Threat Modeling is a structured approach to identifying, quantifying, and addressing security risks in a system. It's an essential practice that provides a systematic way to identify security threats, vulnerabilities, and attacks that might impact an organization's systems and data. According to OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project), effective threat modeling enables companies to determine where security controls are needed and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk.

In today's increasingly complex digital landscape, professionals skilled in threat modeling are invaluable for organizations seeking to strengthen their security posture. These individuals combine analytical thinking with security expertise to anticipate potential attacks before they occur. When hiring for roles that require this competency, you need to assess not just technical knowledge, but also a candidate's ability to think like an adversary, communicate complex risks to stakeholders, and collaborate across teams to implement security solutions.

Behavioral interview questions are particularly effective for evaluating threat modeling skills because they focus on past experiences rather than theoretical knowledge. By asking candidates to share specific examples of when they've identified security threats, developed mitigation strategies, or communicated risks to stakeholders, you'll gain valuable insights into their real-world capabilities and approach to security challenges. This approach aligns with the principle that past behavior is the best predictor of future performance, making it superior to hypothetical questions.

When interviewing candidates, remember that effective evaluation requires more than just asking good questions. Be prepared to follow up with probing inquiries that encourage candidates to share detailed accounts of their experiences. Listen for indications of systematic thinking, attention to detail, and a balance of technical knowledge with business understanding. The right structured interview approach can make all the difference in identifying truly exceptional security talent.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you identified a significant security threat that others had overlooked during the development of a system or application.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the project and the candidate's role
• The methodology or approach used to discover the threat
• Why this particular threat was missed by others
• The potential impact if the threat had not been identified
• The specific actions taken to address the threat
• How the candidate communicated this finding to the team
• Changes made to prevent similar oversights in the future

Follow-Up Questions:

• What specific threat modeling technique or framework did you use in this situation?
• How did you prioritize this threat against other security concerns?
• What resistance, if any, did you encounter when advocating for addressing this threat?
• How did you validate that your proposed mitigation was effective?

Describe a situation where you had to perform threat modeling for a complex system with multiple components and stakeholders.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature and complexity of the system
• How the candidate approached breaking down the system for analysis
• Methods used to identify and categorize potential threats
• How they involved different stakeholders in the process
• Challenges encountered due to the system's complexity
• How they documented and communicated their findings
• The impact of their threat modeling on the final implementation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prioritize which components of the system to focus on first?
• What compromises did you have to make between security and other considerations?
• How did you ensure that all relevant threat vectors were considered?
• How did you handle disagreements between stakeholders about risk severity?

Share an experience where you had to explain complex security vulnerabilities identified through threat modeling to non-technical stakeholders.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and importance of the communication
• The complexity of the security concepts involved
• Techniques used to simplify technical information
• How the candidate adapted their communication style for the audience
• The stakeholders' response to the information
• How the candidate addressed questions or concerns
• The outcome and decisions made based on this communication

Follow-Up Questions:

• What visual aids or analogies did you use to illustrate the concepts?
• How did you frame the risks in terms that resonated with business priorities?
• What feedback did you receive about your explanation?
• How did this experience change your approach to communicating security risks?

Tell me about a time when you had to revise your threat model based on new information or changing circumstances.

Areas to Cover:

• The original threat model and its context
• The nature of the new information or changes
• How the candidate identified the need for revision
• The process of updating the threat model
• Challenges encountered during the revision
• How they communicated these changes to relevant parties
• The impact of the revised threat model on security measures

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you maintain continuity between the original and revised threat models?
• What tools or techniques did you use to track the changes?
• How did you ensure that nothing important was lost during the revision?
• What did this experience teach you about creating more adaptable threat models?

Describe a situation where you collaborated with developers or other team members to integrate threat modeling into the development process.

