Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI Infrastructure Cost Optimization Skills

AI infrastructure cost optimization has become a critical skill as organizations increasingly deploy machine learning models and AI systems at scale. With the exponential growth in computational requirements for training and inference, companies face mounting expenses that can quickly spiral out of control without proper management. Effective cost optimization requires a unique blend of technical knowledge, financial acumen, and strategic thinking.

Evaluating candidates for AI infrastructure cost optimization roles presents a significant challenge. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's practical ability to analyze complex systems, identify inefficiencies, and implement cost-saving measures without compromising performance. Technical knowledge alone is insufficient; successful practitioners must demonstrate creativity, analytical thinking, and business awareness.

The work samples outlined below are designed to simulate real-world scenarios that AI infrastructure specialists encounter daily. They provide a window into how candidates approach problems, balance competing priorities, and communicate technical concepts to various stakeholders. By observing candidates work through these exercises, hiring managers can gain valuable insights into their problem-solving process and technical capabilities.

These exercises go beyond theoretical knowledge to assess how candidates apply their expertise in practical situations. They evaluate not just what candidates know, but how they think and approach complex optimization challenges. Additionally, the feedback mechanism built into each exercise helps assess a candidate's adaptability and receptiveness to coaching—critical traits for success in rapidly evolving technical roles.

Activity #1: Cloud Cost Analysis and Optimization Plan

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze existing AI infrastructure costs, identify inefficiencies, and develop a strategic optimization plan. It tests their knowledge of cloud pricing models, resource utilization patterns, and cost-saving techniques specific to AI workloads. This skill is fundamental as it directly impacts an organization's bottom line while maintaining the performance needed for AI systems.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a simplified but realistic cloud billing report for an AI workload (e.g., a PDF or spreadsheet showing costs across different resource types like compute, storage, and networking).
• Include usage metrics such as GPU/TPU hours, storage consumption, and network egress.
• Provide a brief description of the AI application (e.g., "A recommendation system that processes 10TB of user data daily and serves predictions to 1M users").
• Allocate 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer familiar with cloud costs available to answer clarifying questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided cloud billing report and AI application description.
• Identify the top 3-5 areas where costs could be optimized.
• Create a prioritized action plan with specific recommendations for reducing costs.
• For each recommendation, estimate the potential cost savings (percentage or dollar amount) and any potential trade-offs or risks.
• Prepare a brief presentation (5-10 minutes) explaining your analysis and and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the presentation, the interviewer should highlight one strength in the candidate's approach (e.g., "Your analysis of storage tiering options was particularly insightful").
• The interviewer should then provide one area for improvement (e.g., "You might want to consider the impact of spot instances on model training reliability").
• Give the candidate 5-10 minutes to revise one aspect of their plan based on this feedback.

Activity #2: AI Workload Migration Cost-Benefit Analysis

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to evaluate different infrastructure options for AI workloads and make data-driven recommendations. It tests their understanding of various cloud providers' AI offerings, pricing structures, and the technical considerations that impact both cost and performance. This skill is essential for organizations looking to optimize their infrastructure choices or considering migrations.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing an existing AI workload (e.g., "A computer vision model that processes 100,000 images daily, currently running on on-premises hardware that needs replacement").
• Provide specifications of the current setup (e.g., hardware specs, throughput requirements, storage needs).
• Include any constraints or requirements (e.g., data residency, latency requirements, budget constraints).
• Prepare comparison data for 2-3 cloud providers' relevant offerings (or provide access to their pricing calculators).
• Allow 60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the current workload requirements and constraints.
• Research and compare at least two different infrastructure options (e.g., different cloud providers, specialized AI hardware options, or hybrid approaches).
• Create a detailed cost comparison table showing 1-year and 3-year total cost of ownership.
• Identify non-cost factors that should influence the decision (e.g., performance benefits, ecosystem compatibility).
• Make a final recommendation with justification.
• Prepare a 1-page executive summary and a more detailed technical analysis.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should commend one aspect of the candidate's analysis (e.g., "Your consideration of data transfer costs was very thorough").
• The interviewer should suggest one area where the analysis could be strengthened (e.g., "You might want to consider the cost implications of required model retraining").
• Allow the candidate 10 minutes to address this feedback by enhancing their recommendation.

