Metacognitive skills refer to the awareness and understanding of one's own thought processes, including the ability to monitor, regulate, and reflect on one's learning and problem-solving strategies. In the workplace, these skills enable professionals to evaluate their thinking methods, recognize knowledge gaps, and adjust their approaches to achieve better outcomes.

Strong metacognitive abilities are increasingly valued across all types of roles as organizations face complex, rapidly evolving challenges. Professionals with well-developed metacognitive skills demonstrate exceptional self-awareness, can effectively pivot when strategies aren't working, continuously learn from experiences, and make more thoughtful decisions. These capabilities manifest in various ways—from a software developer who regularly evaluates the effectiveness of their coding approaches, to a sales manager who reflects on client interactions to identify improvement opportunities, to a healthcare provider who consistently reviews and refines their diagnostic processes.

When interviewing candidates for metacognitive abilities, focus on behavioral questions that reveal how they've monitored their thinking, recognized limitations, adjusted strategies, and applied lessons from past experiences. Look for evidence of reflective practices, intellectual humility, and a commitment to ongoing learning. The following questions will help you identify candidates who don't just work hard but work smart by leveraging metacognition to continuously improve their performance and adapt to new challenges.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you realized your approach to solving a problem wasn't working, and you needed to step back and rethink your strategy.

Areas to Cover:

• Specific indicators that made them realize their initial approach wasn't effective
• Their thought process in evaluating what wasn't working
• How they assessed alternative approaches
• The specific changes they made to their strategy
• The outcome of the revised approach
• How this experience affected their approach to similar situations in the future

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific cues or feedback helped you recognize that your approach needed to change?
• How did you manage any frustration or resistance to abandoning your initial strategy?
• What did you learn about your problem-solving process from this experience?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach new challenges?

Describe a situation where you received feedback that contradicted your self-assessment. How did you reconcile these different perspectives?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the feedback and how it differed from their self-perception
• Their initial reaction to the contradictory feedback
• Steps they took to understand the different perspective
• How they evaluated the validity of the feedback
• Adjustments they made based on the feedback
• How this experience affected their self-awareness

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about receiving feedback that didn't align with your self-assessment?
• How did you determine which aspects of the feedback were most valuable to act on?
• What did you learn about your blind spots from this experience?
• How has this experience changed the way you seek out or respond to feedback now?

Share an example of a time when you identified a gap in your knowledge or skills that was hindering your performance. How did you address it?

Areas to Cover:

• How they became aware of the knowledge or skill gap
• The impact this gap was having on their performance
• Their process for determining what they needed to learn
• The specific steps they took to develop the missing knowledge or skill
• How they measured their progress
• The outcome of their learning efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals or experiences helped you identify this gap in your knowledge?
• How did you prioritize what aspects of this skill or knowledge area to focus on first?
• What learning approaches did you find most effective in this situation, and why?
• How do you now proactively identify potential knowledge gaps before they affect your performance?

Tell me about a project or initiative where your initial assumptions proved to be incorrect. How did you recognize this and adapt?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of their initial assumptions
• Signs or data that indicated their assumptions were flawed
• Their process for reassessing the situation
• How they developed new, more accurate assumptions
• Actions they took to adjust their approach based on the new understanding
• Lessons learned about assumption-testing for future projects

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you begin to question your initial assumptions?
• How did you balance the need to move forward with the project against the need to verify your assumptions?
• What methods do you now use to test assumptions early in a project?
• How has this experience changed your approach to formulating and validating assumptions?

