Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Quality Assurance Testers

Quality Assurance Testers play a critical role in ensuring software products meet high standards of functionality, usability, and reliability before reaching end users. The effectiveness of your QA team directly impacts product quality, customer satisfaction, and ultimately, your company's reputation. Finding candidates with the right combination of technical skills, attention to detail, and problem-solving abilities is essential for building a strong QA department.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in real-world testing scenarios. While resumes may list relevant experience and certifications, they don't demonstrate how candidates approach testing challenges, document issues, or communicate findings to development teams. This disconnect can lead to hiring decisions based on theoretical knowledge rather than practical skills.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually perform QA tasks, revealing their methodical approach, thoroughness, and technical acumen. By observing candidates in action, you can assess their ability to identify edge cases, prioritize issues, and articulate problems clearly—skills that are difficult to evaluate through standard interview questions alone.

The following four exercises are designed to evaluate key competencies required for successful QA testers: bug identification and reporting, test case development, regression testing strategy, and test planning. Each exercise simulates real-world scenarios that QA professionals encounter daily, allowing you to make more informed hiring decisions based on demonstrated abilities rather than self-reported skills.

Activity #1: Bug Identification and Reporting

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify issues in a software application and document them effectively. Quality bug reports are essential for efficient development workflows, as they help engineers understand, reproduce, and fix problems quickly. This activity reveals the candidate's attention to detail, technical observation skills, and ability to communicate issues clearly.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide access to a test environment with a web or mobile application that contains 5-7 intentionally planted bugs of varying severity and type (UI issues, functional problems, performance issues, etc.).
• Create a document listing the features to be tested and the expected behavior.
• Provide a standard bug report template that includes fields for severity, steps to reproduce, expected vs. actual results, and screenshots.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise.
• Have a developer or senior QA person available to answer any clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Explore the provided application according to the testing scope document.
• Identify as many bugs as possible within the allotted time.
• Document each bug using the provided template, being as clear and thorough as possible.
• Prioritize bugs based on their severity and impact on user experience.
• Submit your completed bug reports by the end of the session.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the submitted bug reports, provide feedback on one aspect the candidate did well (e.g., thorough reproduction steps, good prioritization) and one area for improvement (e.g., more precise descriptions, better categorization of severity).
• Ask the candidate to revise one of their bug reports based on the feedback and explain their changes.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they implement improvements.

Activity #2: Test Case Development

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to create comprehensive test cases for a new feature. Well-designed test cases ensure thorough coverage of functionality and help prevent defects from reaching production. This activity demonstrates the candidate's understanding of testing methodologies, ability to anticipate user behaviors, and skill in creating clear testing documentation.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simple feature specification document for a new functionality (e.g., user registration form, search feature, or shopping cart).
• Include user stories, acceptance criteria, and any relevant mockups or wireframes.
• Provide a test case template with fields for test ID, description, preconditions, steps, expected results, and test data.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the feature specification document thoroughly.
• Create a comprehensive set of test cases that cover all aspects of the feature, including:
• Positive scenarios (happy paths)
• Negative scenarios (error handling)
• Boundary conditions
• Performance considerations (if applicable)
• Use the provided template to document each test case clearly and concisely.
• Organize test cases in a logical sequence.
• Be prepared to explain your testing approach and rationale.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the test case coverage (highlighting a strength in their approach) and identify one area where additional test cases would be beneficial.
• Ask the candidate to develop 2-3 additional test cases for the area you identified as needing more coverage.
• Evaluate their ability to incorporate feedback and expand their testing strategy.

