Persuasion is a critical competency for Public Relations Manager roles, referring to the ability to influence others' thoughts, attitudes, or behaviors through strategic communication and relationship building. In the PR context, persuasion involves compelling stakeholders to adopt a particular perspective or take specific actions without manipulation or force, requiring a careful blend of emotional intelligence, communication expertise, and strategic thinking.

For Public Relations Managers, persuasion manifests in numerous aspects of the role: convincing media outlets to cover client stories, influencing organizational leadership to adopt communication strategies, persuading clients to embrace recommended approaches, and shaping public opinion during both routine communications and crisis situations. Effective persuasion in PR isn't about forcing a perspective but rather about building credibility, understanding audience needs, and creating compelling messages that resonate authentically.

When evaluating candidates for persuasive abilities, interviewers should focus on past behaviors rather than hypothetical scenarios. The most effective approach involves asking behavioral questions about specific situations where candidates needed to influence or persuade others, then probing deeper with follow-up questions that reveal their approach, thought process, and the outcomes they achieved. This allows you to assess not just their communication skills but also their strategic thinking and ethical approach to persuasion techniques.

Interview Questions

Tell me about a time when you had to persuade senior leadership to adopt a communication strategy they were initially resistant to. What was your approach?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific communication strategy being proposed
• Why leadership was resistant initially
• The candidate's analysis of leadership concerns and perspectives
• Key persuasive techniques and messages they employed
• How they tailored their approach to different stakeholders
• The outcome of their persuasive efforts
• What they learned about persuading senior leadership

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for these conversations with leadership?
• What evidence or data did you use to support your position?
• How did you adapt your approach when you encountered strong resistance?
• What would you do differently if you faced a similar situation in the future?

Describe a situation where you needed to influence public opinion about an organization during a challenging situation or potential PR crisis. How did you approach it?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the challenging situation or crisis
• The existing public perception they needed to influence
• Their strategy for message development and delivery
• Channels and methods used to communicate persuasively
• How they measured the effectiveness of their persuasive efforts
• Ethical considerations in their approach
• The final outcome and impact on the organization's reputation

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine the most effective messaging approach for this situation?
• What stakeholders did you need to coordinate with internally before communicating externally?
• How did you monitor and adapt your strategy as the situation evolved?
• What was the most challenging aspect of persuading the public in this situation?

Share an example of when you had to convince a reluctant client or internal stakeholder to embrace a PR approach they were initially skeptical about. What persuasive techniques did you employ?

Areas to Cover:

• The PR approach being recommended and why it was appropriate
• The specific concerns or objections raised by the stakeholder
• How the candidate analyzed the stakeholder's perspective and interests
• The persuasive strategy developed to address resistance
• The relationship-building aspect of the persuasion process
• The result of their persuasive efforts
• What this experience taught them about stakeholder persuasion

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify the root causes of their skepticism?
• What examples or evidence did you use to build your case?
• How did you balance respecting their concerns while still advocating for your approach?
• How did this experience influence how you handle stakeholder resistance now?

Tell me about a time when you successfully influenced media coverage of an organization, product, or event. What made your approach effective?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific media outcome they were seeking
• Their analysis of media interests and priorities
• The persuasive strategy they developed
• Relationship aspects of their media persuasion
• Specific techniques or messages that proved effective
• Challenges encountered in the process
• Measurable results achieved through their persuasive efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you research and understand what would interest the media outlets you targeted?
• What materials or resources did you develop to support your persuasive pitch?
• How did you establish credibility with the media contacts?
• How did you measure the success of your media persuasion strategy?

Describe a situation where you had to persuade a team to significantly change their communication approach or messaging. What resistance did you face, and how did you overcome it?

Areas to Cover:

• The change in communication approach being advocated
• Why the change was necessary
• The nature of the team's resistance
• Persuasive techniques used with different team members
• How they addressed specific concerns and objections
• The implementation process following successful persuasion
• Results achieved through the new communication approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you initially present the need for change to the team?
• What resistance did you anticipate, and how did you prepare for it?
• How did you balance being persuasive with being collaborative?
• What would you do differently in a similar situation in the future?

