Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring a Non-Profit Program Director

The role of a Non-Profit Program Director is multifaceted and demanding, requiring a unique blend of strategic vision, operational expertise, and interpersonal finesse. While resumes and interviews provide valuable insights into a candidate's background and communication style, they often fall short in revealing how candidates will actually perform in the complex scenarios they'll face daily.

Work samples and role plays offer a window into a candidate's practical abilities, showing how they approach real-world challenges rather than just talking about them. For a Program Director position, these exercises are particularly crucial as they demonstrate a candidate's capacity to develop strategic initiatives, manage resources effectively, engage with diverse stakeholders, and lead teams toward achieving organizational goals.

The best candidates for Program Director roles possess not just theoretical knowledge but the practical skills to implement that knowledge in dynamic, often resource-constrained environments. By incorporating targeted work samples into your hiring process, you can identify individuals who can translate their experience into tangible results for your organization.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate the essential competencies required for success as a Non-Profit Program Director: strategic thinking, financial management, stakeholder engagement, leadership, and adaptability. Each activity simulates a real challenge the director might face, providing you with concrete evidence of how candidates would perform in the role.

Activity #1: Program Strategy Development Exercise

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to develop strategic program initiatives aligned with organizational mission and goals. It tests their strategic thinking, planning capabilities, and understanding of program development in the non-profit context. A successful Program Director must be able to create initiatives that are both impactful and feasible within resource constraints.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a brief description of your organization's mission, current programs, target community, and a specific challenge or opportunity you're facing.
• Include relevant background information such as current funding levels, staffing resources, and any strategic priorities or constraints.
• Allow candidates 48 hours to prepare their proposal before the interview.
• During the interview, give candidates 15 minutes to present their proposal, followed by 15 minutes of questions.
• Evaluate their strategic thinking, alignment with mission, feasibility, creativity, and presentation skills.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided materials about the organization and its current situation.
• Develop a proposal for a new program initiative or enhancement to an existing program that addresses the specified challenge or opportunity.
• Your proposal should include:
• Program overview and objectives
• Target audience and expected impact
• Implementation timeline (high-level)
• Required resources (budget, staffing, etc.)
• Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
• Success metrics and evaluation approach
• Prepare a 15-minute presentation of your proposal, followed by a Q&A session.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, provide specific feedback on one aspect the candidate did particularly well (e.g., "Your approach to measuring program impact was very thorough and practical").
• Offer one area for improvement (e.g., "I'd like to see more consideration of how this program would integrate with our existing initiatives").
• Ask the candidate to take 5 minutes to revise or expand on the area identified for improvement, demonstrating their ability to incorporate feedback and adapt their thinking.

Activity #2: Budget Management and Fundraising Scenario

This exercise assesses a candidate's financial acumen, resource allocation skills, and fundraising capabilities—all critical for a Program Director who must manage limited resources while seeking sustainable funding sources. It reveals how candidates balance program needs with financial realities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario involving a program budget challenge, such as an unexpected funding cut, a new opportunity requiring additional resources, or the need to reallocate funds across programs.
• Provide a simplified budget spreadsheet showing current allocations across program areas, staffing, and operational costs.
• Include information about potential funding sources (e.g., grants, donors, earned income) and any restrictions or opportunities.
• Allow 30 minutes for the candidate to review materials and develop their response.
• Evaluate their financial analysis, prioritization skills, creative problem-solving, and fundraising strategies.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the budget scenario and supporting materials.
• Develop a plan to address the financial challenge that includes:
• Proposed budget adjustments with clear rationale
• Strategies to minimize negative impact on program delivery
• Potential new funding sources or revenue-generating opportunities
• Timeline for implementing changes and securing additional funding
• Be prepared to explain your decision-making process and the trade-offs involved.
• Consider both short-term solutions and long-term financial sustainability.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of their financial strategy (e.g., "Your approach to diversifying funding sources was particularly thoughtful").
• Offer constructive feedback on one area that could be strengthened (e.g., "I'd like to see more consideration of the timeline for implementing these changes").
• Ask the candidate to spend 5 minutes refining their approach based on your feedback, focusing specifically on the area identified for improvement.

