.webp?dpl=dpl_6HV74sURWgKkE2wrjehHDdSHXKK5)
ATS for humans and agents
Hiring software where people decide and agents help.
Yardstick is a hiring system where people manage roles, candidates, interviews, scorecards, and decisions while agents help prepare operational work under human approval.
Human control
Hiring is too sensitive for vague automation.
Moving a candidate, sending a rejection, changing an interviewer, or summarizing evidence cannot be treated like a generic automation task. The useful version of AI in hiring is to show what is stuck, prepare the next step, explain what will change, ask for approval, and save the audit trail.
Safe agent help
Agents prepare work for review.
Yardstick should make agent-assisted hiring reviewable, bounded, and tied to the hiring system of record.
- summarize the pipeline for a role
- identify candidates waiting in a stage
- prepare a candidate stage move
- assign or suggest interviewers
- draft screening or scheduling messages
- identify missing scorecards
- summarize interview-plan or scorecard gaps
Approval workflow
Prepared changes stop at the approval boundary.
Move Morgan Reed to Screening. Assign Alex as interviewer. Add a 30-minute screening task.
Prepared changes:
- Stage: Applied to Screening
- Interviewer: Alex Carter
- Screening task added
Approval required before saving candidate stage changes.
Structured evidence
The interview evidence is part of the system.
Agent assistance is useful only when the hiring system contains useful structure. Yardstick connects role requirements, candidate stages, interview plans, interviewer assignments, questions, rubrics, scorecards, and decisions.
- you want one workspace for roles, candidates, interviews, and scorecards
- interview quality matters as much as pipeline tracking
- hiring managers and interviewers need clearer guidance
- you want agents to help without making unchecked decisions
- you are not ready for heavy enterprise ATS complexity
FAQ
Common questions.
What is an ATS for humans and agents?
It is a hiring system where people manage hiring decisions and agents help prepare operational work inside approval boundaries. Yardstick applies that model to roles, candidates, interviews, scorecards, and decisions.
Can agents reject candidates in Yardstick?
No. Yardstick is built around human control. Candidate-facing and decision actions should require human approval.
How is Yardstick different from a generic ATS?
Generic ATS tools often focus on tracking candidates and workflow stages. Yardstick connects that workflow to structured interview plans, rubrics, scorecards, and comparable evidence.
How is Yardstick different from an AI interview question generator?
Yardstick can help create interview questions, but the questions live inside a broader hiring workflow with roles, candidates, interview plans, scorecards, and decisions.