Eight systems, eight pricing pages

What eight applicant tracking systems actually cost

Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workable, JazzHR, Recruitee, Pinpoint, and Yardstick, priced off their own pages on August 20, 2026. Four publish a number. Four will not. And the four that do are counting four different things.

Run your first 3 Jobs freeSee Yardstick's pricing

Before you compare

Four things to settle before you compare a price to a price.

  1. 1Start with the unit, not the numberWorkable bills against your employee count. Ashby's published tier is banded by company size. JazzHR charges a flat year with a cap on job postings. Yardstick charges per role you have open. Four published prices, four different things being counted, so the headline figures do not line up against each other.
  2. 2Check which tier your must-have actually starts onTwo of the eight put structured interviewing above the entry tier, and one puts developer access on the top tier only. The cheapest published price is often not the price of the product you came to buy.
  3. 3Ask for the contract term in the first emailOnly one of the eight publishes a minimum term. Everyone else settles it in the contract, which is late in your process to discover you are committing to a year.
  4. 4Expect a call before a number from half the fieldFour of these will not tell you what they cost until you have spoken to someone, which adds a week or two to your evaluation before you have anything to compare.

If you want the same field with an opinion attached, our best ATS for startups list ranks a shorter set for a specific kind of team.

Vendor by vendor

What each one charges, and for what.

The first four publish a price. The last four quote on request.

  • Ashby — publishes one tier at $400 a month and quotes the two above it

    Best for: a company under 100 employees that wants a real number without a call, and structured interviewing on the tier it can actually see.

    • Foundations is $400 a month, published, for companies up to 100 employees. Plus (101 to 1,000 employees) and Enterprise (1,000+) are quoted, so two of the three tiers have no number on them.
    • The unit is company size. Your bill moves when your headcount crosses a band, not when your hiring picks up or slows down.
    • Ashby states a “10% discount for annual commitments available”. No minimum term is published.
    • Structured interview plans and public API access are listed on every tier, including the published one. Foundations also carries 1,500 AI credits a month.

    Watch-out: One published number out of three tiers. If you are over 100 employees, you are back to a sales conversation to find out what it costs. Our Yardstick vs Ashby page puts the two side by side.

  • JazzHR — has the lowest published price of the eight at $1,000 a year, and structured interviewing is not on that tier

    Best for: a small team posting a handful of roles a year that wants to buy an ATS without talking to anyone.

    • All three tiers carry a published annual price: Hero $1,000, Plus $3,480, and Pro $5,508 a year. It is the only one of the eight you can price and check out on the website.
    • The unit is a flat annual fee, not your headcount. Hero caps job postings at “Starting at 3/month”; Plus allows “Up to 200 active jobs”.
    • “Structured Interviews & Assessments” arrive at Plus, at $3,480 a year. If structured interviewing is the reason you are buying an ATS, your entry price is three and a half times the headline.
    • No API is published, on the pricing page or the integrations marketplace.

    Watch-out: The $1,000 buys posting and tracking. Read the tier your must-have features sit on before you anchor on the headline.

  • Workable — publishes all three tier prices, banded by how many employees you have

    Best for: a team that wants the entire price list visible up front and is comfortable being billed against headcount.

    • At the 1 to 20 employee band: Standard $299 a month, Premier $599, Enterprise $719. Bands run 1–20, 21–50, 51–100, 101–200, 201–400, 401–600, 601–800, 801–1000, and 1000+.
    • Annual billing takes 20% off, so Standard is $3,588 a year. No minimum term is published.
    • “Interview kits and scorecards”, “API access”, and the “Talent CRM database” are all in Standard, the cheapest tier.
    • Texting, video interviews, and assessments are priced separately on Standard ($89, $109, and $59 a month) and built into Premier. AI runs on credits: 3,000 free, then $0.095 to $0.12 each.

    Watch-out: The price is set by your employee count rather than your hiring. A 300-person company with two open roles pays the band built for 300 people. Our Yardstick vs Workable page has the fuller comparison.

  • Yardstick — prices per open role rather than per employee or per seat, from $49 a month plus $29 for each active Job

    Best for: teams that want to be charged for the hiring they are actually doing, and want the interview itself built to predict performance in the specific role.

    • Free for your first 3 Jobs. Core is $49 a month plus $29 per active Job, Scale is $149 plus $19 per active Job, and Enterprise is quoted. The two paid tiers cross over at 10 active Jobs.
    • Billing is monthly and there are no seats. When a Job stops being active, the charge for it stops the next month.
    • Before anyone is scheduled, you design the interview guide for the role jointly with AI: what the job actually demands, and what evidence would show a candidate can deliver it. The scorecards attached to it hold that evidence in one place.
    • Scorecards, the talent CRM, and the public API are on every account, including the free one, not gated to a higher tier. What Yardstick is covers the rest.

    Watch-out: Yardstick is a focused structured-interview ATS with a talent CRM built in. It is not an HR suite: if you need performance reviews and engagement in the same system, that is a different shopping list.