Tell me about a time when you had to persuade external stakeholders or community members about a controversial issue or decision. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The nature of the controversial issue
• The stakeholders involved and their varying perspectives
• The candidate's strategy for managing competing interests
• Specific persuasive messages and techniques developed
• How they demonstrated empathy while still influencing
• Methods used to reach different stakeholder groups
• The outcome of their persuasive efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you research and understand the various stakeholder perspectives?
• What channels or forums did you use to communicate persuasively?
• How did you handle emotional reactions or strong opposition?
• What metrics did you use to evaluate whether your persuasion was successful?

Share an example of when you had to use data and analytics to persuade stakeholders about a public relations strategy or outcome. How did you make the data compelling?

Areas to Cover:

• The type of data or analytics used
• How they translated complex data into persuasive insights
• The stakeholders they needed to persuade
• How they tailored the data presentation to their audience
• The storytelling approach used to make data meaningful
• Challenges in using data persuasively
• The outcome of their data-driven persuasion

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you determine which data points would be most persuasive?
• What visualization methods did you use to make the data more impactful?
• How did you address skepticism about the data or conclusions?
• What have you learned about using data as a persuasive tool?

Describe a situation where you successfully negotiated with a partner, vendor, or other external entity to achieve a favorable outcome for your organization. What made your approach successful?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific negotiation situation and what was at stake
• Their preparation process for the negotiation
• Their assessment of the other party's interests and positions
• The persuasive strategy and techniques employed
• How they built rapport while still advocating effectively
• Compromises or creative solutions developed
• The final outcome and its impact

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prepare for this negotiation?
• What was your strategy for building relationship while still achieving your goals?
• What obstacles arose during the negotiation, and how did you handle them?
• How did you know when to compromise versus when to hold firm?

Tell me about a PR campaign you led that required persuading multiple audiences with different priorities or perspectives. How did you adapt your approach for each audience?

Areas to Cover:

• The PR campaign objectives and key audiences
• How they analyzed each audience's priorities and perspectives
• The strategic messaging framework developed
• How messages were customized for different audiences
• Channels and tactics tailored to each audience
• Challenges in managing multiple persuasive approaches
• Results achieved across different audience segments

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you research and understand the different audience perspectives?
• What was your process for ensuring consistent core messaging despite audience customization?
• Which audience was most challenging to persuade, and why?
• How did you measure the campaign's effectiveness across different audiences?

Share an example of when you had to persuade others during a time-sensitive situation with limited information. How did you approach this challenge?

Areas to Cover:

• The time-sensitive situation and its constraints
• What was at stake in the persuasive situation
• How they gathered available information quickly
• Their decision-making process for persuasive strategy
• The approach used given the time constraints
• How they managed uncertainty while still being persuasive
• The outcome and lessons learned

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you prioritize what information was essential versus nice-to-have?
• What persuasive principles did you rely on given the limited time?
• How did you balance speed with thoroughness in your approach?
• What would you do differently if faced with a similar situation in the future?

Describe a time when you had to influence internal decision-makers to increase budget or resources for a PR initiative. What approach did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific resources or budget being requested
• The business case they developed
• Their analysis of decision-maker priorities and concerns
• The persuasive strategy and key messages created
• Supporting evidence or data used
• How they addressed objections or concerns
• The outcome of their persuasive efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you quantify the value or return on investment for the additional resources?
• What objections did you encounter, and how did you address them?
• How did you tailor your approach to different stakeholders in the decision process?
• What did this experience teach you about internal persuasion for resources?

Tell me about a situation where you had to rebuild trust with stakeholders before you could effectively persuade them. What steps did you take?

Areas to Cover:

• The context of the trust issue
• Their assessment of stakeholder concerns and perspectives
• The trust-building strategy they developed
• Specific actions taken to rebuild credibility
• How they demonstrated authenticity and transparency
• The timeline of rebuilding trust before attempting persuasion
• The eventual persuasive approach and outcome

Follow-Up Questions:

• What signals told you that trust was low at the beginning?
• What specific actions proved most effective in rebuilding trust?
• How did you know when trust had been sufficiently rebuilt to attempt persuasion?
• What principles guide your approach to trust-based persuasion?

Share an example of when you had to persuade a client or leader to pivot from their original communication plan based on emerging trends or data. How did you make your case?

