Work Samples for AI Workflow Automation Design

Hiring for AI Workflow Automation Design requires looking beyond resumes and theoretical knowledge. While understanding AI concepts, automation platforms, and integration techniques is crucial, the true test lies in a candidate's ability to apply this knowledge in practical scenarios. Can they break down a complex process? Can they identify the optimal points for AI intervention? Can they design a robust, scalable, and maintainable automated workflow? Can they troubleshoot issues when things don't go as planned?

Traditional interview methods, relying solely on behavioral questions or hypothetical scenarios, often fall short in evaluating these critical, hands-on skills. Candidates can easily provide polished answers based on textbook knowledge or memorized frameworks. What's needed is a way to see candidates in action, tackling challenges similar to those they would face on the job.

This is where practical work samples, technical skill evaluations, and role plays become indispensable. By presenting candidates with realistic problems and asking them to design, build, or troubleshoot a workflow, you gain invaluable insight into their problem-solving approach, technical proficiency, creativity, and ability to deliver tangible results. These exercises provide a standardized, objective way to compare candidates based on their actual capabilities, significantly reducing the risk of a mis-hire.

Implementing well-designed work samples not only helps you identify the most capable candidates but also provides a more engaging and realistic interview experience for the candidate. It allows them to showcase their skills in a meaningful way and get a clearer picture of the challenges and opportunities they would encounter in the role. For a role as critical and hands-on as AI Workflow Automation Design, incorporating these practical assessments is not just a best practice; it's a necessity for building a high-performing team.

Activity #1: Designing an End-to-End AI-Powered Customer Onboarding Workflow

This activity challenges the candidate to design a comprehensive AI-powered workflow for a common business process: customer onboarding. It requires them to think holistically about the process, identify opportunities for AI and automation, consider data flow, potential integrations, error handling, and the overall user experience. This exercise demonstrates their ability to translate business requirements into a technical design, their understanding of workflow principles, and their creativity in leveraging AI for efficiency and improved outcomes. It assesses their planning and complex task design skills.

Directions for the Company:Provide the candidate with a written prompt describing a typical customer onboarding process for your company (or a hypothetical one if yours is confidential). Include details about the current manual steps, pain points (e.g., data entry errors, delays, lack of personalization), key systems involved (e.g., CRM, email marketing tool, database), and desired outcomes (e.g., faster onboarding, reduced errors, personalized communication, automated task assignment). Ask the candidate to design an end-to-end AI-powered workflow to automate and enhance this process. They should be prepared to present and explain their design.

Resources for the Company:

• A detailed written prompt outlining the current customer onboarding process, pain points, systems, and desired outcomes.
• Access to a whiteboard, digital collaboration tool (like Miro or Lucidchart), or presentation software for the candidate to illustrate their design.
• (Optional but recommended) A brief overview of the company's existing tech stack and preferred automation platforms.

Directions for the Candidate:You are tasked with designing an AI-powered workflow to automate and improve our customer onboarding process based on the provided description. Your design should cover the entire process from initial sign-up to successful activation/first use. Consider where AI can add value (e.g., data validation, personalization, sentiment analysis, task prediction) and how different systems will integrate. Outline the steps in the workflow, the technologies/tools you would use (can be hypothetical or based on common platforms), data flow, and how you would handle potential errors or exceptions. Prepare to present your design and explain your rationale.

Feedback Mechanism:After the candidate presents their design, the interviewer should provide two pieces of feedback: one specific aspect of the design that was particularly strong or insightful (e.g., their use of AI for personalization, their error handling strategy) and one area for potential improvement or further consideration (e.g., scalability concerns, a potential integration challenge, a missed opportunity for automation). After receiving the improvement feedback, the candidate should be given 5-10 minutes to briefly explain how they might adjust or refine their design based on the feedback.

Activity #2: Implementing a Data Transformation and Routing Workflow Segment

This activity focuses on a more tactical, hands-on aspect of workflow automation: handling data. Candidates will be asked to design or implement a specific segment of a workflow that involves receiving data from one source, transforming it based on certain rules, and routing it to the correct destination using automation principles. This assesses their ability to work with data, apply logic, and potentially use specific automation tool features. It evaluates their tactical completion skills.

