Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Full Stack Developers

In today's competitive tech landscape, hiring the right Full Stack Developer can significantly impact your organization's ability to innovate and deliver high-quality web applications. These versatile professionals bridge the gap between front-end user experiences and back-end functionality, making them invaluable assets to any development team. However, traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities and potential fit within your organization.

Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates approach real-world challenges they'll face in the role. For Full Stack Developers, these exercises should evaluate technical proficiency across the entire stack, problem-solving abilities, code quality, and collaboration skills. By observing candidates in action, you gain insights that resumes and technical interviews alone cannot provide.

Effective work samples for Full Stack Developers should balance complexity with time constraints, offering candidates the opportunity to demonstrate both their technical expertise and their approach to solving problems. These exercises should reflect the actual technologies and challenges specific to your organization while remaining accessible to qualified candidates regardless of their exact background.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate the essential competencies of a Full Stack Developer: technical proficiency, problem-solving, attention to detail, adaptability, and collaboration. Each exercise includes guidance for implementation, clear instructions for candidates, and a structured feedback mechanism to assess coachability—a critical trait for long-term success.

By incorporating these exercises into your hiring process, you'll be able to make more informed decisions, reduce hiring mistakes, and identify candidates who will truly excel in your development environment.

Activity #1: Code Review Challenge

This exercise evaluates a candidate's attention to detail, knowledge of best practices, and ability to communicate technical concepts effectively. Code reviews are a critical part of maintaining code quality and knowledge sharing within development teams, making this skill essential for any Full Stack Developer.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a code snippet (approximately100-150 lines) that contains a mix of front-end and back-end code with intentionally placed issues. Include:
• Security vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection risk, XSS vulnerability)
• Performance issues (e.g., inefficient database queries, unnecessary DOM manipulations)
• Code style inconsistencies
• Logical errors
• Missing error handling
• Provide the code in a format that's easy to read and annotate (e.g., GitHub Gist, PDF with line numbers)
• Allow candidates30-45 minutes to review the code
• Prepare a list of the issues you've embedded for reference during evaluation

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code sample thoroughly
• Identify and document any issues you find, categorizing them by severity (critical, major, minor)
• For each issue:
• Explain why it's problematic
• Suggest a specific solution or improvement
• Provide a brief code snippet demonstrating your fix when applicable
• Be prepared to discuss your findings and recommendations in a follow-up conversation

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, acknowledge areas where they excelled (e.g., "You did a great job identifying the security vulnerability in the authentication function")
• Provide one specific area for improvement (e.g., "I noticed you missed the potential memory leak in the event listener implementation")
• Ask the candidate to revisit that specific area and propose a solution based on your feedback
• Evaluate both their initial review and their ability to incorporate feedback

Activity #2: System Architecture Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to think holistically about application design, make appropriate technology choices, and plan for scalability and maintainability—crucial skills for Full Stack Developers who often contribute to architectural decisions.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a realistic scenario for a new web application or feature that requires both front-end and back-end components
• Include specific requirements around:
• Expected user volume and growth
• Performance expectations
• Integration with existing systems
• Security requirements
• Specific technical constraints relevant to your environment
• Provide any necessary context about your current technology stack
• Allow candidates45-60 minutes to prepare their response
• Prepare evaluation criteria focused on practicality, scalability, and alignment with your technology strategy

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the application requirements carefully
• Design a system architecture that addresses all requirements
• Create a diagram showing the major components and their interactions
• Specify:
• Front-end technologies and frameworks
• Back-end technologies and frameworks
• Database design approach
• API design principles
• Deployment and scaling strategy
• Prepare to explain your choices and the tradeoffs you considered
• Be ready to discuss how your architecture would handle specific challenges like increased load or new feature additions

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their architecture, highlight one aspect they handled particularly well
• Introduce a new requirement or constraint that would challenge their proposed architecture
• Ask them to adapt their design to accommodate this new information
• Evaluate their flexibility, reasoning, and ability to iterate on their solution

Activity #3: Bug Hunting and Fixing

This exercise evaluates a candidate's troubleshooting abilities, debugging skills, and technical problem-solving approach—essential competencies for maintaining and improving existing applications.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a small, functional application with3-5 intentionally placed bugs spanning both front-end and back-end
• Include a variety of bug types:
• UI/UX issues (e.g., form validation not working)
• API integration problems
• Data processing errors
• Performance issues
• Browser compatibility issues
• Provide access to the application, its source code, and any necessary development environment
• Include a brief description of the expected behavior
• Allow60-90 minutes for the exercise
• Document the bugs and ideal fixes for evaluation purposes

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code sample thoroughly
• Identify and document any issues you find, categorizing them by severity (critical, major, minor)
• For each issue:
• Explain why it's problematic
• Suggest a specific solution or improvement
• Provide a brief code snippet demonstrating your fix when applicable
• Be prepared to discuss your findings and recommendations in a follow-up conversation

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, acknowledge areas where they excelled (e.g., "You did a great job identifying the security vulnerability in the authentication function")
• Provide one specific area for improvement (e.g., "I noticed you missed the potential memory leak in the event listener implementation")
• Ask the candidate to revisit that specific area and propose a solution based on your feedback
• Evaluate both their initial review and their ability to incorporate feedback

Activity #2: System Architecture Planning

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to think holistically about application design, make appropriate technology choices, and plan for scalability and maintainability—crucial skills for Full Stack Developers who often contribute to architectural decisions.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a realistic scenario for a new web application or feature that requires both front-end and back-end components
• Include specific requirements around:
• Expected user volume and growth
• Performance expectations
• Integration with existing systems
• Security requirements
• Specific technical constraints relevant to your environment
• Provide any necessary context about your current technology stack
• Allow candidates45-60 minutes to prepare their response
• Prepare evaluation criteria focused on practicality, scalability, and alignment with your technology strategy

