Essential Work Samples for Evaluating AI Model Robustness Testing Skills

AI model robustness testing is a critical skill in today's machine learning landscape. As organizations increasingly rely on AI systems for decision-making, ensuring these models perform reliably under diverse and challenging conditions becomes paramount. Robustness testing identifies vulnerabilities, edge cases, and failure modes that might otherwise remain hidden until deployment, when failures can be costly and damaging to both operations and reputation.

Evaluating candidates' abilities in this specialized area requires more than theoretical knowledge assessment. While understanding concepts like adversarial attacks, distribution shifts, and model vulnerabilities is important, the practical application of these concepts separates truly skilled practitioners from those with merely surface-level knowledge. Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world robustness challenges, revealing their technical depth, methodical thinking, and problem-solving capabilities.

The exercises outlined below are designed to evaluate different facets of AI model robustness testing expertise. They range from strategic planning to hands-on implementation, covering the breadth of skills needed in this role. By observing candidates as they work through these exercises, hiring managers can gain valuable insights into their technical abilities, analytical thinking, and communication skills.

Implementing these work samples as part of your interview process will significantly enhance your ability to identify candidates who can effectively safeguard your AI systems against unexpected failures and malicious attacks. The right robustness testing expert will not only identify vulnerabilities but also help build more reliable, trustworthy AI systems that perform consistently across diverse scenarios and conditions.

Activity #1: Adversarial Attack Implementation and Defense

This exercise evaluates a candidate's hands-on ability to both implement adversarial attacks and develop defenses against them. Adversarial examples are carefully crafted inputs designed to fool machine learning models, and understanding how to create and defend against them is fundamental to AI robustness testing. This activity reveals the candidate's technical implementation skills, creativity in attack vectors, and strategic thinking in developing defensive measures.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with access to a pre-trained image classification model (e.g., a simple CNN trained on MNIST or CIFAR-10).
• Supply a small validation dataset (10-20 examples) and the model's Python code or a notebook environment.
• Ensure the environment has necessary libraries installed (TensorFlow/PyTorch, NumPy, Matplotlib).
• Allocate 60-90 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer available who understands adversarial machine learning concepts.

Directions for the Candidate:

• First, implement at least two different adversarial attack methods (e.g., FGSM, PGD, or DeepFool) against the provided model.
• Generate adversarial examples that cause the model to misclassify with high confidence.
• Visualize the original images alongside the adversarial examples, highlighting the perturbations.
• Then, implement at least one defense strategy (e.g., adversarial training, input preprocessing, or model regularization).
• Evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of your defense against the attacks you created.
• Be prepared to explain your approach, the strengths and limitations of each attack and defense method, and how you would scale this to more complex models.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on the technical implementation of the attacks and defenses.
• Specifically comment on one creative or effective approach the candidate used.
• Suggest one improvement area, such as attack efficiency, defense robustness, or evaluation methodology.
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement the suggested improvement and explain how it enhances their solution.

Activity #2: Robustness Testing Strategy Design

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to develop a comprehensive strategy for testing AI model robustness. It evaluates strategic thinking, knowledge of diverse testing methodologies, and the ability to prioritize testing efforts based on risk assessment. This activity reveals how candidates approach robustness testing at a system level, beyond individual techniques.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a detailed description of a fictional AI system (e.g., a loan approval model, a medical diagnosis system, or an autonomous vehicle perception system).
• Include information about the model architecture, training data characteristics, deployment environment, and potential consequences of failure.
• Provide a template document for the candidate to complete with sections for risk assessment, testing methodologies, and implementation plan.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the AI system description and identify key robustness risks and vulnerabilities.
• Develop a comprehensive robustness testing strategy that addresses:
• Adversarial attack testing (what types of attacks are relevant)
• Data distribution shift testing (how to test model performance across different distributions)
• Edge case identification and testing
• Performance degradation monitoring
• Fairness and bias considerations
• Prioritize testing efforts based on risk assessment and resource constraints.
• Create a high-level implementation plan with timeline estimates and resource requirements.
• Be prepared to justify your choices and explain trade-offs in your strategy.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one particularly insightful aspect of the candidate's strategy.
• Suggest one area where the strategy could be improved or expanded.
• Ask the candidate to revise that specific section of their strategy based on the feedback.
• Evaluate how well the candidate incorporates the feedback and whether they demonstrate adaptability in their thinking.

