Regulatory compliance refers to an organization's adherence to laws, regulations, guidelines, and specifications relevant to its business processes. In a candidate interview setting, it encompasses the ability to understand, implement, interpret, and maintain compliance with applicable regulatory requirements while mitigating risks and protecting the organization from legal penalties and reputational damage.

Regulatory compliance is a critical competency in today's increasingly regulated business environment. Beyond simply following rules, effective compliance professionals must demonstrate a proactive approach to identifying risks, implementing controls, and fostering a culture of compliance throughout the organization. The best compliance professionals blend technical regulatory knowledge with strong communication skills, attention to detail, ethical decision-making, and adaptability to changing regulatory landscapes.

When evaluating candidates for roles requiring regulatory compliance expertise, look for individuals who not only understand specific regulations but who also demonstrate the ability to translate complex requirements into practical business processes. Experience establishing compliance programs, conducting risk assessments, and successfully navigating regulatory audits or examinations can be particularly valuable. Additionally, seek evidence of the candidate's ability to balance compliance needs with business objectives, as this indicates their potential to implement effective compliance measures without unnecessarily hindering operations.

Before diving into specific interview questions, remember that behavioral interviews are most effective when you ask for specific examples from a candidate's past experience rather than hypothetical situations. Follow up with probing questions to understand the full context, actions taken, and results achieved. The past behaviors you uncover through these questions will provide insight into how candidates might handle similar situations in your organization.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a potential regulatory compliance issue before it became a problem. How did you address it?

Areas to Cover:

• How the candidate identified the potential issue
• The specific regulations or requirements involved
• The steps taken to investigate and validate the concern
• How they communicated the issue to relevant stakeholders
• The preventative measures implemented
• The outcome and any lessons learned
• How they applied these lessons to future compliance efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• What resources or methods did you use to stay informed about the relevant regulations?
• How did you prioritize this issue among your other responsibilities?
• How did you gain buy-in from others to implement the necessary changes?
• What systems or processes did you put in place to prevent similar issues in the future?

Describe a situation where you had to implement a new regulatory requirement that faced resistance from business teams. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific regulatory requirement and its business impact
• The nature of the resistance encountered
• The approach taken to understand stakeholder concerns
• How the candidate balanced compliance requirements with business needs
• The communication and education strategies employed
• The outcome of the implementation
• Relationships with business teams after the implementation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you fully understood the business teams' concerns?
• What specific strategies did you use to gain their cooperation?
• How did you measure the success of the implementation?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation?

Tell me about a time when you had to respond to a regulatory examination, audit, or investigation. What was your approach and what was the outcome?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and scope of the examination or audit
• The candidate's role in preparing for and managing the process
• How they organized documentation and evidence
• Their approach to communicating with regulators
• Any challenges encountered during the process
• How they addressed any findings or deficiencies
• The final outcome and organizational impact

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare your team or organization for the examination?
• What was your strategy for presenting information to the regulators?
• How did you manage any unexpected questions or requests during the process?
• What did you learn from this experience that you've applied to subsequent regulatory interactions?

Share an example of when you had to interpret ambiguous regulatory guidance and develop a compliance approach. How did you ensure your interpretation was appropriate?

Areas to Cover:

• The ambiguous regulation or guidance in question
• The research and analysis conducted to understand the requirements
• Consultation with experts, peers, or regulators
• The process used to develop an appropriate interpretation
• How they documented their reasoning and approach
• The implementation of the compliance approach
• Any subsequent validation of their interpretation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What resources did you consult to help form your interpretation?
• How did you weigh different or conflicting interpretations?
• How did you explain your approach to stakeholders who might not have regulatory expertise?
• How did you monitor whether your interpretation remained appropriate over time?

Describe a situation where you discovered a compliance violation that had already occurred. How did you handle it?

Areas to Cover:

• How the violation was discovered
• The initial assessment of severity and potential impact
• The steps taken to investigate the full scope of the issue
• Communication with leadership and other stakeholders
• Remediation actions implemented
• Any reporting to regulatory authorities
• Measures taken to prevent recurrence

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine who needed to be involved in addressing the violation?
• What factors did you consider when deciding how to remediate the issue?
• How transparent were you about the violation within the organization?
• What was the most challenging aspect of handling this situation?