Areas to Cover:

• The initial state of security practices in the development process
• The candidate's approach to introducing threat modeling
• Resistance or challenges encountered
• Techniques used to gain buy-in from the team
• How threat modeling was adapted to fit into existing workflows
• The results of this integration
• Long-term impact on the team's approach to security

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance security concerns with development timelines?
• What specific activities or workshops did you organize to facilitate this integration?
• How did you measure the success of your approach?
• What would you do differently if you were to implement this again?

Tell me about a time when you had to prioritize security threats based on risk assessment.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and scope of the threat modeling exercise
• The methodology used for risk assessment
• The criteria used for prioritization (impact, likelihood, etc.)
• How the candidate handled competing priorities
• The process of communicating prioritization decisions
• Any disagreements about prioritization and how they were resolved
• The outcomes of addressing threats according to this prioritization

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or qualify the different risk factors?
• What frameworks or models did you use to support your assessment?
• How did you handle threats that were difficult to quantify?
• How did you balance addressing high-impact, low-likelihood threats versus low-impact, high-likelihood threats?

Share an experience where you identified a threat that required a significant change in the design or architecture of a system.

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the threat identified
• Why it necessitated a substantial design change
• How the candidate approached advocating for this change
• The resistance or challenges encountered
• The collaborative process of redesigning the system
• The implementation of the new design
• The outcome and lessons learned from this experience

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you balance security needs with other technical or business requirements?
• What alternatives did you consider before recommending the design change?
• How did you ensure the new design didn't introduce new vulnerabilities?
• How did this experience influence your approach to threat modeling early in the design process?

Describe a situation where you had to conduct threat modeling with limited information or under time constraints.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and reasons for the constraints
• How the candidate adapted their approach to these limitations
• The methodology and focus areas chosen given the constraints
• How they prioritized what to analyze
• The level of confidence in their findings
• How they communicated the limitations of their analysis
• Follow-up actions taken when more information or time became available

Follow-Up Questions:

• What shortcuts or heuristics did you apply in this situation?
• How did you communicate the limitations of your analysis to stakeholders?
• What potential threats were you most concerned about potentially missing?
• How did this experience change your approach to threat modeling under ideal circumstances?

Tell me about a time when your threat modeling exercise uncovered an unexpected or unusual security vulnerability.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the threat modeling activity
• What made the vulnerability unusual or unexpected
• The process that led to discovering this vulnerability
• How the candidate validated the vulnerability was real
• The potential impact of this vulnerability
• How it was communicated to the team
• The solution implemented to address it

Follow-Up Questions:

• What about your approach enabled you to identify this non-obvious vulnerability?
• How did others react to this discovery?
• Did this discovery lead you to change your threat modeling approach?
• How did you ensure similar vulnerabilities wouldn't be missed in the future?

Share an experience where you had to balance security concerns identified through threat modeling with other business priorities or constraints.

Areas to Cover:

• The security issues identified through threat modeling
• The competing business priorities or constraints
• How the candidate analyzed the trade-offs
• The process of making and communicating decisions
• Stakeholders involved in the decision-making
• The compromise or solution reached
• How security risks were managed within the constraints

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify or explain the security risks in business terms?
• What creative solutions did you explore to address both security and business needs?
• How did you monitor or revisit security concerns that couldn't be fully addressed?
• What lessons did you learn about balancing security with other priorities?

Describe a situation where you used threat modeling to evaluate a third-party component, service, or vendor.

Areas to Cover:

• The context and purpose of the evaluation
• The approach to threat modeling an external component
• Challenges in obtaining necessary information
• How the candidate assessed security claims or documentation
• Key findings from the threat modeling exercise
• How these findings influenced decisions about using the component
• Any mitigations implemented to address identified risks

Follow-Up Questions:

• What sources of information did you use in your assessment?
• How did you handle areas where you had limited visibility?
• What specific security assurances or changes did you request from the vendor?
• How did this experience inform your approach to evaluating third-party components in the future?