Activity #3: Regression Testing Strategy

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to plan and prioritize regression testing after a significant code change. Effective regression testing ensures that new code changes don't break existing functionality. This activity reveals the candidate's strategic thinking, risk assessment abilities, and testing efficiency.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a major update to an existing application (e.g., redesigned user interface, database migration, or integration with a new third-party service).
• Provide documentation about the application's key features and user flows.
• Include information about time constraints (e.g., "The release is scheduled in 3 days").
• Prepare a list of existing test cases (20-30) covering various features of the application.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the scenario and application documentation.
• Analyze the existing test cases and the nature of the code changes.
• Develop a regression testing strategy that:
• Prioritizes which test cases should be executed first
• Identifies high-risk areas that require more thorough testing
• Suggests any automated testing approaches (if applicable)
• Accounts for the time constraints
• Document your strategy, explaining the rationale behind your prioritization decisions.
• Create a timeline for executing the regression testing plan.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's prioritization approach (highlighting a strength) and suggest one area where their risk assessment could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to revise their testing strategy based on an additional constraint (e.g., "We just learned that the payment processing module was also modified").
• Evaluate how they adapt their plan and reprioritize based on new information.

Activity #4: Test Planning for a Complex Feature

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to develop a comprehensive test plan for a complex feature or system. Effective test planning ensures thorough coverage while optimizing resources and time. This activity demonstrates the candidate's strategic thinking, organizational skills, and ability to anticipate testing challenges.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a detailed specification for a complex feature or system (e.g., an e-commerce checkout process, user authentication system, or data visualization dashboard).
• Include requirements, user stories, technical constraints, and integration points with other systems.
• Provide information about available testing resources and timeline.
• Create a test plan template with sections for scope, approach, resource requirements, schedule, and risk assessment.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the specification and supporting materials.
• Develop a comprehensive test plan that includes:
• Testing objectives and scope
• Testing approach (manual vs. automated, types of testing required)
• Test environment requirements
• Entry and exit criteria
• Resource allocation and schedule
• Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
• Test deliverables
• Be prepared to explain how your plan ensures thorough testing while meeting timeline constraints.
• Identify any assumptions or dependencies that might affect the testing process.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the test plan's comprehensiveness (highlighting a strength) and identify one area that could benefit from more detail or a different approach.
• Ask the candidate to elaborate on how they would address a specific challenge (e.g., "How would you adjust your plan if the development team delivered the feature one week late?").
• Evaluate their problem-solving ability and flexibility in adapting their approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each work sample exercise take?

Each exercise should take approximately 45-60 minutes to complete. This timeframe allows candidates to demonstrate their skills without creating an overly burdensome interview process. For more senior positions, you might consider extending the time for the test planning exercise to 90 minutes.

Should we conduct these exercises remotely or in-person?

Both approaches can be effective. In-person exercises allow you to observe the candidate's process more directly, while remote exercises more closely simulate the reality of distributed QA teams. If conducting remotely, use screen sharing and consider recording the session (with permission) for later review.

How should we evaluate candidates who have experience with different testing tools than we use?

Focus on the candidate's testing methodology and approach rather than specific tool knowledge. A strong QA tester can adapt to new tools quickly if they understand fundamental testing principles. Consider providing a brief orientation to your tools before the exercise or allowing candidates to use tools they're familiar with.

What if a candidate doesn't find all the planted bugs in Activity #1?

The goal isn't necessarily to find every bug but to evaluate the candidate's approach to testing and bug reporting quality. A candidate who finds fewer bugs but provides exceptionally detailed, well-prioritized reports may be more valuable than one who finds more bugs but documents them poorly.

How can we make these exercises fair for candidates with different experience levels?

Adjust your expectations based on the seniority of the role. For junior positions, focus more on basic skills like bug identification and test case writing. For senior roles, place greater emphasis on strategic exercises like test planning and regression strategy. You can also modify the complexity of the scenarios to match the expected experience level.

Should we share these exercises with candidates in advance?

Providing a general overview of the types of exercises helps candidates prepare and reduces anxiety. However, specific details should be reserved for the actual interview to ensure you're evaluating their genuine skills rather than prepared responses.

Finding the right Quality Assurance Tester requires evaluating both technical skills and critical thinking abilities. These work sample exercises provide a comprehensive assessment of how candidates approach real testing scenarios, helping you identify those who will excel in maintaining and improving your product quality. By implementing these practical evaluations, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out our AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for Quality Assurance Testers? Sign up for a free Yardstick account