Directions for the Company:Provide the candidate with a scenario where data needs to be processed and routed. For example, receiving customer feedback data (text) from a survey tool, using AI to categorize the sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) and topic (product, service, billing), and then routing the data (or a summary) to different teams (e.g., positive feedback to marketing, negative product feedback to product team, negative billing feedback to finance) and potentially triggering follow-up actions (e.g., creating a task in a project management tool for negative feedback). Ask the candidate to outline the steps, logic, and tools they would use to build this specific workflow segment. If possible, provide a small sample of mock data.

Resources for the Company:

• A written prompt describing the data source, the required transformations (sentiment analysis, topic categorization), the routing rules, and the destination systems/actions.
• A small sample file of mock data in a relevant format (e.g., CSV, JSON).
• (Optional) Access to a simple workflow automation tool interface (like Zapier, Make, or a low-code platform) if you want them to demonstrate actual configuration, or allow them to describe it conceptually.

Directions for the Candidate:Based on the provided scenario and mock data, design or describe the implementation steps for a workflow segment that receives data, uses AI to analyze sentiment and topic, and routes the information accordingly. Detail the logic you would use for routing and any data transformations required. Specify the types of tools or platforms you would leverage for each step (e.g., an AI service for sentiment analysis, an automation platform for routing). If you have access to a tool, you may be asked to configure a basic version of this workflow segment. Explain your choices and how you ensure data integrity and accuracy.

Feedback Mechanism:After the candidate explains or demonstrates their approach, provide feedback: one positive aspect of their data handling or logic (e.g., their efficiency in routing, their consideration of data format) and one area for improvement (e.g., handling edge cases in data, optimizing the transformation steps, considering data volume). Give the candidate a few minutes to suggest how they would refine their approach based on the feedback.

Activity #3: Troubleshooting a Failing Automated Workflow

This activity tests the candidate's ability to diagnose and resolve issues in an existing automated workflow. Real-world workflows often break due to unexpected data, API changes, system outages, or logic errors. This exercise assesses their problem-solving skills, debugging methodology, and understanding of common failure points in automation.

Directions for the Company:Present the candidate with a description of a simple, hypothetical automated workflow that is currently failing. Describe the intended function of the workflow (e.g., syncing data between two systems, sending automated notifications based on a trigger) and the symptoms of the failure (e.g., data is not syncing, notifications are not sending, error messages are appearing in logs). Provide some mock logs or error messages related to the failure. Ask the candidate to walk through their process for troubleshooting the issue, identify the likely cause(s), and propose a solution.

Resources for the Company:

• A written description of a hypothetical failing workflow, its purpose, and the observed symptoms.
• Mock error messages or log snippets related to the failure.
• (Optional) A diagram of the failing workflow.

Directions for the Candidate:You are given a description of an automated workflow that is currently failing, along with some error messages/logs. Your task is to act as a troubleshooter. Describe the steps you would take to diagnose the problem. What information would you look for? What tools or techniques would you use? Based on the provided symptoms and logs, what do you believe is the most likely cause of the failure? Propose a specific solution to fix the workflow and explain how you would test that the fix is successful.

Feedback Mechanism:Provide feedback on the candidate's troubleshooting process: one strength (e.g., their systematic approach, their ability to interpret logs, their consideration of multiple potential causes) and one area for improvement (e.g., exploring more potential root causes, suggesting more robust testing, considering the impact of the fix on other parts of the system). Allow the candidate a brief moment to suggest how they might adjust their troubleshooting or solution based on the feedback.

Activity #4: Documenting and Communicating a Workflow Design

Designing a great workflow is only part of the job; effectively communicating that design to technical and non-technical stakeholders is equally crucial. This activity assesses the candidate's ability to document their work clearly, explain complex concepts simply, and potentially create visual representations of their designs. This evaluates their communication and documentation skills.