  • Greenhouse — does not publish a price, and says it is customized based on your company's hiring needs

    Best for: larger teams standardizing hiring across many requisitions, with a procurement process that expects a quote anyway.

    • Three tiers are named, Core, Plus, and Pro, with no figure against any of them. Greenhouse says pricing is “customized based on your company's hiring needs”.
    • No pricing unit and no minimum term are published, so there is nothing to compare against the four published prices above until you have had the call.
    • “Structured interview kits & scorecards” are in Core, the entry tier, along with AI scorecard attribute suggestions and interview question suggestions.
    • Developer access is a top-tier item: “Developer sandbox & sync” appears at Pro. CRM events go from 1 at Core to unlimited at Pro.

    Watch-out: You cannot budget from the website, and if you need developer access it sits on the most expensive tier. Our Yardstick vs Greenhouse page goes deeper than a table cell can.

  • Lever — publishes no price, no tier names, and no feature-by-tier breakdown

    Best for: teams that want applicant tracking and nurture in one system and are willing to run a sales cycle to price it.

    • Pricing is “available upon request”. There are no tier names, no figures, and no feature grid on the pricing page, so it offers the least to evaluate on before a call of any of the eight.
    • No pricing unit and no minimum term are published.
    • The API is documented publicly, at hire.lever.co/developer/documentation. Which plans include it is not published.
    • Scorecards are not addressed on the pricing page, so this page does not state anything about them either way.

    Watch-out: Budget a discovery call before you can put Lever into a spreadsheet next to a published price.

  • Pinpoint — does not publish a price, and says company size does not always correlate with hiring complexity

    Best for: teams that want every hiring manager in the system and would rather be priced on how they hire than on headcount.

    • No figure and no tier names are published. Pinpoint asks for “a short conversation with you to better understand your company, hiring process, and how we can help so we can provide you with an accurate price”.
    • The stated reasoning is that “company size doesn't always correlate with hiring complexity”, which is the same objection to headcount pricing that the per-role model answers with a published number.
    • Candidate scorecards are published as a product capability.
    • “Over 100 native integrations, plus an open API for anything custom”. No tier requirement is published, because no tiers are.

    Watch-out: As with the other three quoted vendors, there is no number to put in your comparison until you have taken the call.

  • Recruitee — names three tiers, shows no prices, and is the only one of the eight that publishes a minimum contract term

    Best for: teams that want a careers site and pipeline in one place and can commit to a year.

    • Start, Advance, and Optimize are named with no figure against any of them, and no pricing unit is published.
    • “Our contracts have a minimum commitment of one year.” Monthly payment is possible, and annual payment takes 20% off. No other vendor here publishes a term at all.
    • “Structured evaluation forms” start at Advance, the middle tier, not at Start.
    • “API access” is in Start; Optimize adds “API support” and a testing environment. The AI matching assistant runs 3 searches a month at Advance and 65 at Optimize.

    Watch-out: A one-year minimum with no published price is the combination that is hardest to evaluate quickly, and structured evaluation forms are not on the entry tier.

At a glance

All eight prices in one table.

Checked August 20, 2026 on each vendor's own pricing page. Where a cell reads “Not published”, the vendor does not state that detail, and we have left it rather than filled it with an estimate.

The table scrolls sideways. The tool name stays put.

ToolPublished priceWhat you are billed forMinimum termStructured interviewing fromAPI from
Ashby$400/month (Foundations)Company size band, up to 100 employeesNot published. 10% off annualAll tiersAll tiers
JazzHR$1,000/year (Hero), $3,480 (Plus), $5,508 (Pro)Flat annual fee, with a job-posting allowanceNot publishedPlus, at $3,480/yearNot published
Workable$299/month (Standard), $599 (Premier), $719 (Enterprise)Employee count band, from 1 to 20 upwardNot published. 20% off annualStandardStandard
Yardstick$0 for the first 3 Jobs, then $49/month plus $29 per active JobNumber of active Jobs, billed monthlyNone. Monthly, cancel by going inactiveEvery account, including freeEvery account, including free
GreenhouseNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedCorePro (“Developer sandbox & sync”)
LeverNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedDocumented publicly, tier not published
PinpointNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedPublished, no tiers published“An open API for anything custom”
RecruiteeNot publishedNot publishedOne year minimum. 20% off annualAdvance, the middle tierStart, with more at Optimize

The part that costs people money

The entry price is often not the price of what you came to buy.

Most people shortlist on the headline number, then find that the feature they were buying for sits a tier or two up. Three cases on this list, all published by the vendors themselves:

  • JazzHR: structured interviewing starts at 3.5 times the headline

    Hero is $1,000 a year, the lowest published price of the eight. “Structured Interviews & Assessments” appear on Plus, at $3,480 a year. If structured interviewing is the reason you are replacing a spreadsheet, that is your real entry price.