Activity #3: Stakeholder Communication Role Play

This role play evaluates a candidate's ability to communicate effectively with diverse stakeholders—a fundamental skill for Program Directors who must build relationships with funders, community partners, board members, and program participants. It reveals communication style, persuasiveness, and relationship-building capabilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Develop a scenario requiring the candidate to engage with a challenging stakeholder, such as:
• A major donor concerned about program outcomes
• A community partner with conflicting priorities
• A board member questioning a strategic decision
• A staff member resistant to program changes
• Assign a team member to play the role of the stakeholder, providing them with a detailed character brief.
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to prepare after receiving the scenario.
• The role play should last 15-20 minutes, followed by a debrief.
• Evaluate active listening, clear communication, empathy, negotiation skills, and ability to represent organizational interests.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the stakeholder scenario provided.
• Prepare your approach for engaging with this stakeholder, considering:
• Key messages you want to convey
• Potential concerns or objections from the stakeholder
• Questions you might ask to better understand their perspective
• Possible solutions or compromises you might offer
• During the role play, focus on building rapport, demonstrating understanding of the stakeholder's position, clearly articulating your organization's perspective, and working toward a positive outcome.
• Be prepared to adapt your approach based on how the conversation unfolds.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Highlight one communication strength demonstrated during the role play (e.g., "You did an excellent job acknowledging the donor's concerns while still advocating for our program approach").
• Identify one area where communication could be enhanced (e.g., "You might consider asking more open-ended questions to fully understand the stakeholder's perspective").
• Give the candidate an opportunity to redo a portion of the conversation implementing the feedback, demonstrating their ability to adjust their communication approach.

Activity #4: Program Evaluation and Improvement Case Study

This case study assesses a candidate's ability to analyze program performance data, identify improvement opportunities, and develop data-driven strategies—essential skills for a Program Director responsible for monitoring outcomes and continuously enhancing program effectiveness.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a case study featuring a fictional program with performance challenges, including:
• Program description and objectives
• Current performance metrics showing areas of success and concern
• Participant feedback (quantitative and qualitative)
• Resource constraints or operational challenges
• Any relevant external factors (e.g., changes in community needs)
• Provide visual data representations (charts, graphs) to test data interpretation skills.
• Allow candidates 45 minutes to review materials and prepare their analysis.
• Evaluate analytical thinking, problem identification, solution development, and commitment to program quality.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the program case study and performance data provided.
• Analyze the information to identify:
• Key strengths and weaknesses in current program performance
• Root causes of any performance issues
• Opportunities for program enhancement
• Develop a program improvement plan that includes:
• Specific recommendations for addressing identified issues
• Implementation steps and timeline
• Required resources
• How you would measure success of the improvements
• Be prepared to present your analysis and recommendations in a 15-minute discussion, explaining your reasoning and prioritization decisions.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide positive feedback on one aspect of their analysis or recommendations (e.g., "Your identification of the connection between staff training gaps and program quality issues was particularly insightful").
• Offer constructive feedback on one area that could be strengthened (e.g., "I'd like to see more specific metrics for how you'd measure the success of your proposed changes").
• Ask the candidate to take 5-7 minutes to enhance their improvement plan based on your feedback, focusing specifically on the area identified for improvement.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much time should we allocate for these work samples in our interview process?

Each exercise requires approximately 60-90 minutes, including preparation, execution, and feedback. We recommend selecting 1-2 exercises most relevant to your organization's needs rather than attempting all four. The Program Strategy Development and Stakeholder Communication exercises are particularly revealing of core Program Director competencies.

Should we provide these exercises to candidates in advance?

For the Program Strategy Development exercise, providing materials 48 hours in advance is recommended to allow for thoughtful preparation. For other exercises, providing basic context in advance with specific details shared at the time of the interview often yields the most authentic responses while still respecting candidates' time.

How can we adapt these exercises for remote interviews?

All exercises can be conducted virtually. For the Program Strategy Development presentation, use screen sharing. For the Budget Management exercise, send materials in advance and use collaborative spreadsheet tools. For role plays, video conferencing works well. Ensure all candidates have equal access to technology and clear instructions for the virtual format.

What if candidates have limited experience with our specific type of non-profit work?

Focus evaluation on transferable skills rather than sector-specific knowledge. Provide sufficient context about your organization's work, and consider how candidates apply their experience from other settings to your scenarios. Their approach to problem-solving and learning is often more revealing than prior knowledge of your specific field.

How should we weight these exercises compared to interviews in our hiring decision?

Work samples typically provide more predictive information about job performance than traditional interviews. We recommend giving these exercises significant weight (approximately 40-50% of your overall evaluation) while considering them alongside other assessment methods for a comprehensive view of the candidate.

Should we use the same exercises for all candidates?

Yes, using consistent exercises allows for fair comparison across candidates. However, you may need to make reasonable accommodations for candidates with disabilities while maintaining the core assessment objectives.

Finding the right Program Director is crucial for your non-profit's success. These work samples will help you identify candidates who not only understand program management in theory but can apply those skills effectively in practice. By observing how candidates approach these realistic scenarios, you'll gain valuable insights into their strategic thinking, financial acumen, stakeholder engagement abilities, and leadership potential.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also explore our comprehensive Non-Profit Program Director job description template for additional guidance.

Build a complete interview guide for this role by signing up for a free Yardstick account