Activity #3: Distribution Shift Analysis and Mitigation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to identify, analyze, and address performance degradation due to data distribution shifts—a common challenge in deployed AI systems. It tests statistical analysis skills, diagnostic abilities, and practical knowledge of techniques to improve model robustness across different data distributions.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a dataset with clear distribution shifts between training and test sets (e.g., a dataset where certain features have different distributions in test data).
• Provide a pre-trained model that performs well on in-distribution data but degrades on shifted data.
• Include visualization tools and basic statistical analysis libraries in the environment.
• Allocate 60-75 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Analyze the provided dataset to identify distribution shifts between training and test data.
• Quantify the performance degradation caused by these shifts.
• Visualize and explain the nature of the distribution shifts.
• Implement at least two different approaches to improve model robustness against the identified shifts, such as:
• Domain adaptation techniques
• Robust optimization methods
• Data augmentation strategies
• Model ensemble approaches
• Compare the effectiveness of your approaches and explain their strengths and limitations.
• Recommend a strategy for ongoing monitoring of distribution shifts in production.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide positive feedback on one aspect of the candidate's analysis or mitigation approach.
• Suggest one additional technique or refinement that could further improve robustness.
• Allow the candidate 15 minutes to implement or explain how they would incorporate this suggestion.
• Evaluate the candidate's ability to integrate new ideas and their depth of understanding of distribution shift challenges.

Activity #4: Model Vulnerability Assessment and Reporting

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to systematically identify, document, and communicate model vulnerabilities—a critical skill for effective robustness testing. It evaluates methodical testing approaches, technical documentation skills, and the ability to translate technical findings into actionable recommendations for stakeholders with varying technical backgrounds.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a trained model with several deliberately introduced vulnerabilities (e.g., sensitivity to specific input patterns, poor performance on certain subgroups, or susceptibility to particular adversarial attacks).
• Include basic documentation about the model's purpose, architecture, and training process.
• Prepare a template for the vulnerability report with sections for findings, impact assessment, and recommendations.
• Allow 75-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Conduct a systematic assessment of the model to identify vulnerabilities and robustness issues.
• Use a variety of testing approaches, including but not limited to:
• Input boundary testing
• Subgroup performance analysis
• Adversarial probing
• Stress testing with noisy or corrupted inputs
• Document each identified vulnerability with:
• A clear description of the issue
• Reproducible steps to demonstrate the vulnerability
• Quantitative assessment of the impact
• Root cause analysis where possible
• Prepare a vulnerability report with findings categorized by severity and impact.
• Include specific, actionable recommendations for addressing each vulnerability.
• Create a brief executive summary that communicates the key findings and recommendations to non-technical stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should commend one aspect of the candidate's assessment methodology or reporting.
• Suggest one area where the vulnerability assessment could be more thorough or the reporting more effective.
• Ask the candidate to revise that specific section of their report based on the feedback.
• Evaluate how well the candidate balances technical depth with clear communication in their revised section.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each of these exercises take in an interview setting?

Each exercise is designed to take 60-90 minutes. For interview purposes, you might choose to use a shortened version or select just one or two exercises most relevant to your specific needs. Alternatively, you could assign a take-home exercise with a time limit that allows for more thorough completion.

Should candidates be allowed to use online resources during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, libraries, and general resources (like Stack Overflow) creates a more realistic working environment. However, be clear about what resources are permitted and consider restricting access to complete solutions for the specific problems you're posing.

How technical does the interviewer need to be to evaluate these exercises?

The interviewer should have a solid understanding of machine learning concepts and robustness testing principles. For the more technical exercises (like adversarial attack implementation), having someone with hands-on experience in the area is important for meaningful evaluation and feedback.

Can these exercises be adapted for candidates with different experience levels?

Absolutely. For junior candidates, you might simplify the tasks (e.g., implementing just one attack method instead of two) or provide more scaffolding. For senior candidates, you could add complexity by introducing constraints or asking for more sophisticated approaches.

How should we weight these exercises compared to other interview components?

These work samples should be a significant factor in your evaluation, as they directly demonstrate relevant skills. However, they should be balanced with other assessments of cultural fit, communication skills, and broader technical knowledge. A common approach is to weight work samples at 40-50% of the overall evaluation.

What if a candidate doesn't complete the entire exercise in the allotted time?

Focus on evaluating the quality of what was completed rather than completion alone. Look for sound methodology, technical accuracy, and clear thinking in the work they did accomplish. The ability to prioritize effectively when time-constrained is itself a valuable skill.

AI model robustness testing is a specialized skill that requires both technical depth and strategic thinking. By incorporating these work samples into your interview process, you'll gain valuable insights into candidates' practical abilities that go far beyond what traditional interviews or technical questions can reveal. The right candidate will demonstrate not only technical proficiency in implementing robustness tests but also the strategic vision to design comprehensive testing frameworks and the communication skills to effectively report findings.

As AI systems become increasingly integrated into critical applications, the importance of thorough robustness testing only grows. Investing time in properly evaluating these skills during your hiring process will pay dividends in the form of more reliable, trustworthy AI systems that perform consistently even under challenging conditions.

For more resources to help optimize your hiring process, check out Yardstick's AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Build a complete interview guide for AI Model Robustness Testing by signing up for a free Yardstick account