Essential Work Samples for Evaluating Secure AI API Development Skills

Secure AI API development has become a critical skill as organizations increasingly deploy machine learning models through accessible interfaces. With the proliferation of AI services, the security of these APIs is paramount—they often handle sensitive data, provide access to powerful capabilities, and represent significant business assets. Evaluating a candidate's ability to develop secure AI APIs requires more than just reviewing their resume or asking theoretical questions.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates approach real-world challenges in secure AI API development. They reveal not just technical knowledge, but also problem-solving approaches, attention to security details, and the ability to balance functionality with protection. By observing candidates working through practical scenarios, hiring managers can assess their ability to identify vulnerabilities, implement proper authentication mechanisms, handle sensitive data appropriately, and follow security best practices.

The most effective candidates demonstrate not only technical proficiency but also security mindfulness—the habit of considering potential threats at every stage of development. This includes understanding the unique security challenges of AI systems, such as model poisoning, prompt injection, and inference attacks. Work samples help identify candidates who instinctively incorporate security into their development process rather than treating it as an afterthought.

The following work samples are designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to develop secure AI APIs across different dimensions: architecture planning, implementation, vulnerability assessment, and documentation. Each exercise simulates real-world scenarios that secure AI API developers encounter, providing a comprehensive view of a candidate's capabilities in this specialized field.

Activity #1: Secure AI API Architecture Design

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to design a secure architecture for an AI API system. It tests their understanding of security principles, authentication mechanisms, data protection strategies, and their ability to anticipate potential threats. A strong candidate will demonstrate thoughtful consideration of security at every layer of the architecture while maintaining usability and performance.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide the candidate with a written brief describing a fictional company that wants to deploy a machine learning model as a public-facing API. Include details about the type of model (e.g., a sentiment analysis model, content moderation system, or recommendation engine), the sensitivity of the data it processes, and the expected user base.
• Include any specific compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) that might be relevant.
• Provide whiteboard space or diagramming tools for the candidate to create their architecture design.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.
• Have a technical interviewer with security expertise available to review the design and ask follow-up questions.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided brief and ask any clarifying questions.
• Design a secure architecture for the AI API system, including:
• Authentication and authorization mechanisms
• API rate limiting and abuse prevention
• Data encryption strategies (both in transit and at rest)
• Logging and monitoring approaches
• Deployment infrastructure considerations
• Create a diagram illustrating the architecture components and their interactions.
• Prepare to explain your design choices, particularly those related to security.
• Identify the top three security risks in your design and how you've mitigated them.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should provide feedback on one strong aspect of the candidate's design (e.g., "I appreciated your thoughtful approach to API key rotation") and one area for improvement (e.g., "I noticed you didn't address how you'd handle model versioning securely").
• Give the candidate 10 minutes to revise their design based on the improvement feedback, focusing specifically on that aspect.
• Observe how receptive the candidate is to feedback and how effectively they incorporate it into their revised design.

Activity #2: Secure Endpoint Implementation

This activity tests a candidate's ability to implement a secure API endpoint that interacts with an AI model. It evaluates their coding practices, understanding of secure API development principles, and attention to security details in implementation. This hands-on exercise reveals how candidates translate security knowledge into actual code.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a partially implemented codebase for an AI API (in a language relevant to your stack, such as Python with FastAPI/Flask, Node.js, etc.).
• Include a pre-trained model (or mock one) that the API will expose.
• Identify specific security requirements for the endpoint, such as:
• Proper authentication
• Input validation
• Rate limiting
• Secure handling of model inputs and outputs
• Provide access to a development environment where the candidate can write and test code.
• Allow 60-90 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided codebase to understand its structure and the existing components.
• Implement a new secure endpoint that allows authenticated users to interact with the AI model.
• Ensure your implementation includes:
• Proper authentication verification
• Comprehensive input validation and sanitization
• Protection against common API vulnerabilities (injection attacks, etc.)
• Appropriate error handling that doesn't leak sensitive information
• Logging of relevant security events
• Write brief comments explaining your security-related decisions.
• Be prepared to run your code and demonstrate that it works as expected while maintaining security.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should review the code with the candidate, highlighting one security best practice they implemented well and one security concern or vulnerability they missed.
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to address the identified security concern and explain their approach to fixing it.
• Evaluate not just whether they fixed the issue, but also their understanding of why it was a problem and how their solution addresses the root cause.

Activity #3: AI API Vulnerability Assessment

This activity evaluates a candidate's ability to identify security vulnerabilities in an existing AI API implementation. It tests their security mindset, knowledge of common vulnerabilities specific to AI systems, and ability to prioritize security issues. This exercise is particularly valuable for assessing a candidate's defensive security thinking.

