Internal Audit is a systematic, independent function that evaluates an organization's operations, controls, and compliance to enhance effectiveness and mitigate risk. This critical discipline serves as both a safeguard and strategic advisor for businesses across industries, providing objective assurance that processes are functioning as intended and identifying opportunities for improvement.

In today's complex regulatory environment, effective internal auditors combine analytical precision with business acumen to deliver insights that protect organizational value. The most successful audit professionals demonstrate a unique blend of technical expertise, ethical judgment, and communication skills. They must navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining independence and objectivity – balancing the role of trusted advisor with that of critical evaluator.

When interviewing candidates for internal audit positions, look beyond technical qualifications to assess critical competencies like professional skepticism, integrity, attention to detail, and analytical thinking. The best internal auditors demonstrate intellectual curiosity, ethical courage, and the ability to communicate complex findings in accessible ways. These behavioral interviews should help you identify candidates who can not only identify control weaknesses but also influence positive change within the organization.

To effectively evaluate candidates, focus on asking behavioral questions about specific past experiences, then use follow-up questions to understand their thinking process and actions in detail. By exploring how candidates have handled actual audit scenarios, risk assessments, or ethical dilemmas, you'll gain valuable insights into how they'll perform in your organization's internal audit function.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a significant control weakness or compliance issue during an audit. How did you approach it and what was the outcome?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific nature of the control weakness or compliance issue
• How the candidate discovered or identified the problem
• The approach to investigating and validating the issue
• How they communicated the findings to stakeholders
• Any resistance or challenges they faced
• The ultimate resolution and its impact
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific evidence did you gather to confirm your initial concerns?
• How did you prioritize this issue among other audit findings?
• How did you handle any pushback from the department or team involved?
• What changes were implemented as a result of your finding, and how did you verify their effectiveness?

Describe a situation where you had to maintain your objectivity and independence while facing pressure from management or other stakeholders during an audit.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific circumstances and nature of the pressure
• The candidate's thought process in maintaining independence
• Actions taken to address the pressure while staying objective
• How they communicated their position to stakeholders
• The resolution of the situation
• Impact on stakeholder relationships
• How they balanced professional standards with organizational relationships

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific principles or professional standards guided your response?
• How did you communicate your position without damaging the relationship?
• Looking back, would you have approached the situation differently?
• How did this experience shape your approach to similar situations in the future?

Share an example of a complex audit you conducted that required you to analyze large amounts of data or information. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The scope and complexity of the audit
• Methodology used to organize and analyze the data
• Specific analytical techniques or tools employed
• How they identified key patterns or issues
• Collaboration with team members or subject matter experts
• How they presented complex findings in an understandable way
• The impact of their analysis on audit conclusions

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific analytical tools or techniques did you use and why?
• How did you determine which data points were most relevant to focus on?
• What unexpected patterns or anomalies did you discover, if any?
• How did you translate your complex analysis into actionable recommendations?

Tell me about a time when you identified a risk that wasn't on anyone's radar. How did you identify it and what actions did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The context in which they identified the overlooked risk
• The process that led to the discovery
• Why the risk had been previously overlooked
• How they assessed and validated the risk
• The approach to communicating the new risk to stakeholders
• Actions taken to address the risk
• The outcome and organizational response

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specifically triggered your concern about this previously unidentified risk?
• How did you quantify or assess the potential impact of this risk?
• What resistance, if any, did you face when bringing this risk to attention?
• How has the organization incorporated this risk into its ongoing risk assessment process?

Describe a time when you had to communicate difficult or sensitive audit findings to senior management. How did you approach this?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the sensitive findings
• Preparation done before the communication
• The communication approach and strategy
• How they structured the message
• Management's initial reaction
• How they handled questions or challenges
• The ultimate outcome of the communication
• Lessons learned about effectively communicating difficult information

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for potential defensive reactions?
• What specific techniques did you use to keep the conversation focused on facts rather than emotions?
• How did you prioritize which findings to emphasize?
• What would you do differently in a similar situation in the future?