Tell me about a time when regulatory requirements changed significantly in your industry. How did you stay informed and lead the adaptation process?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and scope of the regulatory changes
• The candidate's approach to learning and understanding the new requirements
• How they assessed the impact on existing policies and procedures
• The strategy developed for implementing necessary changes
• How they communicated changes to affected stakeholders
• Training and education provided to ensure compliance
• Monitoring of the adaptation process and its effectiveness

Follow-Up Questions:

• What resources or networks did you rely on to stay informed about the changes?
• How did you prioritize which changes to implement first?
• What challenges did you encounter during the adaptation process?
• How did you measure whether your organization had successfully adapted to the new requirements?

Share an experience where you had to balance business efficiency with regulatory compliance requirements. How did you approach this balance?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific situation and the competing priorities
• The candidate's analysis of compliance requirements versus business objectives
• Their process for evaluating risks and benefits
• Collaboration with business and compliance stakeholders
• The solution developed to meet both sets of needs
• The outcome and impact on both compliance and business operations
• Lessons learned about balancing these often-competing priorities

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify the risks and benefits of different approaches?
• What principles guided your decision-making in this situation?
• How did you communicate your reasoning to both compliance and business stakeholders?
• Have you applied this balanced approach to other situations since then?

Describe a time when you had to develop or improve a compliance monitoring program. What was your approach and what were the results?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and need for the compliance monitoring program
• How the candidate assessed existing monitoring activities
• Their process for identifying key compliance risks to monitor
• The design of monitoring activities, metrics, and reporting
• Implementation challenges and how they were overcome
• The effectiveness of the program once implemented
• Any iterations or improvements made based on early results

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which compliance areas posed the greatest risk?
• What types of metrics or indicators did you develop to measure compliance?
• How did you ensure the monitoring program was sustainable long-term?
• What technology or tools did you utilize to make the monitoring more efficient?

Tell me about a situation where you had to train non-compliance personnel on regulatory requirements. How did you make complex regulations understandable?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific training need and target audience
• How the candidate assessed the audience's existing knowledge and needs
• Their approach to translating complex requirements into understandable terms
• The training methods and materials developed
• Engagement strategies to maintain interest and attention
• How they evaluated the effectiveness of the training
• Any follow-up or reinforcement activities implemented

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you tailor your communication style to the specific audience?
• What techniques did you use to make abstract regulatory concepts concrete and relevant?
• How did you address questions or confusion during the training?
• How did you know whether the training had been effective?

Share an example of when you had to conduct a compliance risk assessment. What was your methodology and what did you discover?

Areas to Cover:

• The context and scope of the risk assessment
• The candidate's approach to identifying potential risks
• Methods used to evaluate likelihood and impact of different risks
• Data sources and information gathering techniques
• How they prioritized identified risks
• The recommendations developed based on the assessment
• Implementation of risk mitigation strategies
• Follow-up activities to monitor ongoing risk levels

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you were considering all relevant risk factors?
• What framework or methodology did you use to structure your assessment?
• How did you validate your findings with subject matter experts?
• How were the results of your assessment received by leadership?

Describe a time when you had to investigate a potential compliance breach. What was your process and how did you handle the sensitive nature of the investigation?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the potential breach and how it came to light
• The investigation plan developed
• How they maintained confidentiality and objectivity
• The evidence-gathering approach
• Interviews or discussions conducted
• Documentation of findings
• Communication with leadership and other stakeholders
• Resolution and any corrective actions

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the scope of your investigation?
• What steps did you take to ensure the investigation was fair and thorough?
• How did you handle any resistance or defensiveness you encountered?
• What was the most challenging aspect of conducting this investigation?

Tell me about a situation where you had to work with legal counsel on a compliance matter. How did you approach this collaboration?

Areas to Cover:

• The compliance issue requiring legal input
• How the candidate initiated the collaboration
• Their preparation for discussions with legal counsel
• How they communicated compliance considerations and constraints
• The way they integrated legal advice into compliance solutions
• Any challenges in the collaboration and how they were addressed
• The outcome of the joint effort

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure you were providing legal counsel with all the information they needed?
• How did you reconcile any differences in approach or perspective?
• What did you learn about effectively collaborating with legal that you've applied since?
• How did you translate legal advice into practical compliance actions?