Describe a time when you successfully applied a lesson or insight from a past failure to a new situation.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the original failure or setback
• The specific lessons or insights they extracted from that experience
• How they recognized the relevance of those lessons to a new situation
• How they deliberately applied these insights
• The outcome of applying these lessons
• Their process for cataloging and accessing lessons from past experiences

Follow-Up Questions:

• What reflection process did you use to extract meaningful lessons from the initial failure?
• How do you maintain access to insights from past experiences when facing new challenges?
• What criteria do you use to determine whether a past lesson applies to a current situation?
• Can you share other examples of how you've systematically learned from past experiences?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a decision with incomplete information. How did you approach this situation?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the decision and why information was limited
• Their process for evaluating what information was essential versus nice-to-have
• Methods they used to gather the most critical information
• How they assessed and managed the risks of the unknowns
• Their decision-making framework in this uncertainty
• How they monitored the outcomes and adjusted as needed

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what information was most critical to obtain before deciding?
• What mental models or frameworks did you use to make sense of the limited information?
• How did you communicate your decision process to others given the information gaps?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation now?

Share an example of how you've developed or refined your personal system for learning new skills or information.

Areas to Cover:

• Their awareness of their learning preferences and strengths
• How they've experimented with different learning approaches
• Specific refinements they've made to their learning process over time
• Methods they use to track progress and retention
• How they apply their learning system in different contexts
• Results they've achieved through their refined approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What led you to develop this particular learning system?
• How do you adapt your learning approach for different types of skills or knowledge?
• What methods do you use to ensure you retain information long-term?
• How do you determine when you've achieved sufficient mastery of a new skill or topic?

Describe a situation where you had to recognize and overcome a cognitive bias or thinking trap that was affecting your judgment.

Areas to Cover:

• The specific bias or thinking trap they identified
• How they became aware of this bias in their thinking
• The impact this bias was having on their judgment or decisions
• Strategies they used to counteract or compensate for the bias
• The outcome after addressing the bias
• How they now monitor for similar biases in their thinking

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals or feedback helped you recognize this bias in your thinking?
• How did you distinguish between a valid intuition and a potential bias in this situation?
• What specific techniques did you find most effective in overcoming this bias?
• How has awareness of this bias changed your decision-making process going forward?

Tell me about a time when you deliberately sought out perspectives that challenged your thinking on an important issue or decision.

Areas to Cover:

• What motivated them to seek challenging perspectives
• How they identified and accessed diverse viewpoints
• Their process for genuinely considering opposing ideas
• How they integrated these perspectives into their thinking
• The impact these diverse viewpoints had on their final decision or understanding
• How this approach has become part of their regular decision-making process

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you were truly open to perspectives that contradicted your initial thinking?
• What techniques did you use to evaluate the merits of conflicting viewpoints objectively?
• How did you manage any discomfort that came from having your ideas challenged?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to building diverse teams or seeking input?

Share an example of how you've helped others develop their metacognitive skills or become more reflective practitioners.

Areas to Cover:

• Their understanding of metacognitive development in others
• Specific strategies they used to foster metacognition in team members
• How they modeled metacognitive practices
• Challenges they encountered in developing these skills in others
• Methods they used to measure progress
• The impact of these efforts on individuals and team performance

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you adapt your approach for different individuals' learning styles?
• What indicators did you look for to gauge improvement in others' metacognitive abilities?
• What specific questions or prompts did you find most effective in stimulating reflection?
• How has helping others develop metacognitive skills affected your own practices?

Describe a situation where you had to evaluate the effectiveness of your communication with someone and make significant adjustments to be better understood.

Areas to Cover:

• How they recognized that their communication was ineffective
• Their process for diagnosing what wasn't working
• Their analysis of the other person's communication style or needs
• Specific adjustments they made to their approach
• How they monitored whether the new approach was working
• Lessons learned about communication adaptability

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals helped you recognize that your initial communication approach wasn't effective?
• How did you separate the content of your message from the delivery method when making adjustments?
• How did you check your assumptions about what would work better with this person?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to communicating with different audiences?

Tell me about a time when you questioned your usual way of doing something and experimented with a new approach.

Areas to Cover:

• What prompted them to question their established method
• How they evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of their usual approach
• Their process for designing an alternative approach
• How they tested the new method
• Their criteria for evaluating the results
• How this experience has influenced their openness to innovation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made you question your established approach at that particular time?
• How did you balance the risks of trying something new against the comfort of the familiar?
• What did you do to ensure a fair comparison between the old and new methods?
• How has this experience affected your willingness to experiment with new approaches?

