Essential Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Python Developers

Python developers are the backbone of many modern software applications, from web services to data analysis tools and AI systems. Finding the right Python developer requires more than just reviewing resumes and conducting traditional interviews. The best candidates demonstrate their skills through practical application, showing not just what they know, but how they apply that knowledge to solve real-world problems.

Work samples provide a window into a candidate's actual capabilities, revealing their coding style, problem-solving approach, and technical decision-making process. Unlike theoretical questions or whiteboard exercises, well-designed work samples simulate the actual work environment and challenges the candidate will face in the role.

For Python developers specifically, these exercises should evaluate core competencies like code quality, problem-solving efficiency, architectural thinking, and the ability to work with existing codebases. The right work samples will distinguish between candidates who merely know Python syntax and those who can build robust, maintainable solutions.

The following four activities are designed to comprehensively assess Python developer candidates across different dimensions of the role. Each exercise targets specific skills essential for success as a Python developer while providing a realistic preview of the work they'll be doing. By implementing these exercises in your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and make more informed hiring decisions.

Activity #1: Python Problem-Solving Challenge

This exercise evaluates a candidate's core Python skills, algorithmic thinking, and problem-solving approach. By presenting a realistic coding challenge, you'll see how candidates structure their code, optimize for performance, and handle edge cases—all critical skills for effective Python development.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a problem statement that requires implementing a Python function or class to solve a specific problem.
• The problem should be solvable in 45-60 minutes and should involve data structures, algorithms, or Python-specific features.
• Create a GitHub repository with a starter template including function signatures, test cases, and documentation requirements.
• Ensure the problem is relevant to your company's domain (e.g., data processing for data-focused companies, API interactions for web services).
• Have a solution prepared internally to benchmark candidate solutions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Clone the provided repository and implement the requested functionality in Python.
• Focus on writing clean, efficient, and well-documented code.
• Include comments explaining your approach and any trade-offs you considered.
• Write additional test cases to verify your solution works correctly.
• Be prepared to explain your solution and discuss alternative approaches.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After submission, the interviewer should review the code with the candidate, highlighting one strength (e.g., "Your use of list comprehensions made the code very readable") and one area for improvement (e.g., "The solution could be more memory-efficient").
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to refactor their code based on the feedback, observing how they incorporate suggestions and improve their solution.

Activity #2: Code Review and Refactoring

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to understand existing code, identify issues, and improve code quality—essential skills for any Python developer joining an established team with existing codebases.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a Python module (100-200 lines) containing intentional issues such as:
• Performance inefficiencies
• Poor error handling
• Non-Pythonic code patterns
• Potential bugs or edge cases
• Suboptimal design patterns
• The code should be functional but flawed, similar to real-world legacy code.
• Include a brief description of what the code is supposed to do.
• Prepare a list of the key issues for reference during evaluation.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided Python code and identify issues related to functionality, performance, readability, and maintainability.
• Document your findings, explaining why each issue is problematic.
• Implement improvements to address the most critical issues.
• Prioritize your changes and explain your reasoning.
• Be prepared to discuss additional improvements you would make with more time.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their findings, acknowledge one particularly insightful observation they made.
• Point out one important issue they missed or a refactoring approach that could be improved.
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to address this feedback by either explaining how they would fix the missed issue or improving their existing solution.

Activity #3: System Design and Architecture

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design Python systems at a higher level, considering architecture, scalability, and best practices—crucial for more senior Python roles or positions requiring system design responsibilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario requiring the design of a Python-based system relevant to your business (e.g., a data pipeline, API service, or automation system).
• Provide clear requirements, expected scale, and constraints.
• Prepare a whiteboard or collaborative diagramming tool.
• Have an experienced developer or architect evaluate the design.
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Design a Python-based system architecture that meets the provided requirements.
• Create diagrams showing the main components, data flow, and interactions.
• Explain your choice of Python libraries, frameworks, and tools.
• Discuss how your design handles scalability, error cases, and maintenance.
• Be prepared to answer questions about alternative approaches and trade-offs.
• Consider deployment, monitoring, and operational aspects of your solution.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their design, highlight one particularly strong aspect of their architecture.
• Suggest one area where the design could be improved or a constraint that wasn't fully addressed.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to revise their design based on this feedback, observing how they incorporate new considerations and adapt their thinking.

Activity #4: Pair Programming Session

This exercise assesses how candidates collaborate, communicate technical concepts, and work with others—essential skills for team environments. It also reveals their real-time coding habits and problem-solving approach.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a moderately complex Python task that can be completed in 45-60 minutes.
• The task should involve extending or modifying an existing codebase rather than building from scratch.
• Assign an experienced developer to pair with the candidate.
• Ensure the pairing environment is set up with proper tools (IDE, version control, etc.).
• Brief the internal developer on their role: they should collaborate, not just observe.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Work collaboratively with a team member to implement a feature or fix an issue in Python.
• Take turns driving (writing code) and navigating (reviewing and suggesting).
• Communicate your thought process clearly as you work.
• Ask questions when needed and be receptive to suggestions.
• Focus on producing a working solution within the time constraints.
• Demonstrate good practices like writing tests and committing changes incrementally.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the session, the paired developer should highlight one aspect of the collaboration that went particularly well.
• They should also suggest one way the communication or coding approach could be improved.
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to reflect on this feedback and discuss how they would apply it in future collaborative situations.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for each work sample exercise?

Most of these exercises should take 45-60 minutes to complete. The coding challenge and pair programming session might require the full hour, while the code review could potentially be completed in 30-45 minutes. Plan for additional time for setup, instructions, and feedback discussions.

Should we use the same exercises for junior and senior Python developer candidates?

While the basic structure can remain the same, adjust the complexity based on the seniority level. For junior roles, focus more on fundamental Python skills and basic problem-solving. For senior roles, emphasize system design, architecture decisions, and advanced optimization techniques.

How should we evaluate candidates who use different approaches than our internal solution?

Different approaches should be welcomed and evaluated on their merits. The key is whether the solution is effective, efficient, and maintainable—not whether it matches your internal approach. Often, candidates bring fresh perspectives that can improve your existing practices.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using collaborative coding platforms (like CoderPad or Replit), video conferencing with screen sharing, and collaborative diagramming tools (like Miro or Lucidchart) for the system design exercise.

How do we prevent candidates from feeling overwhelmed by these technical exercises?

Provide clear instructions and reasonable time limits. Communicate that you're evaluating their approach and thought process, not just the final solution. Consider sending the problem statement in advance for the coding challenge, allowing candidates to prepare mentally without having time to research complete solutions.

Should we provide access to documentation and internet resources during these exercises?

Yes, in real-world development, engineers regularly consult documentation and resources. Allowing access creates a more realistic environment and reduces unnecessary stress. However, be clear about what resources are permitted (e.g., official documentation vs. solution repositories).

Finding the right Python developer requires evaluating both technical skills and problem-solving approaches. These work samples provide a comprehensive assessment framework that goes beyond traditional interviews to reveal how candidates actually work with Python in realistic scenarios. By implementing these exercises, you'll gain deeper insights into each candidate's capabilities and make more informed hiring decisions.

For more resources to improve your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for Python Developers? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!