Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Hardware Security Engineers

In today's increasingly connected world, hardware security has become a critical concern for organizations across all industries. Hardware Security Engineers play a vital role in safeguarding electronic devices and systems against sophisticated threats. Unlike software vulnerabilities that can often be patched remotely, hardware security flaws can be permanent and potentially catastrophic, making the hiring of skilled Hardware Security Engineers a high-stakes decision.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in hardware security. While resumes and technical discussions provide some insight, they don't demonstrate how candidates approach real-world security challenges. This is where carefully designed work samples become invaluable. By observing candidates as they tackle realistic hardware security scenarios, organizations can gain deeper insights into their technical expertise, problem-solving approaches, and attention to detail.

Effective work samples for Hardware Security Engineers should assess both technical proficiency and essential behavioral competencies. These exercises should evaluate a candidate's ability to identify vulnerabilities, design secure hardware solutions, collaborate with cross-functional teams, and communicate complex security concepts clearly. The best work samples simulate the actual challenges the engineer will face on the job.

The following four exercises are designed to comprehensively evaluate Hardware Security Engineer candidates. Each activity targets specific skills and competencies essential for success in this role, from vulnerability assessment to secure design planning. By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who not only possess the technical knowledge but also demonstrate the critical thinking and collaborative skills needed to excel as a Hardware Security Engineer.

Activity #1: Hardware Vulnerability Assessment

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify security vulnerabilities in hardware components and propose effective mitigation strategies. It tests technical knowledge of hardware security principles, attention to detail, and analytical thinking. By simulating a real-world security assessment, this activity reveals how candidates approach security challenges methodically and thoroughly.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare documentation for a simplified hardware design that contains 3-5 intentional security vulnerabilities. These could include issues like unprotected debug interfaces, weak cryptographic implementations, or vulnerable boot processes.
• Create a schematic diagram, component list, and brief description of the hardware's intended functionality.
• Provide access to relevant datasheets for key components.
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a private room with whiteboard or digital drawing tools for the candidate to document their findings.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided hardware design documentation and identify potential security vulnerabilities.
• For each vulnerability identified, explain:
• The nature of the vulnerability
• How it could be exploited
• The potential impact on system security
• Recommended mitigation strategies
• Prioritize the vulnerabilities based on risk level and implementation complexity.
• Present your findings in a clear, organized manner, as if briefing a technical team.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, provide feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., thoroughness of analysis, quality of mitigation strategies).
• Offer one constructive suggestion for improvement (e.g., missed vulnerability, alternative mitigation approach).
• Ask the candidate to reconsider their mitigation strategy for one of the vulnerabilities based on your feedback, giving them 10-15 minutes to revise their approach.

Activity #2: Secure Hardware Design Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to incorporate security principles into hardware design from the ground up. It evaluates their knowledge of secure design practices, threat modeling, and hardware security mechanisms. The activity reveals how candidates balance security requirements with other design considerations like performance and cost.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a design brief for a new hardware product (e.g., IoT device, secure authentication token, or embedded system).
• Include specific security requirements and constraints (budget, size, power consumption).
• Provide information about the intended use environment and potential threat actors.
• Prepare a template document for the candidate to complete with sections for threat model, security architecture, and component selection.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the design brief and develop a high-level security architecture for the proposed hardware product.
• Create a threat model identifying key assets to protect and potential attack vectors.
• Outline security mechanisms to implement, including:
• Secure boot process
• Key management approach
• Hardware-based security features
• Anti-tampering measures
• Select appropriate security components and justify your choices.
• Consider trade-offs between security, cost, and performance in your design decisions.
• Document your design approach clearly, as if preparing it for review by both technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of the candidate's design approach (e.g., comprehensive threat model, innovative security mechanism).
• Offer constructive feedback on one area for improvement (e.g., overlooked attack vector, cost-prohibitive security measure).
• Ask the candidate to revise one specific aspect of their design based on your feedback, allowing 15 minutes for the revision.

