Effective Work Samples and Role Plays for Hiring Inside Sales Engineers

The Inside Sales Engineer role represents a critical intersection of technical expertise and sales acumen. These professionals serve as the technical bridge between your company's solutions and potential customers, requiring a unique blend of skills that can be challenging to evaluate through traditional interviews alone. While resumes and behavioral questions provide valuable insights, they often fall short in revealing how candidates will actually perform in real-world scenarios that demand technical explanation, consultative selling, and effective communication.

Implementing practical work samples and role plays in your hiring process allows you to observe candidates demonstrating the exact skills they'll need on the job. For Inside Sales Engineers, this means evaluating how effectively they can translate complex technical concepts into value propositions, identify customer needs through strategic questioning, handle technical objections with confidence, and collaborate across teams to drive sales success.

The best Inside Sales Engineers possess a rare combination of deep technical understanding and customer-focused selling skills. They must quickly grasp technical concepts, articulate them clearly to both technical and non-technical audiences, and use that knowledge to guide prospects toward solutions that address their specific challenges. Traditional interviews rarely reveal these capabilities with the clarity that well-designed work samples can provide.

By incorporating the following exercises into your hiring process, you'll gain invaluable insights into how candidates approach the core responsibilities of an Inside Sales Engineer. These activities simulate the actual challenges they'll face on the job, from conducting discovery calls and delivering product demonstrations to handling technical objections and collaborating with cross-functional teams. This approach not only helps you identify the most qualified candidates but also gives applicants a realistic preview of the role, ensuring better alignment between expectations and reality.

Activity #1: Technical Product Demonstration Role Play

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to deliver compelling product demonstrations tailored to client needs—a fundamental skill for Inside Sales Engineers. The role play assesses technical knowledge, communication skills, and the ability to translate features into benefits that resonate with specific customer pain points.

Directions for the Company:

• Select one of your company's products or solutions for the demonstration. Choose something with sufficient technical complexity but that can be explained within 15-20 minutes.
• Create a fictional customer profile with specific industry, company size, challenges, and objectives. For example: "TechCorp, a mid-sized manufacturing company struggling with production inefficiencies and looking to implement automation solutions."
• Provide the candidate with basic product information, key features, and technical specifications 24 hours before the interview. Include just enough information to prepare but require them to prioritize what's most relevant.
• Assign 1-2 interviewers to play the role of the customer. Prepare them with specific questions and objections relevant to the customer profile.
• Record the session (with candidate permission) for evaluation purposes.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided product information and customer profile.
• Prepare a 15-minute product demonstration that addresses the specific needs and challenges of the customer.
• Begin with a brief discovery component to confirm understanding of the customer's situation.
• Focus on connecting product features to specific customer benefits rather than delivering a generic presentation.
• Be prepared to answer technical questions and handle objections during the demonstration.
• Conclude with a clear summary of how the solution addresses the customer's specific challenges.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the demonstration, provide immediate feedback on one aspect the candidate did particularly well (e.g., "Your explanation of how our API integration would solve their data transfer issues was exceptionally clear").
• Offer one specific area for improvement (e.g., "You could strengthen your demonstration by quantifying the ROI more specifically").
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to adjust their approach based on the feedback and re-present a portion of the demonstration.

Activity #2: Technical Discovery Call Simulation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's consultative selling skills and ability to uncover customer needs through strategic questioning. It assesses how well they balance technical inquiry with business-focused discovery to identify solution opportunities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a detailed customer persona with specific technical challenges, business goals, and potential objections. Include information about their current technology stack and pain points.
• Prepare an interviewer to play the role of a prospect who has expressed initial interest but is still early in the buying process.
• The interviewer should have a list of information they can reveal if asked the right questions, but should not volunteer information unprompted.
• Provide the candidate with basic background information about the prospect's company and industry, but limited details about their specific situation.
• Allocate 20-25 minutes for the discovery call simulation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided background information about the prospect.
• Conduct a discovery call to understand the prospect's technical environment, business challenges, and goals.
• Balance technical questions with business-focused inquiry to understand both the technical requirements and the business impact of the challenges.
• Practice active listening and follow-up questions to dig deeper into the prospect's responses.
• By the end of the call, aim to identify key pain points, technical requirements, and potential solution areas that would be relevant to the prospect.
• Conclude by summarizing your understanding of their situation and suggesting potential next steps.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's questioning strategy, highlighting one strength (e.g., "Your technical follow-up questions showed deep understanding of cloud infrastructure challenges").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "You could better connect technical issues to business impact by asking about the financial implications of their current challenges").
• Allow the candidate 5 minutes to ask additional questions based on this feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area.

