Open-mindedness is the willingness to actively consider new ideas, perspectives, and evidence, even when they contradict existing beliefs or assumptions. In the workplace, this manifests as a readiness to entertain alternative viewpoints, adapt thinking based on new information, and approach situations with curiosity rather than rigid preconceptions.

This trait is increasingly essential in today's rapidly evolving business environment. Open-minded professionals demonstrate greater adaptability during change, foster more innovative solutions through the synthesis of diverse perspectives, and build stronger collaborative relationships across different backgrounds and disciplines. For hiring managers, evaluating this quality helps identify candidates who will thrive amid ambiguity, contribute to an innovative culture, and continuously grow their capabilities.

When interviewing candidates for open-mindedness, focus on past behaviors that demonstrate how they've handled contradictory information, navigated diverse perspectives, or modified their approach based on new insights. The best assessment comes from exploring specific situations where candidates had to consider viewpoints different from their own or adapt their thinking in light of new evidence. Listen for self-awareness about their thought processes and willingness to acknowledge when their initial assumptions were incorrect.

For guidance on building a comprehensive interview strategy that includes open-mindedness alongside other essential competencies, check out Yardstick's guide on structured interviewing. You can also learn more about creating effective interview guides to ensure a consistent and thorough evaluation process.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you changed your mind about something important based on new information or perspectives.

Areas to Cover:

• The original belief or position they held
• The nature of the new information or perspective they encountered
• Their thought process in evaluating the new information
• Any resistance they felt to changing their mind
• How they ultimately integrated the new perspective
• The impact of this change in thinking
• What they learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this particular situation challenging for you?
• How did you evaluate the credibility of the new information?
• How did this experience affect your approach to other situations where your views might be challenged?
• What did you learn about yourself through this process?

Describe a situation where you had to work with someone whose perspective or approach was very different from yours.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the differences in perspective
• Initial reactions to these differences
• Steps taken to understand the other person's viewpoint
• How they navigated the differences
• Whether they incorporated any aspects of the other person's approach
• The outcome of the collaboration
• Lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about working with someone with such a different perspective?
• How did you ensure you truly understood their viewpoint?
• Were there any aspects of their approach that you ultimately adopted? Why?
• How has this experience influenced how you approach differences of opinion now?

Share an example of a time when feedback from others made you reconsider your approach to a project or problem.

Areas to Cover:

• The original approach or solution they had developed
• The nature of the feedback received
• Their initial reaction to the feedback
• The process of evaluating the feedback
• How they modified their approach
• The outcome of the situation
• Reflections on the value of the feedback process

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was your initial reaction when you received this feedback?
• How did you determine which aspects of the feedback to incorporate?
• What would have happened if you had maintained your original approach?
• How has this experience affected how you seek and respond to feedback now?

Tell me about a time when you pursued learning in an area outside your expertise or comfort zone.

Areas to Cover:

• What motivated them to explore this new area
• Challenges they encountered in the learning process
• Strategies used to overcome knowledge gaps or discomfort
• How they integrated new knowledge with existing expertise
• Application of the learning to their work or life
• Impact of this experience on their willingness to explore other new areas

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most uncomfortable part of this learning experience?
• How did you approach learning something completely unfamiliar?
• How did this new knowledge or skill complement your existing strengths?
• Has this experience changed how you approach unfamiliar topics or challenges?

Describe a situation where you had to make a decision with incomplete information.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• What information was available and what was missing
• How they approached gathering what information they could
• Their thought process in evaluating options
• How they accounted for uncertainty
• The outcome of the decision
• Reflections on the decision-making process

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine when you had enough information to move forward?
• What strategies did you use to account for the uncertainty?
• Looking back, would you approach the situation differently now?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to decision-making with uncertainty?

Tell me about a time when you discovered that an assumption you held was incorrect.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the assumption and how long they had held it
• How they discovered it was incorrect
• Their initial reaction to discovering their error
• Any resistance felt to acknowledging the incorrect assumption
• How they adjusted their thinking
• Impact of this realization on related decisions or approaches
• What they learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially led you to make this assumption?
• How did it feel to realize your assumption was incorrect?
• How did you communicate this realization to others who might have been affected?
• How has this experience influenced how you test assumptions now?

Describe a situation where you had to consider multiple competing priorities or perspectives before making a recommendation.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the recommendation
• The different priorities or perspectives involved
• Their process for understanding each perspective
• How they weighed competing considerations
• Their reasoning for the ultimate recommendation
• How they communicated their thinking to stakeholders
• The outcome and any lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What framework or approach did you use to evaluate the different perspectives?
• Which perspective was most challenging for you to fully understand? Why?
• How did you ensure you were giving fair consideration to views that differed from your initial thinking?
• How did stakeholders respond to your recommendation?

Tell me about a time when you had to revise a strongly held opinion or belief due to new evidence.

Areas to Cover:

• The original opinion and why it was important to them
• The nature of the new evidence
• Their process for evaluating this evidence
• Any cognitive dissonance or resistance they experienced
• How they ultimately revised their thinking
• How they communicated this change to others
• Impact on future decision-making or beliefs

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this particular belief difficult to reconsider?
• How did you manage any internal resistance to changing your view?
• How did others respond to your change in perspective?
• What did this experience teach you about your own thinking processes?

Describe a situation where you had to adapt quickly to unexpected changes or new information.