Directions for the Company:Ask the candidate to take one of the workflow designs they created in a previous activity (or provide them with a simple pre-designed workflow) and create documentation for it. This documentation should be suitable for both technical team members who might implement or maintain it and business stakeholders who need to understand its function and benefits. Ask them to prepare a brief (5-10 minute) presentation explaining the workflow to a non-technical audience.

Resources for the Company:

• The candidate's design from a previous activity or a simple pre-designed workflow description/diagram.
• Access to documentation tools (like Google Docs, Confluence, or a diagramming tool).
• A clear definition of the target audience for the documentation and presentation (e.g., "explain this to our marketing team").

Directions for the Candidate:Choose one of the workflow designs you've worked on (or use the provided workflow). Create documentation for this workflow that serves two purposes: providing technical details for implementers/maintainers and explaining the workflow's purpose and benefits to business stakeholders. Your documentation should include a clear description of the workflow, its steps, inputs, outputs, and any key logic or AI components. Additionally, prepare a short presentation (5-10 minutes) explaining this workflow to a non-technical audience, focusing on what it does and why it's valuable.

Feedback Mechanism:Provide feedback on the candidate's documentation and presentation: one strength (e.g., clarity of the diagram, effectiveness of explaining technical concepts simply, organization of the document) and one area for improvement (e.g., adding more detail in a specific section, simplifying language for the business audience, improving the flow of the presentation). Give the candidate a few minutes to describe how they would refine their documentation or presentation based on the feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How long should these work samples take?

A: The duration can vary depending on the complexity you introduce. Aim for each activity to take between 30-60 minutes for the candidate to complete or present, plus time for feedback. The goal is to get a window into their skills, not to have them build a production-ready system.

Q: Should candidates complete these exercises live or asynchronously?

A: Both approaches have merit. Live exercises (like Activity 1, 3, and 4 presentations/walkthroughs) allow you to observe their process and ask follow-up questions in real-time. Asynchronous exercises (like designing the workflow in Activity 1 or outlining the steps in Activity 2) allow candidates more time to prepare and showcase their best work. A hybrid approach, where they prepare asynchronously and present/discuss live, often works best.

Q: How do we score or evaluate these work samples?

A: Develop a simple rubric or scorecard for each activity based on the key skills being assessed. For example, for Activity 1, evaluate clarity of design, appropriateness of AI/automation use, consideration of edge cases, and scalability. For Activity 3, evaluate their diagnostic process, logical reasoning, and proposed solution's effectiveness. Focus on objective criteria related to the task requirements.

Q: Can we combine elements of these activities?

A: Yes, absolutely. You could ask a candidate to design a workflow segment (Activity 2), document it (Activity 4), and then troubleshoot a hypothetical issue within that segment (Activity 3). Combining elements can provide a more integrated assessment, but be mindful of the total time commitment for the candidate.

Q: What if a candidate isn't familiar with the specific tools we use?

A: Focus on their understanding of the underlying principles of workflow automation, AI application, data handling, and problem-solving methodology. Allow them to describe their approach using tools they are familiar with or conceptual tools. The goal is to assess their ability to design and think critically about automation, not just their proficiency with a specific software package (unless that's a strict requirement of the role).

Q: How important is the "re-do" part of the feedback mechanism?

A: It's quite important. It assesses the candidate's coachability and their ability to quickly process and incorporate feedback. It shows whether they can think on their feet and adapt their approach, which is a valuable skill in dynamic technical roles. It doesn't need to be a full re-implementation, just a brief explanation of how they would modify their work.

Designing and implementing effective AI workflow automation is a complex skill that requires a blend of technical knowledge, problem-solving ability, and strategic thinking. By incorporating practical work samples like the ones outlined above, you move beyond theoretical discussions and gain real insight into a candidate's capabilities. These exercises, when combined with structured interviews and objective evaluation criteria, form a powerful hiring process. Yardstick is designed to help companies build and execute such rigorous, data-driven hiring processes. Explore how Yardstick's tools, including AI Job Descriptions, AI Interview Question Generator, and AI Interview Guide Generator, can help you design the very best interviews and make confident hiring decisions for critical roles like AI Workflow Automation Design.

‍