Essential Work Sample Exercises for Evaluating LLM and Vision Model Integration Skills

Multimodal AI systems that combine Large Language Models (LLMs) with computer vision capabilities represent one of the most exciting and rapidly evolving areas in artificial intelligence. Organizations seeking to build products that can understand and reason about both text and visual information need engineers and researchers who possess specialized skills in integrating these complex systems.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in this domain. Technical questions may demonstrate theoretical knowledge, but they rarely showcase a candidate's ability to architect, implement, and troubleshoot multimodal AI systems in real-world scenarios. This is where carefully designed work samples become invaluable.

Work samples for LLM and vision model integration should evaluate multiple dimensions: architectural thinking, coding proficiency, debugging skills, and understanding of model limitations. The best candidates will demonstrate not just technical knowledge but also thoughtful approaches to system design, awareness of potential pitfalls, and the ability to communicate complex technical concepts clearly.

The following exercises are designed to simulate real-world challenges in building multimodal AI systems. They provide a structured way to assess a candidate's ability to plan, implement, troubleshoot, and evaluate LLM and vision model integrations. By observing candidates work through these exercises, hiring teams can gain deeper insights into their problem-solving approach, technical skills, and potential fit for roles requiring expertise in this cutting-edge area.

Activity #1: Multimodal System Architecture Design

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design a comprehensive architecture for a multimodal AI system that integrates vision models with LLMs. Strong candidates will demonstrate thoughtful consideration of component selection, data flow, latency concerns, and scalability. This exercise reveals how candidates approach complex system design and their understanding of the technical challenges specific to multimodal AI.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a realistic business case requiring multimodal AI capabilities (e.g., a visual search assistant for e-commerce, a content moderation system, or an accessibility tool that describes images).
• Include specific requirements such as response time expectations, scale considerations, and any technical constraints.
• Prepare a whiteboard or digital drawing tool for the candidate to sketch their architecture.
• Allow 30-45 minutes for the exercise, including time for questions and discussion.
• Have a technical team member familiar with multimodal AI systems conduct this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a system architecture that integrates vision models with LLMs to address the provided business case.
• Create a diagram showing the key components, data flow, and integration points.
• Explain your choice of specific models, APIs, or frameworks you would use.
• Address considerations such as:
• How images will be processed and encoded
• How visual features will be passed to the LLM
• Latency optimization strategies
• Scalability considerations
• Error handling approaches
• Be prepared to explain tradeoffs in your design decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their architecture, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your approach to batching image processing to reduce API costs was well-considered") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The architecture might benefit from considering how to handle vision model failures").
• Ask the candidate to revise a specific portion of their design based on the feedback, giving them 5-10 minutes to make adjustments and explain their updated approach.

Activity #2: Implementing a Basic Vision-Language Integration

This coding exercise assesses a candidate's practical ability to implement a working integration between vision models and LLMs. It tests their coding proficiency, familiarity with relevant APIs and libraries, and understanding of how to effectively combine visual and textual information. This hands-on task reveals whether candidates can translate theoretical knowledge into functional implementations.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a starter code repository with the necessary imports and basic structure for a Python-based implementation.
• Include access to relevant APIs (e.g., OpenAI, Hugging Face, or your company's internal APIs).
• Provide sample images that will be used for testing the implementation.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Ensure the development environment has all necessary dependencies installed.
• Consider making this a take-home exercise if time constraints are a concern.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Implement a Python function or class that:

1. Takes an image as input
2. Extracts relevant visual features or generates a description using a vision model
3. Passes this information to an LLM along with a specific prompt
4. Returns the LLM's response

• Use the provided APIs and libraries for both the vision model and LLM components.
• Write clean, well-documented code with appropriate error handling.
• Include brief comments explaining your implementation choices.
• Test your implementation with the provided sample images.
• Be prepared to explain how your solution works and what improvements you would make given more time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Review the code with the candidate and provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your error handling for API rate limits was thorough") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The prompt engineering could be more robust to handle edge cases").
• Ask the candidate to implement a small improvement based on your feedback, giving them 15-20 minutes to make the change and explain their approach.

