Effective Work Sample Exercises for Hiring UX Researchers

UX Researchers serve as the critical link between users and product development teams, uncovering insights that drive successful digital experiences. Hiring the right UX Researcher requires evaluating not just their knowledge of research methodologies, but their ability to apply these methods effectively, analyze complex data, and communicate findings in ways that inspire action.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in these areas. While candidates may eloquently describe their research experience, this doesn't necessarily translate to skill in practice. Work sample exercises provide a window into how candidates actually approach research challenges, process information, and collaborate with stakeholders.

The exercises outlined below are designed to simulate real-world scenarios UX Researchers face daily. They assess technical proficiency in research methods while also evaluating essential behavioral competencies like critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and adaptability. By observing candidates in action, hiring teams can make more informed decisions about who will truly excel in the role.

Implementing these exercises as part of your interview process not only helps identify top talent but also gives candidates a realistic preview of the work they'll be doing. This transparency leads to better job fit and reduced turnover. Additionally, the feedback mechanism built into each exercise allows you to assess a crucial quality in researchers: coachability.

Activity #1: Research Plan Development

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design appropriate research methodologies for specific product challenges. A strong UX Researcher must be able to select the right research approach based on business objectives, timeline constraints, and available resources.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a brief describing a product challenge your team is facing or has faced in the past. Include background on the product, target users, and specific questions the team needs answered.
• Provide information about constraints such as timeline (e.g., "Results needed within two weeks"), budget limitations, and available resources.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a UX Research leader or experienced researcher available to evaluate the plan and provide feedback.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the product challenge brief provided.
• Develop a comprehensive research plan that includes:
• Research objectives and questions
• Recommended methodology/methodologies with rationale
• Participant recruitment criteria and strategy
• Timeline for execution
• Required resources
• Potential limitations and how to address them
• Be prepared to present and discuss your plan with the interviewer.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their research plan, provide specific feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your participant recruitment strategy was well-thought-out") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The timeline might be too ambitious given the scope").
• Ask the candidate to revise the portion of their plan related to the improvement feedback and explain their adjustments.
• Observe how receptive they are to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised approach.

Activity #2: Usability Test Facilitation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to moderate user sessions effectively, ask insightful follow-up questions, and maintain neutrality while gathering valuable feedback. These skills are essential for extracting meaningful insights from research participants.

Directions for the Company:

• Select a digital product or prototype that the candidate can use for testing (ideally something simple enough to understand quickly but with enough complexity to generate discussion).
• Arrange for a team member to play the role of a user with a specific persona (provide a brief description of this persona to the candidate).
• Provide the candidate with basic information about the product and the primary tasks users typically perform.
• Allocate 30 minutes for the usability test and 15 minutes for discussion afterward.
• Record the session if possible (with permission) for later review.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the product information provided.
• Prepare a brief usability test script including:
• Introduction and explanation of the test process
• 2-3 specific tasks for the participant to complete
• Questions to ask during and after task completion
• Conduct a 30-minute usability test with the mock participant.
• Maintain a neutral stance while gathering feedback.
• Use appropriate probing techniques to uncover the "why" behind user behaviors and comments.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the usability test, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "You did an excellent job of asking non-leading follow-up questions") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider allowing more silence after asking questions to give participants time to think").
• Ask the candidate to reflect on how they would apply this feedback if they were to continue the session for another 5-10 minutes.
• If time permits, allow them to demonstrate this improvement with a brief follow-up task.

Activity #3: Research Findings Analysis & Presentation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to synthesize research data, identify meaningful patterns, and communicate insights in a compelling way that drives action. These skills are crucial for ensuring research has impact within an organization.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a set of raw research data from a previous study (anonymized as needed). This could include:
• User interview transcripts or notes (3-5 participants)
• Survey results
• Usability test observations
• Ensure the data contains some clear patterns but also some ambiguity to test analytical skills.
• Provide context about the research objectives and questions the study aimed to answer.
• Allow candidates to review the materials 24 hours before their interview if possible, or allocate 60-90 minutes during the interview process.
• Have product team members available for the presentation portion.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the research data provided.
• Analyze the information to identify key patterns, insights, and opportunities.
• Prepare a concise presentation (10-15 minutes) that includes:
• Summary of key findings
• 3-5 main insights with supporting evidence
• Recommendations for the product team based on these insights
• Limitations of the research and suggestions for further investigation
• Present your findings as you would to a cross-functional product team.
• Be prepared to answer questions about your analysis process and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your insights were well-supported by the data") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The recommendations could be more specific and actionable").
• Ask the candidate to revise one of their recommendations based on the feedback.
• Observe how they incorporate the feedback and whether they can translate general insights into more specific, actionable guidance.

