Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating AI Legal Document Analysis Skills

The integration of artificial intelligence into legal document analysis and contract review has revolutionized how legal professionals approach their work. As law firms and corporate legal departments increasingly adopt AI-powered solutions, the ability to effectively leverage these technologies has become a crucial skill set. Evaluating candidates' proficiency in this specialized area requires more than traditional interviews—it demands practical demonstrations of their capabilities.

Work samples provide an authentic window into how candidates approach real-world challenges in AI-powered legal document analysis. Unlike theoretical discussions, these exercises reveal a candidate's technical understanding, critical thinking, and practical problem-solving abilities when working with AI tools in legal contexts. They demonstrate whether candidates can bridge the gap between legal expertise and technological implementation.

The intersection of AI and legal work requires a unique blend of skills: understanding machine learning concepts, recognizing the limitations of AI in legal interpretation, knowing how to implement these tools within existing workflows, and maintaining ethical standards. Traditional interviews often fail to adequately assess these multifaceted competencies, making work samples invaluable for identifying truly qualified candidates.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities to work with AI in legal document analysis and contract review across different dimensions. They assess technical knowledge, strategic thinking, practical implementation skills, and ethical awareness—all critical components for success in this specialized field. By incorporating these work samples into your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into which candidates possess the right combination of legal acumen and technological fluency.

Activity #1: AI Contract Review Evaluation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to critically evaluate AI-generated contract analysis and apply human legal judgment to the results. It tests their understanding of AI limitations in legal contexts and their skill in identifying where human expertise remains essential. This competency is fundamental for legal professionals working with AI tools, as they must know when to trust automated analysis and when further human review is necessary.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a sample contract (5-7 pages) with deliberately included ambiguities, unusual clauses, and potential risks.
• Generate an AI analysis of this contract using a contract review tool (like Kira, eBrevia, or similar).
• Ensure the AI analysis contains both accurate findings and several misinterpretations or missed issues.
• Provide both the original contract and the AI-generated analysis to the candidate.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Prepare a "model answer" identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the AI analysis for comparison.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review both the contract and the AI-generated analysis provided.
• Identify and document where the AI tool performed well in its analysis.
• Identify and document where the AI tool missed important issues or misinterpreted clauses.
• Prepare a brief (1-2 page) memo explaining:
• The key strengths and limitations of the AI analysis
• The most critical issues the AI missed or misinterpreted
• Recommendations for how a legal team should use this AI tool effectively
• Suggestions for improving the AI's performance on similar contracts

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's analysis, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "You effectively identified the AI's misinterpretation of the force majeure clause") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how the AI might be trained to better recognize regulatory compliance issues").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising their recommendations based on this feedback, focusing specifically on the improvement area identified.
• Evaluate how receptive they are to feedback and their ability to quickly incorporate new perspectives.

Activity #2: Legal AI Implementation Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's strategic thinking about implementing AI solutions in a legal department. It tests their understanding of change management, workflow integration, and practical considerations when adopting new technologies. This skill is essential for professionals who will be involved in selecting and deploying AI tools within legal organizations.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a fictional case study of a mid-sized legal department (15-20 attorneys) looking to implement AI for contract review and due diligence.
• Include details about their current workflow, volume of documents (e.g., 500+ contracts reviewed monthly), key pain points, and available budget.
• Mention specific challenges like attorney resistance to technology, integration with existing document management systems, and concerns about confidentiality.
• Provide this case study to the candidate along with a template for their implementation plan.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the case study of the legal department seeking to implement AI tools.
• Develop a phased implementation plan that addresses:
• Selection criteria for appropriate AI tools
• Integration with existing systems and workflows
• Training program for attorneys and staff
• Change management strategy to address resistance
• Data security and confidentiality measures
• Success metrics and evaluation timeline
• Budget allocation recommendations
• Create a 2-page implementation roadmap with key milestones and potential challenges.
• Be prepared to present and defend your plan in a 10-minute presentation.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their implementation plan, provide specific feedback on one strong element (e.g., "Your phased approach to training different user groups was well-considered") and one area that needs more development (e.g., "Your plan didn't fully address how to handle sensitive client data during the AI training process").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising the section that needs improvement.
• Evaluate their ability to think on their feet and adapt their strategy based on new considerations.

