Problem solving is a critical competency for Machine Learning Engineers, encompassing the ability to systematically analyze complex challenges, develop innovative solutions, and implement effective strategies to overcome technical obstacles. In the ML engineering context, problem solving involves decomposing complex issues into manageable components, applying algorithmic thinking, validating solutions through experimentation, and iteratively refining approaches based on feedback and results.

Problem solving in Machine Learning Engineering manifests in various ways, from debugging model performance issues and optimizing algorithms to addressing data quality challenges and overcoming production deployment hurdles. For junior engineers, this might involve diagnosing and fixing specific model errors, while senior engineers tackle architectural challenges and navigate complex trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and business requirements. The best ML engineers combine technical expertise with creativity, persistence, and a structured approach to problem-solving.

When evaluating candidates, focus on understanding their problem-solving process rather than just the outcomes they achieved. Listen for how they frame problems, gather information, evaluate alternatives, implement solutions, and learn from both successes and failures. The most valuable insights often come from follow-up questions that explore their decision-making process and how they've applied lessons from past experiences to subsequent challenges. As noted in Yardstick's guide to conducting job interviews, past behavior is the best predictor of future performance, so focus on specific examples rather than hypothetical scenarios.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you faced a particularly challenging machine learning model that wasn't performing as expected. How did you diagnose and solve the problem?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical challenge they encountered
• Their systematic approach to diagnosing the issue
• Data exploration and visualization techniques they used
• How they formed and tested hypotheses about the problem
• The solutions they tried and why
• The final resolution and its effectiveness
• What they learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• What metrics were you using to evaluate the model's performance?
• What initial hypotheses did you have about the cause of the problem?
• How did you prioritize which potential solutions to try first?
• How did you validate that your solution actually resolved the issue?

Describe a situation where you had to optimize a machine learning pipeline for better efficiency or performance. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The initial state of the pipeline and its limitations
• How they analyzed bottlenecks and performance issues
• The specific optimization techniques they applied
• Trade-offs they considered (e.g., accuracy vs. speed)
• Technical challenges they encountered during optimization
• The quantitative impact of their optimization efforts
• How they validated improvements

Follow-Up Questions:

• What tools or profiling methods did you use to identify bottlenecks?
• Were there any optimizations you considered but decided against? Why?
• How did you ensure the optimizations didn't negatively impact model quality?
• What would you do differently if you were to tackle this problem again?

Tell me about a time when you had to work with particularly messy or problematic data for a machine learning project. How did you approach cleaning and preparing it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific data quality issues they encountered
• Their methodical approach to data exploration and cleaning
• Technical tools and techniques they employed
• How they handled missing values, outliers, or inconsistencies
• Their decision-making process for feature engineering
• The impact of their data preparation on the final model
• Lessons learned about data preparation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify which data quality issues to prioritize?
• What automated processes did you implement for data cleaning?
• How did you validate that your cleaning approach was appropriate?
• How would you approach this differently with what you know now?

Describe a situation where you had to balance competing technical constraints in a machine learning project. How did you approach making these trade-offs?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technical constraints or competing objectives
• How they framed the problem and identified the trade-offs
• Their analytical approach to evaluating different options
• How they collaborated with stakeholders or team members
• The decision-making framework they used
• The outcome of their chosen approach
• How they measured success

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you communicate these trade-offs to non-technical stakeholders?
• What quantitative methods did you use to evaluate different options?
• Were there any unexpected consequences of the trade-offs you made?
• How did you know you had reached an optimal balance?

Tell me about a time when your initial approach to a machine learning problem didn't work. How did you pivot and what did you learn?

Areas to Cover:

• The initial problem and their original approach
• How they determined their approach wasn't working
• Their process for re-evaluating the problem
• How they developed alternative solutions
• The way they implemented their pivot
• The outcome of their revised approach
• Key lessons learned from the experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• At what point did you decide to change your approach?
• What indicators told you that your initial solution wasn't optimal?
• How did you maintain momentum after experiencing this setback?
• How has this experience influenced your approach to new ML problems?