Activity #3: AI Resource Utilization Troubleshooting

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify inefficiencies in AI infrastructure resource utilization and recommend practical solutions. It tests their technical understanding of how AI workloads consume resources and their problem-solving skills when faced with suboptimal performance. This skill is crucial for maintaining cost-effective operations while ensuring AI systems perform as expected.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a set of resource utilization metrics and logs from an AI system showing inefficient resource usage (e.g., GPU utilization charts, memory usage, I/O wait times).
• Include a brief description of the AI application and its expected performance.
• Create a scenario where costs are higher than expected despite normal business operations.
• Provide access to mock monitoring dashboards or screenshots that show the issue.
• Allow 45 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided metrics and logs to identify patterns of resource inefficiency.
• Diagnose the root causes of the observed inefficiencies.
• Develop at least three specific recommendations to improve resource utilization and reduce costs.
• Estimate the potential impact of each recommendation on both performance and cost.
• Create a brief troubleshooting report that explains your findings and recommendations in a way that both technical and non-technical stakeholders can understand.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one particularly insightful observation or recommendation from the candidate.
• The interviewer should then suggest one additional area to investigate or a different perspective to consider.
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to incorporate this feedback and refine their recommendations.

Activity #4: AI Infrastructure Scaling Strategy

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to plan for cost-effective scaling of AI infrastructure as demand grows. It tests their strategic thinking, forecasting abilities, and knowledge of advanced cost optimization techniques for large-scale AI operations. This skill is vital for organizations experiencing growth in their AI initiatives who need to maintain financial sustainability while expanding capabilities.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a growing AI application (e.g., "A natural language processing service that currently handles 10,000 requests per day but is projected to reach 1 million daily requests within 18 months").
• Provide current infrastructure costs and utilization metrics.
• Include growth projections (e.g., user growth, data volume growth, model complexity increases).
• Set a constraint that costs cannot grow linearly with usage (e.g., "The budget can only increase by 3x while handling 100x more requests").
• Allow 60-75 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the current infrastructure and growth projections.
• Develop a phased scaling strategy that addresses the growing demand while optimizing costs.
• Include specific technical recommendations (e.g., model optimization, caching strategies, hardware choices).
• Create a cost projection model showing how your strategy will meet the budget constraints.
• Identify key metrics to monitor during scaling to ensure cost efficiency.
• Prepare a presentation (10-15 minutes) outlining your scaling strategy and cost projections.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should commend one innovative or particularly effective aspect of the candidate's scaling strategy.
• The interviewer should then challenge one assumption or approach in the plan and ask how the candidate might address this concern.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to revise their strategy based on this feedback and explain how their revised approach addresses the concern.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much technical detail should we expect in candidates' responses?

The level of technical detail should align with the seniority of the role. For senior positions, expect detailed knowledge of specific optimization techniques, cloud provider offerings, and quantitative analysis. For mid-level roles, focus more on the reasoning process and general approach rather than specialized knowledge.

Should we provide real company data for these exercises?

No, always use synthetic data that resembles your actual infrastructure but doesn't reveal sensitive information. The scenarios should be realistic enough to test relevant skills without exposing proprietary details about your systems or costs.

How do we evaluate candidates who recommend solutions we haven't considered?

This is often a positive sign! Evaluate the reasoning behind their recommendations rather than whether they match your existing approaches. A candidate who can justify an unconventional but sound approach may bring valuable new perspectives to your team.

What if a candidate doesn't have experience with our specific cloud provider?

Focus on transferable concepts rather than provider-specific knowledge. Cost optimization principles are similar across platforms, and a strong candidate should be able to apply their experience from one environment to another, even if some details differ.

How should we balance the technical and business aspects in our evaluation?

The best AI infrastructure cost optimization specialists bridge the gap between technical and financial considerations. Look for candidates who not only understand the technical options but can also translate them into business impact and communicate effectively with both technical and non-technical stakeholders.

Should we expect candidates to complete all aspects of these exercises in the allotted time?

These exercises are intentionally comprehensive to see how candidates prioritize under time constraints. A strong candidate might not complete every detail but will focus on the most impactful areas and communicate clearly about what they would do with more time.

AI infrastructure cost optimization is becoming increasingly critical as organizations scale their AI initiatives. The candidates who demonstrate proficiency in these work samples will likely bring valuable skills to your organization, helping you maximize the return on your AI investments while maintaining financial sustainability.

By implementing these practical exercises in your hiring process, you'll be able to identify candidates who not only understand theoretical cost optimization principles but can apply them effectively in real-world scenarios. This approach leads to better hiring decisions and ultimately contributes to more cost-effective AI operations.

For more resources to enhance your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Infrastructure Cost Optimization by signing up for a free Yardstick account