Practical Work Sample Exercises for Hiring Top Cybersecurity Analysts

In today's digital landscape, cybersecurity analysts serve as the frontline defenders against an ever-evolving array of threats. The cost of a poor hiring decision in this critical role extends far beyond the typical recruitment expenses—it can potentially expose your organization to devastating security breaches, data loss, and reputational damage.

Traditional interviews often fail to reveal a candidate's true capabilities in high-pressure security situations. While certifications and technical knowledge are important, they don't necessarily translate to practical effectiveness in identifying threats, responding to incidents, or communicating security concerns across an organization.

Work samples provide a window into how candidates actually approach security challenges, not just what they claim they would do. By observing candidates perform realistic tasks that mirror day-to-day responsibilities, you can assess their technical proficiency, analytical thinking, attention to detail, and communication skills in action.

The following exercises are designed to evaluate the core competencies required for cybersecurity analysts: incident response capabilities, vulnerability assessment skills, security control implementation, and the ability to effectively communicate security concepts to non-technical stakeholders. Each exercise includes a feedback component to assess the candidate's adaptability and coachability—critical traits in the rapidly changing cybersecurity landscape.

Activity #1: Security Incident Response Simulation

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to analyze security alerts, prioritize threats, and develop appropriate response plans—core responsibilities for any cybersecurity analyst. The simulation tests technical knowledge, analytical thinking, and decision-making under pressure, revealing how candidates approach real-world security incidents.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a simulated security incident scenario with multiple alerts from different security tools (e.g., SIEM alerts, firewall logs, endpoint detection alerts).
• Provide the candidate with a document containing these alerts, relevant system information, and network diagrams.
• Include some obvious threats, some false positives, and at least one sophisticated threat that requires deeper analysis.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to analyze the data and prepare their response.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focusing on threat identification accuracy, prioritization logic, and response strategy.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided security alerts and supporting information.
• Identify which alerts represent actual security threats versus false positives.
• Prioritize the identified threats based on potential impact and urgency.
• Develop a response plan for each legitimate threat, including immediate containment actions and longer-term remediation steps.
• Document your analysis process, explaining how you determined which alerts were significant.
• Prepare to present your findings and recommended actions in a 10-minute briefing.

Feedback Mechanism:

• After the candidate presents their analysis, provide specific feedback on one aspect they handled well (e.g., "Your prioritization of the database server compromise was excellent") and one area for improvement (e.g., "You might have overlooked the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated alerts").
• Ask the candidate to reconsider a portion of their analysis based on the feedback and explain how they would adjust their approach or response plan.
• Evaluate their receptiveness to feedback and ability to incorporate new information into their thinking.

Activity #2: Vulnerability Assessment Exercise

This exercise tests a candidate's ability to identify, analyze, and prioritize security vulnerabilities—a fundamental skill for proactive security management. It reveals their technical knowledge of common vulnerabilities, methodical approach to assessment, and ability to communicate technical findings in business-relevant terms.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a fictional but realistic system environment with deliberately introduced vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, misconfigured services, weak authentication mechanisms).
• Provide documentation including network diagrams, system specifications, and configuration details.
• Include vulnerabilities of varying severity and complexity.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the assessment.
• Prepare a scoring rubric that evaluates thoroughness, accuracy of risk assessment, and quality of remediation recommendations.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the provided system documentation to understand the environment.
• Identify potential security vulnerabilities based on the information provided.
• For each vulnerability identified:
• Describe the nature of the vulnerability
• Assess its potential impact and likelihood of exploitation
• Assign a risk rating (e.g., Critical, High, Medium, Low)
• Recommend specific remediation steps
• Prioritize your findings based on risk level and business impact.
• Document your assessment methodology and explain your prioritization rationale.
• Prepare a brief executive summary of your top findings for non-technical stakeholders.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the candidate's thoroughness in identifying vulnerabilities and the quality of their risk assessments.
• Highlight one area where their analysis was particularly strong and one area where they could improve (e.g., "Your technical analysis was thorough, but your executive summary could better translate technical risks into business terms").
• Ask the candidate to revise their executive summary or a specific remediation recommendation based on your feedback.
• Evaluate how effectively they incorporate the feedback and whether they can adjust their communication style for different audiences.

Activity #3: Security Control Implementation Planning

This exercise evaluates a candidate's ability to design and implement appropriate security controls to address specific risks—a critical skill for improving an organization's security posture. It tests their knowledge of security technologies, understanding of defense-in-depth principles, and ability to balance security requirements with operational needs.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario describing a specific security challenge or requirement (e.g., securing a new cloud deployment, protecting sensitive customer data, implementing zero-trust architecture).
• Provide relevant context including business constraints (budget, timeline), existing infrastructure, and compliance requirements.
• Include some competing priorities that require the candidate to make and justify trade-offs.
• Allow 45-60 minutes for the candidate to develop their plan.
• Prepare evaluation criteria focusing on technical soundness, practicality, and alignment with business needs.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the security challenge and contextual information provided.
• Develop a comprehensive security control implementation plan that addresses the specific requirements.
• Your plan should include:
• Recommended security controls (technical and procedural)
• Implementation phases and priorities
• Required resources and approximate timeline
• Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
• Success metrics and validation methods
• Justify your recommendations, explaining how they address the identified risks while working within the stated constraints.
• Be prepared to discuss alternative approaches you considered and why you selected your recommended solution.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the strengths of the candidate's plan and one area where their approach could be enhanced.
• Challenge one of their recommendations with a realistic business or technical constraint they may not have fully considered.
• Ask them to revise that portion of their plan to address the new constraint.
• Evaluate their flexibility in adapting their approach while maintaining security effectiveness.