Describe a situation where you had to implement a machine learning solution with limited computational resources or other technical constraints. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific resource constraints they faced
• Their analysis of requirements versus available resources
• Creative approaches or algorithmic choices they made
• Trade-offs they considered in their solution design
• How they optimized their solution within constraints
• The effectiveness of their approach
• Lessons learned about operating under constraints

Follow-Up Questions:

• What techniques did you use to maximize performance within your constraints?
• How did you determine which model complexity you could afford?
• What compromises did you have to make, and how did you decide on them?
• How would your approach differ if you had more resources available?

Tell me about a complex machine learning concept or technique that you had to learn quickly for a project. How did you approach learning it and applying it to your work?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific technique they needed to learn and why
• Their strategy for efficiently acquiring new knowledge
• Resources they utilized for learning
• How they validated their understanding
• The way they applied the new knowledge to their project
• Challenges faced during implementation
• The outcome and effectiveness of using this technique

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you truly understood the concept beyond surface level?
• What learning strategies worked best for you in this situation?
• How did you assess whether this technique was the right one for your problem?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to learning new ML concepts?

Describe a time when you had to debug a machine learning model deployed in production. What was your approach to identifying and resolving the issue?

Areas to Cover:

• The symptoms or indicators of the production issue
• Their systematic approach to diagnosing the problem
• Tools and monitoring systems they utilized
• How they isolated the root cause
• Their solution implementation process
• Steps taken to verify the fix
• Preventative measures implemented afterward

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you detect that there was an issue in the first place?
• What monitoring or logging systems were in place?
• How did you minimize impact to users while diagnosing the problem?
• What processes did you implement to prevent similar issues in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to collaborate with domain experts to solve a machine learning problem. How did you bridge the communication gap and incorporate their expertise?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the collaboration and the problem to be solved
• How they established communication with domain experts
• Techniques used to elicit relevant knowledge
• Methods for translating domain knowledge into ML features or approaches
• Challenges in the collaboration process
• How domain expertise ultimately improved the solution
• Lessons learned about cross-disciplinary collaboration

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you explain technical ML concepts to non-technical experts?
• What techniques did you use to validate domain assumptions?
• How did you resolve any conflicting perspectives between ML best practices and domain knowledge?
• How did this experience change your approach to working with domain experts?

Describe a situation where you had to design a machine learning solution for a problem with ambiguous requirements or objectives. How did you approach defining the problem and developing a solution?

Areas to Cover:

• The initial ambiguity they faced
• Their process for clarifying requirements
• How they involved stakeholders in defining the problem
• Techniques used to handle uncertainty
• How they evaluated potential approaches given the ambiguity
• The iterative process of refining the solution
• How they measured success without clear initial metrics

Follow-Up Questions:

• What questions did you ask to help clarify the requirements?
• How did you determine when you had enough clarity to proceed?
• What techniques did you use to validate your understanding with stakeholders?
• How did you manage expectations throughout this process?

Tell me about a time when you had to make a critical decision about a machine learning project with incomplete information. How did you approach this decision?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the decision
• What information was available and what was missing
• Their process for gathering additional information
• How they assessed risks and uncertainties
• The framework they used to make the decision
• The outcome of their decision
• How they validated whether it was the right choice

Follow-Up Questions:

• What techniques did you use to mitigate the risks of the unknown information?
• How did you communicate your decision process to others on the team?
• In retrospect, what additional information would have been most valuable?
• How has this experience influenced your decision-making in subsequent projects?

Describe a time when you had to improve the explainability or interpretability of a machine learning model. What approaches did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and need for explainability
• Their analysis of available explainability techniques
• Trade-offs they considered (accuracy vs. explainability)
• The specific methods they implemented
• How they validated the explanations provided
• Stakeholder reactions to the explanations
• Lessons learned about model interpretability

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which aspects of the model needed to be explained?
• What techniques did you consider but decide against using? Why?
• How did you evaluate the quality of the explanations generated?
• How did improving explainability affect other aspects of the model?

