Information seeking is a fundamental competency defined as the ability to proactively identify, obtain, and evaluate relevant information from multiple sources to make informed decisions and solve problems effectively. This skill goes beyond basic research to encompass the strategic gathering, critical assessment, and practical application of information in professional contexts.

In today's information-rich workplace, effective information seeking is crucial for success across virtually all roles and industries. The ability to gather relevant data, distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones, and apply insights appropriately can significantly impact decision quality, innovation potential, and problem-solving effectiveness. Information seeking manifests in numerous workplace activities, from conducting market research and competitive analysis to troubleshooting technical problems and identifying customer needs.

This competency has several dimensions that should be evaluated during the interview process. These include curiosity and intellectual inquisitiveness, research methodology and source selection, critical evaluation of information quality, persistence in the face of information gaps, and the ability to synthesize and apply findings appropriately. When assessing candidates, interviewers should listen for specific examples that demonstrate systematic approaches to gathering information, adaptability when facing information challenges, and the ability to translate research into actionable insights.

To effectively evaluate a candidate's information seeking abilities, focus on behavioral questions that require specific examples from their past experiences. Listen carefully for the process they used, how they determined what information was relevant, and how they overcame obstacles in their information search. The best candidates will demonstrate not just the ability to find information but to evaluate its quality, recognize knowledge gaps, and apply findings in meaningful ways to solve problems or make decisions.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you needed to learn about a topic or subject area that was completely new to you in order to complete an important task or project.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific topic they needed to learn and why it was important
• Their approach to identifying reliable information sources
• How they organized and prioritized their learning
• Challenges they encountered in finding or understanding information
• How they evaluated the quality and reliability of information
• How they applied what they learned to the task or project
• The outcome and what they would do differently next time

Follow-Up Questions:

• What criteria did you use to determine which information sources were most valuable?
• How did you know when you had gathered enough information to proceed?
• What was the most challenging aspect of learning this new topic?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to learning new things?

Describe a situation where you had to gather information from multiple stakeholders who had different perspectives or conflicting viewpoints.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the situation and why gathering diverse perspectives was necessary
• Their strategy for identifying and approaching different stakeholders
• How they encouraged honest and comprehensive information sharing
• Their process for documenting and organizing divergent information
• How they reconciled conflicting information or perspectives
• How they determined which information was most relevant or accurate
• The ultimate outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you establish trust with stakeholders to get accurate information?
• What techniques did you use to identify potential biases in the information you received?
• How did you handle situations where stakeholders were reluctant to share information?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a project where your initial assumptions or understanding proved to be incorrect, and you had to seek out new information to adjust your approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the project and their initial assumptions
• How they discovered their assumptions were incorrect
• Their process for gathering new information once they realized the gap
• How they evaluated which new information was relevant
• The adjustments they made based on new findings
• How they communicated changes to others involved
• The outcome of the adjusted approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you realize your initial understanding was insufficient?
• How did you determine which new sources of information to consult?
• What was the most valuable lesson you learned from this experience?
• How has this experience affected how you approach new projects?

Share an example of a time when critical information was difficult to find or access. How did you overcome this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and why the information was important
• The specific barriers or challenges they encountered
• Alternative approaches they considered
• Resources or people they leveraged to overcome obstacles
• Their persistence and creativity in problem-solving
• How they ultimately obtained the needed information
• How the experience affected their approach to similar situations in the future

Follow-Up Questions:

• What alternative sources did you consider when your initial approach wasn't working?
• At what point would you have decided to proceed without the information?
• What resourcefulness techniques proved most effective?
• How did you validate the information once you finally obtained it?

Describe a situation where you needed to analyze a large amount of information to identify key insights or patterns.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and purpose of the analysis
• Their approach to organizing and categorizing information
• Methods or tools they used to manage data volume
• How they identified meaningful patterns or connections
• Their process for prioritizing which insights were most important
• How they communicated findings to others
• The impact of their analysis on decision-making or outcomes

Follow-Up Questions:

• What techniques or frameworks did you use to structure your analysis?
• How did you determine which patterns were significant versus coincidental?
• What was the most surprising insight you discovered?
• What would you do differently if you had to analyze a similar volume of information again?