Activity #4: Stakeholder Collaboration Exercise

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to collaborate effectively with cross-functional teams and navigate potentially conflicting priorities. Success as a UX Researcher depends heavily on these skills, as research must ultimately influence product decisions to have value.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a scenario where research findings conflict with stakeholder assumptions or business priorities.
• Arrange for 2-3 team members to role-play as stakeholders with different perspectives:
• Product Manager (concerned about timeline and feature prioritization)
• Designer (focused on user experience and design integrity)
• Engineer (concerned about technical feasibility)
• Brief these team members on their roles and the positions they should take.
• Provide the candidate with research findings that challenge some existing assumptions.
• Allocate 45 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the research findings provided.
• Prepare to facilitate a 30-minute discussion with stakeholders to:
• Present the research insights clearly and objectively
• Listen to stakeholder concerns and perspectives
• Help the team reach consensus on next steps based on the research
• Advocate for user needs while acknowledging business and technical constraints
• Your goal is not to "win" but to collaborate effectively toward the best possible outcome.
• Focus on finding solutions that address both user needs and business requirements.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the exercise, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "You did an excellent job of acknowledging the Product Manager's timeline concerns while still advocating for user needs") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider using more specific examples from the research to support your points").
• Ask the candidate how they would approach the most challenging part of the discussion differently based on this feedback.
• Observe their self-awareness and ability to adapt their approach to different stakeholder dynamics.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise requires different time commitments. Research Plan Development and Stakeholder Collaboration typically need 45-60 minutes. Usability Test Facilitation works best with 45 minutes (30 for testing, 15 for discussion). The Research Findings Analysis is most effective when candidates have 24 hours to prepare, followed by a 30-minute presentation and discussion.

Should we use real product challenges or create fictional ones?

Using real challenges from your organization provides the most authentic assessment and gives candidates insight into the actual work they'll be doing. However, ensure you're not sharing confidential information. For early-stage interviews, you might use simplified versions of real challenges or fictional scenarios based on common situations in your industry.

How many of these exercises should we include in our interview process?

Most companies find success implementing 1-2 of these exercises, depending on the seniority of the role. For junior positions, the Usability Test Facilitation and Research Plan Development exercises are most valuable. For senior roles, the Research Findings Analysis and Stakeholder Collaboration exercises better assess strategic thinking and leadership skills.

How should we evaluate candidates' performance on these exercises?

Create a structured evaluation rubric for each exercise based on the key skills being assessed. Include both technical proficiency (e.g., research methodology knowledge) and behavioral competencies (e.g., communication clarity). Have multiple evaluators use the same rubric to reduce bias, and compare candidates against the same standard rather than against each other.

What if a candidate has never used our specific product or industry before?

These exercises are designed to assess fundamental research skills that transfer across products and industries. Provide enough context for candidates to understand the basic purpose and user goals of the product. Focus evaluation on their research approach, analytical thinking, and communication skills rather than domain-specific knowledge.

How do we ensure these exercises don't create an undue burden on candidates?

Be transparent about the exercises in advance, respect time limits, and consider candidates' circumstances. For exercises requiring preparation, provide materials at least 24 hours in advance. If possible, compensate candidates for significant time investments, especially for the Research Findings Analysis exercise if preparation is expected outside the interview.

Implementing these work sample exercises will significantly improve your ability to identify UX Researchers who can truly drive product success through user insights. By observing candidates tackle realistic challenges, you'll gain a much clearer picture of their capabilities than traditional interviews alone can provide.

Ready to take your UX Researcher hiring process to the next level? Yardstick offers AI-powered tools to help you create comprehensive job descriptions, generate targeted interview questions, and design effective interview guides tailored to your specific needs. Check out our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator to streamline your hiring process and find the perfect UX Researcher for your team. For more insights on hiring UX Researchers, visit our UX Researcher job description example.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account here