Risk communication is the process of exchanging information about potential hazards, their implications, and management strategies between experts, stakeholders, and the public. In the workplace context, it involves effectively conveying complex risk information in ways that promote understanding, trust, and appropriate action.

Effective risk communication is essential for organizational success across numerous roles and industries. Whether communicating product safety concerns to customers, explaining compliance risks to executives, or discussing project uncertainties with stakeholders, this competency enables better decision-making and builds trust. Risk communication encompasses several critical dimensions: translating technical information for different audiences, maintaining appropriate transparency, building credibility, managing emotional responses, adapting messages across diverse stakeholder groups, and communicating effectively in both crisis and non-crisis situations.

For hiring managers and recruiters, evaluating a candidate's risk communication abilities requires looking beyond general communication skills. The best assessment approach involves behavioral questions that reveal how candidates have handled actual risk communication challenges in the past. By probing for specific examples, listening for the candidate's approach to stakeholder concerns, and exploring how they've balanced transparency with organizational interests, you'll gain valuable insights into their potential effectiveness in your organization. Remember that structured interviews consistently using the same core questions across candidates will provide the most objective comparison.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to communicate a significant risk or potential problem to stakeholders who were initially resistant to hearing about it.

Areas to Cover:

• Nature of the risk and why stakeholders were resistant
• How the candidate prepared for the communication
• Techniques used to overcome resistance
• How information was tailored for the specific audience
• The outcome of the communication
• Lessons learned about stakeholder resistance to risk information

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals told you that stakeholders were resistant to this information?
• How did you validate that stakeholders truly understood the risk after your communication?
• Looking back, what would you do differently in your approach?
• How did this experience influence your approach to similar situations later?

Describe a situation where you needed to translate complex technical risk information into terms that non-experts could understand and act upon.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the technical risk information
• How the candidate assessed the audience's level of understanding
• Specific techniques used to translate complex concepts
• Methods for confirming understanding
• The actions taken by the non-expert audience
• Feedback received on the communication approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What was the most challenging concept to translate and how did you approach it?
• How did you balance simplifying information without oversimplifying the risks?
• What visual aids or analogies, if any, did you use to enhance understanding?
• How did you ensure that the simplified message still conveyed the appropriate level of risk?

Share an experience where you had to communicate different aspects of the same risk to various stakeholder groups with different needs and concerns.

Areas to Cover:

• The risk situation and various stakeholder groups involved
• How the candidate identified different information needs
• Specific adaptations made for each audience
• Methods for maintaining consistency across communications
• How competing stakeholder interests were managed
• The overall effectiveness of the multi-audience approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify what each stakeholder group needed to know?
• What challenges did you face in maintaining consistent core messages across different audiences?
• How did you handle situations where one group's concerns conflicted with another's?
• What tools or frameworks did you use to organize your communication strategy?

Tell me about a time when you had to communicate risks during a crisis or emergency situation.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the crisis and risks involved
• The candidate's approach to gathering and verifying information
• Decisions about timing and channels for communication
• How uncertainty was handled and communicated
• Management of emotional responses
• The impact of the communications on the situation outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance the need for speed with the need for accuracy?
• What did you do when you didn't have all the information you needed?
• How did you manage your own emotions during this high-pressure situation?
• What feedback did you receive about your communications during this crisis?

Describe a situation where you realized a risk communication approach wasn't working and you needed to change your strategy.

Areas to Cover:

• Initial communication approach and why it was chosen
• Signs that indicated the approach wasn't effective
• Process for evaluating alternative approaches
• Specific changes made to the communication strategy
• Results of the adjusted approach
• Lessons learned from having to adapt

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the earliest indicators that your approach wasn't working?
• What did you learn about your audience from this experience?
• How quickly were you able to pivot to a new approach?
• How did this experience change your preparation for future risk communications?

Tell me about a time when you had to build trust with an audience before they would accept your risk-related communications.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and audience's initial level of trust
• Factors that contributed to the trust deficit
• Specific actions taken to build credibility
• How the candidate demonstrated expertise and empathy
• Time required to build sufficient trust
• How trust building affected the risk communication outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals told you there was a trust issue to begin with?
• Which specific action do you believe had the biggest impact on building trust?
• How did you balance building trust with the urgency of communicating the risk?
• How has this experience shaped your approach to new audiences?

Share an experience where you had to communicate unpopular risk-mitigation measures or restrictions.

Areas to Cover:

• The situation and specific measures that were unpopular
• The candidate's approach to framing the necessity of these measures
• How resistance was anticipated and addressed
• Techniques used to gain buy-in
• Level of compliance achieved
• Lessons learned about communicating necessary but unwelcome information

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you validate that the unpopular measures were truly necessary?
• What specific objections did you encounter and how did you address them?
• How did you balance acknowledging valid concerns while still advocating for the necessary measures?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation?

Describe a time when you had to communicate a risk where there was significant scientific or factual uncertainty.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the uncertain risk
• How the uncertainty was acknowledged and explained
• Approach to maintaining credibility while discussing unknowns
• Methods used to help decision-makers act despite uncertainty
• How new information was incorporated over time
• The outcome and stakeholder response to the communication of uncertainty

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you decide what level of detail about the uncertainty was appropriate to share?
• How did you address questions that couldn't be answered with certainty?
• What techniques did you use to prevent unnecessary alarm while still conveying the potential seriousness?
• How did you handle situations where different experts had differing assessments of the risk?

Tell me about a situation where you needed to correct or update previous risk information you had communicated.