Share an example of when you had to adapt your audit approach due to unexpected circumstances or limitations. What did you do and what was the result?

Areas to Cover:

• The original audit plan and objectives
• The unexpected circumstances or limitations encountered
• Their decision-making process in determining how to adapt
• How they communicated changes to stakeholders
• Alternative approaches or methods implemented
• How they ensured audit objectives were still met despite changes
• The outcome and any impact on audit quality or timeline

Follow-Up Questions:

• How quickly were you able to develop an alternative approach?
• What key considerations guided your decision on how to adapt?
• How did you ensure the revised approach still provided the necessary assurance?
• What did this experience teach you about audit planning and flexibility?

Tell me about a time when you worked with a difficult or uncooperative auditee. How did you handle the situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific circumstances and nature of the difficulty
• Their assessment of why the auditee was being uncooperative
• Strategies used to build rapport and cooperation
• How they balanced firmness with relationship building
• Communication approaches used
• The resolution and outcome
• Impact on the quality and efficiency of the audit
• Lessons learned about managing difficult stakeholders

Follow-Up Questions:

• What do you think was the underlying reason for their resistance?
• What specific techniques did you use to build trust with this person?
• How did you ensure you still obtained the information needed for the audit?
• How did this experience change your approach to stakeholder management?

Describe a situation where you identified an opportunity for process improvement during an audit. How did you develop and present your recommendations?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the process being audited
• How they identified the improvement opportunity
• Their process for developing practical recommendations
• Research or benchmarking conducted
• How they built a case for the recommended changes
• The approach to presenting recommendations
• Stakeholder reception and implementation
• Results and benefits realized from the improvement

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure your recommendations were practical and implementable?
• What potential obstacles to implementation did you consider?
• How did you quantify the potential benefits of your recommendations?
• What follow-up did you do to track the implementation and effectiveness of your recommendations?

Tell me about a time when you had to quickly become knowledgeable about a new business area, industry regulation, or technical domain for an audit.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific knowledge gap they needed to address
• The time constraints involved
• Resources and methods used to gain knowledge
• How they applied the new knowledge to the audit
• Any challenges faced in the learning process
• How they validated their understanding
• The impact of their quick learning on audit quality
• Techniques they found most effective for rapid knowledge acquisition

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific resources did you find most valuable in building your knowledge?
• How did you verify that your newly acquired knowledge was accurate and sufficient?
• How did you balance the need for quick learning with the thoroughness required for the audit?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to professional development?

Share an example of when you identified fraud, significant misconduct, or a material error during an audit. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The circumstances that led to the discovery
• Initial indicators or red flags
• The approach to investigating and confirming the issue
• How they documented evidence
• The process for escalating the matter
• How they maintained confidentiality and objectivity
• The resolution and organizational response
• Lessons learned about detecting and handling such serious matters

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially triggered your suspicion?
• How did you gather evidence without alerting the individuals involved?
• How did you determine when and to whom to escalate the matter?
• What controls or processes were implemented afterward to prevent similar issues?

Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with other teams or departments to complete an effective audit.

Areas to Cover:

• The audit objectives and why collaboration was necessary
• The teams or departments involved
• How they established productive working relationships
• Challenges faced in the collaboration
• Communication strategies employed
• How they managed different priorities or perspectives
• The outcome and impact of the collaboration
• Lessons learned about cross-functional teamwork

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you establish trust with teams that might have been hesitant about the audit?
• What specific strategies did you use to align different departmental priorities?
• How did you handle any conflicts that arose during the collaboration?
• How did the collaboration ultimately enhance the quality or impact of the audit?

Tell me about a time when you had to exercise professional skepticism during an audit. What were the circumstances and what actions did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and initial information provided
• What triggered their professional skepticism
• How they balanced skepticism with professional courtesy
• Additional procedures or inquiries they performed
• How they corroborated or challenged information
• The outcome of their skeptical approach
• Impact on audit findings or conclusions
• How they maintained positive relationships while being appropriately skeptical

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific aspects of the information or situation triggered your skepticism?
• How did you frame your additional inquiries to avoid appearing accusatory?
• What techniques did you use to verify the information independently?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to professional skepticism?