Activity #3: Debugging a Multimodal AI System

This troubleshooting exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify and resolve issues in an existing LLM and vision model integration. It tests their debugging skills, system understanding, and problem-solving approach when faced with realistic challenges. This exercise reveals how candidates approach complex technical problems and their attention to detail.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a functional but flawed implementation of a multimodal AI system with 3-5 deliberate issues of varying complexity, such as:
• Incorrect image preprocessing that affects vision model performance
• Inefficient prompt construction leading to poor LLM responses
• Memory leaks or resource management issues
• Edge case handling problems (e.g., with certain image types)
• API error handling deficiencies
• Provide documentation on the expected behavior and the current problematic behavior.
• Include sample inputs that trigger the issues.
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code and documentation to understand the intended functionality.
• Identify issues in the implementation that cause the system to behave incorrectly or inefficiently.
• For each issue you find:

1. Document the problem
2. Explain its impact on system performance or reliability
3. Implement a fix or describe your approach to fixing it

• Prioritize issues based on their severity and impact.
• Test your fixes with the provided sample inputs.
• Be prepared to explain your diagnostic process and reasoning behind your solutions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings and fixes, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "You quickly identified the critical token handling issue that was causing most failures") and one area for improvement (e.g., "You might have missed how the image preprocessing affects model performance in low-light conditions").
• Ask the candidate to address the improvement area, giving them 15 minutes to implement or explain an additional fix based on your feedback.

Activity #4: Evaluating and Optimizing Multimodal Model Performance

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to evaluate the performance of a multimodal AI system and propose optimization strategies. It tests their analytical skills, understanding of model limitations, and ability to balance technical tradeoffs. This activity reveals how candidates approach system evaluation and optimization in real-world scenarios.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a dataset of 15-20 diverse test cases with varying complexity, including edge cases that highlight common limitations of multimodal systems.
• Provide access to a working multimodal system that has room for improvement.
• Include metrics on current system performance (e.g., accuracy, latency, cost).
• Prepare documentation on the system's architecture and current optimization strategies.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the performance of the provided multimodal system using the test dataset.
• Identify at least three specific areas where the system underperforms or could be improved.
• For each area, propose concrete optimization strategies that address:
• Accuracy improvements
• Latency reduction
• Cost optimization
• Handling of edge cases
• Create a prioritized list of recommended improvements with justifications.
• Estimate the potential impact and implementation complexity of each recommendation.
• Be prepared to discuss the tradeoffs involved in your proposed optimizations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis and recommendations, provide feedback on one strength (e.g., "Your analysis of how prompt engineering affects performance on ambiguous images was insightful") and one area for improvement (e.g., "Consider how batch processing could further reduce API costs").
• Ask the candidate to elaborate on how they would implement their highest-priority recommendation, giving them 10-15 minutes to provide more detailed implementation steps based on your feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

How technical should the interviewer be for these exercises?

The interviewer should have practical experience with multimodal AI systems, particularly for Activities #2 and #3. For the architecture and evaluation exercises, someone with general ML engineering experience and understanding of multimodal concepts can effectively evaluate responses, but having a specialist will yield better insights into the candidate's expertise.

Can these exercises be adapted for remote interviews?

Yes, all four exercises can be conducted remotely. For the architecture exercise, use collaborative diagramming tools like Miro or Figma. For coding exercises, consider screen sharing with a collaborative IDE or using platforms like CoderPad. Take-home versions can also be effective, especially for the implementation exercise.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different approaches than we expected?

Focus on the reasoning behind their choices rather than whether they match your expected solution. Strong candidates may propose novel approaches that are equally or more effective. Evaluate based on whether their solution addresses the core requirements, demonstrates sound technical understanding, and shows awareness of relevant tradeoffs.

What if a candidate has experience with different vision or language models than we use?

This is common and shouldn't be a concern. The fundamental concepts of multimodal integration are transferable across specific models. Focus on their understanding of how to effectively combine visual and textual information, handle the challenges of multimodal systems, and their general approach to the problems presented.

Should we provide access to external resources during these exercises?

For implementation exercises, allowing access to documentation, API references, and even general internet searches creates a more realistic working environment. This approach tests a candidate's ability to efficiently find and apply information rather than memorize specific APIs. However, be clear about expectations regarding external resources at the beginning of each exercise.

How do we ensure these exercises don't take too much of the candidate's time?

Be realistic about time constraints and consider offering the implementation exercise as a time-boxed take-home assignment. For in-person exercises, clearly communicate time expectations and design the exercises to be completable within the allocated time. Focus on evaluating approach and reasoning rather than complete implementation when time is limited.

The integration of LLMs with vision models represents a specialized and rapidly evolving technical domain. By using these work sample exercises, you can more effectively evaluate candidates' abilities to design, implement, troubleshoot, and optimize multimodal AI systems. These practical assessments provide deeper insights than traditional interviews alone, helping you identify candidates who can successfully navigate the complex challenges of building systems that understand both visual and textual information.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Want to build a complete interview guide for evaluating LLM and Vision Model Integration skills? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!