Share an example of when you had to develop compliance policies or procedures. What was your approach to ensuring they were both effective and practical?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific need for new or updated policies
• How the candidate researched relevant requirements
• Their process for drafting the policies
• Consultation with stakeholders and subject matter experts
• The balance between compliance thoroughness and operational practicality
• Implementation and communication of the policies
• Monitoring the effectiveness of the policies after implementation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure the policies addressed all relevant regulatory requirements?
• How did you gain input from those who would be following these policies?
• What approach did you take to making the policies clear and understandable?
• How did you measure whether the policies were being followed?

Describe a time when you identified and addressed a gap in compliance documentation or record-keeping. What was your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• How the documentation gap was identified
• The potential risk or impact of the gap
• The candidate's assessment of what was needed
• Their process for developing improved documentation practices
• Implementation of the new documentation approach
• Training and communication to affected staff
• Quality control measures to ensure ongoing compliance
• The outcome and any benefits realized

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine what documentation was required?
• What challenges did you face in implementing new documentation practices?
• How did you balance thoroughness with practicality in your approach?
• How did you ensure the sustainability of the improved documentation process?

Tell me about a time when you had to prepare compliance reports for senior management or a board of directors. How did you make the information meaningful and actionable?

Areas to Cover:

• The reporting requirement and audience
• How the candidate determined what information was most important
• Their approach to organizing and presenting complex compliance data
• Methods used to highlight key risks or issues
• How they developed recommendations or action items
• The reception of their report by leadership
• Any decisions or actions that resulted from their reporting

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you tailor your communication for this senior audience?
• What types of metrics or indicators did you include in your reports?
• How did you handle any challenging questions or skepticism from leadership?
• How did you follow up on action items after the presentation?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when evaluating regulatory compliance skills?

Behavioral questions based on past experiences provide evidence of how a candidate has actually handled compliance situations rather than how they think they might react. Past behavior is the best predictor of future performance. When a candidate describes real experiences, you can assess their practical knowledge of regulations, their problem-solving approach, and how they've navigated compliance challenges in real-world situations. Hypothetical questions may only reveal theoretical knowledge rather than proven abilities.

How many behavioral questions should I ask in an interview for a compliance role?

Quality trumps quantity. It's better to ask 3-4 well-crafted behavioral questions with thorough follow-up than to rush through many questions. Each behavioral question, when properly explored, can reveal multiple competencies. For a 45-60 minute interview focused on regulatory compliance, plan to spend 10-15 minutes on each behavioral question, allowing time for the candidate's initial response and your follow-up questions to dig deeper into their experience.

How can I assess a candidate's compliance skills if they come from a different industry with different regulations?

Focus on transferable compliance skills and approaches rather than specific regulatory knowledge. Look for evidence of how the candidate has learned new regulations, their methodical approach to compliance, risk assessment capabilities, and their ability to implement effective controls. Many compliance principles are universal across industries, such as documentation practices, stakeholder communication, and risk-based approaches. A candidate who has mastered these fundamentals can typically learn new regulatory frameworks.

Should I be concerned if a candidate discusses compliance violations they've encountered in previous roles?

Not necessarily. What's important is how the candidate handled the situation. A thoughtful discussion of how they identified, addressed, and learned from compliance issues demonstrates maturity and a commitment to continuous improvement. Red flags would include candidates who dismiss the importance of violations, blame others without taking responsibility, or show a lack of understanding about the seriousness of compliance breaches.

How can I tell if a candidate will be able to balance strict compliance requirements with business objectives?

Look for examples in their responses that demonstrate this balance. Effective compliance professionals understand that their role is not just to enforce rules but to help the organization achieve its objectives within appropriate regulatory boundaries. Listen for instances where the candidate has collaborated with business teams, found creative solutions to compliance challenges, or implemented efficient compliance processes that minimized business disruption while maintaining regulatory requirements.

Interested in a full interview guide with Regulatory Compliance as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.