Activity #3: AI Legal Document Analysis Troubleshooting

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to identify and resolve issues with AI document analysis in complex legal scenarios. It evaluates their technical understanding of how AI systems process legal language and their problem-solving skills when these systems encounter difficulties. This competency is crucial for maintaining quality control when using AI in high-stakes legal work.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a set of 3-5 legal documents (contracts, legal opinions, regulatory filings) where AI analysis has produced errors or inconsistent results.
• Create a report showing the AI system's output alongside annotations indicating where and how the analysis went wrong.
• Include information about the AI system used, its training parameters, and the types of documents it was designed to analyze.
• Provide these materials to the candidate along with access to documentation about the AI system's capabilities and limitations.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided documents and the AI system's analysis errors.
• For each error or inconsistency, determine the likely cause:
• Is it a training data issue?
• A misinterpretation of legal terminology?
• A limitation in the AI's pattern recognition?
• A novel legal structure the AI hasn't encountered before?
• Develop recommendations for addressing each type of error, including:
• Short-term fixes for the immediate analysis needs
• Medium-term improvements to the AI system
• Process changes to better integrate human review
• Document your findings and recommendations in a structured troubleshooting report.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's troubleshooting report, provide feedback on one particularly insightful diagnosis (e.g., "You effectively identified the pattern in how the AI misinterprets conditional clauses was excellent") and one area where their analysis could be deeper (e.g., "Consider how the document formatting might be affecting the AI's ability to recognize section hierarchies").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes expanding on their solution for the area identified for improvement.
• Evaluate their technical understanding and ability to refine their approach based on feedback.

Activity #4: Legal AI Training Data Development

This exercise assesses a candidate's understanding of how AI systems learn from training data and their ability to develop effective training materials for legal AI applications. It tests their knowledge of both legal document structures and machine learning principles. This skill is vital for organizations looking to customize AI tools for their specific legal needs or improve existing systems.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a brief overview of a legal AI project that needs training data (e.g., an AI system being developed to identify potential regulatory compliance issues in financial contracts).
• Provide 2-3 sample documents that represent the type of materials the AI will need to analyze.
• Include a basic schema showing the categories of information the AI should extract or identify.
• Create a simple annotation tool or template the candidate can use to mark up documents.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the project overview and sample documents provided.
• Develop a training data strategy that includes:
• Recommendations for the volume and variety of documents needed
• A structured approach to annotating the documents
• Guidelines for identifying edge cases and exceptions
• Quality control measures for the training data
• Annotate one of the provided sample documents according to your strategy, marking up relevant sections and explaining your annotation decisions.
• Create a brief (1-page) document explaining how your training data approach will help the AI system achieve its intended purpose.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After reviewing the candidate's training data strategy and sample annotations, provide feedback on one effective element (e.g., "Your approach to categorizing different types of regulatory references was very thorough") and one area that could be enhanced (e.g., "Consider how you might help the AI distinguish between mandatory and recommended compliance measures").
• Ask the candidate to spend 10 minutes revising their annotation guidelines to address the feedback.
• Evaluate their understanding of how training data quality affects AI performance and their ability to incorporate feedback into their approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-60 minutes, plus additional time for feedback and revision. For remote assessments, consider sending the materials in advance with a specified time window for completion. For in-person assessments, plan for a half-day session if conducting multiple exercises.

Should we use our actual legal documents for these exercises?

While using real documents provides authenticity, we recommend creating modified versions with sensitive information removed or fictional documents that closely mirror your typical work. This protects confidentiality while still testing relevant skills. If using real documents is necessary, ensure they're properly redacted and covered by confidentiality agreements.

What if we don't currently use AI tools for legal document analysis?

If you're evaluating candidates in preparation for adopting AI tools, you can still conduct these exercises by using trial versions of commercial legal AI platforms or by simulating AI output based on research into common capabilities and limitations. The exercises test fundamental skills that will be valuable regardless of the specific tools you eventually implement.

How technical should candidates be to complete these exercises successfully?

These exercises are designed to test the intersection of legal and technical knowledge, but candidates don't need to be programmers or data scientists. They should understand AI concepts as applied to legal work, recognize capabilities and limitations of these systems, and know how to effectively integrate AI tools into legal workflows. The focus is on practical application rather than deep technical expertise.

Can these exercises be adapted for different levels of seniority?

Yes, these exercises can be scaled according to the seniority of the role. For junior positions, focus more on the execution aspects (like the AI evaluation and troubleshooting exercises) with simplified scenarios. For senior roles, emphasize the strategic components (like implementation planning) and add complexity to the scenarios, such as multi-jurisdictional considerations or integration with broader legal operations.

How should we weigh these work samples against other assessment methods?

These work samples should complement, not replace, traditional interviews and credentials review. We recommend they constitute 40-50% of your overall assessment, with particular emphasis on the exercises most relevant to your specific needs. The candidate's approach to problem-solving and their receptiveness to feedback during these exercises often provide insights that traditional interviews cannot.

The integration of AI into legal document analysis represents a significant shift in how legal work is performed. By incorporating these practical work samples into your hiring process, you'll identify candidates who not only understand the theoretical aspects of AI in legal contexts but can also apply this knowledge effectively in real-world scenarios. These exercises reveal a candidate's ability to balance technological capabilities with legal judgment—a critical skill set as the legal profession continues to evolve.

At Yardstick, we're committed to helping organizations build effective, forward-thinking teams through data-driven hiring practices. For more resources to optimize your hiring process, explore our AI job descriptions, AI interview question generator, and AI interview guide generator.

Want to build a complete interview guide for evaluating AI legal document analysis skills? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!