Share an example of how you've used reflection or post-mortem practices to improve team performance over time.

Areas to Cover:

• The structured reflection practices they implemented
• How they created psychological safety for honest evaluation
• The process for extracting actionable insights
• How they ensured lessons were implemented in future work
• Methods for tracking improvements resulting from these practices
• Challenges encountered and how they were addressed

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you design the reflection process to ensure it captured diverse perspectives?
• What techniques did you use to move beyond surface-level observations to deeper insights?
• How did you balance looking at successes versus failures in your reflection practices?
• How did you ensure lessons from reflections were actually applied to future work?

Describe a situation where you had to recognize the limits of your expertise and involve others to achieve the best outcome.

Areas to Cover:

• How they recognized they were reaching the boundaries of their knowledge
• Their process for identifying the expertise needed
• How they engaged others with complementary skills or knowledge
• Their approach to collaborating effectively with these experts
• The outcome of this collaborative approach
• How this experience shaped their view of expertise and collaboration

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals indicated to you that you needed to bring in additional expertise?
• How did you overcome any reluctance to acknowledge the limits of your knowledge?
• How did you identify the right people with the expertise you needed?
• How has this experience affected your approach to new challenges that stretch your expertise?

Tell me about a time when you had to learn something complex very quickly. What strategies did you use?

Areas to Cover:

• Their assessment of what needed to be learned versus what could be deprioritized
• How they broke down the complex subject into manageable components
• Specific learning techniques they employed for rapid mastery
• How they monitored their progress and comprehension
• Adjustments they made to their learning approach during the process
• The outcome of their learning efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which aspects of the subject were most important to focus on first?
• What resources or support did you seek out, and how did you evaluate their usefulness?
• How did you test your understanding during the learning process?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar learning challenge in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is assessing metacognitive skills important in the hiring process?

Metacognitive skills are crucial determinants of a candidate's ability to learn, adapt, and improve over time. Employees with strong metacognitive abilities typically demonstrate superior problem-solving, more effective self-directed learning, greater adaptability to change, and better decision-making. These skills become increasingly important in complex, rapidly evolving environments where the ability to quickly learn, unlearn, and relearn is essential for success.

How can I distinguish between candidates who genuinely possess metacognitive skills versus those who simply prepare good interview answers?

Look for specificity and depth in candidates' responses. Those with genuine metacognitive skills will provide detailed examples with nuanced reflection, explain their thinking processes clearly, describe specific adjustments they've made based on self-assessment, and articulate lessons learned that they've applied elsewhere. Ask unexpected follow-up questions that probe deeper into their thought processes, which are harder to prepare for in advance.

Should I adjust these questions based on the seniority level of the role?

Yes, while metacognitive skills are valuable at all levels, you should adjust expectations and questions based on seniority. For junior roles, focus on basic self-awareness, learning approaches, and receptiveness to feedback. For mid-level positions, emphasize how candidates have refined their metacognitive practices and applied them to increasingly complex situations. For senior roles, look for how they've not only mastered personal metacognition but also fostered these skills in others and created systems that support organizational learning.

How do metacognitive skills relate to other competencies like problem-solving or adaptability?

Metacognitive skills serve as a foundation that enhances many other competencies. They enable more effective problem-solving by helping people monitor their progress and switch strategies when needed. They underpin adaptability by facilitating self-awareness and reflective learning. They improve decision-making by promoting consideration of different perspectives and recognition of biases. Think of metacognition as a meta-competency that amplifies the effectiveness of many other skills and abilities.

How many of these questions should I include in an interview?

Rather than trying to cover many questions superficially, select 3-4 questions most relevant to your role and organization, and explore them deeply with thorough follow-up questions. This approach will yield more meaningful insights than rushing through more questions. For senior roles or positions where metacognition is particularly crucial, consider dedicating an entire interview round to this competency.

Interested in a full interview guide with Metacognitive Skills as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.