Tell me about a time when you had to implement a machine learning solution that needed to be both accurate and fair. How did you approach building fairness into your solution?

Areas to Cover:

• Their understanding of fairness considerations in the specific context
• How they identified potential sources of bias
• Their approach to measuring fairness metrics
• Techniques used to mitigate bias
• Trade-offs between fairness and other objectives
• How they tested and validated fairness in the solution
• The effectiveness of their approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you define "fairness" in this specific context?
• What fairness metrics or evaluation approaches did you use?
• How did you balance fairness considerations with other requirements?
• What did you learn about implementing ethical ML solutions from this experience?

Describe a situation where you needed to optimize a machine learning model to meet specific inference time or latency requirements. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific performance requirements
• Their analysis of the initial performance bottlenecks
• Techniques they considered for optimization
• The experimentation process they followed
• Trade-offs they made in the optimization process
• The final solution and its performance characteristics
• How they validated meeting the requirements

Follow-Up Questions:

• What profiling tools did you use to identify bottlenecks?
• How did you prioritize which optimizations to implement first?
• What was the most challenging aspect of meeting the performance requirements?
• How did you ensure model quality wasn't compromised in the optimization process?

Tell me about a time when you had to work with a distributed team to solve a complex machine learning problem. How did you approach collaboration and problem-solving in this environment?

Areas to Cover:

• The composition and distribution of the team
• Communication and collaboration tools utilized
• Their approach to dividing and coordinating work
• How they handled knowledge sharing
• Challenges specific to the distributed nature of the team
• Their leadership or contribution to the solution
• Lessons learned about distributed collaboration

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure everyone had a shared understanding of the problem?
• What processes did you establish to track progress and coordinate efforts?
• How did you handle disagreements or differing perspectives within the team?
• What would you do differently when working with distributed teams in the future?

Frequently Asked Questions

How important is it to assess problem-solving skills specifically for Machine Learning Engineers compared to technical knowledge?

Both are essential, but problem-solving skills are particularly crucial for ML Engineers as they often face novel challenges that don't have established solutions. Technical knowledge forms the foundation, but the ability to apply that knowledge creatively and systematically to solve new problems is what distinguishes exceptional ML Engineers. As technologies and techniques continue to evolve rapidly, strong problem-solving abilities enable engineers to adapt and continue delivering value.

How can I tell if a candidate is exaggerating their contribution to solving a problem?

Look for specificity and depth in their answers. Candidates who genuinely solved problems can typically describe their thought process in detail, explain technical trade-offs they considered, and articulate lessons learned. Ask follow-up questions that probe for deeper technical understanding of their solution. Also, listen for mentions of collaboration - strong candidates usually acknowledge team contributions while clearly articulating their personal role and impact.

Should I focus more on the outcome of the problem or the process the candidate followed?

While successful outcomes are important, the process reveals more about a candidate's problem-solving abilities. Focus on how they approached the problem, what methods they used to analyze it, how they generated and evaluated potential solutions, and how they implemented and validated their chosen approach. A candidate who demonstrates a thoughtful, systematic approach but didn't achieve perfect results may be stronger than one who got lucky with a less rigorous process.

How many of these questions should I ask in a single interview?

For a typical 45-60 minute interview focused on problem-solving, select 3-4 questions that cover different aspects of machine learning problem-solving. This allows you to explore each situation in depth with follow-up questions. Quality of discussion is more valuable than quantity of questions. If you're conducting multiple interview rounds, coordinate with other interviewers to cover different problem-solving dimensions across the interview process.

How should I evaluate candidates with different levels of ML experience using these questions?

Adjust your expectations based on experience level. For junior candidates, focus on fundamental problem-solving approaches, learning ability, and basic ML troubleshooting skills. For mid-level engineers, look for systematic approaches to complex problems and examples of independent problem-solving. For senior candidates, evaluate their ability to solve novel problems, lead others through complex challenges, and make sophisticated trade-off decisions. The questions themselves can work across levels, but your evaluation criteria should be calibrated to experience.

Interested in a full interview guide with Problem Solving for Machine Learning Engineer Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.