Directions for the Company:

• Prepare a code sample of an AI API with intentionally introduced security vulnerabilities. Include a mix of:
• General API security issues (e.g., missing authentication, improper input validation)
• AI-specific vulnerabilities (e.g., prompt injection vulnerabilities, lack of output filtering)
• Infrastructure/deployment issues (e.g., exposed secrets in configuration)
• Provide documentation explaining the intended functionality of the API.
• Consider including the API's OpenAPI/Swagger specification if applicable.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided code and documentation to understand the API's purpose and functionality.
• Identify as many security vulnerabilities as you can within the time limit.
• For each vulnerability:
• Describe the vulnerability and its potential impact
• Explain how an attacker might exploit it
• Rate its severity (low, medium, high, critical)
• Recommend a specific fix or mitigation strategy
• Prioritize the vulnerabilities based on their risk level and potential impact.
• Be prepared to discuss your findings and recommendations.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should acknowledge one vulnerability the candidate identified thoroughly and point out one significant vulnerability they missed or misunderstood.
• Give the candidate 10-15 minutes to analyze the missed vulnerability, explain why it's a concern, and propose a solution.
• Evaluate the candidate's receptiveness to learning about new security issues and their ability to quickly understand and address unfamiliar vulnerabilities.

Activity #4: Secure AI API Documentation and Compliance

This activity assesses a candidate's ability to create comprehensive security documentation for an AI API and address compliance requirements. It evaluates their understanding of security communication, documentation best practices, and awareness of regulatory considerations for AI systems. This exercise is crucial for determining if a candidate can effectively communicate security aspects to stakeholders.

Directions for the Company:

• Provide a description of an AI API system, including its purpose, the type of data it processes, and its target users.
• Include information about relevant compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA) that apply to the system.
• Provide a template or outline for the security documentation to guide the candidate.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for this exercise.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Create security documentation for the described AI API that includes:
• A security overview section explaining the security architecture
• Authentication and authorization requirements for API users
• Data handling and privacy practices
• Potential security risks and mitigations
• Compliance considerations specific to the AI functionality
• Security recommendations for API consumers
• Address how the API meets the specified compliance requirements.
• Create a section on "Responsible AI Use" that covers ethical considerations and potential misuse prevention.
• Develop a brief incident response plan specific to potential security breaches of the AI API.

Feedback Mechanism:

• The interviewer should highlight one particularly strong section of the documentation and identify one area that needs more detail or clarity.
• Give the candidate 15 minutes to enhance the identified section, adding the missing details or improving clarity.
• Assess the candidate's ability to communicate complex security concepts clearly and their understanding of compliance requirements in the context of AI systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should each of these work sample activities take?

Each activity is designed to take between 45-90 minutes, depending on the complexity. For a comprehensive assessment, you might want to select 1-2 activities rather than conducting all four. Choose the ones most relevant to your specific needs and the seniority of the role.

Should candidates be allowed to use reference materials or the internet during these exercises?

Yes, allowing access to documentation, reference materials, and even internet searches more closely simulates real-world working conditions. Security professionals regularly consult resources, and this approach tests a candidate's research skills and ability to apply information rather than just memorization.

How should we evaluate candidates who approach security differently than our organization?

Focus on the soundness of their security reasoning rather than specific implementation details. Different approaches can be valid if they effectively address the security concerns. Use the discussion portion to understand their decision-making process and assess if they can adapt to your organization's security philosophy.

What if a candidate identifies security issues we hadn't considered in the vulnerability assessment exercise?

This is actually a positive outcome! It demonstrates the candidate's strong security mindset and may help improve your own systems. Make note of these insights and consider them valuable contributions, even if they weren't part of your planned assessment criteria.

How can we adapt these exercises for remote interviews?

All these activities can be conducted remotely using screen sharing, collaborative coding platforms (like CoderPad or GitHub Codespaces), and virtual whiteboarding tools (like Miro or Figma). Provide clear instructions ahead of time about the tools that will be used and ensure candidates have access to them before the interview.

Should we provide these exercises to candidates ahead of time?

For the architecture design and documentation exercises, providing the scenario 24 hours in advance can lead to more thoughtful responses. For the implementation and vulnerability assessment activities, it's usually better to present them during the interview to assess real-time problem-solving skills.

Evaluating secure AI API development skills through practical work samples provides invaluable insights that traditional interviews simply cannot capture. These exercises reveal not just technical knowledge, but also security mindset, attention to detail, and problem-solving approaches that are essential for this critical role. By implementing these work samples in your hiring process, you'll be better equipped to identify candidates who can build AI APIs that are both functional and secure.

As AI becomes increasingly integrated into business operations, the security of these systems is paramount. The candidates who excel at these exercises demonstrate the rare combination of AI expertise, security awareness, and implementation skills needed to protect your organization's most valuable AI assets. For more resources on creating effective hiring processes, check out Yardstick's AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for secure AI API development? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!