Activity #4: Security Awareness Training Simulation

This exercise assesses a candidate's ability to effectively communicate security concepts to non-technical users—an increasingly important skill as social engineering attacks become more sophisticated. It evaluates their communication skills, ability to translate complex security concepts into accessible language, and effectiveness in motivating security-conscious behavior.

Directions for the Company:

• Create a scenario requiring the candidate to develop and deliver a brief security awareness training segment on a specific topic (e.g., phishing detection, password management, data handling).
• Provide information about the target audience (e.g., sales team, executive leadership, new employees).
• Include any relevant company policies or recent security incidents that should inform the training.
• Allow 30-45 minutes for preparation and 10-15 minutes for presentation.
• Have 2-3 team members role-play as the audience, asking questions of varying sophistication.

Directions for the Candidate:

• Review the security awareness topic and audience information provided.
• Develop a 10-minute training segment that effectively communicates key security concepts to the specified audience.
• Your training should include:
• Clear explanation of the security risk in non-technical terms
• Practical examples or demonstrations that make the risk tangible
• Specific actions the audience should take to mitigate the risk
• Engaging elements that will help the information be remembered
• Prepare to answer questions from the audience and adapt your explanation based on their level of understanding.
• Consider how you would measure the effectiveness of this training if implemented.

Feedback Mechanism:

• Provide feedback on the clarity, engagement level, and appropriateness of the training for the target audience.
• Highlight one particularly effective element and one area where the training could be improved.
• Ask the candidate to revise a specific portion of their presentation based on the feedback (e.g., "How would you explain this concept differently to make it more relatable to the sales team?").
• Evaluate their ability to adapt their communication style while maintaining technical accuracy.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should we allocate for these work sample exercises?

Each exercise is designed to take 45-60 minutes for the candidate to complete, plus additional time for setup, feedback, and discussion. We recommend scheduling at least 90 minutes for each exercise you choose to implement. For a comprehensive assessment, you might spread these across multiple interview stages rather than attempting all four in a single session.

Should we use these exercises for all cybersecurity analyst candidates regardless of experience level?

These exercises can be adapted for different experience levels. For junior candidates, you might simplify the scenarios or provide more context and guidance. For senior candidates, you could increase the complexity of the scenarios or add constraints that require more sophisticated solutions. The evaluation criteria should be adjusted accordingly.

How should we prepare the materials for these exercises?

Ideally, the scenarios should reflect your organization's actual technology environment and security challenges, though with fictional details to protect sensitive information. If you don't have the resources to create custom materials, consider partnering with your security team to adapt publicly available security scenarios or case studies to your context.

What if a candidate performs poorly on the technical aspects but shows excellent communication skills or vice versa?

This highlights the value of these work samples—they reveal a candidate's strengths and weaknesses across different dimensions of the role. Consider the specific requirements of your position. Some cybersecurity analyst roles may emphasize technical skills while others require more stakeholder communication. Use these insights to determine fit or identify areas for development if you proceed with hiring.

How can we ensure these exercises don't disadvantage candidates from diverse backgrounds?

Review your scenarios to ensure they don't require specific cultural knowledge unrelated to the job. Provide clear instructions and equal preparation time to all candidates. Consider offering accommodations for candidates who might need them. Focus evaluation on the problem-solving approach and core competencies rather than familiarity with specific tools that can be learned on the job.

Can these exercises be conducted remotely?

Yes, all of these exercises can be adapted for remote interviews using video conferencing and screen sharing. For the incident response and vulnerability assessment exercises, you can provide the materials ahead of time or use collaborative online tools. For the training simulation, the candidate can present via video conference to a small panel of interviewers.

In today's complex threat landscape, finding cybersecurity analysts with the right combination of technical skills, analytical thinking, and communication abilities is crucial for maintaining your organization's security posture. These practical work samples go beyond traditional interviews to reveal how candidates actually perform in realistic scenarios, helping you make more informed hiring decisions.

By implementing these exercises as part of your hiring process, you'll gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities and identify those who can truly contribute to your security team's success. For more resources to enhance your cybersecurity hiring process, check out our AI Job Description Generator, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator. You can also find the complete job description for a Cybersecurity Analyst at Yardstick's Cybersecurity Analyst Job Description.

Ready to build a complete interview guide for hiring Cybersecurity Analysts? Sign up for a free Yardstick account today!