Effective Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating Reinforcement Learning Skills

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful approach for solving complex optimization problems across industries. From supply chain management to energy grid optimization, RL techniques enable systems to learn optimal decision-making strategies through interaction with their environment. When hiring for roles requiring RL expertise, traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this specialized field.

Evaluating a candidate's proficiency in Reinforcement Learning requires more than assessing theoretical knowledge. It demands understanding how they approach problem formulation, algorithm selection, implementation challenges, and result interpretation. The complexity of RL applications means that candidates must demonstrate both technical depth and the ability to communicate complex concepts clearly.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates actually approach RL problems in realistic scenarios. They reveal critical thinking patterns, coding practices, debugging skills, and the ability to translate business problems into mathematical frameworks suitable for RL approaches. These practical demonstrations help distinguish between candidates who have merely studied RL concepts and those who can apply them effectively.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate different aspects of a candidate's RL capabilities, from problem formulation to implementation and communication. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's ability to leverage RL for optimization challenges in your specific context.

Activity #1: RL Problem Formulation and Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to translate a business optimization problem into a well-structured reinforcement learning framework. The skill of properly formulating a problem is often more critical than implementation details, as a poorly defined RL problem will never yield useful results regardless of the algorithm used.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a written description of a realistic optimization problem relevant to your industry (e.g., inventory management, resource allocation, energy optimization).
• Include constraints, available data, and business objectives without explicitly framing it as an RL problem.
• Provide access to a whiteboard or digital drawing tool for the candidate to sketch their solution.
• Allow 30-45 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare questions about scalability, data requirements, and potential limitations of their approach.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided optimization problem and formulate it as a reinforcement learning problem.
• Define the state space, action space, reward function, and environment dynamics.
• Sketch the overall architecture of your proposed solution.
• Explain which RL algorithm(s) would be appropriate and why.
• Discuss potential challenges in implementation and how you would address them.
• Be prepared to explain how you would evaluate the performance of your solution.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of their problem formulation that was particularly strong (e.g., clever state representation, appropriate reward design).
• Offer one constructive suggestion for improvement (e.g., simplifying the state space, reconsidering the reward function).
• Allow the candidate 5-10 minutes to refine their approach based on the feedback and explain how the changes address the concern raised.

Activity #2: RL Algorithm Implementation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to implement a reinforcement learning algorithm for a specific optimization task. It reveals their coding practices, understanding of RL fundamentals, and ability to translate theoretical concepts into working code.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified optimization problem with a clear objective (e.g., resource allocation, path finding, or scheduling).
• Create a Python environment with necessary libraries (NumPy, TensorFlow/PyTorch, Gym if applicable).
• Provide a skeleton code with the environment implementation and evaluation functions.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Consider allowing the candidate to use reference materials as they would in a real work environment.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement a reinforcement learning algorithm (e.g., Q-learning, DQN, or PPO) to solve the provided optimization problem.
• Your implementation should include:
• Agent initialization and training loop
• Policy definition and update mechanism
• Appropriate exploration strategy
• Basic performance tracking
• Write clean, well-commented code that demonstrates your understanding of RL principles.
• Be prepared to explain your implementation choices and potential improvements with more time.
• Run your algorithm to demonstrate it learning over time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one aspect of the implementation that demonstrates good understanding of RL concepts.
• Suggest one area for improvement (e.g., exploration strategy, hyperparameter choice, code organization).
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement and explain how it affects the algorithm's performance.

Activity #3: RL Model Debugging and Optimization

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to troubleshoot and improve an existing reinforcement learning implementation. It tests their debugging skills, understanding of common RL pitfalls, and ability to optimize algorithm performance.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a working but suboptimal RL implementation with intentional issues (e.g., poor reward scaling, inappropriate hyperparameters, inefficient state representation).
• Include training logs or visualizations showing the model's current performance.
• Provide access to the full codebase and execution environment.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare questions about the reasoning behind their proposed fixes.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided RL implementation and identify issues affecting its performance.
• Analyze the training logs and model behavior to diagnose specific problems.
• Propose and implement improvements to address the identified issues.
• Document your changes and explain the rationale behind each modification.
• Run the improved model to demonstrate performance gains.
• Be prepared to discuss additional optimizations you would make with more time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Acknowledge one particularly insightful diagnosis or fix the candidate implemented.
• Suggest one additional issue they may have missed or an alternative approach to a problem they identified.
• Allow the candidate 10-15 minutes to address this additional feedback and explain how their new changes complement their initial improvements.

Activity #4: Communicating RL Solutions to Stakeholders

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to explain complex reinforcement learning concepts and results to non-technical stakeholders. Effective communication is crucial for ensuring RL solutions are understood, trusted, and properly implemented within organizations.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where an RL solution has been developed for a business problem.
• Create a set of results, visualizations, and performance metrics from the RL model.
• Provide a description of the stakeholder audience (e.g., executives, operations team, product managers).
• Allow 30-45 minutes for preparation and 15 minutes for presentation.
• Have team members play the role of stakeholders, asking challenging but realistic questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the RL solution and its results.
• Prepare a brief presentation (10-15 minutes) explaining:
• The business problem and why RL is an appropriate solution
• How the RL system works in non-technical terms
• The results achieved and their business impact
• Limitations and areas for future improvement
• Create visualizations or analogies that make RL concepts accessible to non-technical audiences.
• Be prepared to answer questions about reliability, interpretability, and implementation concerns.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one aspect of the presentation that effectively communicated a complex concept.
• Suggest one area where the explanation could be more accessible or address a stakeholder concern more directly.
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise their explanation of that specific concept based on the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How technical should we expect candidates to be in these exercises?

The level of technical depth should match the requirements of your specific role. For research-focused positions, expect deeper theoretical understanding and mathematical rigor. For applied roles, emphasize practical implementation skills and the ability to translate business problems into RL frameworks.

Should we provide access to documentation or allow internet searches during these exercises?

Yes, especially for the implementation exercise. In real work environments, engineers and data scientists regularly consult documentation and references. This approach tests how candidates find and apply information rather than memorization.

How do we evaluate candidates who use different RL algorithms than we expected?

Focus on their reasoning rather than specific algorithm choices. A candidate who can clearly explain why they chose a particular approach and understands its strengths and limitations may demonstrate stronger critical thinking than one who uses a more complex algorithm without proper justification.

What if we don't have team members with deep RL expertise to evaluate responses?

Consider bringing in a consultant or advisor with RL experience for the technical evaluation. Alternatively, focus more on the problem formulation and communication exercises, which can be evaluated based on clarity, structure, and business understanding.

How can we adapt these exercises for remote interviews?

Use collaborative coding platforms (like CoderPad or Replit) for implementation exercises, virtual whiteboards for design activities, and video conferencing for presentations. Provide clear time expectations and ensure candidates have access to necessary tools before the interview.

Should we share these exercises with candidates in advance?

For complex exercises like the implementation task, consider providing the problem statement (but not the full exercise) 24 hours in advance. This allows candidates to refresh relevant concepts while still testing their ability to apply knowledge under realistic conditions.

Incorporating these work sample exercises into your hiring process will significantly improve your ability to identify candidates with genuine reinforcement learning skills applicable to optimization problems. By observing how candidates approach problem formulation, implementation, debugging, and communication, you'll gain valuable insights that traditional interviews simply cannot provide.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, explore Yardstick's suite of AI-powered tools, including our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. These tools can help you create comprehensive hiring materials tailored to specialized technical roles like those requiring reinforcement learning expertise.

Build a complete interview guide for evaluating Reinforcement Learning skills by signing up for a free Yardstick account