Activity #3: Technical Objection Handling Exercise

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to address technical objections confidently and persuasively—a critical skill for Inside Sales Engineers who must overcome prospect concerns about product capabilities, implementation challenges, or competitive alternatives.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a list of 3-5 common technical objections your sales team encounters. These should include both legitimate concerns and misconceptions about your product.
• Examples might include: "Your solution doesn't integrate with our existing CRM system," "Your security protocols don't meet our compliance requirements," or "Your competitor offers this feature at a lower price point."
• Create a brief scenario for each objection, providing context about the customer and where they are in the sales process.
• Provide the candidate with basic product information and competitive positioning 24 hours before the interview.
• Assign an interviewer to present the objections in a realistic but challenging manner.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the product information provided to understand key capabilities, limitations, and competitive differentiators.
• For each objection presented, follow this approach:

1. Acknowledge the concern without becoming defensive
2. Ask clarifying questions to understand the underlying issue
3. Address the objection with specific technical information and examples
4. Confirm that your response addresses their concern

• Focus on being honest about product capabilities while highlighting relevant strengths and workarounds where appropriate.
• Maintain a consultative approach rather than becoming argumentative or overly defensive.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After handling all objections, provide feedback on one particularly effective response (e.g., "Your explanation of our API flexibility when addressing the integration concern was excellent").
• Offer one specific area for improvement (e.g., "When addressing the security objection, you could have referenced our compliance certifications more specifically").
• Present one additional objection and allow the candidate to address it using the feedback provided.

Activity #4: Cross-Functional Collaboration Scenario

This exercise evaluates how effectively candidates can collaborate with other teams to solve customer challenges—a key responsibility for Inside Sales Engineers who must often coordinate with product, engineering, and customer success teams to drive sales forward.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario involving a complex customer request that requires input from multiple departments (e.g., a custom integration, unique security requirement, or specialized implementation need).
• Prepare role players to represent different internal stakeholders: a product manager, a software engineer, and an account executive.
• Each stakeholder should have different priorities and constraints:
• Product Manager: Concerned about roadmap impact and feature prioritization
• Software Engineer: Focused on technical feasibility and resource requirements
• Account Executive: Pressured to close the deal quickly with minimal customization
• Provide the candidate with background on the customer request and basic information about internal processes 24 hours before the exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the customer request and company information provided.
• Lead a 25-minute meeting with the cross-functional team to:

1. Clearly articulate the customer's technical requirements and business needs
2. Facilitate discussion to identify possible solutions
3. Navigate competing priorities and constraints
4. Build consensus on a recommended approach
5. Outline next steps and responsibilities

• Balance customer advocacy with realistic internal constraints.
• Demonstrate technical credibility while also showing respect for each team member's expertise.
• Conclude with a clear summary of the agreed approach and action items.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on one aspect of the candidate's facilitation that was particularly effective (e.g., "You did an excellent job translating the customer's business needs into technical requirements the engineering team could understand").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "You could have more actively managed the account executive's timeline expectations based on the technical complexity involved").
• Give the candidate 5 minutes to reflect on how they would adjust their approach based on this feedback and articulate those changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for each of these exercises?

Each exercise should take approximately 25-30 minutes, including time for setup, the activity itself, feedback, and the improvement opportunity. For the product demonstration and discovery call, allocate 15-20 minutes for the actual role play, with the remaining time for feedback and improvement. Plan for a total of 2-3 hours if implementing all four exercises, potentially spread across different interview stages.

Should we use our actual product for these exercises, or create a simplified version?

For candidates with no prior knowledge of your product, create a simplified version that captures the essential technical elements without requiring extensive product training. For candidates with industry experience, using your actual product (or a close approximation) provides a more realistic assessment. In either case, provide sufficient preparation materials 24 hours in advance.

What if we don't have team members who can effectively play the customer or stakeholder roles?

Role-playing effectiveness is crucial for accurate assessment. Invest time in preparing your role players with detailed scripts and coaching. If possible, involve actual sales team members who regularly interact with customers. For the cross-functional exercise, try to involve actual representatives from those departments. If resources are limited, consider recording professional role play videos that present consistent scenarios.

How should we evaluate and compare candidates across these exercises?

Create a structured scorecard for each exercise that aligns with the key competencies for an Inside Sales Engineer: technical acumen, consultative selling, communication effectiveness, adaptability, and collaborative problem-solving. Rate candidates on specific observable behaviors rather than general impressions. Include both technical accuracy and communication effectiveness in your evaluation criteria.

Should we share these exercises with candidates in advance?

Provide a general overview of the types of exercises they'll encounter, along with any preparation materials they'll need to review. For technical demonstrations and discovery calls, sharing the customer profile and basic product information 24 hours in advance allows candidates to prepare thoughtfully—a positive indicator for most Inside Sales Engineer roles. However, don't share the specific objections or cross-functional challenges, as handling unexpected situations is part of the assessment.

What if a candidate has limited experience with our specific industry or technology?

Focus your evaluation on the candidate's approach, learning agility, and core skills rather than specific industry knowledge. The preparation materials should provide sufficient context for candidates to demonstrate their ability to quickly grasp and articulate new technical concepts—a critical skill for Inside Sales Engineers. Consider adjusting your expectations based on the candidate's background, while maintaining consistent evaluation criteria.

The Inside Sales Engineer role demands a unique combination of technical expertise and sales acumen that traditional interviews often fail to assess effectively. By implementing these work samples and role plays, you'll gain deeper insights into how candidates perform in realistic scenarios that mirror the actual responsibilities of the position. This approach not only helps you identify the most qualified candidates but also gives applicants a clearer understanding of what the role entails.

Remember that the quality of your hiring process directly impacts the quality of your team. By investing in a thorough, skills-based assessment approach, you'll be better positioned to build a high-performing Inside Sales Engineering team that drives revenue growth and customer satisfaction.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find the complete Inside Sales Engineer job description that informed these work samples.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for Inside Sales Engineers? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!