did you use to ensure people felt heard?
• How did you maintain your own composure if emotions were running high?

Tell me about a time when you had to tailor your communication about the same topic to different audiences with varying levels of knowledge or interest.

Areas to Cover:

• The information that needed to be communicated
• The different audiences and how they varied
• How the candidate assessed each audience's needs
• Specific adaptations made for each audience (content, style, medium)
• Challenges in maintaining consistency while customizing
• The effectiveness of the varied approaches
• Lessons about audience-centered communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what information was most relevant to each audience?
• What techniques did you use to assess whether your communication was effective with each group?
• How did you maintain consistency in your core message while varying the delivery?
• What was most challenging about this multi-audience communication?

Give me an example of when you used storytelling or narrative techniques to make your communication more compelling or memorable.

Areas to Cover:

• The communication objective and context
• Why the candidate chose a narrative approach
• How they structured their story for maximum impact
• Elements included (characters, conflict, resolution, etc.)
• How the story connected to broader points or data
• The audience response and outcomes
• Insights about effective storytelling in professional contexts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you choose which story would resonate most with this particular audience?
• What elements of your story do you think were most effective and why?
• How did you ensure your story supported rather than distracted from your main message?
• How do you determine when storytelling is the right approach versus other communication methods?

Describe a time when you had to communicate effectively in writing to influence a decision or outcome.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and purpose of the written communication
• The audience and what influenced the writing style
• How the candidate structured the written communication
• Persuasive techniques used in the writing
• Any feedback or iteration process
• The outcome and effectiveness of the written communication
• Lessons about influential written communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did your approach to written communication differ from how you might have handled this verbally?
• What techniques did you use to maintain the reader's attention and interest?
• How did you ensure your key points would stand out in your writing?
• What feedback did you receive, and how did it inform your future written communications?

Tell me about a situation where you had to advocate for an unpopular position or challenge the status quo through your communication.

Areas to Cover:

• The unpopular position and why the candidate supported it
• The prevailing viewpoint they were challenging
• How they framed their position to maximize receptivity
• Techniques used to reduce defensiveness in the audience
• How objections or resistance were handled
• The outcome and any shifts in perspective achieved
• Insights about effective advocacy communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for potential pushback on your position?
• What made you decide this was worth challenging despite its unpopularity?
• How did you balance conviction with openness to others' perspectives?
• What was the most effective element of your communication in this situation?

Share an example of how you've used questions effectively to influence a conversation or outcome.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the candidate's communication objective
• The types of questions used and their purpose
• How questions were sequenced or structured
• The impact of the questions on the conversation flow
• How the candidate used the answers to guide the discussion
• The outcome of this questioning approach
• Lessons about using questions as a communication tool

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide which questions to ask and in what order?
• What was most challenging about using questions in this situation?
• How did you respond when answers took the conversation in unexpected directions?
• What have you learned about the strategic use of questions in communication?

Describe a time when you had to gain buy-in or support from someone who had more power or authority than you.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and why gaining support was important
• The power dynamics at play
• How the candidate prepared for the communication
• Specific approaches used to influence upward
• How the candidate established credibility
• The outcome and effectiveness of the approach
• Lessons about communicating across power differences

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you establish credibility with this person?
• What considerations went into your communication approach given the power differential?
• How did you ensure your message would be valued and not dismissed?
• What did you learn about effectively communicating with senior stakeholders?

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when assessing influential communication?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually handled communication challenges in the past, providing concrete evidence of their skills rather than theoretical answers about what they might do. This approach gives insight into their real communication patterns, strengths, and growth areas based on lived experience, which is a stronger predictor of future performance than hypothetical scenarios.

How many of these questions should I include in an interview?

Rather than trying to cover all these questions, select 3-4 that are most relevant to your specific role requirements. This allows time for the detailed follow-up questions that will provide deeper insights into the candidate's communication abilities. Quality of exploration is more valuable than quantity of questions.

How can I distinguish between candidates who are naturally charismatic communicators versus those who are strategically effective?

Focus on the process questions: ask how they prepared, what research they did, how they adjusted their approach based on feedback, and what lessons they learned. Strategically effective communicators can articulate their thought process and demonstrate adaptability, while those relying solely on charisma might struggle to explain their methodology or show evidence of tailoring their approach to different situations.

Should I expect candidates to have perfect communication success stories, or is it valuable to hear about failures too?

Stories about communication challenges or initial failures that led to learning and adaptation are often more revealing than perfect success stories. These experiences demonstrate self-awareness, resilience, and growth mindset. The key is whether candidates can articulate what they learned and how they applied those insights to improve their communication effectiveness.

How do I evaluate influential communication for technical roles where technical expertise might seem more important?

Even in technical roles, influential communication remains crucial for explaining complex concepts, collaborating across teams, advocating for resources or approaches, and building consensus. Focus questions on how candidates have translated technical information for non-technical audiences, built support for technical decisions, or influenced project direction through effective communication.

Interested in a full interview guide with Influential Communication as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.