Areas to Cover:

• The original plan and why it needed to change
• The emerging trends or data that prompted the recommendation
• Their analysis of the risks of not pivoting
• The persuasive strategy they developed
• How they managed potential resistance to change
• The new direction they advocated for
• The outcome and impact of the pivot

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you present the case for change in a way that didn't criticize the original plan?
• What evidence did you find most compelling in persuading the stakeholders?
• How did you help them overcome the sunk cost fallacy regarding the original plan?
• What did this teach you about persuading others to change direction?

Describe a time when you needed to persuade team members or colleagues to embrace new PR technologies, tools, or methodologies. How did you gain their buy-in?

Areas to Cover:

• The specific innovation being introduced
• The resistance or hesitation encountered
• Their assessment of underlying concerns about change
• The persuasive strategy developed
• How they demonstrated the value and benefits
• Training or support provided to ease adoption
• The outcome of their persuasive efforts

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify early adopters who could help influence others?
• What objections did you encounter, and how did you address them?
• How did you balance pushing for adoption while respecting concerns?
• What metrics did you use to measure successful adoption?

Tell me about a situation where you used storytelling as a persuasive technique in a PR context. What made your approach effective?

Areas to Cover:

• The PR objective they were trying to achieve
• The audience they needed to persuade
• The story framework or narrative they developed
• How they identified or created the central story
• Elements that made the story compelling and persuasive
• How they measured the story's impact
• Results achieved through the storytelling approach

Follow-Up Questions:

• How did you identify which story would resonate with your target audience?
• What elements did you include to make the story emotionally compelling?
• How did you ensure the story aligned with broader brand messaging?
• What feedback did you receive about the story's impact?

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are behavioral questions more effective than hypothetical questions when assessing persuasion skills?

Behavioral questions reveal how candidates have actually approached persuasion in real situations, not just how they think they would act. Past behavior is the best predictor of future performance. When candidates share specific examples from their experience, you gain insights into their strategic thinking, their ability to adapt persuasive approaches to different situations, and most importantly, the actual results they've achieved through persuasion. Hypothetical questions often elicit idealized answers that may not reflect a candidate's true capabilities.

How many persuasion-focused questions should I include in an interview for a PR Manager role?

For a comprehensive assessment, include 3-4 persuasion-focused questions in your interview. This allows you to evaluate the candidate's persuasive abilities across different contexts (internal stakeholders, media, clients, public) while still leaving time to assess other important competencies. Choose questions that align with the specific persuasion challenges in your organization. Quality is more important than quantity – it's better to thoroughly explore fewer situations with good follow-up questions than to rush through many examples superficially.

Should I be concerned if a candidate's examples of persuasion seem manipulative?

Yes, this is a red flag. Effective PR professionals understand the difference between ethical persuasion and manipulation. Pay attention to how candidates describe their persuasive approaches – do they emphasize transparency, honest communication, and mutual benefit, or do they focus on "tricks" to get their way? The best PR managers use persuasion ethically, building trust rather than undermining it. If candidates describe manipulative tactics, this suggests they may damage your organization's reputation in the long run.

How can I tell if a candidate is truly skilled at persuasion versus just good at talking about it?

Look for specific, measurable outcomes in their answers. Skilled persuaders can articulate exactly what changed as a result of their efforts – whether that's quantifiable media coverage secured, budget increases obtained, or stakeholder perceptions shifted. Also, pay attention to how they describe their approach: Do they demonstrate thoughtful analysis of audience needs? Do they adapt strategies for different stakeholders? Do they acknowledge challenges and failures? Truly persuasive candidates will also show these skills during the interview itself through their compelling, clear communication.

How important is persuasion compared to other skills for a Public Relations Manager?

Persuasion is among the most critical competencies for PR Managers, as influencing stakeholders without direct authority is fundamental to the role. However, it should be balanced with other essential skills like strategic thinking, writing ability, media relations expertise, crisis management, and analytical capabilities. The ideal candidate demonstrates persuasive abilities alongside these complementary skills. The relative importance may vary slightly depending on your specific organization's needs – for example, persuasion may be even more critical in roles focused on public affairs or community relations.

Interested in a full interview guide with Persuasion for Public Relations Manager Roles as a key trait? Sign up for Yardstick and build it for free.