Tell me about a time when you had to research and make recommendations on a topic with significant technical complexity or that required specialized knowledge.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the technical topic
• Their strategy for building understanding of complex concepts
• Resources, experts, or tools they utilized
• How they determined which technical aspects were most relevant
• Their approach to translating technical information for different audiences
• The quality and reception of their recommendations
• How they addressed questions or challenges to their findings

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you verify your understanding of technical concepts?
• What strategies did you use to explain complex information to non-technical stakeholders?
• How did you balance depth versus breadth in your research?
• What would you do differently in researching a complex topic next time?

Describe a situation where you uncovered information that contradicted your team's or organization's existing approach or assumptions.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and nature of the contradictory information
• How they verified the accuracy of the new information
• Their process for evaluating the implications
• How they approached sharing potentially unwelcome information
• Resistance they encountered and how they addressed it
• The ultimate outcome and organizational response
• Lessons learned about managing organizational knowledge

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure the contradictory information was valid before sharing it?
• What approach did you take to present the information in a constructive way?
• How did stakeholders initially respond to the contradictory information?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to quickly gather information to address an urgent problem or crisis.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the urgent situation
• How they prioritized what information was critical versus nice-to-have
• Their strategy for rapid information gathering
• How they balanced speed with accuracy
• Resources and people they leveraged
• How they made decisions with potentially incomplete information
• The outcome and what they learned about rapid information seeking

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which information sources to prioritize?
• What shortcuts or efficiencies did you discover in your information-gathering process?
• How did you validate information given the time constraints?
• What would you change about your approach if faced with a similar time-sensitive situation?

Share an experience where you implemented a systematic approach to gather ongoing information about industry trends, competitive activities, or emerging technologies.

Areas to Cover:

• The business need for ongoing information monitoring
• Their method for identifying relevant information streams
• Tools, resources, or systems they established
• How they filtered signal from noise in continuous information
• Their process for synthesizing and sharing findings with others
• The impact of their information monitoring system
• How they refined their approach over time

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which information sources were most valuable to monitor?
• What techniques did you use to efficiently process ongoing information?
• How did you measure the effectiveness of your information gathering system?
• What improvements would you make to your approach in the future?

Describe a time when you had to seek information from sources outside your organization to solve an internal challenge.

Areas to Cover:

• The internal challenge and why external information was needed
• How they identified potential external information sources
• Their approach to establishing connections with external sources
• Methods for evaluating the relevance of external information to their context
• How they adapted external insights for internal application
• Challenges in translating external practices to their organization
• The outcome and impact of bringing in external perspectives

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify which external sources would have relevant information?
• What techniques did you use to build relationships with external sources?
• How did you evaluate whether external information would apply to your specific context?
• What did you learn about balancing internal and external information sources?

Tell me about a time when you had to gather feedback or information from users or customers to improve a product, service, or process.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and purpose for gathering user/customer information
• Methods they chose for collecting feedback and why
• Their approach to designing questions or prompts
• How they ensured comprehensive and representative input
• Their process for analyzing and prioritizing user information
• How they translated user insights into specific improvements
• The impact of the changes implemented based on feedback

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you were getting honest, unfiltered feedback?
• What techniques did you use to uncover needs that users couldn't articulate directly?
• How did you distinguish between what users said they wanted versus what they needed?
• What surprised you most about the feedback you gathered?

Share an example of when you had to validate information from multiple sources before making an important decision.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• Their criteria for evaluating information reliability
• How they identified potentially conflicting information
• The steps they took to verify critical information
• How they weighted different sources based on credibility
• Their process for reconciling contradictions or gaps
• The ultimate decision and how information validation affected it

Follow-Up Questions:

• What red flags helped you identify potentially unreliable information?
• How did you determine which sources were most credible?
• What techniques did you use when sources provided conflicting information?
• How did the validation process change your initial understanding of the situation?