Activity #3: Side-Channel Attack Analysis

This exercise evaluates a candidate's understanding of advanced hardware attack techniques and their ability to identify and mitigate side-channel vulnerabilities. It tests specialized knowledge in hardware security while also assessing problem-solving skills and attention to detail.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified case study of a hardware implementation vulnerable to side-channel attacks (power analysis, electromagnetic analysis, or timing attacks).
• Include power trace data, timing measurements, or electromagnetic readings that show information leakage.
• Provide background information on the cryptographic algorithm or security function being implemented.
• Create a worksheet for the candidate to document their analysis and recommendations.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided data to identify potential side-channel vulnerabilities in the hardware implementation.
• Determine what sensitive information could be extracted through the side-channel leakage.
• Explain the underlying mechanism of the side-channel vulnerability.
• Propose specific countermeasures to mitigate the identified vulnerabilities, considering:
• Hardware design changes
• Implementation techniques
• Additional protective components
• Evaluate the effectiveness and implementation cost of each proposed countermeasure.
• Document your analysis and recommendations clearly, as if preparing a security advisory for a development team.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one strength in the candidate's analysis or proposed countermeasures.
• Provide one constructive suggestion regarding their approach or an alternative countermeasure they didn't consider.
• Ask the candidate to refine one of their countermeasure proposals based on your feedback, allowing 10-15 minutes for the revision.

Activity #4: Hardware-Software Security Integration

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to work at the intersection of hardware and software security, a critical skill for Hardware Security Engineers. It evaluates their understanding of how hardware security mechanisms support software security and their ability to collaborate across disciplines.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario involving a security feature that requires hardware-software co-design (e.g., secure storage of cryptographic keys, secure boot implementation, or trusted execution environment).
• Create documentation describing both the hardware platform and the software requirements.
• Include a specific security challenge that requires coordination between hardware and software components.
• Prepare a template for the candidate to document their solution architecture.
• Allow 60-75 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and identify the security requirements that span hardware and software domains.
• Design an integrated security solution that leverages appropriate hardware security features to support software security requirements.
• Specify:
• Hardware security mechanisms to implement
• Hardware-software interfaces
• Key management approach
• Security verification methods
• Create a diagram showing the interaction between hardware and software security components.
• Document potential security risks at the hardware-software boundary and how they would be mitigated.
• Prepare to explain your solution as if in a cross-functional team meeting with both hardware and software engineers.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of the candidate's integrated solution (e.g., elegant interface design, comprehensive risk assessment).
• Offer constructive feedback on one area that could be improved (e.g., overlooked attack vector, implementation challenge).
• Ask the candidate to revise one specific aspect of their hardware-software integration approach based on your feedback, allowing 15 minutes for the revision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How should we adapt these exercises for remote interviews?

A: For remote interviews, provide all documentation digitally in advance. Use screen sharing for presentations and collaborative diagramming tools for design exercises. Consider extending time limits slightly to account for potential technical issues. For hardware-specific exercises, provide detailed specifications and images rather than physical components.

Q: How do we evaluate candidates with different levels of experience?

A: Adjust your expectations based on the candidate's experience level. For junior candidates, focus more on their approach and reasoning rather than expecting comprehensive solutions. For senior candidates, look for deeper insights, consideration of edge cases, and more sophisticated mitigation strategies. The feedback portion becomes especially important for assessing growth potential in less experienced candidates.

Q: Should we provide candidates with these exercises in advance?

A: For Activities #1 and #3, it's better not to provide details in advance as they test the candidate's ability to analyze security issues on the spot. For Activities #2 and #4, you might consider providing the basic scenario 24 hours in advance to allow candidates to familiarize themselves with the context, but reserve specific requirements for the interview session.

Q: How do we ensure these exercises don't take too much of the candidate's time?

A: Be respectful of candidates' time by clearly communicating the expected duration of each exercise. Consider conducting these exercises across multiple interview stages rather than all at once. Focus each exercise on specific key skills rather than trying to assess everything in one session. The depth of the candidate's approach is often more revealing than the breadth of topics covered.

Q: How should we weigh technical skills versus communication abilities in these exercises?

A: While technical accuracy is essential, effective communication is equally important for Hardware Security Engineers who must collaborate with cross-functional teams. Evaluate both dimensions, giving appropriate weight based on the specific requirements of your team. The presentation and explanation components of these exercises are designed specifically to assess communication skills in a technical context.

Q: How can we make these exercises more relevant to our specific hardware products?

A: Customize these exercises to reflect your organization's specific hardware platforms, security concerns, and industry requirements. Use simplified versions of actual security challenges your team has faced. Incorporate relevant industry standards and compliance requirements specific to your sector (e.g., automotive, medical devices, industrial controls).

In conclusion, implementing these work sample exercises will significantly enhance your ability to identify truly qualified Hardware Security Engineers. By observing candidates as they tackle realistic security challenges, you'll gain insights into their technical capabilities, problem-solving approaches, and communication skills that simply cannot be assessed through traditional interviews alone.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find more information about hardware security engineering roles at our Hardware Security Engineer job description page.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account here