Tell me about a time when you implemented or improved a threat modeling methodology within your organization.

Areas to Cover:

• The state of threat modeling practices before the improvement
• The candidate's rationale for implementing changes
• The specific methodology chosen or developed
• How the candidate introduced and gained adoption for the new approach
• Training or resources provided to the team
• Challenges encountered during implementation
• Measurable improvements resulting from the change

Follow-Up Questions:

• Why did you choose this particular methodology over alternatives?
• How did you adapt the methodology to fit your organization's specific needs?
• What metrics did you use to evaluate the effectiveness of the new approach?
• How did you ensure the sustainability of the practice beyond initial implementation?

Share an experience where threat modeling helped prevent a significant security incident or vulnerability.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the threat modeling exercise
• The specific threat or vulnerability identified
• The potential impact had it not been discovered
• The process that led to identifying this issue
• Actions taken to address the vulnerability
• How the candidate validated the effectiveness of the solution
• Lessons learned and improvements made to the process

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you estimate the potential impact of this vulnerability?
• What might have happened if this issue had been exploited?
• How did you ensure the mitigation was properly implemented?
• How did this experience influence your approach to threat modeling going forward?

Describe a situation where you had to evolve your threat modeling approach in response to new types of threats or technologies.

Areas to Cover:

• The catalyst for evolving the threat modeling approach
• The limitations of the previous approach
• Research or learning undertaken to develop the new approach
• Specific changes made to the methodology
• How the candidate implemented and tested the new approach
• Challenges encountered during the transition
• The effectiveness of the evolved approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• What resources or experts did you consult when developing the new approach?
• How did you ensure the new approach addressed emerging threats?
• What aspects of the original methodology did you retain?
• How did you measure the success of your evolved approach?

Tell me about a time when you used the results of threat modeling to develop security requirements or acceptance criteria for a project.

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the project and threat modeling exercise
• How the candidate translated threats into specific requirements
• The process of integrating these requirements into the project
• Collaboration with product managers or other stakeholders
• How these requirements were prioritized
• The verification process to ensure requirements were met
• The impact of these requirements on the final product's security

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you ensure the requirements were specific and testable?
• What pushback did you receive on any of the requirements?
• How did you handle requirements that were difficult to implement?
• How did you track compliance with these requirements throughout the project?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is it important to ask behavioral interview questions when evaluating threat modeling skills?

Behavioral questions help reveal how candidates have actually applied threat modeling in real situations, rather than just testing their theoretical knowledge. This approach provides insights into their problem-solving process, communication skills, and how they collaborate with others—all critical aspects of effective threat modeling that might not be apparent from technical questions alone.

How many of these questions should I ask in a single interview?

For a typical 45-60 minute interview, focus on 3-4 questions with thorough follow-up rather than rushing through more questions superficially. This allows you to explore each situation in depth and gives the candidate time to provide meaningful examples. Quality of discussion is more valuable than quantity of questions.

What if a candidate doesn't have direct threat modeling experience?

For candidates without formal threat modeling experience, look for transferable skills. Ask about their experience with risk assessment, security analysis, or systematic problem-solving in other contexts. You can also pose questions about how they would approach learning threat modeling or how they've applied analytical thinking to security challenges in the past.

How can I tell if a candidate is just reciting textbook answers versus sharing real experiences?

Listen for specific details, challenges faced, and lessons learned—these typically indicate genuine experience. Follow up with questions about the specifics of their process, interactions with team members, or unexpected obstacles they encountered. Candidates with real experience will be able to elaborate on these details comfortably and consistently.

Should I adjust these questions based on the specific role the candidate is applying for?

Absolutely. Tailor the questions to emphasize aspects of threat modeling most relevant to the role. For a security architect, focus more on methodology and technical depth. For a product security manager, emphasize communication with stakeholders and integration with development processes. The core competencies for the specific role should guide your emphasis.

Interested in a full interview guide with Threat Modeling as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.