Describe a situation where you needed to gather information about a sensitive or confidential matter.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the situation and sensitivity concerns
• Their approach to identifying appropriate information sources
• How they balanced information needs with confidentiality
• Techniques used to establish trust with information providers
• Ethical considerations in their information gathering
• How they protected sensitive information while using it
• The outcome and lessons learned about handling sensitive information

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine who should have access to the sensitive information?
• What additional precautions did you take because of the sensitivity?
• How did you build trust with stakeholders when discussing sensitive matters?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar sensitive situation?

Tell me about a time when you had to piece together incomplete information to develop a recommendation or solution.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and why complete information wasn't available
• How they determined what information was critical versus nice-to-have
• Their approach to identifying and filling information gaps
• Methods they used to make reasonable inferences
• How they communicated the limitations of their analysis
• The outcome of their recommendation
• How they incorporated new information as it became available

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the most critical information gaps?
• What techniques did you use to make educated assumptions when information was missing?
• How did you communicate the uncertainty in your recommendations?
• What would you do differently if faced with incomplete information in the future?

Share an experience where you had to learn a new tool, technology, or methodology to access or analyze information effectively.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and why the new tool/technology was necessary
• Their approach to learning the new capability
• Resources or people they leveraged in the learning process
• Challenges they encountered and how they overcame them
• How they applied the new capability to their information needs
• The impact on their effectiveness or efficiency
• How they've continued to develop their skill with the tool/technology

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about learning this new tool or method?
• How did you determine this tool was worth the investment of your time to learn?
• What shortcuts or efficiencies did you discover that weren't obvious at first?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to learning new tools?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why should I focus on behavioral interview questions rather than hypothetical ones when assessing information seeking skills?

Behavioral questions that ask candidates to describe past experiences provide more reliable insights into their actual capabilities than hypothetical scenarios. When candidates describe how they've sought information in real situations, you get concrete evidence of their process, resourcefulness, and effectiveness. Hypothetical questions often elicit idealized answers that may not reflect how candidates actually perform. The detailed examples from behavioral questions allow you to better predict how candidates will approach information seeking in your organization.

How many information seeking questions should I include in an interview?

Quality is more important than quantity. Rather than asking many questions with superficial follow-up, select 3-4 well-crafted information seeking questions with thorough follow-up to allow candidates to demonstrate depth in their experiences. This approach provides the context needed for more objective assessment. For technical or research-intensive roles, you might weight information seeking questions more heavily, while for other roles, you might balance them with questions assessing other competencies.

How can I tell if a candidate is exaggerating their information seeking abilities?

Listen for specificity in their answers. Strong information seekers will readily provide detailed descriptions of their process, including specific sources they consulted, challenges they encountered, and how they evaluated information quality. Ask probing follow-up questions about the tools they used, their evaluation criteria for sources, or how they organized their findings. Vague responses or inability to elaborate on the process may indicate exaggeration. Also, note whether they can articulate what they would do differently next time, as this reflects authentic reflection on their experiences.

How do information seeking skills differ across industries or role types?

While the core competency remains the same, the application varies by context. Technical roles may require deeper skills in evaluating specialized information sources, data analysis tools, or technical documentation. Strategic roles often emphasize competitive intelligence gathering, market analysis, and synthesizing diverse stakeholder inputs. Creative roles might focus on trend research, user insights, and inspiration gathering. Customer-facing roles typically emphasize gathering information directly from clients and translating needs into solutions. When evaluating candidates, consider how their information seeking experience aligns with your specific industry and role requirements.

How can I help candidates who struggle with this competency improve their information seeking skills?

Candidates can develop information seeking skills through structured practice and feedback. Recommend they: 1) Cultivate curiosity by regularly reading outside their immediate domain; 2) Practice systematic research approaches, using frameworks to organize information gathering; 3) Develop criteria for evaluating source reliability; 4) Learn to use advanced search techniques and relevant research tools; 5) Join professional communities where knowledge sharing is encouraged; and 6) Seek feedback on their research methods and findings. For those you hire who need development in this area, consider pairing them with mentors who excel at information seeking and provide opportunities for them to conduct research projects with guidance.

Interested in a full interview guide with Information Seeking as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.