  • Recruitee: evaluation forms start on the middle tier

    “Structured evaluation forms” begin at Advance, not at Start. No price is published for either tier, and contracts carry a one-year minimum, so this is worth settling on the first call rather than the last.

  • Greenhouse: developer access is a top-tier item

    “Developer sandbox & sync” appears at Pro. If you plan to drive your ATS from anything other than its own interface, confirm which tier that needs before you budget.

The check that saves the most time is a boring one: write down the three things you will not run hiring without, then find the cheapest tier at each vendor that has all three. That number, not the headline, is the one to compare.

Beyond the price

Two things worth weighing before the price.

Most of these bill you for headcount, not for hiring. Two of the four published prices scale with how many people work at your company, and a third is a flat year bought up front. Hiring plans do not hold still for a year. Yardstick charges for the roles you actually have open, billed monthly, so the bill goes up when you open a search and back down when you close one. The first 3 Jobs are free, which is enough to run a real search before you decide anything.

You want the interview to change who you hire, not just record it. An applicant tracking system tracks applicants. Seven of the eight vendors here list scorecards, which give you somewhere to put what you heard. Yardstick starts a step earlier: before anyone is scheduled, you design the interview guide for the role jointly with AI, working out what this job actually demands and what evidence would show a candidate can deliver it. Plenty of candidates are high performers somewhere, and the guide is built to surface which of them will perform in this role. AI turns the finished scorecards into a decision brief, and the hiring team makes the call.

Run your first 3 Jobs freeSee Yardstick's pricing

FAQ

Questions buyers ask about ATS pricing.

How much does an applicant tracking system cost?

Of the eight checked here on August 20, 2026, the published prices are: JazzHR $1,000, $3,480, or $5,508 a year; Workable $299, $599, or $719 a month at the 1 to 20 employee band; Ashby $400 a month for companies up to 100 employees; and Yardstick free for the first 3 Jobs, then $49 a month plus $29 per active Job. Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, and Recruitee do not publish a price at all. The four published figures are not directly comparable, because each vendor bills for a different unit: employee count, company size, a flat year, or the number of roles you have open.

Which applicant tracking systems publish their pricing?

Four of these eight publish a price. JazzHR, Workable, and Yardstick publish their full tier lists, and Ashby publishes its entry tier and quotes the two above it. Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, and Recruitee quote on request, and Lever publishes no tier names or feature grid either. Recruitee is the only one of the eight that publishes a minimum contract term, which it states as one year.

What is the cheapest applicant tracking system?

By published headline price, JazzHR's Hero tier at $1,000 a year is the lowest of the eight, and Yardstick's first 3 Jobs are free. The headline is not the whole answer, though: JazzHR's structured interviews and assessments start on the Plus tier at $3,480 a year, so the cheapest tier that includes structured interviewing costs three and a half times the entry price. Recruitee's structured evaluation forms also start above its entry tier. Price the tier that contains what you actually need, not the first row of the table.

Why can't I compare these prices directly?

Because they measure different things. Workable's $299 a month is set by how many employees your company has. Ashby's $400 a month covers a company of up to 100 employees. JazzHR's $1,000 is a flat year with a cap of about three job postings a month on that tier. Yardstick's $49 a month plus $29 per active Job is set by how many roles you have open. A 300-person company hiring for two roles and a 30-person company hiring for twelve will rank these four in completely different orders, so work out which unit matches your own hiring before you compare any numbers.

Which of these include scorecards and structured interviewing?

Seven of the eight publish scorecards or structured evaluation of some kind, and Lever's pricing page does not address it. What differs is the tier it starts on: Ashby, Workable, Greenhouse, and Yardstick include it on their entry tier, JazzHR starts it at Plus, and Recruitee starts it at Advance. Worth asking beyond the checkbox is whether the interview that fills the scorecard was designed for the specific role. A form for recording impressions is not the same thing as an interview built to show whether this candidate can do this job. In Yardstick you design that interview guide with AI before anyone is scheduled, and the scorecards hang off it.

Which of these have a public API, and on which tier?

Ashby lists public developer API access on all tiers, Workable includes API access in Standard, Recruitee includes API access from Start and adds API support and a testing environment at Optimize, and Yardstick ships a public API on every account including the free one. Greenhouse publishes developer sandbox and sync at Pro, its top tier. Pinpoint describes an open API without publishing tiers. Lever publishes API documentation without stating which plans include it, and JazzHR does not publish an API on its pricing page or its integrations marketplace.

How current are these prices?

Every figure here was read on the vendor's own pricing page on August 20, 2026, and the date is on the table so you can see how fresh it is. ATS pricing moves, and most of these vendors will quote you something specific to your company anyway, so treat any number here as a starting point and confirm it with the vendor before you sign.

Pay for the roles you are hiring for.

You are charged for the roles you actually have open, billed monthly, with no year-long commitment to guess at. And for each of those roles you design the interview guide with AI, so the interview is built to show who will perform in that job. Your first 3 Jobs are free.

Run your first 3 Jobs freeSee the full price listBook a call