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the application requirements carefully
• Design a system architecture that addresses all requirements
• Create a diagram showing the major components and their interactions
• Specify:
• Front-end technologies and frameworks
• Back-end technologies and frameworks
• Database design approach
• API design principles
• Deployment and scaling strategy
• Prepare to explain your choices and the tradeoffs you considered
• Be ready to discuss how your architecture would handle specific challenges like increased load or new feature additions

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their architecture, highlight one aspect they handled particularly well
• Introduce a new requirement or constraint that would challenge their proposed architecture
• Ask them to adapt their design to accommodate this new information
• Evaluate their flexibility, reasoning, and ability to iterate on their solution

Activity #3: Bug Hunting and Fixing

This exercise evaluates a candidate's troubleshooting abilities, debugging skills, and technical problem-solving approach—essential competencies for maintaining and improving existing applications.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a small, functional application with3-5 intentionally placed bugs spanning both front-end and back-end
• Include a variety of bug types:
• UI/UX issues (e.g., form validation not working)
• API integration problems
• Data processing errors
• Performance issues
• Browser compatibility issues
• Provide access to the application, its source code, and any necessary development environment
• Include a brief description of the expected behavior
• Allow60-90 minutes for the exercise
• Document the bugs and ideal fixes for evaluation purposes

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the application requirements to understand the expected behavior
• Explore the application to identify the bugs
• For each bug you find:
• Document the issue and how to reproduce it
• Identify the root cause in the code
• Implement a fix
• Verify your solution works as expected
• Prioritize bugs based on their impact on user experience and application functionality
• Be prepared to explain your debugging process and the reasoning behind your fixes

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's fixes, highlight one particularly elegant or efficient solution they implemented
• Point out one bug fix that could be improved or optimized
• Ask the candidate to refactor that specific solution based on your feedback
• Evaluate both their technical ability to fix bugs and their approach to incorporating feedback

Activity #4: Feature Implementation Challenge

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to implement a complete feature across the full stack, demonstrating their coding proficiency, understanding of data flow, and ability to create cohesive solutions.

Directions for the Company:

• Design a self-contained feature implementation task that requires both front-end and back-end work
• Examples include:
• A user authentication system with registration and login
• A data visualization dashboard with filtering capabilities
• A content management interface with CRUD operations
• Provide a starter codebase with the necessary structure and dependencies
• Include clear requirements and acceptance criteria
• Allow candidates to complete this as a take-home exercise (3-4 hour time expectation)
• Prepare evaluation criteria focused on code quality, functionality, and adherence to requirements

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the feature requirements thoroughly
• Plan your implementation approach before writing code
• Implement the required feature using the provided starter code
• Ensure your solution includes:
• Clean, well-documented code
• Appropriate error handling
• Basic tests for critical functionality
• Responsive UI (if applicable)
• Secure implementation of any sensitive operations
• Submit your completed code along with a brief explanation of your approach, any assumptions you made, and how you would extend the feature given more time

Feedback Mechanism:

• During a follow-up discussion, highlight one aspect of their implementation that demonstrates strong technical skills
• Identify one area where their implementation could be improved (e.g., performance, security, code organization)
• Ask them to explain how they would refactor that specific aspect based on your feedback
• Evaluate both their initial implementation and their thought process when considering improvements

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allow for each work sample exercise?

The time allocation depends on the exercise complexity. Code reviews and architecture planning typically require30-60 minutes. Bug fixing might need60-90 minutes. For feature implementation, consider a take-home exercise with a3-4 hour expected completion time. Always communicate time expectations clearly to candidates.

Should we use our actual codebase for these exercises?

While using your actual technology stack is beneficial, create simplified versions of your codebase that focus on the skills being tested. This protects proprietary code while still providing a relevant assessment. Consider creating exercises that use the same languages and frameworks without exposing sensitive business logic.

How do we evaluate candidates who use different technologies than our stack?

Focus on evaluating the underlying principles and problem-solving approach rather than specific syntax. Strong Full Stack Developers can adapt to new technologies. Consider allowing candidates to use their preferred stack for certain exercises, as this demonstrates their strengths while still revealing their thinking process and approach.

What if a candidate doesn't complete the exercise in the allotted time?

Partial completion isn't necessarily a negative indicator. Evaluate what they did accomplish, their prioritization choices, and their communication about what they would have done with more time. Some candidates may be thorough rather than fast, which could be valuable for your team.

How should we incorporate these exercises into our broader interview process?

These exercises work best as part of a comprehensive process. Consider using the architecture planning or code review exercise during an on-site interview, while the feature implementation might work well as a take-home assignment. The bug fixing exercise can be effective either way, depending on your setup and the candidate's availability.

Should we compensate candidates for take-home exercises?

For extensive take-home assignments (anything expected to take more than2-3 hours), consider offering compensation for the candidate's time. This demonstrates respect for their expertise and ensures candidates from all backgrounds can participate in your process.

In conclusion, implementing these work sample exercises will significantly enhance your ability to identify truly exceptional Full Stack Developers who can contribute meaningfully to your organization. By observing candidates tackle realistic challenges, you'll gain insights into their technical abilities, problem-solving approaches, and cultural fit that traditional interviews simply cannot reveal.

Remember that the best candidates are evaluating your company just as carefully as you're evaluating them. A well-designed, respectful interview process featuring relevant, thoughtful work samples demonstrates your commitment to technical excellence and creates a positive impression of your engineering culture.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find more information about Full Stack Developer roles at our example job description.

Build Your Complete Full Stack Developer Interview Guide Today

Sign up for a free Yardstick account to create a customized interview guide for your Full Stack Developer role.