Share an example of a situation where you had to prioritize multiple high-risk areas during an audit with limited resources or time constraints.

Areas to Cover:

• The audit scope and resource constraints
• The process used to assess and rank risks
• Factors considered in prioritization
• How they communicated prioritization decisions to stakeholders
• Strategies to maximize efficiency while maintaining quality
• Areas that were deprioritized and the rationale
• The outcome and any adjustments made during the audit
• Lessons learned about resource allocation and prioritization

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific criteria did you use to rank the risk areas?
• How did you ensure that critical areas weren't overlooked despite constraints?
• How did you communicate your prioritization decisions to the audit team and stakeholders?
• Looking back, would you have prioritized differently, and why?

Describe a time when you had to revise an audit opinion or findings based on new information. How did you handle this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The original audit findings and conclusions
• The nature of the new information
• How they evaluated the new information's validity and impact
• The process for revising findings or opinions
• How they communicated the changes to stakeholders
• Any challenges in maintaining credibility despite the revision
• The final outcome
• Lessons learned about thoroughness and flexibility

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point in the audit process did this new information emerge?
• How did you determine that a revision was necessary?
• How did you communicate the change to maintain transparency while preserving credibility?
• What steps did you implement to reduce the likelihood of similar situations in future audits?

Tell me about a situation where you identified an audit finding that had significant business implications. How did you help the organization understand and address these implications?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the audit finding
• The broader business implications they identified
• How they connected the technical finding to business impact
• Their approach to communicating with business stakeholders
• How they helped develop practical solutions
• Any resistance encountered and how it was addressed
• The business response and implementation of recommendations
• The ultimate impact on the organization

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or illustrate the business impact of your finding?
• How did you tailor your communication to different stakeholder groups?
• What specific insights about the business did you leverage to make your case compelling?
• How did you balance technical accuracy with business practicality in your recommendations?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many behavioral interview questions should I ask in an internal audit interview?

For a typical 45-60 minute interview, focus on 3-4 behavioral questions with thorough follow-up. This approach allows you to explore each situation in sufficient depth rather than collecting superficial answers to many questions. For senior roles, you might want to explore fewer scenarios but in greater detail to understand the candidate's strategic thinking and leadership approach.

How can I tell if a candidate is describing genuine experiences versus theoretical responses?

Look for specific details that indicate authenticity: names of specific tools used, exact percentages or metrics, challenges encountered, emotional responses, and lessons learned. Follow-up questions are crucial—ask for specifics about their decision-making process, timeline, or people involved. Genuine experiences typically include complications, adjustments, and reflective learning that theoretical responses lack.

Should the interview questions differ for an entry-level internal auditor versus a senior audit manager?

Yes, while the core competencies remain similar, the complexity and scope should differ. For entry-level positions, focus on foundational skills like attention to detail, analytical thinking, and integrity in academic or early career experiences. For senior roles, emphasize leadership scenarios, strategic risk assessment, executive communication, and transformational audit experiences that demonstrate their ability to drive value at a higher level.

How important is industry-specific experience when evaluating internal audit candidates?

While industry knowledge is valuable, particularly for regulated industries like healthcare or financial services, core internal audit competencies often transfer well across sectors. For senior positions, industry experience becomes more important due to the need for specialized regulatory knowledge. For junior to mid-level positions, prioritize fundamental audit skills, analytical abilities, and learning agility over industry expertise, which can be acquired.

How can I assess a candidate's ability to maintain independence while still being a business partner?

Look for examples where candidates have successfully balanced maintaining professional skepticism with building collaborative relationships. The best responses will demonstrate how they've stood firm on important issues while finding constructive ways to work with management to implement solutions. Ask how they've handled situations where they needed to deliver unwelcome findings to stakeholders while maintaining positive working relationships.

Interested in a full interview guide with Internal Audit as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.