Areas to Cover:

• The original risk communication and what changed
• How the need for correction was identified
• The candidate's approach to acknowledging the change
• Specific messaging used to maintain credibility despite the correction
• Stakeholder reactions to the updated information
• Impact on trust and credibility

Follow-Up Questions:

• How quickly did you decide to issue the correction?
• What considerations factored into how you framed the update?
• How did you address any credibility issues that arose from needing to correct previous information?
• What systems or processes did you put in place to minimize similar issues in the future?

Describe your experience developing or implementing a risk communication plan or framework.

Areas to Cover:

• Context requiring the plan/framework
• The candidate's approach to assessing communication needs
• Key components included in the plan
• How stakeholder input was incorporated
• Methods for evaluating effectiveness
• Lessons learned from implementation

Follow-Up Questions:

• What resources or best practices did you draw on when developing this plan?
• What was the most challenging aspect of implementing the framework?
• How did you ensure the plan would work across different types of risk scenarios?
• How was the framework received by those who needed to use it?

Share an experience where you had to help other team members or colleagues improve their risk communication skills.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and specific skills that needed improvement
• Assessment of development needs
• Specific coaching or training approaches used
• How progress was measured
• Results achieved through the development effort
• Insights gained about teaching risk communication skills

Follow-Up Questions:

• What were the most common mistakes you observed in others' risk communications?
• How did you tailor your coaching approach to different individuals?
• What resistance did you encounter and how did you address it?
• What feedback did you receive about your coaching or training approach?

Tell me about a time when cultural differences affected your approach to risk communication.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and specific cultural factors involved
• How cultural differences were identified
• Adaptations made to address cultural considerations
• Consultation or resources used to inform the approach
• Effectiveness of the culturally-adapted communication
• Lessons learned about cross-cultural risk communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you research or learn about the cultural factors you needed to consider?
• What was the most surprising cultural difference you encountered in this situation?
• How did you balance cultural adaptation with the need for consistent core messages?
• How has this experience changed your approach to risk communication in diverse settings?

Describe a situation where you had to communicate complex probability or statistical risk information to an audience without technical expertise.

Areas to Cover:

• The type of statistical information involved
• Assessment of the audience's statistical literacy
• Techniques used to make probabilities meaningful
• Visual or narrative tools employed
• Evidence of audience comprehension
• Challenges encountered and how they were addressed

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you assess the audience's starting level of understanding?
• What analogies or comparisons did you use to make the statistics meaningful?
• How did you address common cognitive biases in risk perception?
• What feedback did you receive about your approach?

Tell me about a time when you had to balance transparency about risks with other organizational considerations.

Areas to Cover:

• The risk situation and competing considerations
• How the candidate evaluated what to disclose and when
• The decision-making process for determining the approach
• Specific messaging developed to balance competing needs
• Outcomes of the chosen approach
• Ethical considerations that factored into decisions

Follow-Up Questions:

• Who was involved in making decisions about the communication approach?
• What principles guided your decision-making about transparency?
• How did you evaluate whether you'd struck the right balance?
• Looking back, would you make the same decisions again? Why or why not?

Share an experience where you had to communicate about a risk that generated significant emotional responses or fear.

Areas to Cover:

• The risk situation and nature of emotional responses
• The candidate's approach to acknowledging emotions
• Techniques used to maintain a rational discussion despite emotions
• How information was presented to avoid unnecessary fear
• Management of the candidate's own emotions
• The outcome and stakeholder response

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the emotional concerns that needed addressing?
• What specific techniques did you use to acknowledge emotions while still focusing on facts?
• How did you maintain your composure if you encountered hostile or highly emotional reactions?
• What did you learn about communicating emotionally charged risk information?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when evaluating risk communication skills?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually handled risk communication challenges in real situations, rather than how they think they might respond in theory. Past behavior is a much stronger predictor of future performance. Real experiences also include constraints, emotional factors, and unexpected complications that hypothetical scenarios often miss. This gives you insight into the candidate's actual capabilities, not just their knowledge of best practices.

How can I assess a candidate's risk communication skills if they have limited professional experience?

For candidates with limited professional experience, look for examples from academic projects, internships, volunteer work, or personal situations where they had to explain risks or potentially negative information to others. Even explaining the risks of a class project to team members or communicating health risks to family members can demonstrate key skills. Focus your questions on transferable skills like translating complex information, adapting messages to different audiences, and handling difficult conversations.

How many of these questions should I include in an interview?

Select 3-4 questions that best align with your specific role requirements, rather than trying to cover all aspects. This allows time for the candidate to provide detailed answers and for you to ask meaningful follow-up questions. Quality of response is more valuable than quantity. For senior roles with significant risk communication responsibilities, consider dedicating an entire interview focused on this competency.

What red flags should I watch for when evaluating responses to these questions?

Watch for candidates who: 1) Focus only on the technical aspects without addressing human/emotional factors; 2) Show a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach to risk communication; 3) Demonstrate poor judgment about transparency vs. confidentiality; 4) Show little awareness of how their communications were received; or 5) Blame audience "stupidity" or "irrationality" when communications were ineffective. These may indicate potential issues with their risk communication approach.

How can I use these questions as part of a structured interview process?

Incorporate these questions into a structured interview guide alongside questions assessing other critical competencies for the role. Use a standardized scoring rubric that evaluates specific aspects of risk communication like clarity, stakeholder awareness, transparency, and adaptability. Have multiple interviewers assess the same competencies, and compare notes during a candidate debrief to reduce individual bias in evaluation.

Interested in a full interview guide with Risk Communication as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.