Areas to Cover:

• The original plan or expectation
• The nature of the unexpected change
• Their initial reaction to the change
• How they assessed the implications
• The process of adapting their approach
• The outcome of the situation
• What they learned about adaptability

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was most challenging about adapting to this change?
• How did you help others adapt to the new situation?
• What resources or support did you seek during this transition?
• How has this experience affected your approach to planning and expectations?

Tell me about a time when you sought out perspectives very different from your own to solve a problem or improve a project.

Areas to Cover:

• The problem or project context
• What motivated them to seek different perspectives
• How they identified and engaged with these different viewpoints
• Challenges in understanding or integrating these perspectives
• How the diverse input influenced the outcome
• Benefits gained from incorporating different viewpoints
• Lessons learned about the value of diverse perspectives

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you were getting authentically different perspectives?
• Which perspective was most surprising or valuable? Why?
• How did you handle any conflicting input from different sources?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to problem-solving now?

Describe a situation where you had to abandon a solution or approach you had invested in when it became clear it wasn't working.

Areas to Cover:

• The original solution and their investment in it
• How they realized it wasn't working
• Any resistance to abandoning the original approach
• The process of letting go and developing an alternative
• How they communicated this change to stakeholders
• The outcome of the situation
• What they learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you recognize that your original approach wasn't going to succeed?
• What was most difficult about abandoning your initial solution?
• How did you approach developing an alternative?
• How has this experience influenced how you evaluate progress on initiatives now?

Tell me about a time when you supported an idea or approach that wasn't originally yours.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the idea that was proposed
• Their initial reaction to the idea
• The process of evaluating its merits
• How they came to support it
• The actions they took to champion the idea
• The outcome of the situation
• What this experience taught them about considering others' ideas

Follow-Up Questions:

• What initially made you receptive to this idea?
• Were there aspects of the idea you helped refine or improve?
• How did you balance providing support while also offering constructive input?
• How has this experience influenced how you respond to others' ideas now?

Describe a situation where you had to modify your communication style or approach to effectively work with someone different from you.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and relationship
• The differences in style or approach
• How they became aware of the need to adapt
• The specific modifications they made
• Challenges encountered in making these adaptations
• The outcome of their modified approach
• What they learned about flexibility in communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what adjustments would be effective?
• What was most challenging about modifying your natural style?
• How did the other person respond to your adapted approach?
• What did this experience teach you about effective communication across differences?

Tell me about a project or initiative where you incorporated feedback that significantly changed your original direction.

Areas to Cover:

• The original project plan or initiative
• The source and nature of the feedback
• Their initial reaction to the feedback
• How they evaluated its validity and implications
• The process of incorporating the feedback
• How the project changed as a result
• The outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• What made this particular feedback compelling enough to change direction?
• How did you manage any resistance (from yourself or others) to changing course?
• What would have happened if you hadn't incorporated this feedback?
• How has this experience influenced how you plan projects now?

Share an example of when you encouraged someone else to consider a different perspective or approach.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and the person's original viewpoint
• Why you felt a different perspective was needed
• How you approached the conversation
• Techniques used to encourage openness
• How they responded to your suggestions
• The outcome of the situation
• What you learned about influencing others' thinking

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you establish trust before suggesting an alternative perspective?
• What resistance did you encounter and how did you address it?
• How did you ensure you weren't simply imposing your own view?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is open-mindedness particularly important in today's workplace?

Open-mindedness has become crucial as businesses navigate increasingly complex, diverse, and rapidly changing environments. It enables teams to innovate through the synthesis of diverse perspectives, adapt quickly to market changes, build inclusive cultures that leverage differences as strengths, and identify opportunities that might be missed with rigid thinking. Open-minded professionals tend to be stronger collaborators, more effective problem-solvers, and better equipped to navigate ambiguity – all essential qualities in modern organizations.

How can I distinguish between a candidate who is genuinely open-minded versus one who just claims to be?

Look for concrete examples where candidates had to revise their thinking based on new information, rather than vague statements about valuing different perspectives. Probe how they handled situations where they were wrong, and listen for self-awareness about their thinking processes. Genuine open-mindedness is revealed in how candidates describe their thought process when evaluating contradictory information, the specific steps they took to understand different perspectives, and their ability to articulate both the challenge and value in changing their mind.

Should I ask these questions in a particular order?

Rather than following a prescribed order, select 3-4 questions that best match the requirements of your role and the experience level of candidates. Consider starting with a more straightforward question (like pursuing learning outside their expertise) before moving to more challenging ones (like revising strongly held beliefs). This allows candidates to warm up to the topic. Tailor your selection to emphasize aspects of open-mindedness most critical to success in the position.

How can I evaluate open-mindedness for very senior positions?

For senior roles, focus on questions that reveal how candidates foster open-mindedness in others and create environments where diverse perspectives are valued. Ask about situations where they've helped teams navigate conflicting viewpoints, encouraged constructive dissent, or implemented systems that promote consideration of alternative approaches. Look for evidence that they can balance decisiveness with genuine consideration of different perspectives, and how they've modeled open-mindedness for their organizations.

Is it possible for someone to be too open-minded in a professional context?

Yes – effective open-mindedness must be balanced with decisiveness and judgment. Watch for candidates who describe endlessly seeking new perspectives without eventually forming conclusions, or those who appear to change direction with each new piece of information. The ideal candidate shows thoughtful evaluation of different viewpoints, clear criteria for determining when they have sufficient information to proceed, and the ability to commit to a direction while remaining receptive to refining their approach as needed.

Interested in a full interview guide with Open-Mindedness as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.